Log in

Computational psychiatry and the lived experience of mental illness

  • Comment
  • Published:

From Nature Reviews Psychology

View current issue Sign up to alerts

The next generation of translational measures must exhibit greater construct validity in their capacity to capture the dynamic nature of mental illness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Brendler, J., Silver, M., Haber, M. & Sargent, J. Madness, Chaos, and Violence: Therapy with Families at the Brink (Basic Books, 1991).

  2. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D. & Funder, D. C. Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2, 396–403 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu, C. C., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., Katovich, K. & Knutson, B. Affective traits link to reliable neural markers of incentive anticipation. Neuroimage 84, 279–289 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huys, Q. J. M., Browning, M., Paulus, M. P. & Frank, M. J. Advances in the computational understanding of mental illness. Neuropsychopharmacology 46, 3–19 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, V. M., Chen, J., Gillan, C. M. & Price, R. B. Improving the reliability of computational analyses: model-based planning and its relationship with compulsivity. Biol. Psychiatry Cogn. Neurosci. Neuroimaging 5, 601–609 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hitchcock, P. F., Fried, E. I. & Frank, M. J. Computational psychiatry needs time and context. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 73, 243–270 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hedge, C., Powell, G. & Sumner, P. The reliability paradox: why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behav. Res. Methods 50, 1166–1186 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pascual-Leone, A., Herpertz, S. C. & Kramer, U. Experimental designs and the ‘emotion stimulus critique’: hidden problems and potential solutions in the study of emotion. Psychopathology 49, 60–68 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Loucks, L. et al. You can do that?!: feasibility of virtual reality exposure therapy in the treatment of PTSD due to military sexual trauma. J. Anxiety Disord. 61, 55–63 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Franklin, J. C., Huang, X. & Bastidas, D. Virtual reality suicide: development of a translational approach for studying suicide causes. Behav. Res. Ther. 120, 103360 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael T. Treadway.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author is a paid consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim. This work is not related to the views expressed in the current article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Treadway, M.T. Computational psychiatry and the lived experience of mental illness. Nat Rev Psychol 2, 67–68 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00142-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00142-z

  • Springer Nature America, Inc.

Navigation