Log in

Predictive Factors of Regional Toxicity and Serum Creatine Phosphokinase Levels After Isolated Limb Infusion for Melanoma: A Multi-Institutional Analysis

  • Melanomas
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Isolated limb infusion (ILI) is a minimally invasive technique delivering regional chemotherapy to treat in-transit extremity melanoma. Determining perioperative factors that could predict toxicity is important to optimize strategies to improve clinical outcomes after regional chemotherapy in melanoma.

Methods

Perioperative factors from 171 ILI patients performed at eight centers from 2001 to 2008 were reviewed. The Wieberdink limb toxicity scale and creatine phosphokinase (CK) levels were used to measure toxicity. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the association between toxicity and perioperative parameters.

Results

Mild (grades I–II) and severe (grades ≥III) limb toxicity developed in 68% and 32% of patients, respectively. Melphalan adjusted for ideal body weight (aIBW) and papaverine were used in 47% and 63% of patients, respectively. Median peak CK for all patients was 563 U/l, and median peak occurred at postoperative day 4. On univariate analysis, papaverine and high CK levels (>563 U/l) were significantly associated with higher toxicity. On the contrary, aIBW was significantly associated with a lower risk of severe toxicity. Perfusate blood gas at 30 min [pH, PaO2, and base excess (BE) ], limb temperature, and ischemia time were not predictive of limb toxicity. On multivariate analysis, severe toxicity was associated with female sex (P = 0.01), papaverine (P = 0.01), and high peak CK levels (P < 0.01). Independent predictors of high CK levels included younger age, unadjusted melphalan dose, and low PaO2 at 30 min.

Conclusions

ILI can be performed with an acceptable morbidity. Papaverine use, female gender, and high peak CK were associated with higher limb toxicity. CK levels can be diminished significantly with aIBW.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Borgstein PJ, Meijer S, van Diest PJ. Are locoregional cutaneous metastases in melanoma predictable? Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6(3):315–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pawlik TM, Ross MI, Johnson MM, et al. Predictors and natural history of intransit melanoma after sentinel lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12(8):587–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Balch CM, Buzaid AC, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for cutaneous melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(16):3635–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Balch CM, Soong SJ, Atkins MB, et al. An evidence-based staging system for cutaneous melanoma. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54(3):131–49; quiz 182–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gimbel MI, Delman KA, Zager JS. Therapy for unresectable recurrent and intransit extremity melanoma. Cancer Control. 2008;15(3):225–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Creech O Jr, Krementz ET, Ryan RF, Winblad JN. Chemotherapy of cancer: regional perfusion utilizing an extracorporeal circuit. Ann Surg. 1958;148(4):616–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Minor DR, Allen RE, Alberts D, et al. A clinical and pharmacokinetic study of isolated limb perfusion with heat and melphalan for melanoma. Cancer. 1985;55(11):2638–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Di Filippo F, Calabro A, Giannarelli D, et al. Prognostic variables in recurrent limb melanoma treated with hyperthermic antiblastic perfusion. Cancer. 1989;63(12):2551–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Klaase JM, Kroon BB, van Geel AN, et al. Prognostic factors for tumor response and limb recurrence-free interval in patients with advanced melanoma of the limbs treated with regional isolated perfusion with melphalan. Surgery. 1994;115(1):39–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson JF, Hunt JA, Shannon KF, Kam PC. Frequency and duration of remission after isolated limb perfusion for melanoma. Arch Surg. 1997;132(8):903–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cornett WR, McCall LM, Petersen RP, et al. Randomized multicenter trial of hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion with melphalan alone compared with melphalan plus tumor necrosis factor: American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z0020. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(25):4196–201.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Moller MG, Lewis JM, Dessureault S, Zager JS. Toxicities associated with hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion and isolated limb infusion in the treatment of melanoma and sarcoma. Int J Hyperthermia. 2008;24(3):275–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lens MB, Dawes M. Isolated limb perfusion with melphalan in the treatment of malignant melanoma of the extremities: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Lancet Oncol. 2003;4(6):359–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoven-Gondrie ML, Thijssens KM, Van den Dungen JJ, et al. Long-term locoregional vascular morbidity after isolated limb perfusion and external-beam radiotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(7):2105–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eggimann P, Chiolero R, Chassot PG, et al. Systemic and hemodynamic effects of recombinant tumor necrosis factor alpha in isolation perfusion of the limbs. Chest. 1995;107(4):1074–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Grunhagen DJ, van Etten B, Brunstein F, et al. Efficacy of repeat isolated limb perfusions with tumor necrosis factor alpha and melphalan for multiple in-transit metastases in patients with prior isolated limb perfusion failure. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12(8):609–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vrouenraets BC, Keus RB, Nieweg OE, Kroon BB. Complications of combined radiotherapy and isolated limb perfusion with tumor necrosis factor alpha ± interferon gamma and melphalan in patients with irresectable soft tissue tumors. J Surg Oncol. 1997;65(2):88–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson JF, Waugh RC, Saw RPM, Kam PCA. Isolated limb infusion with melphalan for recurrent limb melanoma: a simple alternative to isolated limb perfusion. Reg Cancer Treat. 1994;7:188–92.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson JF, Kam PC, Waugh RC, Harman CR. Isolated limb infusion with cytotoxic agents: a simple alternative to isolated limb perfusion. Semin Surg Oncol. 1998;14(3):238–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kroon HM, Moncrieff M, Kam PC, Thompson JF. Outcomes Following isolated limb infusion for melanoma. A 14-year experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(11):3003–13.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zager JS, Gershenwald JE, Aldrink EL, et al. Isolated limb infusion for locally recurrent and in-transit extremity melanoma: a combined institutional initial experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(2):s84.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Brady MS, Brown K, Patel A, Fisher C, Marx W. A phase II trial of isolated limb infusion with melphalan and dactinomycin for regional melanoma and soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(8):1123–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Beasley GM, Petersen RP, Yoo J, et al. Isolated limb infusion for in-transit malignant melanoma of the extremity: a well-tolerated but less effective alternative to hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(8):2195–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Beasley GM, Caudle A, Petersen R, et al. A multi-institutional experience of isolated limb infusion: defining response and toxicity in the United States. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;In press.

  25. Lindner P, Doubrovsky A, Kam PC, Thompson JF. Prognostic factors after isolated limb infusion with cytotoxic agents for melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9(2):127–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wieberdink J, Benckhuysen C, Braat RP, van Slooten EA, Olthuis GA. Dosimetry in isolation perfusion of the limbs by assessment of perfused tissue volume and grading of toxic tissue reactions. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1982;18(10):905–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Klaase JM, Kroon BB, van Geel BN, et al. Patient- and treatment-related factors associated with acute regional toxicity after isolated perfusion for melanoma of the extremities. Am J Surg. 1994;167(6):618–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vrouenraets BC, Hart GA, Eggermont AM, et al. Relation between limb toxicity and treatment outcomes after isolated limb perfusion for recurrent melanoma. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;188(5):522–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Thompson JF, Lai DT, Ingvar C, Kam PC. Maximizing efficacy and minimizing toxicity in isolated limb perfusion for melanoma. Melanoma Res. 1994;4(Suppl 1):45–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bonenkamp JJ, Thompson JF, de Wilt JH, et al. Isolated limb infusion with fotemustine after dacarbazine chemosensitisation for inoperable loco-regional melanoma recurrence. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30(10):1107–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Vrouenraets BC, Eggermont AM, Hart AA, et al. Regional toxicity after isolated limb perfusion with melphalan and tumour necrosis factor-alpha versus toxicity after melphalan alone. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001;27(4):390–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vrouenraets BC, Klaase JM, Kroon BB, et al. Long-term morbidity after regional isolated perfusion with melphalan for melanoma of the limbs. The influence of acute regional toxic reactions. Arch Surg. 1995;130(1):43–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Klaase JM, Kroon BB, Beijnen JH, van Slooten GW, van Dongen JA. Melphalan tissue concentrations in patients treated with regional isolated perfusion for melanoma of the lower limb. Br J Cancer. 1994;70(1):151–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Edwards MJ, Soong SJ, Boddie AW, Balch CM, McBride CM. Isolated limb perfusion for localized melanoma of the extremity. A matched comparison of wide local excision with isolated limb perfusion and wide local excision alone. Arch Surg. 1990;125(3):317–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Parsons PG, Carter FB, Morrison L, Regius Mary S. Mechanism of melphalan resistance developed in vitro in human melanoma cells. Cancer Res. 1981;41(4):1525–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Krementz ET, Carter RD, Sutherland CM, et al. Regional chemotherapy for melanoma. A 35-year experience. Ann Surg. 1994;220(4):520–34; discussion 534–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Vrouenraets BC, Kroon BB, Klaase JM, et al. Value of laboratory tests in monitoring acute regional toxicity after isolated limb perfusion. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4(1):88–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hohenberger P, Haier J, Schlag PM. Rhabdomyolysis and renal function impairment after isolated limb perfusion–comparison between the effects of perfusion with rhTNF alpha and a ‘triple-drug’ regimen. Eur J Cancer. 1997;33(4):596–601.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Cheng TY, Grubbs E, Abdul-Wahab O, et al. Marked variability of melphalan plasma drug levels during regional hyperthermic isolated limb perfusion. Am J Surg. 2003;186(5):460–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan S. Zager MD, FACS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santillan, A.A., Delman, K.A., Beasley, G.M. et al. Predictive Factors of Regional Toxicity and Serum Creatine Phosphokinase Levels After Isolated Limb Infusion for Melanoma: A Multi-Institutional Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 16, 2570–2578 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0563-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0563-9

Keywords

Navigation