Log in

Biodiversity monitoring

The limits of acoustic indices

  • News & Views
  • Published:

From Nature Ecology & Evolution

View current issue Submit your manuscript

A cross-validation approach with acoustic and bird datasets from four regions shows that acoustic indices produce inconsistent and non-generalizable estimates of biodiversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1: Acoustic indices aim to assess biodiversity from audio recordings, but recent research has shown their substantial limitations in extracting accurate and generalized biodiversity metrics.

References

  1. Obrist, M. K. et al. Abc Taxa 8, 68–99 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Laiolo, P. Biol. Conserv 143, 1635–1645 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sugai, L. S. M., Silva, T. S. F., Ribeiro, J. W. Jr & Llusia, D. Bioscience 69, 15–25 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gibb, R., Browning, E., Glover‐Kapfer, P. & Jones, K. E. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 169–185 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tuia, D. et al. Nat. Commun. 13, 792 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sethi, S. S. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1373–1378 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sueur, J., Farina, A., Gasc, A., Pieretti, N. & Pavoine, S. Acta Acust. United Acust 100, 772–781 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sueur, J., Pavoine, S., Hamerlynck, O. & Duvail, S. PLoS ONE 3, e4065 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Pieretti, N., Farina, A. & Morri, D. Ecol. Indic. 11, 868–873 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alcocer, I., Lima, H., Sugai, L. S. M. & Llusia, D. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 97, 2209–2236 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Retamosa Izaguirre, M., Barrantes-Madrigal, J., Segura Sequeira, D., Spínola-Parallada, M. & Ramírez-Alán, O. Neotrop. Biodivers. 7, 431–442 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bicudo, T., Llusia, D., Anciães, M. & Gil, D. Ecol. Inform. 77, 102241 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Roe, P. et al. Methods Ecol. Evol. 12, 1802–1808 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Servick, K. Science 343, 834–837 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson, E. O. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1590–1591 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diego Llusia.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Llusia, D. The limits of acoustic indices. Nat Ecol Evol 8, 606–607 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02348-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02348-1

  • Springer Nature Limited

Navigation