Log in

Contrast Enhancement of Industrial Radiography Images by Gabor Filtering with Automatic Noise Thresholding

  • Radiation Methods
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The defect detection procedure of a radiographic image is a very important task. This is because of its importance regarding the safety of different industrial equipment. The defect detection procedures must reveal the defect region with the edges preserved. The radiography images are degraded by different noises caused by photon x-ray scattering, data acquisition and system errors. Due to the noise, radiography experts may encounter certain difficulties when extracting the defect region in the noisy images. This article presents a novel implementation of the Gabor filtering algorithm to improve contrast and denoise radiography images and detect the defects. Gabor filtering with automatic detection of noise level is a powerful contrast enhancement algorithm, but it tends to remove specific details from the processed images passing them off as noise. The performance of the proposed approach, the region defect, is revealed in radiographic images of different welded specimens. Results show major improvement not only in the noise attenuation, but also in the preservation of small details and the defect region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Spain)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ananda, A.R.S. and Kumar, P., Flaw detection in radiographic weld images using morphological watershed segmentation technique, NDT&E Int., 2009, vol. 42, pp. 2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Movafeghi, A., Krgarnovin, M.H., and Soltanian-Zadeh, H., A radiographic calibration method for eddy current testing of heat exchanger tubes, Insight Nondestr. Test. Cond. Monit., 2004, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 594–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kajiwara, G., Examination of the X-ray pi** diagnostic system using EGS4 (examination of the film and iron rust), in Proc. Second Int. Workshop EGS, Tsukuba, Japan, August 2000, pp. 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lee, S.S., Thickness evaluation of pipes using density profile on radiographs, in 10th Asia-Pac. Conf. Nondestr. Test., Brisbane, Australia, 2001, pp. 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shafeek, H.I., Gadelmava, E.S., abdel-Shafy, A.A., and Elewa, I.M., Assessment of welding defects for gas pipeline radiographs using computer vision, NDT&E Int., 2004, vol. 37, pp. 291–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lim, T.Y., Ratnam, M.M., and Khalid, M.A., Automatic classification of weld defects using simulated data and an MLP neural network, Insight, March 2007, vol 49, pp. 154–159.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Edalati, K., Rastkhah, N., Kermani, A., Seiedi, M., and Movafeghi, A., In-service corrosion evaluation in pipelines by gamma radiography, A numerical approach, Insight, July 2004, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 396–398.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yahaghi, E., Movafeghi, A., and Mohmmadzadeh, N., Enhanced radiographic imaging of defects in aircraft structure materials with the dehazing method, Nondestr. Test. Eval., 2015, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2015.1018254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gonzalez, R. and Woods, R., Digital Image Processing, Pearson-Prentice Hall, 2008, 2nd Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kovesi, P., Phase preserving denoising of images, in Proc. Fifth Int./Natl. Bienn. Conf. Digital Image Comput., Tech. Appl. (DICTA), Perth, Australia, December 7–8, 1999, pp. 212–217.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Ameena, Z., Sulonga, Gh., Rehmanb, A., Al-Rodhaanc, M., Sabad, T., and Al-Dhelaanc, A., Phase-preserving approach in denoising computed tomography medical images, in Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging & Visualization, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681163.2014.955615

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schilham, A.M., van Ginneken, B., Gietema, H., and Prokop, M., Local noise weighted filtering for emphysema scoring of low-dose CT images, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 2006, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 451–463.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Z. Chen, R. Ning. Breast volume denoising and noise characterization by 3D wavelet transform, Comput. Med. Imaging. Graph., 2004, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 235–246.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rodríguez, P. and Wohlberg, B., Efficient minimization method for a generalized total variation functional, IEEE Trans Image Process., 2009, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 322–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cai, J.-F., Chan, R.H., and Fiore, C., Minimization of a detail-preserving regularization functional for impulse noise removal, J. Math. Imaging Vis., 2007, vol. 29, p. 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. EN 14096-1. Non-destructive testing—Qualification of radiographic film digitization systems—part 1: Definitions, qualitative measurements of image quality parameters, standard reference film and qualitative control, Eur. Norm, 2004.

  17. EN 14096-2. Non-destructive testing—Qualification of radiographic film digitization systems—part 2: Minimum requirement, Eur. Norm, 2004.

  18. Operation Manual of Scanmaker-1000 Scanner, Microtek Co., 2005.

  19. ISO 19232-5. Non-destructive testing—Image quality of radiographs—Part 5: Determination of the image unsharpness value using duplex wire-type image quality indicators, 2013, 2nd Ed.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Effat Yahaghi.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yahaghi, E., Movafeghi, A. Contrast Enhancement of Industrial Radiography Images by Gabor Filtering with Automatic Noise Thresholding. Russ J Nondestruct Test 55, 73–79 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830919010121

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830919010121

Keywords

Navigation