Log in

Orbital Precession in the Restricted Three-Body Problem: Exact Representations

  • ASTRONOMY
  • Published:
Vestnik St. Petersburg University, Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analytical representations of the rate of apsidal precession in the planar elliptical restricted three-body problem are considered in the case when the orbit of the disturbing body is external with respect to the orbit of the test particle. The analytical expressions are compared with the numerical data obtained for the apsidal precession rate in the form of a power series with a parameter equal to the ratio of the semi-major axis of the orbit of the test particle to that of the disturbing planet. It is shown that the analytical expressions for the rate of apsidal precession of the particle are reliable only at distances not close to the instability zone near the orbit of the disturbing planet. Near the Wisdom gap, the linear secular theory is no more valid. An empirical correction formula is proposed to calculate the apsidal procession rate at relatively high (however less than 0.5) eccentricities of the particle and disturbing planet. The proposed formulas are applied to describe the precession of orbits in real exoplanetary systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

REFERENCES

  1. T. A. Heppenheimer, “On the formation of planets in binary star systems,” Astron. Astrophys. 65, 421–426 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Whitmire, J. Matese, L. Criswell, and S. Mikkola, “Habitable planet formation in binary star systems,” Icarus 132, 196–203 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Thebault, F. Marzari, and H. Scholl, “Relative velocities among accreting planetesimals in binary systems: The circumprimary case,” Icarus 183, 193–206 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2006.01.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Mayor, A. Duquennoy, J.-L. Halbwachs, and J.-C. Mermilliod, “CORAVEL surveys to study binaries of different masses and ages,” in Complementary Approaches to Double and Multiple Star Research: Proc. 135th IAU Colloquium, Pine Mountain, Ga., Apr. 5–10, 1992 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, Chelsea, 1992); in Ser.: ASP Conference Series, Vol. 32, pp. 73–81.

  5. R. B. Larson, “Implications of binary properties for theories of star formation.,” in Proc. 200th IAU Symp. on The Formation of Binary Stars, Potsdam, Germany, Apr. 10–15, 2000 (Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco, 2001), pp. 93–106. https://doi.org/10.48550/ar**v.astro-ph/0006288

  6. I. I. Shevchenko, Dynamical Chaos in Planetary Systems (Springer-Verlag, Cham, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52144-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. T. V. Demidova and I. I. Shevchenko, “Spiral patterns in planetesimal circumbinary disks,” Astrophys. J. 805, 38 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. D. Murray and S. F. Dermott, Solar System Dynamics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1999; Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2009).

  9. Y. Lithwick and Y. Wu, “Theory of secular chaos and Mercury’s orbit,” Astrophys. J. 739, 31 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/739/1/31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Rein and D. S. Spiegel, “IAS15: A fast, adaptive, high-order integrator for gravitational dynamics, accurate to machine precision over a billion orbits,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 446, 1424–1437 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Rein and S.-F. Liu, “REBOUND: An open-source multi-purpose N-body code for collisional dynamics,” Astron. Astrophys. 537, A128 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201118085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Wisdom, “The resonance overlap criterion and the onset of stochastic behavior in the restricted three-body problem,” Astron. J. 85, 1122–1133 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1086/112778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Duncan, T. Quinn, and S. Tremaine, “The long-term evolution of orbits in the solar system. A map** approach,” Icarus 82, 402–418 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(89)90047-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Ya. Marov and I. I. Shevchenko, “Exoplanets: Nature and models,” Phys. Usp. 63, 837–871 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNr.2019.10.038673

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author is grateful to I.I. Shevchenko for valuable advice and recommendations concerning this manuscript. The author thanks the reviewers for their useful detailed remarks.

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 22-22-00046.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Berezina.

Ethics declarations

The author of this work declares that she has no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by E. Smirnova

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Berezina, A.A. Orbital Precession in the Restricted Three-Body Problem: Exact Representations. Vestnik St.Petersb. Univ.Math. 57, 130–139 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063454124010047

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063454124010047

Keywords:

Navigation