Abstract
A methodology from the international trade literature is adapted to study country-of-origin (COO) effects. The resulting measures offer improvements over those used in the marketing literature by using actual household consumption data that is widely available. The measures capture consumer cosmopolitanism vs. ethnocentrism in each country, and nostalgia vs. animosity between country pairs. Research questions addressed include how cultural, linguistic, geographic, and historical factors impact COO effects. The results confirm several earlier findings from the literature and advance it as follows: Consumers exhibit more animosity toward countries that are culturally distant; do not speak the same languages; historically less connected; geographically close; and less developed, but also toward regional powers, and toward the US. Additionally, ethnocentric countries tend to be large; individualistic, feminine, risk averse, short-term oriented with high power distance and less prone to indulgence; with a high percentage of English speakers; and central in alliances.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcantara-Pilar, J.M., and S. Del Barrio-Garcia. 2015. Antecedents of attitudes towards the website: The moderating role of long-term orientation and individualism. Cross Cultural Management 22: 379–404.
Alesina, A., W. Easterly, A. Devleeschauwer, S. Kurlat, and R. Wacziarg. 2003. Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth 8: 155–194.
Amine, L.S., M.C.H. Chao, and M.J. Arnold. 2005. Executive insights: Exploring the practical effects of country of origin, animosity, and price-quality issues: Two case studies of Taiwan and Acer in China. Journal of International Marketing 13 (3): 54–78.
Averill, J.R. 2012. Anger and aggression: An essay on emotion. Singapore: Springer.
Bahaee, M., and M.J. Pisani. 2009. Iranian consumer animosity and US products: A witch’s brew or elixir? International Business Review 18: 199–210.
Becic, M. 2017. An assessment of consumer ethnocentrism tendencies scale among university students: The case of Turkish and Bosnian student. Sarajevo Journal of Society Sciences 2 (1): 119–130.
Brewer, P.A. 2007. Operationalizing psychic distance: A revised approach. Journal of International Marketing 15 (1): 44–66.
Buckley, P., and D. Lessard. 2005. Regaining the edge for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies 36 (6): 595–599.
Cannon, H., S.J. Yoon, L. McGowan, and A. Yaprak. 1994. In search of the global consumer. Paper included in proceedings for the 1994 Annual Meeting of the Academy of International Business.
Chandon, P., V.G. Morwitz, and W.J. Reinartz. 2005. Do intentions really predict behavior? Self-generated validity effects in survey research. Journal of Marketing 69 (2): 1–14.
Cleveland, M., and M. Laroche. 2007. Acculturation to the global consumer culture: Scale development and research paradigm. Journal of Business Research 60 (3): 249–259.
Cleveland, M., M. Laroche, and N. Papadopoulos. 2009. Cosmopolitanism, consumer ethnocentrism, and materialism: An eight-country study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of International Marketing 17 (1): 116–146.
Conner, S.L., J. Reardon, C. Miller, L. Salciuviene, and V. Auruskeviciene. 2017. Cultural antecedents to the normative, affective, and cognitive effects of domestic versus foreign purchase behavior. Journal of Business Economic and Management 18: 100–115.
Costa, C., J. Carneiro, and R. Goldszmidt. 2016. A contingent approach to country-of-origin effects on foreign products evaluation: Interaction of facets of country image with product classes. International Business Review 25: 1066–1075.
Doran, C.J. 2009. The role of personal values in fair trade consumption. Journal of Business Ethics 84 (4): 549–563.
Dube, L.F., and G.S. Black. 2010. Impact of national traumatic events on consumer purchasing. International Journal of Consumer Studies 34 (3): 333–338.
Evanschitzky, H., F. Wangenheim, D. Woisetschlager, and M. Blut. 2008. Consumer ethnocentrism in the German market. International Marketing Review 25 (1): 7–32.
Feldman, F. 2004. Pleasure and the good life: Concerning the nature, varieties, and plausibility of hedonism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gineikiene, J., and A. Diamantopoulos. 2017. I hate where it comes from but I still buy it: Countervailing influences of animosity and nostalgia. Journal of International Business Studies 48 (8): 992–1008.
Gurhan-Canli, Z., and D. Maheswaran. 2000. Cultural variations in country of origin effects. Journal of Marketing Research 37 (3): 309–317.
Gylfason, T. 2001. Natural resources, education and economic development. European Economic Review 45 (4–6): 847–859.
Hakanson, L., and B. Ambos. 2010. The antecedents of psychic distance. Journal of International Management 16 (3): 195–210.
Hakanson, L., and D. Dow. 2012. Markets and networks in international trade: On the role of distances in globalization. Management International Review 52: 761–789.
Harmeling, C.M., P. Magnusson, and N. Singh. 2015. Beyond anger: A deeper look at consumer animosity. Journal of International Business Studies 46 (6): 676–693.
Head, K. and T. Mayer. 2002. Illusory border effects: Distance measurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade. CEPII Working Paper 2002-01.
Heix, S., L. Wulf, S. Kocher, and H. Holzmuller. 2017. Is two really better than one? The effects of dual language labelling on consumer perceptions and purchase intention: An abstract. Academy of Management Science Annual Conference. pp. 679–680.
Henry, P.J., and J. Napier. 2017. Education is related to greater ideological prejudice. Public Opinion Quarterly 81 (4): 93–942.
Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G., G.J. Hoftstede, and M. Minkov. 2010. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Hsieh, M. 2004. An investigation of country-of-origin effect using correspondence analysis: A cross-national context. International Journal of Market Research 46 (3): 267–295.
Hulland, J.S. 1999. The effect of country-of-brand and brand name on product evaluation and consideration: A cross-country comparison. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 11 (1): 23–40.
Jaffe, E.D., and I. Nebenzahl. 2006. National image and competitive advantage: The theory and practice of place branding. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
Josiassen, A., and A.-W. Harzing. 2008. Descending from the ivory tower: Reflections on the relevance and future of country-of-origin research. European Management Review 5 (4): 264–270.
Kandogan, Y. 2020. Using macro cross-border trade data to better understand micro-level country of origin effects. Thunderbird International Business Review 62 (2): 213–226.
Kandogan, Y., and J. Hiller. 2018. Alliances in international governmental organizations, regional trade agreement formation and multinational enterprise regionalization strategy. Journal of International Business Studies 49 (6): 729–742.
Katsumata, S., and J. Song. 2015. The reciprocal effects of country-of-origin on product evaluation. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics 28 (1): 92–106.
Kirkman, B.L., K.B. Lowe, and C.B. Gibson. 2006. A quarter century of culture’s consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies 37 (3): 285–320.
Klein, J., R. Ettenson, and M. Morris. 1998. The animosity model of foreign product purchase: An empirical test in the PRC. Journal of Marketing 62 (1): 89–100.
Kogut, B., and H. Singh. 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies 19 (3): 411–432.
Lee, R., and K. Tae Lee. 2013. The longitudinal effects of a two-dimensional consumer animosity. Journal of Consumer Marketing 30 (3): 273–282.
Luedicke, M.K. 2011. Consumer acculturation theory: (Crossing) conceptual boundaries. Consumption, Markets and Culture 14 (3): 223–244.
Ma, J., J. Yang, and B. Yoo. 2020. The moderating role of personal cultural values on consumer ethnocentrism in develo** countries: The case of Brazil and Russia. Journal of Business Research 108: 375–389.
Magnusson, P., and S.A. Westjohn. 2011. Is there a country-of-origin theory? In Handbook of research in international marketing, ed. S.C. Jain and D.A. Griffith, 292–316. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Matsumoto, D., S.H. Yoo, and S. Nakagawa. 2008. Culture, emotion regulation, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94 (6): 925.
McCallum, J. 1995. National borders matter: Canada-US regional trade patterns. American Economic Review 85 (3): 615–623.
Melitz, J., and F. Toubal. 2014. Native language, spoken language, translation and trade. Journal of International Economics 92 (2): 351–363.
Mikhailitchenko, A., R.G. Javalgi, G. Mikhailitchenko, and M. Laroche. 2009. Cross-cultural advertising communication: Visual imagery, brand familiarity, and brand recall. Journal of Business Research 62 (10): 931–938.
Nguyen, T.D., T.T.M. Nguyen, and N.J. Barrett. 2008. Consumer ethnocentrism, cultural sensitivity, and intention to purchase local products: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Consumer Behavior 7 (1): 88–100.
Nijssen, E., and S.P. Douglas. 2004. Examining the animosity model in a country with a high level of foreign trade. International Journal of Research in Marketing 21 (1): 23–38.
Podoschen, J. 2009. Distressing events and future purchase decisions: Jewish consumers and the Holocaust. Journal of Consumer Marketing 26: 263–276.
Ramsaran, R.R. 2015. The country-of-origin effect on perceptions of imported and domestic products in a develo** country international. Journal of Business and Social Science 6 (9): 14–24.
Raskovic, M., Z. Ding, M. Hirose, V. Zabkar, and K.S. Fam. 2019. Segmenting young-adult consumers in East Asia and Central and Eastern Europe -The role of consumer ethnocentrism and decision-making styles. Journal of Business Research 108: 496–507.
Riefler, P., A. Diamantopoulos, and J.A. Siguaw. 2012. Cosmopolitan consumers as a target group for segmentation. Journal of International Business Studies 43 (3): 285–305.
Schwartz, S.H., and T. Rubel-Lifschitz. 2009. Cross-national variation in the size of sex differences in values: Effects of gender equality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97: 171–185.
Schwartz, S.H. 2012. An overview of Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116.
Sedikides, C., T. Wildschut, C. Routledge, J. Arndt, E.G. Hepper, and X. Zhou. 2015. To nostalgize: Mixing memory with affect and desire. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 51: 189–273.
Shankarmahesh, M.N. 2006. Consumer ethnocentrism: An integrative review of its antecedents and consequences. International Marketing Review 23 (2): 146–172.
Sharma, P. 2010. Measuring personal cultural orientations: Scale development and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 38: 787–806.
Sharma, P. 2015. Consumer ethnocentrism: Reconceptualization and cross-cultural validation. Journal of International Business Studies 46 (3): 381–389.
Sheppard, B.H., J. Hartwick, and P.R. Warshaw. 1988. The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. Journal of Consumer Research 15 (3): 325–343.
Verlegh, P.W.J., and J.B.-E.M. Steenkamp. 1999. A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology 20 (5): 521–546.
Wang, C.L., and Z.X. Chen. 2004. Consumer ethnocentrism and willingness to buy domestic products in a develo** country setting: Testing moderating effects. Journal of Consumer Marketing 21 (6): 391–400.
Wang, X., and Z. Yang. 2008. Does country-of-origin matter in the relationship between brand personality and purchase intention in emerging economies? Evidence from China’s auto industry. International Marketing Review 25 (4): 458–474.
Wu, J., N. Zhu, and Q. Dai. 2010. Consumer ethnocentrism, product attitudes and purchase intentions of domestic products in China. International Conference on Engineering and Business Management, Bei**g 2010: 2262–2265.
Yang, J., J. Ma, M. Arnold, and K. Nuttavuthisit. 2018. Global identity, perceptions of luxury value and consumer purchase intention: A cross-cultural examination. Journal of Consumer Marketing 35 (5): 533–542.
Yoo, B., and N. Donthu. 2005. The effect of personal cultural orientation on consumer ethnocentrism: Evaluations and behaviors of US consumers toward Japanese products. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 18: 7–44.
Funding
No funding has been used in development of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author has reviewed the Journal’s conflict of interest statement and declares that there is no interests that might conflict with the statement. The article does not have any elements that would require copyright permission from other parties. The author also confirms that all the research meets the ethical guidelines, including adherence to the legal requirements of the study countries. Furthermore, the author confirms that the manuscript has been submitted solely to this journal and is not published, in press, or submitted elsewhere, in whole or parts thereof.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kandogan, Y. A comprehensive multi-country study of country-of-origin effects using actual product ownerships. J Market Anal (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-023-00215-9
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-023-00215-9