Abstract
Shear strain localization into shear bands is associated with velocity weakening instabilities and earthquakes. Here, we simulate steady-state plane-shear flow of numerical granular material (gouge), confined between parallel surfaces. Both constant shear stress and constant strain-rate boundary conditions are tested, and the two types of boundary conditions are found to yield distinct velocity profiles and friction laws. The inertial number, I, exerts the largest control on the layers’ behavior, but additional dependencies of friction on normal stress and thickness of the layer are observed under constant stress boundary condition. We find that shear-band localization, which is present in the quasistatic regime (\(I<10^{-3}\)) in rate-controlled shear, is absent under stress-controlled loading. In the latter case, flow ceases when macroscopic friction coefficient approaches the quasistatic friction value. The inertial regime that occurs at higher inertial numbers (\(I>10^{-3}\)) is associated with distributed shear, and friction and porosity that increase with shear rate (rate-strengthening regime). The finding that shear under constant stress boundary condition produces the inertial, distributed shear but never quasistatic, localized deformation is rationalized based on low fluctuations of shear forces in granular contacts for stress-controlled loading. By examining porosity within and outside a shear band, we also provide a mechanical reason why the transition between quasistatic and inertial shear coincides with the transition between localized and distributed strain.
Graphic abstract
![](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepje%2Fs10189-021-00138-2/MediaObjects/10189_2021_138_Figa_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepje%2Fs10189-021-00138-2/MediaObjects/10189_2021_138_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepje%2Fs10189-021-00138-2/MediaObjects/10189_2021_138_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepje%2Fs10189-021-00138-2/MediaObjects/10189_2021_138_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepje%2Fs10189-021-00138-2/MediaObjects/10189_2021_138_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepje%2Fs10189-021-00138-2/MediaObjects/10189_2021_138_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepje%2Fs10189-021-00138-2/MediaObjects/10189_2021_138_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepje%2Fs10189-021-00138-2/MediaObjects/10189_2021_138_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepje%2Fs10189-021-00138-2/MediaObjects/10189_2021_138_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1140%2Fepje%2Fs10189-021-00138-2/MediaObjects/10189_2021_138_Fig9_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Porosity \(\phi \) should not be confused with solid (volume) fraction, equal to one minus porosity, which is unfortunately also often denoted by the same symbol.
In DEM an asperity may be thought of as a grain configuration that requires above-average shear stress for deformation to proceed, either by dilatancy or by enhanced dissipation.
References
C.H. Scholz, Geology 15(6), 493 (1987)
F.M. Chester, J.P. Evans, R.L. Biegel, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 98(B1), 771 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1029/92JB01866
A. Billi, J. Struct. Geol. 27, 1823 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2005.05.013
M.L. Arboleya, T. Engelder, J. Struct. Geol. 17, 519 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(94)00079-F
S. Cashman, K. Cashman, Geology 28, 111 (2000)
N.W. Hayman, B.A. Housen, T.T. Cladouhos, K. Livi, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 109, B5 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JB002902
A.M. Boullier, E.C. Yeh, S. Boutareaud, S.R. Song, C.H. Tsai, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 10, Q03016 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GC002252
S. Siman-Tov, E. Aharonov, A. Sagy, S. Emmanuel, Geology 41(6), 703 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1130/G34087.1
L. Smeraglia, A. Billi, E. Carminati, A. Cavallo, G. Di Toro, E. Spagnuolo, F. Zorzi, Sci. Rep. 7(1), 664 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00717-4
J.M. Logan, M. Friedman, N. Higgs, C. Dengo, T. Shimamoto, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open File Rep. 79–1239, 305 (1979)
C. Marone, C.B. Raleigh, C.H. Scholz, J. Geophys. Res. 95, 7007 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1029/JB095iB05p07007
J. Logan, C. Dengo, N. Higgs, Z. Wang, Fault mechanics and transport properties of rocks, in International Geophysics, vol. 51, ed. by B. Evans, T. Fong Wong (Academic Press, Cambridge, 1992), pp. 33–67
N.M. Beeler, T.E. Tullis, M.L. Blanpied, J.D. Weeks, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 101(B4), 8697 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1029/96JB00411
A.R. Niemeijer, C.J. Spiers, J. Geophys. Res. 112, S78 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.09.018
Z. Reches, D. Lockner, Nature 467, 452 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09348
B.P. Proctor, T.M. Mitchell, G. Hirth, D. Goldsby, F. Zorzi, J.D. Platt, G. Di Toro, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 119(11), 8107 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011057
E.K. Mitchell, Y. Fialko, K.M. Brown, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 121, 6932 (2016)
P. Mora, D. Place, Geophys. Res. Lett. 26(1), 123 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1029/1998GL900231
E. Aharonov, D. Sparks, Phys. Rev. E 65, 051302 (2002)
J.K. Morgan, M.S. Boettcher, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 104(B2), 2703 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JB900056
K. Mair, S. Abe, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 274(1), 72 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.010
K. Li, Y.F. Wang, Q.W. Lin, Q.G. Cheng, Y. Wu, Landslides 18, 1779 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01607-z
Y. Ben-Zion, C.G. Sammis, Pure Appl. Geophys. 160(3), 677 (2003)
C. Marone, PAGEOPH 137, 409 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00879042
W.F. Brace, Tectonophysics 14, 189 (1972)
M. Ikari, C. Marone, D. Saffer, Geology 39, 83 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1130/G31416.1
T. Shimamoto, Science 231, 711 (1986)
M. French, W. Zhu, J. Banker, Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 4330 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068893
W. Wu, Y. Zou, X. Li, J. Zhao, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 093902 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4894207
J. Samuelson, D. Elsworth, C. Marone, J. Geophys. Res. 114, B12404 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB006273
D.R. Faulkner, C. Sanchez-Roa, C. Boulton, S.A.M. den Hartog, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 123, 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB015130
L. Goren, E. Aharonov, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 277(3), 365 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.11.002
F.M. Chester, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 99, 7247 (1994)
E. Aharonov, C.H. Scholz, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 123(2), 1591 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013829
K.M. Frye, C. Marone, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 107(B11), ETG11 (2002)
J.W. Rudnicki, J.R. Rice, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 23, 371 (1975)
J.R. Rice, The localization of plastic deformation, in Theoretical and applied mechanics, vol. 1, ed. by W. T. Koiter (North-Holland Publishing Co., Delft, 1976), pp. 207–220
I. Vardoulakis, Mech. Res. Commun. 3(3), 209 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-6413(76)90014-8
I. Vardoulakis, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 4(2), 103 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610040202
H.B. Muhlhaus, I. Vardoulakis, Géotechnique 37(3), 271 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1987.37.3.271
J. Sulem, I. Vardoulakis, Acta Mech. 83, 195 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01172981
R. Larsson, K. Runesson, K. Axelsson, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 20(11), 771 (1996)
G. Weir, R. Young, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 27(15), 1299 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.322
I. Einav, M. Randolph, Géotechnique 56(7), 501 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2006.56.7.501
I. Vardoulakis, J. Sulem, Bifurcation Analysis in Geomechanics (Taylor & Francis, Oxon, England, 1995)
J.R. Rice, J. Geophys. Res. 111, B05311 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JB004006
J. Sulem, V. Famin, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 114(B3), B03309 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB006004
J. Sulem, I. Stefanou, E. Veveakis, Granul. Matter 13, 261 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-010-0244-1
N. Brantut, J. Sulem, J. Appl. Mech. 79, 3 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4005880
M. Veveakis, I. Stefanou, J. Sulem, Geotech. Lett. 3, 31 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1680/geolett.12.00063
J.R. Rice, J.W. Rudnicki, J.D. Platt, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 119(5), 4311 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010710
J. Desrues, R. Chambon, M. Mokni, F. Mazerolle, Géotechnique 46(3), 529 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1996.46.3.529
T.W. Lambe, R.V. Whitman, Soil Mechanics (John Wiley, New York, 1969)
G.D.R. MiDi, Eur. Phys. J. E 14, 341 (2004)
Y. Forterre, O. Pouliquen, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 1 (2008)
F. da Cruz, S. Emam, M. Prochnow, J.N. Roux, F. Chevoir, Phys. Rev. E 72, 021309 (2005)
A. Singh, V. Magnanimo, K. Saitoh, S. Luding, New J. Phys. 17, 043028 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/17/4/043028
S. Parez, E. Aharonov, Front. Phys. 3, 80 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2015.00080
S. Parez, E. Aharonov, R. Toussaint, Phys. Rev. E 93, 042902 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.93.042902
Z. Shojaaee, J.N. Roux, F. Chevoir, D.E. Wolf, Phys. Rev. E 86, 011301 (2012)
E. DeGiuli, M. Wyart, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114(35), 9284 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1706105114
J.A. Dijksman, G.H. Wortel, L.T.H. van Dellen, O. Dauchot, M. van Hecke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 108303 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.108303
O. Kuwano, R. Ando, T. Hatano, Geophys. Res. Lett. 40(7), 1295 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50311
B. Andreotti, Y. Forterre, O. Pouliquen, Granular Media: Between Fluid and Solid (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2013)
H.J. Melosh, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 84(B13), 7513 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1029/JB084iB13p07513
T. Barker, J.M.N.T. Gray, J. Fluid Mech. 828, 5–32 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.428
A.H. Clark, J.D. Thompson, M.D. Shattuck, N.T. Ouellette, C.S. O’Hern, Phys. Rev. E 97, 062901 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.062901
F.C. Frank, Rev. Geophys. 3(4), 485 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1029/RG003i004p00485
O. Reynolds, Phylos. Mag. Ser. 5(20), 469 (1885)
P.A. Cundall, O.D. Strack, Géotechnique 29, 47 (1979)
D. Frenkel, B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulations (Academic Press, San Diego, 2002)
Z. Shojaaee, L. Brendel, J. Torok, D.E. Wolf, Phys. Rev. E 86, 011302 (2012)
L.E. Silbert, D. Ertas, G.S. Grest, T.C. Halsey, D. Levine, S.J. Plimpton, Phys. Rev. E 64, 051302 (2001)
A. Favier de Coulomb, M. Bouzid, P. Claudin, E. Clément, B. Andreotti, Phys. Rev. Fluids 2, 102301 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.2.102301
G. Koval, J.N. Roux, A. Corfdir, F. Chevoir, Phys. Rev. E 79, 021306 (2009)
L. Bocquet, A. Colin, A. Ajdari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 036001 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.036001
K. Kamrin, G. Koval, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 178301 (2012)
K. Kamrin, D.L. Henann, Soft Matter 11, 179 (2015)
O. Pouliquen, Y. Forterre, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 367, 5091 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2009.0171
P. Jop, Y. Forterre, O. Pouliquen, Nature 441, 727 (2006)
P.W. Rowe, G.I. Taylor, Proceedings of the royal society of London. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci. 269(1339), 500 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1962.0193
N. Makedonska, D.W. Sparks, E. Aharonov, L. Goren, J. Geophys. Res. 116, B09302 (2011)
Z. Lyu, J. Rivière, Q. Yang, C. Marone, Tectonophysics 763, 86 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2019.04.010
K.J. Hsu, Albert Heim: Observations on landslides and relevance to modern interpretations, in Rockslides and avalanches, vol. 14, ed. by B. Voight (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1978), pp. 71–93
F. Guillard, P. Golshan, L. Shen, J.R. Valdes, I. Einav, Nat. Phys. 11(10), 835 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3424
S. Ben-Zeev, E. Aharonov, R. Toussaint, S. Parez, L. Goren, Phys. Rev. Fluids 5, 054301 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.054301
S. Ben-Zeev, L. Goren, S. Parez, R. Toussaint, C. Clément, E. Aharonov, The combined effect of buoyancy and excess pore pressure in facilitating soil liquefaction, in Poromechanics VI: Proceedings of the Sixth Biot Conference on Poromechanics, vol. 1, ed. by M. Vandamme, P. Dangla, J. M. Pereira, S. Ghabezloo (American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480779.013
Acknowledgements
S.P., T.T. and M.S. are grateful for the support of Grant No. 19-21114Y from the Czech Science Foundation (GA CR). E.A. acknowledges the support of ISF Grant No. 910/17. Computational resources were supplied by the project “e-Infrastruktura CZ” (e-INFRA LM2018140) provided within the program Projects of Large Research, Development and Innovations Infrastructures.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.P. designed the test of boundary conditions, contributed to the data analysis, interpreted the results and wrote the article. T.T. and M.S. conducted the numerical simulations and contributed to the data analysis. E.A. designed the theoretical model for porosity control over strain localization and contributed to writing of the article.
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Parez, S., Travnickova, T., Svoboda, M. et al. Strain localization in planar shear of granular media: the role of porosity and boundary conditions. Eur. Phys. J. E 44, 134 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/s10189-021-00138-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/s10189-021-00138-2