Abstract
We extend a second-generation Schumpeterian growth model to incorporate human capital accumulation to clarify the general equilibrium effects of subsidy policies on human capital accumulation and R&D activities in a unified framework. Despite the conventional argument that subsidies always stimulate these growth-promoting activities, we find that subsidies asymmetrically affect human capital accumulation and R&D activities. Our theoretical results suggest that research using standard models of human capital might find false negative relationships between education subsidies and economic growth.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acemoglu, D. (1997) “Training and Innovation in an Imperfect Labour Market”, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp. 445–464.
Ang, J. B. and J. B. Madsen (2011) “Can Second-Generation Endogenous Growth Models Explain the Productivity Trends and Knowledge Production in the Asian Miracle Economies?”, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 93, No. 4, pp. 1360–1373.
Arnold, L. (1998) “Growth, Welfare, and Trade in an Integrated Model of Human-Capital Accumulation and Research”, Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 81–105.
Connolly, M. and P. F. Peretto (2003) “Industry and the Family: Two Engines of Growth”, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 115–148.
Dinopoulos, E. and P. Thompson (1998) “Schumpeterian Growth without Scale Effects”, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 313–335.
Eicher, T. S. and S. J. Turnovsky (1999) “Non-Scale Models of Economic Growth”, Economic Journal, Vol. 109, No. 457, pp. 394–415.
Grossmann, V. (2007) “How to Promote R&D-Based Growth? Public Education Expenditure on Scientists and Engineers Versus R&D Subsidies”, Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 891–911.
Ha, J. and P. Howitt (2007) “Accounting for Trends in Productivity and R&D: A Schumpeterian Critique of Semi-Endogenous Growth Theory”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 733–774.
Howitt, P. (1999) “Steady Endogenous Growth with Population and R&D Inputs Growing”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 107, No. 4, pp. 715–730.
—— (2005) “Health, Human Capital and Economic Growth: A Schumpeterian Perspective”, in G. Lpez-Casasnovas, B. Rivera and L. Currais, eds, Health and Economic Growth: Findings and Policy Implications, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 19–40.
Jones, C. I. (1995) “R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 103, No. 4, pp. 759–784.
Kortum, S. S. (1997) “Research, Patenting, and Technological Change”, Econometrica, Vol. 65, No. 6, pp. 1389–1419.
Lucas, R. (1988) “On the Mechanisms of Economic Development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 3–42.
Machin, S., K. G. Salvanes and P. Pelkonen (2012) “Education and Mobility”, Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 10, pp. 417–450.
Madsen, J. B. (2008) “Semi-Endogenous versus Schumpeterian Growth Models: Testing the Knowledge Production Function Using International Data”, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 1–26.
—— (2010) “The Anatomy of Growth in the OECD since 1870”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 57, No. 6, pp. 753–767.
——, J. Ang and R. Banerjee (2010) “Four Centuries of British Economic Growth: The Roles of Technology and Population”, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 263–290.
Mankiw, N. G., D. Romer and D. Weil (1992) “A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 107, No. 2, pp. 407–437.
Peretto, P. F. (1998) “Technological Change and Population Growth”, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 283–311.
Rebelo, S. (1991) “Long-Run Policy Analysis and Long-Run Growth”, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 99, No. 3, pp. 500–521.
Redding, S. (1996) “The Low-Skill, Low-Quality Trap: Strategic Complementarities between Human Capital and R&D”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 106, No. 435, pp. 458–470.
Sakakibara, M. and L. Branstetter (2001) “Do Stronger Patents Induce More Innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese Patent Law Reforms”, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 77–100.
Segerstrom, P. S. (1998) “Endogenous Growth without Scale Effects”, American Economic Review, Vol. 88, No. 5, pp. 1290–1310.
—— (2000) “The Long-Run Growth Effects of R&D Subsidies”, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 277–305.
Ulku, H. (2007) “R&D, Innovation, and Growth: Evidence from Four Manufacturing Sectors in OECD Countries”, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 513–535.
Uzawa, H. (1965) “Optimum Technical Change in An Aggregative Model of Economic Growth”, International Economic Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 18–31.
Young, A. (1998) “Growth without Scale Effects”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 106, No. 1, pp. 41–63.
Zachariadis, M. (2003) “R&D, Innovation, and Technological Progress: A Test of the Schumpeterian Framework without Scale Effects”, Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 566–586.
—— (2004) “R&D-Induced Growth in the OECD?”, Review of Development Economics, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 423–439.
Zeng, J. (2003) “Reexamining the Interaction between Innovation and Capital Accumulation”, Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 541–560.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We wish to thank Ronald Harstad, Akiomi Kitagawa, Fumio Ohtake, Akihisa Shibata, John Stachurski and participants of the annual conference of the Western Economic Association International for their helpful comments and suggestions. We would like to acknowledge the research grants provided by the Global Center of Excellence programs of Keio University, Kyoto University and Osaka University.