Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24920-0, published online 10 August 2021

The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 1, in which the 3386 gamma line de-exciting the 10+ isomer should end at the 6+ state (and not the 4+ state).

The correct version of Fig. 1 is:

which replaces the previous incorrect version:

This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.