Account
Extended Data Fig. 6: Comparison of different models for QEC result. | Nature

Extended Data Fig. 6: Comparison of different models for QEC result.

From: Quantum error correction with silicon spin qubits

Extended Data Fig. 6

Comparison of the fitting results of quadratic (a + cp2 + dp3), third-order polynomial (a + bp + cp2 + dp3) and linear functions (a + bp). The coefficients a, b, c and d are the fitting parameters. We obtain a = 0.879 ± 0.006, c = −2.72 ± 0.06 and d = 1.89 ± 0.06 (quadratic function), a = 0.88 ± 0.01, b = 0.0 ± 0.1, c = −2.75 ± 0.24 and d = 1.91 ± 0.16 (third-order polynomial function), and a = 0.94 ± 0.02 and b = −1.00 ± 0.03 (linear function) from the fitting results. To compare the fitting results by different models, we calculate the Bayesian information criterion43 (BIC) and the Akaike information criterion44 (AIC). Models with lower BIC are preferred, whereas models with lower AIC provide better prediction of the experimental behaviour. The difference between the linear fit and the others is found to be decisive45 (|ΔBIC| ≈ 50). In addition, although the difference is not as large (|ΔBIC| ≈ 3), the quadratic fit without the first-order term is more preferred than the polynomial function including the first-order term. The errors are 1σ from the mean.

Back to article page

Navigation