Log in

New Representative of Pinus L. from Jurassic Deposits of Belgorod Region, Russia

  • Published:
Paleontological Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new species of fossil pines, P. bukatkinii sp. nov., was found in the Middle Jurassic of Stoilensk open mine (the vicinity of Stary Oskol town, Belgorod Region). Seed cones of the new species possess four key diagnostic characters of representatives of the genus Pinus L.: thickened scale apices with apophyses and umbo; trace to the seed scale and bract represents a single unit; resin canals enter the seed scale base abaxially; adaxially convex vascular bundles in the seed scale. The distinctive feature of the new species is a strong sclerification of the seed scale ground tissue. Galleries, made by herbivores, were found in seed cones of P. bukatkinii sp. nov., that represents the oldest documented evidence of parasitism on pinaceous seed cones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

REFERENCES

  1. Alvin, K.L., On Pseudoaraucaria Fliche emend., a genus of fossil pinaceous cones, Ann. Bot., New Ser., 1957, vol. 21, pp. 33–51.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alvin, K.L., Further conifers of the Pinaceae from the Wealden Formation of Belgium, Mem. Inst. R. Sci. Nat. Belg., 1960, vol.146, pp. 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Banks, H.P., Ortiz-Sotomayor, A., and Hartman, C.M., Pinus escalantensis, sp. nov., a new permineralized cone from the Oligocene of British Columbia, Bot. Gaz., 1981, vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 286–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Delevoryas, T. and Hope, R.C., Fertile coniferophyte remains from the Late Tiassic Deep River basin, North Carolina, Am. J. Bot., 1973, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 810–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Delevoryas, T. and Hope, R.C., Further observations on the late Triassic conifers Compsostrobus neotericus and Voltzia andrewsii, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 1987, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 59–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bazhenov, A.V. and Bazhenova, N.V., On the age of ancient pinaceous ovulate cones, in Paleostrat–2022. Godichnoe sobranie (nauchn. conf.) sektsii paleontol. MOIP i Moskovskogo otdeleniya Paleontol. o-va pri RAN, Moskva, 31 yanvarya–2 fevralya 2022 g, Tez. dokl. (Paleostrat-2022. Tez. Annu. Meet. (Sci. Conf.) Paleontol. Sect. Moscow Soc. Nature Explorers, Moscow Branch Paleontol. Soc. Russ. Acad. Sci.; Moscow, January 31–February 2, 2022), Golubev, V.K. and Nazarova, V.M., Eds., Moscow: Paleontol. Inst. Russ. Akad. Nauk, 2022, pp. 8–9.

  7. Bazhenova, N.V. and Bazhenov, A.V., Stems of a new Osmundaceous fern from the Middle Jurassic of Kursk Region, European Russia, Paleontol. J., 2019, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 540–550.

  8. Domogatskaya, K.V. and Herman, A.B., New species of the genus Schizolepidopsis (conifers) from the Albian of the Russian high Arctic and geological history of the genus, Cretaceous Res., 2019, vol. 97, pp. 73–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Falder, A.B., Rothwell, G.W., Mapes, G., et al., Pityostrobus milleri sp. nov., a pinaceous cone from the Lower Cretaceous (Aptian) of southwestern Russia, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 1998, vol. 103, nos. 3–4, pp. 253–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Farjon, A., A Handbook of the World’s Conifers, Vol. II, Leiden–Boston: Brill, 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Gernandt, D.S., León-Gómez, C., Hernández-León, S., et al., Pinus nelsonii and a cladistic analysis of Pinaceae ovulate cone characters, Syst. Bot., 2011, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 583–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirejtshuk, A.G., Azar, D., Beaver, R.A., et al., The most ancient bark beetle known: a new tribe, genus and species from Lebanese amber (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae), Syst. Entomol., 2009, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Klymiuk, A.A., Stockey, R.A., and Rothwell, G.W., The first organismal concept for an extinct species of Pinaceae: Pinus arnoldii Miller, Int. J. Plant Sci., 2011, vol. 172, no. 2, pp. 294–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McKown, A.D., Stockey, R.A., and Schweger, C.E., New species of Pinus subgenus Pinus subsection Contortae from Pliocene sediments of Ch’ijee’s Bluff, Yukon Territory, Canada, Int. J. Plant Sci., 2002, vol. 163, no. 4, pp. 687–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leslie, A.B., Glasspool, I., Herendeen, P.S., et al., Pinaceae-like reproductive morphology in Schizolepidopsis canicularis sp. nov. from the Early Cretaceous (Aptian–Albian) of Mongolia, Am. J. Bot., 2013, vol. 100, no. 12, pp. 2426–2436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsunaga, K.K.S., Herendeen, P., Herrera, F., et al., Ovulate cones of Schizolepidopsis ediae sp. nov. provide insights into the Evolution of Pinaceae, Int. J. Plant Sci., 2021, vol. 182, no. 6, pp. 490–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller, C.N., Pinus avonensis, a new species of petrified cones from the Oligocene of Western Montana, Am. J. Bot., 1969, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 972–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller, C.N., Pinus wolfei, a new petrified cone from the Eocene of Washington, Am. J. Bot., 1974, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 772–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller, C.N., Early evolution in the Pinaceae, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 1976, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller, C.N., Pityostrobus lynni (Berry) comb. nov., a Pinaceous seed cone from the Paleocene of Virginia, Bull. Torrey Bot. Club., 1977, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller, C.N., Pinus burtii, a new species of petrified cones from the Miocene of Martha’s Vineyard, Bull. Torrey Bot. Club., 1978, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 93–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Miller, C.N. and Malinky, J.M., Seed cones of Pinus from the Late Cretaceous of New Jersey, U.S.A., Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 1986, vol. 46, nos. 3–4, pp. 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Miller, C.N. and Robison, C.R., Two new species of structurally preserved pinaceous cones from the Late Cretaceous of Martha’s Vineyard Island, Massachusetts, J. Paleontol., 1975, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 138–150.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ohsawa, T.A., Nishida, M., and Nishida, H., Structure and affinities of the petrified plants from the Cretaceous of northern Japan and Saghalien. XII. Obirastrobus gen. nov., petrified pinaceous cones from the Upper Cretaceous of Hokkaido, Bot. Mag., Tokyo, 1992, vol. 105, pp. 461–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Radais, M., Contribution a l’étude de l’anatomie comparée du fruit des conifers, Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot, Paris, 1894, Ser. 7–19, pp. 165–368.

  26. Ratzel, S.R., Rothwell, G.W., Mapes, G., et al., Pityostrobus hokodsensis, a new species of pinaceous cone from the Cretaceous of Russia, J. Paleontol., 2001, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 895–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rothwell, G.W., Mapes, G., Stockey, R.A., et al., The seed cone Eathiestrobus gen. nov.: Fossil evidence for a Jurassic origin of Pinaceae, Am. J. Bot., 2012, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 708–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ryberg, P.E., Rothwell, G.W, Stockey, R.A., et al., Reconsidering relationships among stem and crown group Pinaceae: Oldest record of the genus Pinus from the Early Cretaceous of Yorkshire, United Kingdom, Int. J. Plant Sci., 2012, vol. 173, no. 8, pp. 917–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Saiki, K., Pinus mutoi (Pinaceae), a new species of permineralized seed cone from the Upper Cretaceous of Hokkaido, Japan, Am. J. Bot., 1996, vol. 83, no. 12, pp. 1630–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shaw, G.R., The genus Pinus, in Publications of Arnold Arboretum, no. 5, Riverside, Cambridge: Mass, 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Smith, S.Y. and Stockey, R.A., A new species of Pityostrobus from the Lower Cretaceous of California and its bearing on the evolution of Pinaceae, Int. J. Plant Sci., 2001, vol. 162, no. 3, pp. 669–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Smith, S.Y. and Stockey, R.A., Permineralized pine cones from the Cretaceous of Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Int. J. Plant. Sci., 2002, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 185–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stockey, R.A., Middle Eocene Pinus remains from British Columbia, Bot. Gaz., 1983, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Taylor, T.N., Taylor, E.L., and Krings, M., Paleobotany: The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants, N.Y.: Acad., 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Underwood, C. and Miller, C.N., Pinus buchananii, a new species based on a petrified cone from the Oligocene of Washington, Am. J. Bot., 1980, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 1132–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yamada, M. and Yamada, T., Ovuliferous scale anatomy of Pinus species and its value for classification above the species level, Bot. J. Linn. Soc., 2017, vol. 183, no. 4, pp. 633–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEGMENTS

Authors are grateful to M.S. Rogov from the Geological Institute RAS, Moscow (GIN RAS) from the discussion of the geology of Stoilensk locality and R.A. Rakitov from A.A. Borissyak Paleontological Institute RAS, Moscow (PIN RAS) for help with SEM and Micro Computer Tomography System.

Funding

The study was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 19-04-00046.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. V. Bazhenova.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bazhenova, N.V., Bazhenov, A.V., Tekleva, M.V. et al. New Representative of Pinus L. from Jurassic Deposits of Belgorod Region, Russia. Paleontol. J. 57, 102–119 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030123010033

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030123010033

Keywords:

Navigation