SpringerLink
Log in

The mutual construction of knowledge transfer and shared context in capability development within the networked MNC

  • Article
  • Published:
Knowledge Management Research & Practice

Abstract

Consistent with the knowledge-based view of the firm, capability augmentation in the multinational corporation (MNC) entails the adaptation and diffusion of knowledge within a network of globally dispersed subsidiaries. We used case study methodology to examine the transfer of knowledge practices within four MNCs in order to identify specific mechanisms through which social context impacts efficiency and effectiveness of transfer, as well as the resulting development of associated capabilities. The primary findings of this study are the identification of mechanisms that headquarters can use to create mutual interdependencies among subsidiaries, which in turn hasten capability development and enhance knowledge flow; and the mutually constructive roles of knowledge transfer and shared context, through promotion of organizational knowledge use. The manner in which these coordination and control mechanisms are implemented facilitates the integration of different units within the networked MNC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeida P, Song J and Grant RM (2002) Are firms superior to alliances and markets? An empirical test of cross-border knowledge building. Organization Science 13 (2), 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambos TC and Ambos B (2009) The impact of distance on knowledge transfer effectiveness in multinational corporations. Journal of International Management 15 (3), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand N, Gardner H and Morris T (2007) Knowledge-based innovation: emergence and embedding of new process areas in management consulting firms. Academy of Management Journal 50 (2), 406–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argote L and Ingram P (2000) Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82 (1), 150–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augier M, Shariq SZ and Vendelø MT (2001) Understanding context: its emergence, transformation and role in tacit knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management 5 (2), 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat RS, Kedia BL, Harveston PD and Triandis HC (2002) Cultural variations in the cross-border transfer of organizational knowledge: an integrative framework. Academy of Management Review 27 (2), 204–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell J (1995) The globalization of technology: what remains of the product cycle model. Cambridge Journal of Economics 19 (1), 155–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell J and Janne O (1999) Technological globalisation and innovative centres: the role of corporate technological leadership and locational hierarchy. Research Policy 28 (2–3), 199–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciabuschi F, Dellestrand H and Kappan P (2011) Exploring the effects of vertical and lateral mechanisms in international knowledge transfer projects. Management International Review 51 (2), 129–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WM and Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin JM and Strauss A (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello N (1996) Learning and routines in high-tech SMEs: analyzing rich case study material. Journal of Economic Issues 30 (2), 591–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellestrand H and Kappen P (2011) Headquarters allocation of resources to innovation transfer projects within the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Management 17 (4), 263–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JH (1994) Multinational enterprises and the globalization of innovatory capacity. Research Policy 23 (1), 67–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theory from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14 (4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman MS (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science 11 (6), 611–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman MS (2003) A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Industrial and Corporate Change 12 (4), 727–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman MS and Pentland BT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly 48 (1), 94–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueiredo PN (2013) Embedding with multiple knowledge sources to improve innovation performance: the learning experience of Motorola in Brazil. Knowledge Management Research and Practice 11 (4), 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford DP and Chan YE (2003) Knowledge sharing in a multi-cultural setting: a case study. Knowledge Management Research and Practice 1 (1), 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss NJ and Pedersen T (2002) Transferring knowledge in MNCs: the role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context. Journal of International Management 8 (1), 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gnyawali DR, Singal M and Mu S (2009) Knowledge ties among subsidiaries in MNCs: a multi-level conceptual model. Journal of International Management 15 (4), 387–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooderham PN (2007) Enhancing knowledge transfer in multinational corporations: a dynamic capabilities driven model. Knowledge Management Research and Practice 5 (1), 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant RM (1996) Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter Special Issue), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guba E and Lincoln Y (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AK and Govindarajan V (1991) Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review 16 (4), 768–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AK and Govindarajan V (2000) Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal 21 (4), 473–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz SK and Santillan C (2012) Knowledge sharing in global virtual team collaboration: applications of CE and thinkLets. Knowledge Management Research and Practice 10 (4), 342–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichijo K and Kohlbacher F (2008) Tap** tacit local knowledge in emerging markets – the Toyota way. Knowledge Management Research and Practice 6 (3), 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen R and Szulanski G (2004) Stickiness and the adaptation of organizational practices in cross-border knowledge transfers. Journal of International Business Studies 35 (6), 508–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson A and Kalling T (2007) Challenges to knowledge sharing across national and intra-organizational boundaries: case studies of IKEA and SCA Packaging. Knowledge Management Research and Practice 5 (3), 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimble C, Li F and Barlow A (2000) Effective virtual teams through communities of practice. Strathclyde Business School, Research Paper No. 2000/9.

  • Kogut B (2000) The network as knowledge: generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management Journal 21 (3), 405–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B and Zander U (1992) Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3 (3), 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut B and Zander U (1993) Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies 24 (4), 625–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova T and Roth K (2002) Adoption of an organizational practice by foreign subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal 45 (1), 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurokawa S, Iwata S and Roberts EB (2007) Global R&D activities of Japanese MNCs in the US: a triangulation approach. Research Policy 36 (1), 3–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnier-Watanabe R, Benton C and Senoo D (2011) A study of knowledge management enablers across countries. Knowledge Management Research and Practice 9 (1), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makani J and Marche S (2010) Towards a typology of knowledge-intensive organizations: determinant factors. Knowledge Management Research and Practice 8 (4), 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2 (1), 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minbaeva D, Pedersen T, Björkman I, Fey CF and Park HJ (2003) MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies 34 (6), 586–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan G and Kristensen PH (2006) The contested space of multinationals: varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism. Human Relations 59 (11), 1467–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi R (2008) Location, control and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Economic Geography 8 (5), 699–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I and Konno N (1998) The concept of ‘ba’: building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review 40 (3), 40–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Toyama R and Nagata A (2000) A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: a new perspective on the theory of the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change 9 (1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanastassiou M and Pearce RD (1997) Technology sourcing and the strategic roles of manufacturing subsidiaries in the U.K.: local competences and global competitiveness. Management International Review 37 (1), 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce RD (1999) Decentralised R&D and strategic competitiveness: globalised approaches to generation and use of technology in multinational enterprises (MNEs). Research Policy 28 (2–3), 157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen T, Petersen N and Sharma D (2003) Knowledge transfer performance of multinational companies. Management International Review 43 (3), 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling TC (1960) Strategy of Conflict. Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu H (1995) Ba-principle: new logic for the real-time emergence of information. Holonics 5 (1), 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkovics RR, Roath AS and Cavusgil ST (2011) International integration and coordination in MNEs: implications for international management. Management International Review 51 (2), 121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spradley JP (1979) The Ethnographic Interview. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski G (1996) Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski G (2000) The process of knowledge transfer: a diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82 (1), 9–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai W (2001) Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal 44 (5), 996–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valkokari K, Paasi J and Rantala T (2012) Managing knowledge within networked innovation. Knowledge Management Research and Practice 10 (1), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamin M, Tsai H and Holm U (2011) The performance effects of headquarters’ involvement in lateral innovation transfers in multinational corporations. Management International Review 51 (2), 157–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2009) Case Study Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zander I (1999) How do you mean ‘global’? An empirical investigation of innovation networks in the multinational corporation. Research Policy 28 (2–3), 195–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zollo M and Winter SG (2002) Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Organization Science 13 (3), 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Schools of Business, Fordham University, New York, U.S.A.

    Nathaniel C Lupton

  2. Ivey School of Business, Western University, London, Canada

    Paul W Beamish

Authors
  1. Nathaniel C Lupton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul W Beamish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lupton, N., Beamish, P. The mutual construction of knowledge transfer and shared context in capability development within the networked MNC. Knowl Manage Res Pract 14, 150–157 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2014.25

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2014.25

Keywords

Search

Navigation