Log in

Education, Innovation and Long-Run Growth

  • Published:
The Japanese Economic Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We extend a second-generation Schumpeterian growth model to incorporate human capital accumulation to clarify the general equilibrium effects of subsidy policies on human capital accumulation and R&D activities in a unified framework. Despite the conventional argument that subsidies always stimulate these growth-promoting activities, we find that subsidies asymmetrically affect human capital accumulation and R&D activities. Our theoretical results suggest that research using standard models of human capital might find false negative relationships between education subsidies and economic growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu, D. (1997) “Training and Innovation in an Imperfect Labour Market”, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, J. B. and J. B. Madsen (2011) “Can Second-Generation Endogenous Growth Models Explain the Productivity Trends and Knowledge Production in the Asian Miracle Economies?”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 93, No. 4, pp. 1360–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, L. (1998) “Growth, Welfare, and Trade in an Integrated Model of Human-Capital Accumulation and Research”, Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, M. and P. F. Peretto (2003) “Industry and the Family: Two Engines of Growth”, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 115–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinopoulos, E. and P. Thompson (1998) “Schumpeterian Growth without Scale Effects”, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 313–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eicher, T. S. and S. J. Turnovsky (1999) “Non-Scale Models of Economic Growth”, Economic Journal, Vol. 109, No. 457, pp. 394–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann, V. (2007) “How to Promote R&D-Based Growth? Public Education Expenditure on Scientists and Engineers Versus R&D Subsidies”, Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 891–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha, J. and P. Howitt (2007) “Accounting for Trends in Productivity and R&D: A Schumpeterian Critique of Semi-Endogenous Growth Theory”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 733–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howitt, P. (1999) “Steady Endogenous Growth with Population and R&D Inputs Growing”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 107, No. 4, pp. 715–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (2005) “Health, Human Capital and Economic Growth: A Schumpeterian Perspective”, in G. Lpez-Casasnovas, B. Rivera and L. Currais, eds, Health and Economic Growth: Findings and Policy Implications, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. I. (1995) “R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 103, No. 4, pp. 759–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kortum, S. S. (1997) “Research, Patenting, and Technological Change”, Econometrica, Vol. 65, No. 6, pp. 1389–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. (1988) “On the Mechanisms of Economic Development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machin, S., K. G. Salvanes and P. Pelkonen (2012) “Education and Mobility”, Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 10, pp. 417–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, J. B. (2008) “Semi-Endogenous versus Schumpeterian Growth Models: Testing the Knowledge Production Function Using International Data”, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (2010) “The Anatomy of Growth in the OECD since 1870”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 57, No. 6, pp. 753–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, J. Ang and R. Banerjee (2010) “Four Centuries of British Economic Growth: The Roles of Technology and Population”, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 263–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, N. G., D. Romer and D. Weil (1992) “A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 107, No. 2, pp. 407–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peretto, P. F. (1998) “Technological Change and Population Growth”, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 283–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo, S. (1991) “Long-Run Policy Analysis and Long-Run Growth”, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 99, No. 3, pp. 500–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redding, S. (1996) “The Low-Skill, Low-Quality Trap: Strategic Complementarities between Human Capital and R&D”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 106, No. 435, pp. 458–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakakibara, M. and L. Branstetter (2001) “Do Stronger Patents Induce More Innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese Patent Law Reforms”, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segerstrom, P. S. (1998) “Endogenous Growth without Scale Effects”, American Economic Review, Vol. 88, No. 5, pp. 1290–1310.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (2000) “The Long-Run Growth Effects of R&D Subsidies”, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 277–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulku, H. (2007) “R&D, Innovation, and Growth: Evidence from Four Manufacturing Sectors in OECD Countries”, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 513–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzawa, H. (1965) “Optimum Technical Change in An Aggregative Model of Economic Growth”, International Economic Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 18–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. (1998) “Growth without Scale Effects”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 106, No. 1, pp. 41–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zachariadis, M. (2003) “R&D, Innovation, and Technological Progress: A Test of the Schumpeterian Framework without Scale Effects”, Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 566–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— (2004) “R&D-Induced Growth in the OECD?”, Review of Development Economics, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 423–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, J. (2003) “Reexamining the Interaction between Innovation and Capital Accumulation”, Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 541–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We wish to thank Ronald Harstad, Akiomi Kitagawa, Fumio Ohtake, Akihisa Shibata, John Stachurski and participants of the annual conference of the Western Economic Association International for their helpful comments and suggestions. We would like to acknowledge the research grants provided by the Global Center of Excellence programs of Keio University, Kyoto University and Osaka University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hori, K., Yamada, K. Education, Innovation and Long-Run Growth. JER 64, 295–318 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5876.2012.00588.x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5876.2012.00588.x

JEL Classification Numbers

Navigation