Abstract
The interaction of a shock wave in a combustible gas mixture with an ellipsoidal region of an inert gas of increased density is numerically simulated using the Euler equations in the two-dimensional plane and axisymmetric formulations. Four qualitatively different regimes of indirect initiation of detonation have been found: upon reflection of a wave from the gas interface, upon focusing of secondary transverse shock waves on the axis/plane of symmetry, upon amplification of a transverse wave converging to the axis of symmetry, and upon secondary focusing of waves in front of the bubble. It is shown that the mode of detonation initiation depends significantly on both the intensity of the shock wave and the shape of the bubble. Based on a series of simulations, the dependence of the threshold Mach numbers of the incident wave on the shape of the bubble is determined. In the plane flow, a moderate elongation of the bubble leads to a significant decrease in the threshold Mach number. In an axisymmetric flow, the lower threshold Mach number is less sensitive to the shape of the bubble, and the most effective detonation initiation is carried out using a spherical bubble. The effect of shock wave focusing makes it possible to achieve successful initiation of detonation at a fundamentally lower intensity of the incident wave compared to direct initiation.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS1028335823050075/MediaObjects/11446_2024_1466_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS1028335823050075/MediaObjects/11446_2024_1466_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS1028335823050075/MediaObjects/11446_2024_1466_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS1028335823050075/MediaObjects/11446_2024_1466_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS1028335823050075/MediaObjects/11446_2024_1466_Fig5_HTML.png)
REFERENCES
N. Apazidis and V. Eliasson, Shock Focusing Phenomena (Springer, New York, 2018).
P. Y. Georgievskiy, V. A. Levin, and O. G. Sutyrin, Shock Waves 25, 357 (2015).
N. Haehn, D. Ranjan, C. Weber, J. Oakley, D. Rothamer, and R. Bonazza, Combust. Flame 159, 1339 (2012).
F. Diegelmann, S. Hickel, and N. A. Adams, Combust. Flame 174, 85 (2016).
F. Diegelmann, V. Tritschler, S. Hickel, and N. Adams, Combust. Flame 163, 414 (2016).
P. Yu. Georgievskiy, V. A. Levin, and O. G. Sutyrin, Tech. Phys. Lett. 45, 1209 (2019).
P. Yu. Georgievskii and O. G. Sutyrin, Dokl. Phys. 67, 74 (2022).
P. Yu. Georgievskiy, V. A. Levin, and O. G. Sutyrin, Tech. Phys. Lett. 47, 451 (2021).
V. Korobeinikov and V. Levin, Fluid Dyn. 4 (6), 30 (1969).
A. Matsuo and T. Fujiwara, in Proceedings of the 26th Thermophysics Conference, 1991, p. 1414.
G.-S. Jiang and C.-W. Shu, J. Comput. Phys. 126, 202 (1996).
Z. He, L. Li, Y. Zhang, and B. Tian, Comput. Fluids 168, 190 (2018).
J.-F. Haas and B. Sturtevant, J. Fluid Mech. 181, 41 (1987).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was carried out in accordance with the research plan of the Institute of Mechanics, Moscow State University, using the equipment of the Center for Collective Use of Ultra-High-Performance Computing Resources, Moscow State University.
Funding
This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, project no. 075-15-2020-806.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note.
Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Georgievskiy, P.Y., Sutyrin, O.G. Detonation of a Combustible Gas Mixture upon the Interaction of a Shock Wave with an Ellipsoidal Inert Gas Bubble. Dokl. Phys. 68, 164–170 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028335823050075
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028335823050075