Abstract
For the first time, lux biosensors of E. coli and the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans were used to study the genotoxicity of beta-propiolactone (BPL) used in the production of inactivated viral vaccines as an inactivator. It has been shown that the DNA-damaging activity of BPL is due not only to its ability to bind to bacterial DNA, but also to the ability to generate in the cell reactive oxygen species such as superoxide anions and peroxide, which have genotoxic activity. It was found that BPL in a dose-dependent manner, starting from a concentration of 0.001 mol/L, reduces the survival of bacteria. However, the intensity of expression of the antioxidant defense gene of superoxide dismutase soxS and the DNA repair gene colD increased. BPL-induced DNA breaks in nematode cells were detected by electrophoresis. The antioxidant acetylcysteine reduced the genotoxic effects of BPL on both bacteria and the nematode.
REFERENCES
Sanders, B., Koldijk, M., and Schuitemaker, H., Inactivated viral vaccines, Vaccine Analysis: Strategies, Principles, and Control, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2015, pp. 45—80.
Lawrence, S.A., Beta-propiolactone: viral inactivation in vaccines and plasma products, PDA J. Pharm Sci. Technol., 2000, vol. 54, pp. 209—214.
Kurashova, S.S., Ishmukhametov, A.A., Egorova, M.S., et al., Comparative characteristics of inactivating agents for the development of a vaccine against hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome, Epidemiol. Vaktsinoprofil., 2018, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 26—29. https://doi.org/10.31631/2073-3046-2018-17-4-26-29
Colburn, N.H., Richardson, R.G., and Boutwell, R.K., Studies of the reaction of β-propiolactone with deoxyguanosine and related compounds, Biochem. Pharmacol., 1965, vol. 14, pp. 1113—1118.
β-Propiolactone, in IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Lion: IARC, 1999, vol. 71, pp. 1103—1118.
Perrin, P. and Morgeaux, S., Inactivation of DNA by β-propiolactone, Biologicals, 1995, vol. 23, pp. 207—211.
Taubman, M.A. and Atassi, M.Z., Reaction of beta-propiolactone with amino acids and its specificity for methionine, Biochem. J., 1968, vol. 106, pp. 829—834. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1060829
Lawley, P.D. and Brookes, P., Further studies on the alkylation nucleic acids and their constituent nucleotides, Biochem. J., 1963, vol. 89, pp. 127—138. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0890127
Penman, B.W., Hoppe, H., and Thilly, W.G., Concentration-dependent mutation by alkylating agents in human lymphoblasts and Salmonella typhimurium: N-methyl-N-nitrosourethane and beta-propiolactone, J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 1979, vol. 63, pp. 903—907.
Kortselius, M.J., Induction of sex-linked recessive lethals and autosomal translocations by beta-propiolactone in Drosophila: influence of the route of administration on mutagenic activity, Mut. Res., 1979, vol. 66, pp. 55—63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1218(79)90007-7
Shamberger, R.J, Corlett, C.L, Beaman, D., and Kasten, B.L., Antioxidants reduce the mutagenic effect of malonaldehyde and beta-propiolactone: IX. Antioxidants and cancer, Mut. Res., 1979, vol. 66, pp. 349—355. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1218(79)90045-4
Benning, V., Brault, D., Duvinage, C., et al., Validation of the in vivo CD1 mouse splenocyte micronucleus test, Mutagenesis, 1994, vol. 9, pp. 199—204. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/9.3.199
Klein, C.B. and Rossman, T.G., Transgenic Chinese hamster V79 cell lines which exhibit variable levels of gpt mutagenesis, Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 1990, vol. 16, pp. 1—12. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.2850160102
Brusick, D., The genetic properties of β-propiolactone, Mut. Res., 1976, vol. 39, pp. 241—255.
Santaló, J., Estop, A.M., and Egozcue, J., Genotoxic effect of beta-propiolactone on mammalian oocytes, Mut. Res., 1987, vol. 189, pp. 407—416. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1218(87)90050-4
Brault, D., Renault, D., Tombolan, F., and Thybaud, V., Kinetics of induction of DNA damage and lacZ gene mutations in stomach mucosa of mice treated with beta-propiolactone and N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine, using single-cell gel electrophoresis and MutaMouse models, Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 1999, vol. 34, pp. 182—189.
Snyder, C.A., Garte, S.J., Sellakumar, A.R., and Albert, R.E., Relationships between the levels of binding to DNA and the carcinogenic potencies in rat nasal mucosa for three alkylating agents, Cancer Lett., 1986, vol. 33, pp. 175—181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3835(86)90022-4
Kotova, V.Yu., Manukhov, I.V., and Zavilgelsky, G.B., Lux biosensors for detecting SOS response, heat shock and oxidative stress, Biotekhnologiya, 2009, no. 6, pp.16—25. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683810080089
Zavilgelsky, G.B., Kotova, V.Yu., and Manukhov, I.V., Sensor bioluminescent systems based on lux operons for the toxic substances detection, Khim. Fiz., 2012, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 15—20.
Meneely, P.M., Dahlberg, C.L., and Rose, J.K., Working with worms: Caenorhabditis elegans as a model organism, Curr. Protoc. Essent. Lab. Tech., 2019, vol. 19. e35. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpet.35
Imanikia, S., Galea, F., Nagy, E., et al., The application of the comet assay to assess the genotoxicity of environmental pollutants in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 2016, vol. 7, no. 45, pp. 356—361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2016.06.020
Zavilgelsky, G.B., 60 years of SOS repair, Mol. Biol. (Moscow), 2013, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 605—612. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026893313050221
Maslowska, K.H., Makiela Dzbenska, K. and Fijalkowska, I.J., The SOS system: a complex and tightly regulated response to DNA damage, Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 2019, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 368—384. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.22267
Baharoglu, Z. and Mazel, D., SOS, the formidable strategy of bacteria against aggressions, FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 2014, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1126—1145. https://doi.org/10.1002/em.22267
Sedgwick, B., Batesb, P.A., Paik, J., et al., Repair of alkylated DNA: recent advances, DNA Repair, 2007, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 429—442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.10.005
Mielecki, D. and Grzesiuk, E., Ada response—a strategy for repair of alkylated DNA in bacteria, FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 2014, vol. 355, no. 1, pp. 1—11. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968
Mielecki, D., Wrzesiński M., and Grzesiuk, E., Inducible repair of alkylated DNA in microorganisms, Mut. Res., 2015, vol. 763, pp. 294—305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2014.12.001
Ordzhonikidze, K.G., Igonina, E.V., Zhoshibekova, B.S., and Abilev, S.K., Comparative study of the DNA-damaging activity of epichlorohydrin using Escherichia coli biosensors and the comet assay method in mice, Russ. J. Genet., 2021, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 1035—1041. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795421090088
Machigov, E.A., Igonina, E.V., Sviridova, D.A., et al., Genotoxic effect of paraquat radiomimetic on Escherichia coli bacteria, Rad. Biol. Radioekol., 2022, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 240—249. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869803122030055
Sviridova, D.A., Machigov, E.A., Igonina, E.V., et al., Study of the dioxidine genotoxicity using Escherichia coli lux biosensors, Rad. Biol. Radioekol., 2020, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 595—603. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869803120060223
Hartman, J.H., Widmayer, S.J., Christina, M., et al., Xenobiotic metabolism and transport in Caenorhabditis elegans, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Part B, 2021, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 51—94. https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2021.1884921
Harlow, P.H., Perry, S.J., Alexander, J., et al., Comparative metabolism of xenobiotic chemicals by cytochrome P450s in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, Nat. Sci. Rep., 2018, vol. 8, p. 13333.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31215-w
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Statement on the welfare of animals. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals have been followed.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Machigov, E.A., Abilev, S.K., Igonina, E.V. et al. Study of the Genotoxicity of Beta-Propiolactone Using Lux Biosensors E. coli and the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Russ J Genet 59, 432–440 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795423040075
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795423040075