Log in

Dynamics of One-Way Hydraulic Impact System with Two Piston Stop Tools

  • SCIENCE OF MINING MACHINES
  • Published:
Journal of Mining Science Aims and scope

Abstract

The mathematical model of the one-way hydraulic positive-displacement system with two piston stop tools includes the design variables of the system and its interaction with rock mass, namely, dry friction in the impact facility body–piston couple, pressure losses in the hydraulic system branches and piston velocity recovery factor. The dynamic similarity criteria, which are dimensionless analogs of the listed characteristics, are determined. The numerical calculation is performed, the influence of the similarity criteria on the dynamics and integral characteristics of the test system is analyzed, and the main behavioral patterns are revealed. It is found that these criteria influence the shape of the domains of the single impact travel and back run, two-impact and multi-impact limit cycles. It is possible to reduce the difference between the system characteristics in the impact travel and back run by means of changing the piston coordinates such that the valve stations are changed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Yang, G. and Chen, Y., The Research of New Type Hydraulic Breaker with Strike Energy and Frequency of Adjusted, Mech. Eng. Research., 2012, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yang, G., Ding, C., and Liang, C., Research on Intelligent Hydraulic Impactor, Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Meas. Technol. Mechatronics Autom., 2011, vol. 3, pp. 3–6.

  3. Ding, W.S., Wang, J.J., and Chen, L.N., Electronic Control Hydraulic Impactor Based on Pressure Feedback, Int. Conf. Mech. Autom. Control Eng., 2010, no. 50775075, pp. 2716–2719.

  4. Zhao, H., Liu, P., Shu, M., and Wen, G., Simulation and Optimization of a New Hydraulic Impactor, Appl. Mech. Mater., 2012, vol. 120, pp. 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lazutkin, S.L. and Lazutkina, N.A., Effective Parameters for Work Members of Adaptable Impacting System, Sovr. Naukoemk. Tekhnol., 2019, no. 5, pp. 58–63.

  6. Fabrichnyi, D.Yu., Tolengutiva, M.M., and Fabrichnyi, Yu.F., Automated Adjustment of Hydraulic Impacting Devices Based on Loading, Mashinostroen. Bezop. Zhiznedeyat., 2013, no. 4, pp. 72–77.

  7. Kucu,k K., Aksoy, C., Basarir, H., Onargan, T., Genis, M., and Ozacar, V., Prediction of the Performance of Impact Hammer by Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System Modeling, Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol. Inc. Trenchless Technol. Res., 2011, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 38–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gorodilov, L., Analysis of Self-Oscillating Single-Acting Hydro-Impact System Operational Modes with Two Limiters of Striker Movement, Int. J. Fluid Power., 2019, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 209–224.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alimov, O.D. and Basov, S.A., Gidravlicheskie vibroudarnye sistemy (Hydraulic Vibropercussion Systems), Moscow: Nauka, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yasov, V.G., Teoriya i raschet rabochikh protsessov gidroudarnykh burovykh mashin (Theory and Design of Operations in Hydraulic Percussion Drilling Machines), Moscow: Nedra, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Manzhosov, V.K. and Novikov, D.A., Modelirovanie perekhodnykh protsessov i predel’nykh tsiklov dvizheniya vibroudarnykh sistem s razryvnymi kharakteristikami (Modeling Transition Processes and Limit Cycles in Motion of Vibropercussion Systems with Noncontinuous Characteristics), Ulyanovsk: UlGTU, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lekontsev, Yu.M. and Sazhin, P.V., Directional Hydraulic Fracturing in Difficult Caving Roof Control and Coal Degassing, Journal of Mining Science, 2015, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 914–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gorodilov, L.V. and Sazhin, P.V., RF patent no. 27003029, Byull. Izobret., 2019, no. 29.

  14. Gorodilov, L.V., Basic Properties of One-Way Action Hydraulic Percussion System with Two Piston Arresters, Journal of Mining Science, 2020, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 972–981.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mamontov, M.A., Analogichnost’ (Analogy), Moscow: MO SSSR, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Arushanyan, O.B. and Zaletkin, S.F., Chislennoe reshenie obyknovennykh differentsial’nykh uravnenii na Fortrane (Numerical Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations in FORTRAN), Moscow: MGU, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Besekerskii, V.A. and Popov, E.P., Teoriya sistem avtomaticheskogo regulirovaniya (Theory of Automated Control Systems), Saint-Petersburg: Professiya, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Al’tshul’, A.D., Zhivotnovskii, L.S., and Ivanov, L.P., Gidravlika i aerodinamika (Hydraulics and Aerodynamics), Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Idel’chik, I.E., Spravochnik po gidravlicheskim soprotivlenyam (Pressure Losses: Manual), Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. V. Gorodilov.

Additional information

Translated from Fiziko-Tekhnicheskie Problemy Razrabotki Poleznykh Iskopaemykh, 2021, No. 4, pp. 88-98. https://doi.org/10.15372/FTPRPI20210409.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gorodilov, L.V., Pershin, A.I. Dynamics of One-Way Hydraulic Impact System with Two Piston Stop Tools. J Min Sci 57, 615–624 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739121040098

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062739121040098

Keywords

Navigation