Log in

Contrasting Variants of Soil Development at Archaeological Sites on Floodplains in the Forest-Steppe of the Central Russian Upland

  • GENESIS AND GEOGRAPHY OF SOILS
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The soils of archaeological sites on river floodplains with contrasting history of the Holocene soil evolution in the south and north of the forest-steppe zone on the Central Russian Upland have been studied. The conditions for the meadow-chernozemic soil development on the high floodplain in the lower course of the Savala River (Voronezh oblast) were most favorable in the Early Holocene (10.3–9 ka BP); 9 ka BP, the soil humus profile was two times deeper than it is today. The most intensive alluvial sedimentation (0.5 mm/yr) was typical of the Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene (11–8.3 ka BP), while in the Middle and Late Holocene, the rate of the upward growth of soils decreased to 0.05 mm/yr. The underdevelopment of modern chernozemic-meadow soil profiles suggests an alternation of accumulation and denudation (including deflation) of fine-earth particles on the soil surface in the Late Holocene. On the floodplain in the upper course of the Oka River (Orel oblast), the development of a monogenetic profile of medium-deep leached chernozems with the humus content of more than 7% and humus stocks in the upper meter of at least 450 t/ha took place in the Holocene. Before the beginning of the second millennium AD, the alluvium sedimentation rate was no more than 0.02 mm/yr; in the recent millennium, it has increased up to 1 mm/yr. The specificity of changes in the bioclimatic conditions and spatiotemporal specificity of anthropogenic disturbances of the natural environment caused the metachronous Holocene evolution of floodplain soils in the studied regions. The importance of radiocarbon dating of organic matter of uneven-aged soils for paleopedological and paleogeographic reconstructions is shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. L. Aleksandrovskii, Evolution of East European Soils in the Holocene (Nauka, Moscow, 1983) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. L. Aleksandrovskii, “Phases and rates of soil evolution within river floodplains in the center of Russian Plain,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 37, 1137–1146 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. L. Aleksandrovskii and E. I. Aleksandrovskaya, Soil Evolution and the Environment (Nauka, Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. L. Aleksandrovskii and M. P. Glasko, “Interaction of alluvial and pedogenic processes at different stages of the formation of river floodplains in the Holocene (by the example of rivers in the central part of the East European Plain),” Geomorfologiya, No. 4, 3–17 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. L. Aleksandrovskii, E. G. Ershova, and N. A. Krenke, “Geoarcheology of the floodplain: stratigraphy, chronology, and paleoreconstructions,” in Proceedings of the Scientific Seminar “Archeology of the Floodplain: Relief, Paleoenvironment, and Settlement History,” Abstracts of Papers (Universitetskaya Kniga, Moscow, 2019), pp. 13–16.

  6. A. L. Aleksandrovskii, E. G. Ershova, E. V. Ponomarenko, N. A. Krenke, and V. V. Skripkin, “Natural and anthropogenic changes in the soils and environment of the Moskva River floodplain in the Holocene: pedogenic, palynological, and anthropological evidences,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 51, 613–627 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. L. Aleksandrovskii, Yu. G. Chendev, and M. A. Trubitsyn, “Paleosol indicators of variability of ecological conditions in the central forest-steppe in the Late Holocene,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., No. 6, 87–99 (2011).

  8. A. L. Aleksandrovskii and O. A. Chichagova, “Radiocarbon age of Holocene paleosols in the forest-steppe of Eastern Europe,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 31, 1284–1292 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. P. Akhtyrtsev and A. B. Akhtyrtsev, “Paleochernozems of the central Russian forest-steppe in the Late Holocene,” Pochvovedenie, No. 3, 14–24 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. V. Borisov and I. V. Kovda, “Evolution of Vertisols in the Central Ciscaucasia in the second half of the Holocene,” in Evolution of Soils and Soil Cover: Theory, Diversity of Nature Evolution, and Anthropogenic Transformation of Soils (GEOS, Moscow, 2015), pp. 502–519.

  11. O. K. Borisova, “Fast landscape-climatic changes in the Holocene,” in Evolution of Soils and Soil Cover: Theory, Diversity of Nature Evolution, and Anthropogenic Transformation of Soils (GEOS, Moscow, 2015), pp. 351–354.

  12. A. N. Gennadiev, “Time-dependent factors and stages of pedogenesis,” Pochvovedenie, No. 4, 102–122 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. A. Demkin, Paleosol Science and Archeology (Pushchino, 1997) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. V. Dokuchaev, Russian Chernozem (St. Petersburg, 1883) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. I. V. Ivanov, V. E. Prikhodko, I. V. Zamotaev, D. V. Manakhov, E. Yu. Novenko, P. I. Kalinin, L. M. Markova, and A. L. Plaksina, “Synlithogenic evolution of floodplain soils in valleys of small rivers in the Trans-Ural steppe,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 52, 593–609 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. D. Krasnoshchekova and L. N. Krasnitskii, Archeology of Orel Oblast (Veshnie Vody, Orel, 2006) [in Russian].

  17. Yu. A. Lavrushin, E. A. Spiridonova, L. V. Alekseeva, et al., “Comprehensive study of Stone Age monuments in the Middle Oskol basin,” in Proceedings of the Scientific Conference “Theory and Methods of Archeological Studies of Monuments in Forest-Steppe Zone,” Abstracts of Papers (Lipetsk, 1992), pp. 65–67.

  18. T. N. Nikol’skaya, Land of the Vyatichi: The History of the Population of the Upper and Middle Oka Basin in the 9th–13th Centuries (Nauka, Moscow, 1981) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. N. Plekhanova, V. A. Demkin, and G. B. Zdanovich, Evolution of Soils of River Valleys in Steppe Trans-Ural Region in the Second Half of Holocene (Nauka, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  20. V. E. Prikhod’ko, “Reconstruction of environment and soils of the forest-steppe in the Holocene in the Central chernozem region and Western Siberia,” in Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific Conference with International Participation Dedicated to the 50th Anniversary of the Institute of Soil Science and Agrochemistry, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences “Soils in Biosphere” (Novosibirsk, 2018), Part 1, pp. 86–94.

  21. E. A. Spiridonova, Evolution of Vegetation Cover of the Don River Basin in the Upper Pleistocene–Holocene (Nauka, Moscow, 1991) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  22. Central Russian Belogorie, Ed. by F. N. Mil’kov (Voronezh, 1985) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. A. Sycheva, “Minor climatic optimum of the Holocene and Little Ice Age as reflected in memory of soils and sediments on floodplains of the Russian Plain,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., No. 1, 79–93 (2011).

  24. S. A. Sycheva, “Holocene evolution of floodplain soils and landscapes in the Kulikovo field area,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 42, 13–23 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S. A. Sycheva, “Cycles of soil formation and sediment accumulation in the Holocene (according to 14C data),” Eurasian Soil Sci. 32, 613–623 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. A. Sycheva, “Paleosol and archaeological evidences of rhythmic development of river floodplains in Holocene,” Proceedings of the Scientific Seminar “Archeology of the Floodplain: Relief, Paleoenvironment, and Settlement History,” Abstracts of Papers (Universitetskaya Kniga, Moscow, 2019), pp. 83–87.

  27. S. A. Sycheva and O. A. Chichagova, “Radiocarbon chronostratigraphy of Holocene deposits in the Central Russian Upland,” Byull. Kom. Izuch. Chetvertichn. Perioda, Ross. Akad. Nauk, No. 63, 104–113 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  28. V. O. Targulian and M. A. Bronnikova, “Soil memory: theoretical basics of the concept, its current state, and prospects for development,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 52, 229–243 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. T. F. Tregub, “Stages of vegetation development in the Holocene in Voronezh oblast,” Vestn. Voronezh. Gos. Univ., Ser. Geol., No. 1, 29–33 (2008).

  30. I. V. Fedyunin, Mesolithic Monuments of the Middle Don (Voronezh, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  31. I. V. Fedyunin, Site Plautino 2 and Its Place in the Mesolith of the Don River Basin (Voronezh, 2012) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yu. G. Chendev, Evolution of Forest-Steppe Soils of the Central Russian Upland in the Holocene (GEOS, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yu. G. Chendev, E. G. Ershova, A. L. Aleksandrovskii, E. V. Ponomarenko, A. A. Golyeva, O. S. Khokhlova, A. V. Rusakov, and A. S. Shapovalov, “Soil and botanical notes on dynamics of the environment in Yamskaya steppe in the Holocene,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geogr., No. 2, 75–89 (2016). https://doi.org/10.15356/0373-2444-2016-2-75-89

  34. Yu. G. Chendev, A. A. Golyeva, A. V. Dolgikh, S. V. Uvarkin, A. N. Golotvin, V. G. Belevantsev, V. A. Sarapulkin, and D. I. Dudin, “Soils of archeological landscape Sorokino 1 (Orel oblast): reconstruction of natural changes and anthropogenic transformation of the environment,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 52, 619–631 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. O. A. Chichagova, Radiocarbon Dating of Soil Humus (Nauka, Moscow, 1985) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  36. O. A. Chichagova and E. P. Zazovskaya, “Past, present, and future of radiocarbon dating: development of the concepts of I.P. Gerasimov,” Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, No. 81, 160–176 (2015). https://doi.org/10.19047/0136-1694-2015-81-160-176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. C. B. Ramsey and S. Lee, “Recent and planned developments of the program OxCal,” Radiocarbon 55 (2–3), 720–730 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. IUSS Working Group WRB, World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps, World Soil Resources Reports No. 106 (UN Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yu. Chendev, O. Khokhlova, E. Ponomarenko, E. Ershova, A. Alexandrovskiy, and T. Myakshina, “Holocene environmental and anthropogenic changes of soils and vegetation in the Central Russian Upland: the case study in the “Belogorie” natural reserve,” Geosciences 8, (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8120473

  40. F. Gasse, “Hydrological changes in the African tropics since the Last Glacial Maximum,” Quat. Sci. Rev. 19 (1–5), 189–211 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. H. Jenny, Factors of Soil Formation: A System of Quantitative Pedology (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1941).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. P. J. Reimer, E. Bard, A. Bayliss, J. W. Beck, P. G. Blackwell, C. Bronk Ramsey, P. M. Grootes, et al., “IntCal13 and MARINE13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP,” Radiocarbon 55 (4), (2013).

  43. V. Skripkin and N. Kovalyukh, “Recent developments in the procedures used at the SSCER laboratory for the preparation of lithium carbide,” Radiocarbon 40 (1), 211–214 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. S. A. Sycheva, A. N. Bessudnov, A. L. Cheplayga, T. A. Sadchikova, and S.N. Sedov, “Divnogorie pedolithocomplex of the Russian Plain: Latest Pleistocene deposits and environments based on study of the Divnogorie 9 geoarchaeological site (middle reaches of the Don River),” Quat. Int. 418, 49–60 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study of soil evolution in the areas of archeological sites Kamenka 1 and Pleshcheevo 2 sites was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 19-29-05012). Soil-archeological studies of the Kamenka 1 site were supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 17-78-20048).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu. G. Chendev.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Translated by D. Konyushkov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chendev, Y.G., Fedyunin, I.V., Inshakov, A.A. et al. Contrasting Variants of Soil Development at Archaeological Sites on Floodplains in the Forest-Steppe of the Central Russian Upland. Eurasian Soil Sc. 54, 461–477 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229321040050

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229321040050

Keywords:

Navigation