Abstract
Current study is focused on human event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited in the auditory spatial masking paradigm. ERPs of the test subjects (n = 18) were recorded in the passive conditions using uncorrelated low-frequency noise signals. Spatial positions of the stimuli were determined by interaural level differences (ILDs). Test signal and masker were colocated or separated by 90 or 180 deg of azimuth and were presented simultaneously. The onset of a test signal was delayed from masker onset in order to separate the onset responses. We estimated the ERPs dependence on angular distance between signal and masker. When the test signal was presented against the background of a masker, the N1 and P2 components decreased in magnitude and increased in latency, as compared to presentation in silence. Spatial release from masking resulted in ERP magnitude increase and latency decrease as the angular distance between test signal and masker changed from 0 to 90 deg. A further spatial separation of the lateralized signal and masker did not result in further release from masking. ERPs magnitude was a more reliable indicator of the angular separation of signals than its latency. These findings suggest that binaural unmasking mechanisms operate at the preconscious stage of complex auditory scene analysis.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS0362119722700098/MediaObjects/10747_2023_84456_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS0362119722700098/MediaObjects/10747_2023_84456_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS0362119722700098/MediaObjects/10747_2023_84456_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1134%2FS0362119722700098/MediaObjects/10747_2023_84456_Fig4_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Yost, W.A., The cocktail party effect: 40 years later, Localization and Spatial Hearing in Real and Virtual Environments, Gilkey, R. and Anderson, T., Eds., Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Press, 1997, p. 329.
Al’tman, Ya.A., and Vaitulevich, S.F., Slukhovye vyzvannye potentsialy cheloveka i lokalizatsiya istochnika zvuka (Human Auditory Evoked Potentials and Sound Source Localization), St. Petersburg: Nauka, 1992.
Litovsky, R.Y., Spatial release from masking, Acoust. Today, 2012, vol. 8, p. 18.
Al’tman, Ya.A., Prostranstvennyi slukh (Spatial Hearing), St. Petersburg: Inst. Fiziol. im. I, p. Pavlova Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2011.
Perrott, D.R., Concurent minimum audible angle: a reexamination of the concept of auditory spatial acuity, J. Accoust. Soc. Am. 1984, vol. 75, no. 4, p. 1201.
Divenyi, P.L. and Oliver, S.K., Resolution of steady-state sounds in simulated auditory space, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1989, vol. 85, no. 5, p. 2042.
Yost, W.A. and Brown, C.A., Localizing the sources of two independent noises: role of time varying amplitude differences, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2013, vol. 133, no. 4, p. 2301.
Best, V., van Schaik, A., and Carlile, S., Separation of concurrent broadband sound sources by human listeners, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2004, vol. 115, no. 1, p. 324.
Salminen, N.H., Tiitinen, H., and May, P.J.C., Auditory spatial processing in the human cortex, Neuroscientist, 2012, vol. 18, no. 6, p. 602.
Ahveninen, J., Kopčo, N., and Jääskeläinen, I.P., Psychophysics and neuronal bases of sound localization in humans, Hear. Res., 2014, vol. 307, p. 86.
Tanis, D.C. and Teas, D.C., Evoked potential correlates of interaural phase reversals, Audiology, 1974, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 357.
Edwards, J.D., Henderson, D., and Nodar, R.H., The averaged evoked response threshold for monaural and binaural masked signals, JASA, 1971, vol. 49, p. 112.
Yonovitz, A., Thompson, C.L., and Lozar, J., Masking level differences: auditory evoked responses with homophasic and antiphasic signal and noise, J. Speech Hear. Res., 1979, vol. 22, no. 2, p. 403.
Vaĭtulevich, S.F. and Mal’tseva, N.F., Reflection of the effect of binaural release from masking in human long-latency auditory evoked potentials, Fiziol. Chel., 1987, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 196.
Whiting, K.A., Martin, B.A., and Stapells, D.R., The effects of broadband noise masking on cortical event-related potentials to speech sounds /ba/ and /da/, Ear Hear., 1998, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 218.
Martin, B.A. and Stapells, D.R., Effects of low-pass noise masking on auditory event-related potentials to speech, Ear Hear., 2005, vol. 26, no. 2, p. 195.
Billings, C.J., McMillan, G.P., Penman, T.M., and Gille, S.M., Predicting perception in noise using cortical auditory evoked potentials, J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol., 2013, vol. 14, no. 6, p. 891.
Lewald, J. and Getzmann, S., Electrophysiological correlates of cocktail-party listening, Behav. Brain Res., 2015, vol. 292, p. 157.
Lewald, J., Hanenberg, C., and Getzmann, S., Brain correlates of the orientation of auditory spatial attention onto speaker location in a “cocktail-party” situation, Psychophysiology, 2016, vol. 53, no. 10, p. 1484.
Atienza, M., Cantero, J.L., and Escera, C., Auditory information processing during human sleep as revealed by event-related brain potentials, Clin. Neurophysiol., 2001, vol. 112, no. 11, p. 2031.
Szalárdy, O., Tóth, B., Farkas, D., et al., Neuronal correlates of informational and energetic masking in the human brain in a multi-talker situation, Front. Psychol., 2019, vol. 10, p. 786.
Delorme, A., Sejnowski, T., and Makeig, S., Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis, NeuroImage, 2007, vol. 34, no. 4, p. 1443.
Billings, C.J., Tremblay, K.L., Stecker, G.C., and Tolin, W.M., Human evoked cortical activity to signal-to-noise ratio and absolute signal level, Hear Res., 2009, vol. 254, nos. 1—2, p. 15.
Somervail, R., Zhang, F., Novembre, G., et al., Waves of change: brain sensitivity to differential, not absolute, stimulus intensity is conserved across humans and rats, Cereb. Cortex, 2021, vol. 31, no. 2, p. 949.
Ebata, M., Sone, T., and Nimura, T., Improvement of hearing ability by directional information, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1968, vol. 43, no. 2, p. 289.
Folstein, J.R. and Van Petten, C., Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review, Psychophysiology, 2008, vol. 45, no. 1, p. 1520.
Funding
This study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 22-25-00033).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest. The authors declare the absence of obvious and potential conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article.
Statement of compliance with standards of research involving humans as subjects. All studies were carried out in accordance with the principles of biomedical ethics formulated in the Declaration of Helsinki of 1964 and its subsequent updates and approved by the local bioethical committee of St. Petersburg State University (St. Petersburg). Each participant provided a voluntary written signed informed consent after explaining the potential risks and benefits, as well as the nature of the upcoming study.
Additional information
Translated by M. Batrukova
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shestopalova, L.B., Petropavlovskaia, E.A., Salikova, D.A. et al. Event-Related Potentials in Conditions of Auditory Spatial Masking in Humans. Hum Physiol 48, 633–643 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119722700098
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0362119722700098