Abstract—The model of variations in the Earth’s magnetic field with random Gaussian coefficients is considered. It is shown that at small amplitudes of random nondipole field component σ, the scatter of the direction of the virtual geomagnetic pole grows with increasing latitude. At large σ, the scatter does not change much and its maximum is located at middle latitudes.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS1069351323020106/MediaObjects/11486_2023_1307_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS1069351323020106/MediaObjects/11486_2023_1307_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS1069351323020106/MediaObjects/11486_2023_1307_Fig3_HTML.png)
Notes
It is sufficient to try to write Maxwell’s equations in terms of D and I in order to understand how inconvenient these quantities are for physics—e.g., due to the violation of the superposition principle, or the appearance of parasitic frequencies in the time spectra for D and I (Petrova and Reshetnyak, 1999), etc.
REFERENCES
Baag, C.G. and Helsley, C., Geomagnetic secular variation model E, J. Geophys. Res., 1974, vol. 79, no. 32, pp. 4918–4922.
Biggin, A.J., van Hinsbergen, D.J., Langereis, C.G., Straathof, G.B., and Deenen, M.H., Geomagnetic secular variation in the Cretaceous Normal Superchron and in the Jurassic, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 2008, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 3–19.
Burakov, K.S., Galyagin, D.K., Nachasova, I.E., Reshetnyak, M.Yu., Sokolov, D.D., and Frick, P.G., Wavelet analysis of geomagnetic field intensity for the past 4000 years, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 1998, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 773–778.
Christensen, U.R. and Tilgner, A., Power requirement of the geodynamo from ohmic losses in numerical and laboratory dynamos, Nature, 2004, vol. 429, no. 6988, pp. 169–171.
Cox, A., Latitude dependence of the angular dispersion of the geomagnetic field, Geophys. J. Int., 1970, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 253–269.
Hulot, G. and Gallet, Y., On the interpretation of virtual geomagnetic pole (VGP) scatter curves, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 1996, vol. 95, nos. 3–4, pp. 37–53.
Hulot, G. and Mouël, J.L., A statistical approach to the Earth’s main magnetic field, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 1994, vol. 82, nos. 3–4, pp. 167–183.
Irving, E. and Ward, M.A., A statistical model of the geomagnetic field, Pure Appl. Geophys., 1964, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 47–52.
Johnson, C. and McFadden, P., Time-averaged field and paleosecular variation, in Treatise on Geophysics, vol. 5: Geomagnetism, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007, pp. 417–453.
Khokhlov, A.V., The model of the paleomagnetic secular variation: theory and implementation, Geofiz. Issled., 2012, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 50–61.
Korte, M., Constable, C., Donadini, F., and Holme, R., Reconstructing the Holocene geomagnetic field, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2011, vol. 312, no. 3, pp. 497–505.
Lowes, F.J., Spatial power spectrum of the main geomagnetic field, and extrapolation to the core, Geophys. J. Int., 1974, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 717–730.
McFadden, P., Merrill, R., McElhinny, M., and Lee, S., Reversals of the Earth’s magnetic field and temporal variations of the dynamo families, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 1991, vol. 96, no. B3, pp. 3923–3933.
Petrova, G.N. and Reshetnyak, M.Yu., On the time spectrum of secular variations in geomagnetic field intensity and its sources, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 1999, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 484–491.
Reshetnyak, M.Yu., Evolution of the large-scale geomagnetic field over the last 12 000 years, Geomagn. Aeron., 2020, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 121–130.
Funding
The work was carried out under the state contract with IPE RAS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Translated by M. Nazarenko
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reshetnyak, M.Y. Latitudinal Variations of the Geomagnetic Field. Izv., Phys. Solid Earth 59, 115–119 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351323020106
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351323020106