Abstract
How consumers perceive corporate social responsibility (CSR) has shifted significantly over the past decades. Initially, a voluntary commitment to solving urgent social problems, CSR was once a source of competitive advantage, specific positioning, and exclusivity in customers’ eyes. Today, however, CSR has become a fundamental prerequisite for a company to function in society, a source of company legitimacy, expected and demanded by many stakeholder groups. As research demonstrates, young people in particular loudly and intensely declare their interest in today’s challenges and vigorously demand that the companies they buy from or work for participate in CSR. On the contrary, in everyday practice, we as scholars and educators have learned that CSR is more of an empty word for consumers, something that is right but of which they have no precise idea. CSR finds itself in a paradoxical situation. Therefore, our study aims to identify the main paradoxes in how millennials perceive CSR. First, it addresses the term paradox and its contextualization within the CSR discourse. Second, the three main paradoxes (authenticity/communication, legitimacy/trust, pay-off/non-pay-off) are outlined and verified through mixed methods research. The paradoxes are identified and confirmed through the ambivalent and inconsistent responses to a questionnaire and, subsequently, multiple focus groups. Finally, implications for the CSR concept are suggested. Furthermore, this paper questions the validity of instruments traditionally used to measure consumer attitudes (not only) in the field of CSR.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashforth, Blake E., and Barrie W. Gibbs. 1990. The Double-Edge of Organizational Legitimation. Organization Science 1 (2): 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.2.177.
Barthes, Roland. 1994. The Semiotic Challenge, 1st ed. Berkeley, MA: University of California Press.
Baudrillard, Jean. 1981. For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign, 1st ed. St. Louis, MO: Telos Press.
Baudrillard, Jean. 1996. The Perfect Crime. Verso.
Bentele, Günter. 1994. Öffentliches Vertrauen — Normative Und Soziale Grundlage Für Public Relations. In Normative Aspekte Der Public Relations: Grundlegende Fragen Und Perspektiven. Eine Einführung, edited by Wolfgang Armbrecht and Ulf Zabel, 131–58. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97043-5_7.
Bentele, Günter, and Howard Nothhaft. 2011. Trust and Credibility as the Basis of Corporate Social Responsibility. In The Handbook of Communication and Corporate Social Responsibility, edited by Ø Ihlen, J.L. Bartlet, and S. May, 208–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118083246.ch11.
Campbell, John L. 2006. Institutional Analysis and the Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility. American Behavioral Scientist 49 (7): 925–938. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205285172.
Carroll, Archie B. 1979. A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. Academy of Management Review 4 (4): 497–505. https://doi.org/10.2307/257850.
Carroll, Archie B. 2008. A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices. Edited by Andrew Crane, Dirk Matten, Abagail McWilliams, Jeremy Moon, and Donald S Siegel. Vol. 1. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford University Press.
Carroll, Archie B. 2015. Corporate Social Responsibility: The Centerpiece of Competing and Complementary Frameworks. Organizational Dynamics 44 (2): 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.02.002.
Chaffee, Eric C. 2017. The Origins of Corporate Social Responsibility. University of Cincinnati Law Review 85: 353.
Chatzopoulou, Elena, and Adrian de Kiewiet. 2021. Millennials’ Evaluation of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Wants and Needs of the Largest and Most Ethical Generation. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 20 (3): 521–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1882.
Coleman, James S. 1994. Foundations of Social Theory. Harvard University Press.
Coleman, James Samuel. 1982. Systems of Trust. A Rough Theoretical Framework. Angewandte Sozialforschung Anc AIAS Informationen Wien 10 (3): 277–307.
Commission of the European Communities. 2001. Green Paper: Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. Commission of the European Communities.
Cone Communications. 2015. “2015 Cone Communications Millennial CSR Study—Cone.” 2015. https://conecomm.com/2015-cone-communications-millennial-csr-study/#download-research.
Corazza, Laura, Simone Domenico Scagnelli, and Chiara Mio. 2017. Simulacra and Sustainability Disclosure: Analysis of the Interpretative Models of Creating Shared Value. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 24 (5): 414–434. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1417.
Crowther, David, and Shahla Seifi. 2018. “Against Theory: Redefining Corporate Social Responsibility Using a Lacanian Perspective.” In The Goals of Sustainable Development : Responsibility and Governance, edited by David Crowther, Shahla Seifi, and Abdul Moyeen, 77–93. Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5047-3_5.
Colle, De., Adrian Henriques Simone, and Saras Sarasvathy. 2014. The Paradox of Corporate Social Responsibility Standards. Journal of Business Ethics 125 (2): 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1912-y.
Deutsch, Morton. 1958. Trust and Suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution 2 (4): 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275800200401.
Deutsch, Morton. 1977. The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Du, Shuili, and Edward T. Vieira. 2012. Striving for Legitimacy through Corporate Social Responsibility: Insights from Oil Companies. Journal of Business Ethics 110 (4): 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1490-4.
Fern, Edward F. 1982. The Use of Focus Groups for Idea Generation: The Effects of Group Size, Acquaintanceship, and Moderator on Response Quantity and Quality. Journal of Marketing Research 19 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378201900101.
Fry, Richard. 2020. “Millennials Overtake Baby Boomers as America’s Largest Generation.” Pew Research Center (blog). 2020. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/04/28/millennials-overtake-baby-boomers-as-americas-largest-generation/.
Gapper, John. 2018. How Millennials Became the World’s Most Powerful Consumers | Financial Times. 2018. https://www.ft.com/content/194cd1c8-6583-11e8-a39d-4df188287fff.
Giddens, Anthony. 1991. The Consequences of Modernity, 1st ed. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
Giddens, Anthony. 2020. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. In The New Social Theory Reader, ed. S. Seidman and J.C. Alexander, 354–61. Abingdon: Routledge.
González-González, José María., Francisco D. Bretones, Rocío González-Martínez, and Pedro Francés-Gómez. 2019. ‘The Future of an Illusion’: A Paradoxes of CSR. Journal of Organizational Change Management 32 (1): 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-01-2018-0018.
Hahn, Tobias, Jonatan Pinkse, Lutz Preuss, and Frank Figge. 2015. Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: Towards an Integrative Framework. Journal of Business Ethics 127 (2): 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2047-5.
Hoffmann, Jochen. 2018. Talking into (Non) Existence: Denying or Constituting Paradoxes of Corporate Social Responsibility. Human Relations 71 (5): 668–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717721306.
Hume, Margee. 2010. Compassion without Action: Examining the Young Consumers Consumption and Attitude to Sustainable Consumption. Journal of World Business 45 (4): 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.08.007.
Agudelo, Latapí, Mauricio Andrés, Lára. Jóhannsdóttir, and Brynhildur Davídsdóttir. 2019. A Literature Review of the History and Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility 4 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y.
Lock, Irina, and Charlotte Schulz-Knappe. 2018. Credible Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Communication Predicts Legitimacy: Evidence from an Experimental Study. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 24 (1): 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-07-2018-0071.
López-Fernández, Andrée Marie. 2020. Price Sensitivity versus Ethical Consumption: A Study of Millennial Utilitarian Consumer Behavior. Journal of Marketing Analytics 8 (2): 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00074-8.
Luger, Michaela, Katharina Maria Hofer, and Arne Floh. 2022. Support for Corporate Social Responsibility among Generation Y Consumers in Advanced versus Emerging Markets. International Business Review 31 (2): 101903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101903.
Macintosh, Norman B., Teri Shearer, Daniel B. Thornton, and Michael Welker. 2000. Accounting as Simulacrum and Hyperreality: Perspectives on Income and Capital. Accounting, Organizations and Society 25 (1): 13–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00010-0.
Martin, Roger L. 2002. The Virtue Matrix: Calculating the Return on Corporate Responsibility. Harvard Business Review 80 (3): 68–75.
Mattessich, Richard. 2000. The Beginnings of Accounting and Accounting Thought: Accounting Practice in the Middle East (8000 BC to 2000 BC) and Accounting Thought in India (300 BC and the Middle Ages), 1st ed. New York: Routledge.
McGlone, Teresa, Judith Winters Spain, and Vernon McGlone. 2011. Corporate Social Responsibility and the Millennials. Journal of Education for Business 86 (4): 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2010.502912.
Mohr, Lois A., and Deborah J. Webb. 2005. The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and Price on Consumer Responses. Journal of Consumer Affairs 39 (1): 121–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2005.00006.x.
Morsing, Mette, Majken Schultz, and Kasper Ulf Nielsen. 2008. The ‘Catch 22’of Communicating CSR: Findings from a Danish Study. Journal of Marketing Communications 14 (2): 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527260701856608.
Müller-Christ, Georg. 2011. Sustainable Management: Co** with the Dilemmas of Resource-Oriented Management. Heidelberg: Springer.
Neugebauer, Friederike, Frank Figge, and Tobias Hahn. 2016. Planned or Emergent Strategy Making? Exploring the Formation of Corporate Sustainability Strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment 25 (5): 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1875.
Newell, Stephen J., and Ronald E. Goldsmith. 2001. The Development of a Scale to Measure Perceived Corporate Credibility. Journal of Business Research 52 (3): 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00104-6.
Öberseder, Magdalena, Bodo B. Schlegelmilch, and Verena Gruber. 2011. ‘Why Don’t Consumers Care about CSR?’: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Role of CSR in Consumption Decisions. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (4): 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0925-7.
Osborne, Jason W., and Margaret R. Blanchard. 2011. Random Responding from Participants Is a Threat to the Validity of Social Science Research Results. Frontiers in Psychology 1: 220. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00220.
Park, Sun-Young., Moonhee Cho, and Soo** Kim. 2021. The Effect of CSR Expectancy Violation: Value from Expectancy Violation Theory and Confirmation Bias. Journal of Marketing Communications 27 (4): 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2019.1671478.
Pérezts, Mar, Jean-Philippe. Bouilloud, and Vincent De Gaulejac. 2011. Serving Two Masters: The Contradictory Organization as an Ethical Challenge for Managerial Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 101 (1): 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1176-3.
Petersen, Verner. 2002. Beyond Rules in Society and Business. Northampton, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Pomering, Alan, and Sara Dolnicar. 2009. Assessing the Prerequisite of Successful CSR Implementation: Are Consumers Aware of CSR Initiatives? Journal of Business Ethics 85 (2): 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9729-9.
Porter, Michael E., and Mark R. Kramer. 2006. The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review 84 (12): 78–92.
Průša, Přemysl, and Tomáš Sadílek. 2017. Green Marketing and Its Perception by Young Consumers of the ‘Generation Y.’ In Global and National Business Theories and Practice: Bridging the Past with the Future, 1289–1298. Rome: Italy.
Quinn, Robert E, and Kim S Cameron. 1988. Paradox and Transformation: A Framework for Viewing Organization and Management. Ballinger Series on Innovation and Organizational Change. Ballinger Pub Co.
Sjovall, Andrea M., and Andrew C. Talk. 2004. From Actions to Impressions: Cognitive Attribution Theory and the Formation of Corporate Reputation. Corporate Reputation Review 7 (3): 269–281. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540225.
Smith, Wendy K., and Marianne W. Lewis. 2011. Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Organizing. Academy of Management Review 36 (2): 381–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0223.
Thomas, Michelle, Jane Frankland, and Michael Bloor. 2000. Focus Groups in Social Research. Focus Groups in Social Research, 1–120.
Thomas, William Isaac, and D.S. Thomas. 1928. The Child in America. Oxford: Knopf.
Trethewey, Guest editors Angela, and Karen L Ashcraft. 2004. Special Issue Introduction: Practicing Disorganization: The Development of Applied Perspectives on Living with Tension. Journal of Applied Communication Research 32 (2): 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/0090988042000210007.
Tynan, A Caroline, and Jennifer L. Drayton. 1988. Conducting Focus Groups—A Guide for First-time Users. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 6 (1): 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb045757.
der Byl, Van, A. Connie, and Natalie Slawinski. 2015. Embracing Tensions in Corporate Sustainability: A Review of Research from Win-Wins and Trade-Offs to Paradoxes and Beyond. Organization & Environment 28 (1): 54–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575047.
Waddock, Sandra, and Bradley K. Googins. 2011. The Paradoxes of Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility. In The Handbook of Communication and Corporate Social Responsibility, 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118083246.ch2.
Wagner, Tillmann, Richard J. Lutz, and Barton A. Weitz. 2009. Corporate Hypocrisy: Overcoming the Threat of Inconsistent Corporate Social Responsibility Perceptions. Journal of Marketing 73 (6): 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.6.77.
Wheeler, David, Heike Fabig, and Richard Boele. 2002. Paradoxes and Dilemmas for Stakeholder Responsive Firms in the Extractive Sector: Lessons from the Case of Shell and the Ogoni. Journal of Business Ethics 39 (3): 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016542207069.
Yoon, Yeosun, Zeynep Gürhan-Canli, and Norbert Schwarz. 2006. The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities on Companies with Bad Reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology 16 (4): 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Šimůnková, K., Kincl, T. & Gunina, D. CSR Did Not Take Place: An Empirical Study Exploring Consumers Trapped in Paradoxes. Corp Reputation Rev (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-024-00195-1
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-024-00195-1