Using carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) for carbon removal is crucial to climate policy, but implementation at scale is at risk owing to political obstacles. Climate policies must avoid relying on empty promises of CCS for carbon removal without necessary financial resourcing and support emissions reductions separately from carbon removal.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Brack, D. & King, R. Managing land-based CDR: BECCS, forests and carbon sequestration. Glob. Policy 12, 45–56 (2021).
Hudson, M. Carbon Capture and Storage in the United Kingdom: History, Policies and Politics (Routledge, 2024).
Chatterjee, S. & Huang, K. W. Unrealistic energy and materials requirement for direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways. Nat Commun. 11, 3287 (2020).
Palm, E., Tilsted, J. P., Vogl, V. & Nikoleris, A. Imagining circular carbon: a mitigation (deterrence) strategy for the petrochemical industry. Environ. Sci. Policy 151, 103640 (2024).
Hougaard, I.-M. Enacting biochar as a climate solution in Denmark. Environ. Sci. Policy 152, 103651 (2024).
Carton, W., Hougaard, I.-M., Markusson, N. & Friis Lund, J. Is carbon removal delaying emission reductions? WIRES Clim. Change. 14, e826 (2023).
Buck, H. J., Carton, W., Friis Lund, J. & Markusson, N. Why residual emissions matter right now. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 351–358 (2023).
Smith, H. B., Vaughan, N. E. & Forster, J. Residual emissions in long-term national climate strategies show limited climate ambition. One Earth 7, 867–884 (2024).
McLaren, D. P., Tyfield, D. P., Willis, R., Szerszynski, B. & Markusson, N. Beyond ‘net-zero’: a case for separate targets for emissions reduction and negative emissions. Front. Clim. 1, 4 (2019).
Markusson, N., McLaren, D., Szerszynski, B., Tyfield, D. & Willis, R. Life in the hole: practices and emotions in the cultural political economy of mitigation deterrence. Eur. J. Fut. Res. 10, 2 (2022).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Related links
Axe Drax: https://axedrax.uk/
Carbfix: https://www.carbfix.com/
East Coast Cluster: https://eastcoastcluster.co.uk/
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Markusson, N. Political obstacles to carbon capture and storage for carbon removal. Nat Rev Earth Environ 5, 481–482 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-024-00574-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-024-00574-6
- Springer Nature Limited