Inhibition of autophagy and MEK promotes ferroptosis in Lkb1-deficient Kras-driven lung tumors

Bhatt, Vrushank; Lan, Tai**; Wang, Wen**; Kong, Jerry; Lopes, Eduardo Cararo; Wang, Jianming; Khayati, Khoosheh; Raju, Akash; Rangel, Michael; Lopez, Enrique; Hu, Zhixian Sherrie; Luo, Xuefei; Su, **aoyang; Malhotra, Jyoti; Hu, Wenwei; Pine, Sharon R.; White, Eileen; Guo, Jessie Yanxiang

doi:10.1038/s41419-023-05592-8

Inhibition of autophagy and MEK promotes ferroptosis in Lkb1-deficient Kras-driven lung tumors

Article
Open access
Published: 26 January 2023

Volume 14, article number 61, (2023)
Cite this article

Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Cell Death & Disease

Inhibition of autophagy and MEK promotes ferroptosis in Lkb1-deficient Kras-driven lung tumors

Download PDF

6305 Accesses
14 Citations
9 Altmetric
Explore all metrics

Abstract

LKB1 and KRAS are the third most frequent co-mutations detected in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and cause aggressive tumor growth. Unfortunately, treatment with RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK pathway inhibitors has minimal therapeutic efficacy in LKB1-mutant KRAS-driven NSCLC. Autophagy, an intracellular nutrient scavenging pathway, compensates for Lkb1 loss to support Kras-driven lung tumor growth. Here we preclinically evaluate the possibility of autophagy inhibition together with MEK inhibition as a treatment for Kras-driven lung tumors. We found that the combination of the autophagy inhibitor hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and the MEK inhibitor Trametinib displays synergistic anti-proliferative activity in Kras^G12D/+;Lkb1^-/- (KL) lung cancer cells, but not in Kras^G12D/+;p53^-/- (KP) lung cancer cells. In vivo studies using tumor allografts, genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) showed anti-tumor activity of the combination of HCQ and Trametinib on KL but not KP tumors. We further found that the combination treatment significantly reduced mitochondrial membrane potential, basal respiration, and ATP production, while also increasing lipid peroxidation, indicative of ferroptosis, in KL tumor-derived cell lines (TDCLs) and KL tumors compared to treatment with single agents. Moreover, the reduced tumor growth by the combination treatment was rescued by ferroptosis inhibitor. Taken together, we demonstrate that autophagy upregulation in KL tumors causes resistance to Trametinib by inhibiting ferroptosis. Therefore, a combination of autophagy and MEK inhibition could be a novel therapeutic strategy to specifically treat NSCLC bearing co-mutations of LKB1 and KRAS.

Blocking autophagy improves the anti-tumor activity of afatinib in lung adenocarcinoma with activating EGFR mutations in vitro and in vivo

Article Open access 04 July 2017

Autophagy regulates vinorelbine sensitivity due to continued Keap1-mediated ROS generation in lung adenocarcinoma cells

Article Open access 12 September 2018

LKB1 deficiency enhances sensitivity to energetic stress induced by erlotinib treatment in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells

Article 29 June 2015

Introduction

Lung cancer is a leading contributor to cancer-attributed deaths in the United States, with an overall survival rate of 17% at any stage and 4% for more advanced stages [1]. About 85% of lung cancers are characterized as non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) [2]. KRAS mutations in NSCLC usually signify a poor prognosis and are linked with resistance to multiple cancer treatments [3]. Functional, predictive biomarkers play an essential role in predicting response to different treatments to enhance prognosis, thereby enabling the formulation of individualized therapies. Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), KRAS, Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1), Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), MET, PIK3CABRAF, ROS1, NTRK, RET, HER2, LKB1, and TP53 [4,5,6,7] have been used as biomarkers to guide targeted cancer treatment. In particular, tumors with LKB1 mutations, which are detected in 15–30% of NSCLC, including tumors with co-occurring KRAS mutations detected in 5–10% of NSCLC [8, 9], unfortunately lack effective targeted therapies and are associated with the resistance to immunotherapy [6].

TP53 and LKB1 mutations in KRAS-mutant NSCLC show distinct genetic profiles and responses to therapies [6]. While co-mutations in KRAS and LKB1 are found in tumors of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, KRAS and TP53 co-mutations are found only in adenocarcinoma [10, 11]. Whereas Kras-p53 mutant tumors respond to combination therapy with docetaxel and the MEK inhibitor Selumetinib, Kras-Lkb1 mutant tumors do not [12]. Kras-p53 mouse lung tumors are also more responsive to radiotherapy compared to tumors harboring Kras-Lkb1 mutations [13, 14]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for precision therapy for different subgroups of KRAS-driven NSCLC.

Except for KRAS^G12C [15, 16], targeting RAS directly remains a challenge for NSCLC therapy [17]. Moreover, inhibiting downstream effectors of RAS signaling such as the MAP kinase pathway has not produced durable responses [18,19,20]. The contemporary strategies for lung cancer therapy are centered on the rationale of combining several different treatment modalities that produce the best patient outcomes [21]. Treatment with MEK inhibitors often forms the basis for lung cancer combination therapies [22, 23]. Trametinib, a MEK1/2 inhibitor, was the first agent approved by the FDA in 2013 for the treatment of BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic melanoma, followed by Cobimetinib [23, 24]. A combination of Dabrafenib and Trametinib was approved by the FDA in 2017 for the treatment of metastatic NSCLC harboring BRAF V600E-mutations [24]. The use of Trametinib as a single agent has been shown to induce resistance via overactivation of BRAF or PI3K/Akt pathways [25] and activation of the IGF1R–MEK5–Erk5 pathway [26]. In addition, the adverse side effects of MEK inhibitors [27] prompt the urgent need to develop other novel combination strategies to reduce drug-induced toxicities and suppress conventional therapy-induced resistance.

Autophagy -a lysosomal-mediated cannibalization process- captures, degrades, and recycles subcellular macromolecules and organelles [28]. Using genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs) to conditionally delete essential autophagy genes, our group and others have demonstrated that autophagy is upregulated and promotes tumorigenesis in different types of cancer by multiple tumor cell-autonomous mechanisms [29,30,31,32,Full size image

Table 1 DRUG COMBINATION in Vitro CALCUSYN REPORT (Fa-CI table with Fa increment of 0.05).

Full size table

Combination of HCQ and Trametinib impaired KL TDCL mitochondrial metabolism

Autophagy is essential to maintain mitochondrial metabolism for cancer cell survival during metabolic stress [5, 30, 32, 45]. To understand the mechanism of synergistic anti-proliferation by the combination treatment in KL TDCLs, KL and KP TDCLs were treated with the single agents or their combination for 6 h and the mitochondrial function was examined using the Seahorse XFe24 Analyzer (Fig. 1F). Combination treatment significantly inhibited basal respiration and ATP production compared with the vehicle control or Trametinib alone in KL TDCLs (Fig. 1G), but not in KP TDCLs (Fig. 1H). Further, metabolomics analysis (Fig. 1I) of TDCLs observed that treatment with Trametinib significantly increased the levels of several glycolytic and TCA cycle intermediates in KL TDCLs, which were reduced upon co-treatment with HCQ (Fig. 1J). In connection with these changes, Trametinib treatment suppressed AMP levels and increased ATP levels in KL cells, which was corrected by co-treatment with HCQ (Fig. 1J). The mitochondrial membrane potential generated by proton pumps is an essential component in the process of energy storage during oxidative phosphorylation. Together with the proton gradient, mitochondrial membrane potential forms the transmembrane potential of hydrogen ions which is harnessed to make ATP [46]. Hence, we measured the mitochondrial membrane potential using MitoTracker Red CMXRos and observed that Trametinib treatment alone significantly increased mitochondrial membrane potential compared to vehicle control in KL TDCLs, which was significantly dampened by the combination of HCQ and Trametinib (Fig. 1K), but not in KP TDCLs (Fig. 1L). Such reduced mitochondrial membrane potential by the combination treatment in KL TDCLs, not in KP TDCLs, was further validated using a standard less oxidative stress-sensitive dye TMRM (Fig. 1M, N). The combination treatment also reduced the levels of several amino acids that were upregulated upon treatment with Trametinib (Fig. 1J). Taken together, we found that the combination of HCQ and Trametinib in KL cells impairs functional mitochondria, leading to energy crises that could prevent cell proliferation and induce cell death.

Combination of HCQ and Trametinib synergistically inhibited KL allograft tumor growth, but not KP allograft tumor growth

To further validate our hypothesis that combining autophagy and MEK inhibitors could be a novel therapeutic strategy specifically in the treatment of KL NSCLC, we first assessed the anti-tumor effect of the combination therapy in established KL and KP TDCL-induced allograft tumors in immunodeficient NCr nude mice. When the allograft tumors were measurable, the mice were treated with HCQ or Trametinib alone, or with a combination of both (Fig. 2A). Although the single agents had no effect in reducing tumor growth, the combination treatment significantly reduced KL allograft tumor growth (Fig. 2B–D), which was accompanied by reduced cell proliferation (Ki67) and pErk in these tumors compared to the tumors collected from the mice treated with the single agents or vehicle control (Fig. 2E). Moreover, p62 accumulation, indicative of autophagy blockade, was observed in the tumors collected from the mice treated with HCQ or the combination (Fig. 2E). Compared to KP lung tumors, KL lung tumors have increased metastasis [11]. We observed that the combination treatment significantly inhibited spontaneous lung metastasis migrated from KL allograft tumors in NCr nude mice assessed by the quantification of tumor number and tumor burden of scanned lung sections (Fig. 2F–H). However, combination treatment did not cause any tumor growth inhibition of KP allograft tumors in NCr nude mice (Fig. 2I–L).

**Fig. 2: Combination of HCQ and Trametinib inhibited the growth of established KL allograft tumors, and not KP allograft tumors.**

Combination of HCQ and Trametinib synergistically inhibited established KL lung tumor growth, but not KP lung tumor growth

To better determine whether the combination of HCQ and Trametinib is a novel specific approach for treating KL lung tumors, we induced KL lung tumors in Kras^LSL-G12D/+;Lkb1^Flox/Flox GEMMs via a single Lentiviral Cre-recombinase intranasal infection. At 12 weeks post tumor induction, when lung tumors were developed [5], mice were treated with vehicle, Trametinib, HCQ or the combination therapy for four weeks (Fig. 3A) and the tumor growth was assessed by gross lung pathology, wet lung weight (Fig. 3B), and quantification of tumor burden and tumor number of scanned lung sections with H&E staining (Fig. 3C–E). As expected, Trametinib did not inhibit the growth of KL lung tumors; however, HCQ showed a tendency to inhibit the growth of KL lung tumors. Most excitingly, the combination therapy significantly suppressed the growth of KL lung tumors compared with the vehicle control or the single agents (Fig. 3B–E). In addition, there was no significant difference in mouse body weight between the four treatment groups, indicating lack of drug toxicity (Fig. 3F). The treatment with Trametinib significantly reduced the phosphorylation of ERK, whereas HCQ treatment caused the accumulation of p62, indicating blockade of the MEK and autophagy pathways in KL lung tumors (Fig. 3G). Less KL tumor cell proliferation was observed when mice were treated with either HCQ or the combination (Fig. 3G), which is consistent with the reduced tumor growth (Fig. 3B–E). These same treatments were applied to the Kras^LSL-G12D/+;p53^Flox/Flox GEMMs bearing KP lung tumors. The single agents or the combination therapy had no anti-tumor effect on established KP lung tumors (Fig. 3H–N).

**Fig. 3: HCQ increased the sensitivity of KL lung tumors, and not KP lung tumors, to MEK inhibitor Trametinib.**

Combination of HCQ and Trametinib synergistically inhibited KL PDX tumor growth, but not KP PDX tumor growth

Patient-derived tumor xenograft models (PDXs) have increasingly become the preferred tool in research to translate findings for optimal treatment of the human diseases. We therefore examined the effect of combination therapy in treating PDX tumors for KL and KP NSCLC. NSG mice bearing established KL (JAX-J000095635) PDX or KP (JAX-TM00233) PDX were treated with the single agents or the combination, and tumor growth was monitored (Fig. 4A). Compared with the single agents, the combination treatment synergistically inhibited KL PDX tumor growth (Fig. 4B–D). Histology analysis found that the combination treatment increased p62 accumulation, decreased pERK and pS6, and inhibited cell proliferation (Ki67) (Fig. 4E). Although Trametinib inhibited the growth of KP PDX tumors, the addition of HCQ did not show further anti-tumor effects (Fig. 4F–I). In conclusion, through different mouse models, we demonstrated that the use of HCQ to inhibit autophagy specifically causes KL tumors, but not KP tumors, to be sensitive to the MEK inhibitor Trametinib.

**Fig. 4: HCQ increased the sensitivity of KL PDX tumors, not KP PDX tumors, to MEK inhibitor Trametinib.**

Combination of HCQ and Trametinib impaired KL lung tumor energy homeostasis

To understand the mechanism of the combination treatment in inducing KL tumor regression, we dissociated the KL lung tumors into single-cell suspension one week after treatment with the single agents or the combination and examined the mitochondrial function (Fig. 5A). We found that mitochondrial membrane potential was significantly higher in the KL lung tumor cells from mice treated with Trametinib than vehicle control mice, which was significantly reduced when combined with HCQ treatment (Fig. 5B). Compared with Trametinib alone, the combination of HCQ and Trametinib also resulted in a significant decrease in basal respiration and ATP production in KL lung tumor cells (Fig. 5C, D). Hence, as observed in the in vitro experiments (Fig. 1F–K, M), the combination therapy may impair mitochondrial function to prevent the growth of KL lung tumors in vivo.

**Fig. 5: Combination of HCQ and Trametinib impaired KL lung tumor energy production.**

LKB1 loss upregulates tumor glycolysis [47]. In addition, glucose is one of the major carbon sources for KL lung tumor TCA cycle intermediates [48]. To determine the impact of the combination treatment on KL lung tumor glycolysis and TCA cycle metabolism, we performed in vivo [U¹³C6]-glucose tracing and metabolic flux analysis in mice bearing KL lung tumors after two weeks of drug treatment (Fig. 5E). Total glucose enrichment was comparable in KL lung tumors of mice treated with vehicle control, HCQ, Trametinib or the combination. We observed that HCQ significantly inhibited the glucose flux to glycolytic intermediates glucose-6-phosphate, pyruvate and lactate; but had no effect on TCA cycle metabolites; the combination of HCQ and Trametinib significantly suppressed the glucose flux to glycolytic intermediates and TCA cycle intermediates (Fig. 5F). In addition, the levels of glucose and pyruvate in KL lung tumors from combination treatment were significantly lower than the tumors of mice treated with Trametinib (Fig. 5G). Moreover, compared with the vehicle control or the single agents, the ATP level of KL lung tumors in mice treated with the combination was significantly reduced (Fig. 5H). Taken together, our observations indicate that one of the mechanisms by which the combination therapy inhibits the growth of KL tumors might be the impairment of glucose-mediated metabolism, resulting in energy crisis.

Combination of HCQ and Trametinib induced Ferroptosis in KL tumors

Ferroptosis is characterized by ROS production from accumulated lipid and iron peroxidation [49]. Autophagy promotes ferroptosis by regulating cellular iron homeostasis [50, 51]. However, many existing studies suggest that autophagy promotes drug resistance, while ferroptosis reverses drug resistance in cancer treatment [52, 53]. A recent study reported that Atg7 deletion in Cre-inducible Atg7 knockout mice decreases NRF2 levels and enhances ferroptosis in liver [54]. Increased oxidative stress is usually associated with mitochondrial injury with a marked decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential [55]. Indeed, we observed that combination of HCQ and Trametinib led to reduced mitochondrial membrane potential compared to control or Trametinib treatment alone in KL TDCLs (Fig. 1K, M). We therefore hypothesized that combination of HCQ and Trametinib may cause ferroptosis in KL tumors.

As ferroptosis is associated with lipid peroxidation [56], we first examined the lipid peroxidation in KL and KP TDCLs in the absence or presence of the ferroptosis inhibitor Ferrostatin-1 by C-11 BODIPY staining. We found that HCQ combined with Trametinib significantly increased lipid peroxidation of KL TDCLs compared with vehicle control or Trametinib alone, which was significantly inhibited by the ferroptosis inhibitor Ferrostatin-1 (Fig. 6A). In KP TDCLs, although lipid peroxidation was observed when cells were treated with Trametinib or the combination, Ferrostatin-1 treatment had no effect on lipid peroxidation (Fig. 6A). We further found that Ferrostatin-1 successfully prevented cell death and restored the reduced cell proliferation caused by the combination therapy in KL TDCLs (Fig. 6B & C).

**Fig. 6: Combination of HCQ and Trametinib induced ferroptotic cell death to inhibit KL tumor growth.**

Consistent with the in vitro data, KL lung tumors and KL PDX tumors from the mice treated with the combination therapy showed increased expression of ferroptosis marker 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) compared with vehicle control and the single agents (Fig. 6D, E); this difference was not observed in KP lung tumors and PDX tumors (Fig. 6D, E). These prompted us to test the hypothesis that combination of HCQ and Trametinib may cause ferroptosis, thereby suppressing the growth of KL tumors. We therefore induced subcutaneous allograft KL tumors by injecting KL TDCLs in syngeneic C57BL/6 mice. Once the tumor size reached to 200 mm³, we treated the mice with the single agents or the combination in the absence or presence of the ferroptosis inhibitor Liproxstatin-1. The combination of HCQ and Trametinib significantly inhibited KL allograft tumor growth compared with the control or the single agents; while the ferroptosis inhibitor Liproxstatin-1 significantly rescued the KL allograft tumor growth in mice treated with the combination compared with vehicle control (Fig. 6F–H). There was no difference in the body weight between treatment groups (Fig. 6I), indicating lack of drug toxicities. Moreover, decreased cell proliferation was observed in the tumors of mice with combination treatment, which was abolished by the Liproxstatin-1 treatment (Fig. 6J). Taken together, we demonstrated that one of mechanisms for reducing KL tumor growth through the combination of HCQ and Trametinib might be by inducing ferroptotic cell death.

Discussion

Autophagy promotes cancer by enhancing metabolic fitness and limiting immune and non-immune tumor suppression mechanisms to provide protection from cancer therapy [28]. This provides strong evidence that targeting the autophagy pathway with small-molecule inhibitors would be a novel therapeutic strategy. A recent preclinical mouse study and clinical trial suggest that targeting autophagy with chloroquine (CQ) increases the sensitivity of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) to MEK inhibition [29, 57]. The combination of CQ and Trametinib-induced cytotoxicity in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma [58]. Co-mutations of LKB1 or TP53 with KRAS define different subsets of NSCLC which exhibit different responses to standard cancer treatments [6, 9, 59]. Previously we found that the dependence of cell-autonomous autophagy on tumorigenesis is distinct between KL and KP lung tumors [5]. In this study, we further revealed that targeting autophagy by inhibiting lysosome function with HCQ can sensitize KL NSCLC, but not KP NSCLC, to MEK inhibitor Trametinib, suggesting that LKB1 mutations could be explored as a predictive biomarker for precision lung cancer therapy using autophagy inhibitors.

Inhibition of the MAPK pathway using Trametinib induces autophagy [60]. Trametinib has also been shown to upregulate the expression of autophagy promoter ULK1 in human breast cancer tissues [61]. In the present study, our work suggests that autophagy acts as a resistance mechanism for KL lung tumor cells to survive MEK inhibition. Using different mouse tumor models, including allograft mouse models, GEMMs, and PDX mouse models, we provide a therapeutic strategy by combining MEK and autophagy inhibition for the treatment of LKB1-mutant KRAS-driven NSCLC. Recently, Lys05, a potent lysosomal inhibitor as well as ULK1 inhibitors ULK-101 and Vps34 inhibitors have shown promising results when used in combination with chemotherapy and immunotherapy [62,63,64]. In the future, it would be interesting to understand whether targeting autophagy using other autophagy inhibitors could also cause KL lung tumors to be sensitive to MEK inhibition. This can provide increased options for the treatment of KL NSCLC.

Cancer cells alter cellular metabolism to fulfill the needs of enhanced proliferation and growth [65]. Both host autophagy and tumor cell-autonomous autophagy sustain nutrients for cancer cells to survive metabolic stress [28, 29, 36, 39, 41]. Targeting autophagy by HCQ makes KL lung tumors sensitive to the MEK inhibitor Trametinib, prompting us to further elucidate the potential underlying mechanism of tumor regression caused by the combination therapy. By examining the mitochondrial membrane potential, mitochondrial oxygen consumption rate as well as in vivo [¹³C6]-glucose metabolic channel to glycolytic and TCA cycle intermediates, we found that the combination of HCQ and Trametinib impaired glucose-mediated metabolism and caused mitochondrial dysfunction, thereby resulting in the energy crisis.

Several cell death pathways have been discovered during cancer treatment. Ferroptosis is a type of controlled cell death marked by the iron-dependent aggregation of lethal amounts of lipid hydroperoxides [49]. Tumorigenesis induction of the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway inhibits ferroptosis through SREBP-mediated lipid synthesis; and suppression of this pathway improves the chemotherapeutic impact of ferroptosis induction [52]. Ferroptosis is, indeed, associated with severe damage in mitochondrial morphology, bioenergetics, and metabolism [66]. Increased oxidative stress is associated with mitochondrial damage and decreased mitochondrial membrane potential [66], which was observed in KL cancer cells with combination treatment. This prompted us to test the hypothesis that dysfunctional mitochondria in KL cancer cells caused by the combination treatment may trigger ferroptosis. Indeed, we observed an increased lipid peroxidation and cell death in KL TDCLs in the combination treatment, which was rescued by ferrostatin-1, a ferroptosis inhibitor. In addition, Liproxstatin-1, a ferroptosis inhibitor for in vivo study, restored KL tumor growth that was suppressed by the combination therapy. As such, our observations suggest that the combination of HCQ and Trametinib induces ferroptotic cell death, resulting in a decrease in KL allograft tumor growth. The interrelationship between autophagy and ferroptosis has recently attracted more attention. In particular, numerous studies reported that autophagy promotes drug resistance, while ferroptosis is generally considered to reverse drug resistance in cancer. Moreover, ferroptosis can be induced by autophagy upon the elimination of ferritin in the cancerous cells [50]. Like cellular metabolites including lipids, amino acids and carbohydrates can induce ferroptosis, treatment with inhibitors of MEK signaling together with autophagy inhibition causes a devastating type of oxidative stress: ferroptosis-inducing lipid peroxidation [65, 67, 68]. Our current study found that autophagy inhibition alone did not induce ferroptosis in KL tumor cells; rather, inhibition of autophagy sensitized KL tumors to MEK inhibitor by inducing ferroptotic cell death. Therefore, in the future, it will be interesting to understand how KL cancer cells “decide” to respond to Trametinib by preferentially undergoing ferroptosis or autophagy and determine how ‘ferroptotic’ and ‘autophagic’ processes work alone or synergistically to improve the prognosis of patients with cancer. In addition, it would be of great value to assess if the combination of HCQ and Trametinib can further sensitize KL lung tumors to ferroptosis inducer, which may provide a potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of this subtype of NSCLC. Although combination therapy induces ferroptosis, other mechanisms might be involved in the reduction of KL tumor growth, which requires further investigation.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture

KL (2126 3-2, 2126 5-5) and KP (2871-7 and 2871-8) TDCLs were generated from mouse KL or KP lung tumors as reported previously [5, 30]. TDCLs were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine plasma (FBS), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, and 0.075% sodium bicarbonate at 37 °C with 5% CO₂.

Cell lines were routinely confirmed to be free of mycoplasma using the MycoAlert Mycoplasma Detection Kit (Lonza).

Mice

Rutgers Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) has approved all animal experiments performed in this study. Kras^LSL-^G12D/+;Lkb1^flox/flox and Kras^LSL_G12D/+;p53^flox/flox mice were generated in our previous study [5, 30]. Mice (equal numbers of males and females) were intranasally infected with Lentiviral-Cre (UI Viral Vector Core) at 5 × 10⁶ pfu per mouse at 6–8 weeks of age to induce KL and KP lung tumors. C57BL/6 mice were ordered from Rutgers CINJ Animal Breeding Core Facility. 6–8 weeks NCr nude mice (CrTac:NCr-Foxn1^nu) were ordered from Taconic. NSG mice (Strain #: 005557) at 6–8 weeks were ordered from the Jackson Laboratory. JAX-J000095635 (co-mutations of KRAS and LKB1: KL_PDX) and JAX-TM00233 (co-mutations of KRAS and TP53: KP_PDX) mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory and PDX tumors were implanted into the left and right back flank of male NSG mice.

For allograft tumor induction, KL (2126 3-2) TDCLs and KP (2871-8) TDCLs were subcutaneously injected into the right and left flank of male NCr nude mice or male C57BL/6 mice at 2 × 10⁶ cells/injection at 6–8 week of age.

For the drug treatment of mice bearing allograft tumors or PDX tumors, when a tumor size reached 200 mm³, mice were randomly divided into four groups and treated with vehicle control, HCQ (50 mg/kg, intraperitoneal route (I.P.), daily), Trametinib (1 mg/kg, oral gavage, 5 days/week), or the combination. Liproxstatin (MedChemExpress, Cat#: HY-12726) was administered to a group of mice at 10 mg/kg, I.P., daily. n = 5 for each treatment group. Tumor volume was measured using a caliper three times a week. Treatment was continued until a humane endpoint was reached to sacrifice the mice and tumors were collected for histological analysis.

For the treatment of mice bearing KL or KP lung tumors, at 12 weeks post tumor induction, mice were randomly divided into four groups and treated with vehicle control, HCQ (50 mg/kg, I.P., daily), Trametinib (1 mg/kg, oral gavage, 5 days/week), or the combination for four weeks; subsequently, mice were sacrificed for histology analysis. n ≥ 5 for each treatment group.

For intravenous infusion experiments, a jugular vein catheterization surgery was performed in mice bearing KL lung tumors. n ≥ 3 for each treatment group. After 5 days of recovery post-catheterization, [U¹³C6]-glucose tracer was infused at 0.1 μl/g/min rate for 2.5 h (2:30–5 pm) during the fasting stage. At the end of the infusion, blood was collected to analyze circulating plasma metabolites. Mice were euthanized via cervical dislocation, tumors were collected and immediately clamped between metal plates at liquid nitrogen temperature.

For the drug treatment, tumor-bearing mice were randomly divided into each treatment group and treated blindly.

Reagents

[U¹³C6]-glucose was purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (Cat#: CLM-1396). Hydroxychloroquine sulfate was purchased from ACROS Organics. Ferrostatin-1 (Cat#: SML0583-5MG) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich. BisBenzimide H33342 trihydrochloride (Hoechst) (Cat#: 14533) was purchased from Sigma Aldrich. MitoTracker Red CMXRos (Cat#: M7512) and MitoTracker Green FM (Cat#: M7514) were purchased from Invitrogen. TMRM Assay Kit (Mitochondrial Membrane Potential) (Cat#: ab228569) was purchased from Abcam.

Tumor burden quantification

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained lung specimens were imaged at Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey Biomedical Informatics shared resource using an Olympus VS120 whole slide scanner (Olympus Corporation of the Americas, Center Valley, PA) at 20x magnification. The image analysis protocol was custom developed on the Visiopharm image analysis platform (Visiopharm A/S, Hoersholm, Denmark) to identify tissue area and compute tumor burden based on semi-automatically detected tumors. Tumor masks and whole-tissue masks were computed from low-resolution image maps, which were extracted from whole slide images. Tumor and whole-tissue masks were created for each slide. The segmentation masks were used for the generation of ratios of tumor burden.

Histology and IHC

For IHC, paraffin-embedded sections were stained with antibodies against p62 (Enzo Life Sciences, PW9860-0100), Ki67 (Abcam, ab-15580), pS6 (Cell Signaling, 4858S), p42/44 MAPK (p-ERK) (Cell Signaling, 4376), and 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) (Abcam, ab46545) as described previously [30].

For quantification of IHC for Ki67, pS6, p-ERK and 4-HNE, 6–10 representative images from each treatment group were obtained and scored using the ImageJ software.

Mitochondrial membrane potential

KL and KP TDCLs were seeded at 1 × 10⁴ cells in 96-well plates overnight. The next day, cells were preincubated in RPMI supplemented with vehicle, HCQ, Trametinib or the combination treatment for 6 h. Media was aspirated and fresh media containing MitoTracker Red CMXRos (400 nM) to stain mitochondrial membrane potential and Mitotracker green (600 nM) to stain mitochondrial mass together with Hoechst 33342 (1:1000) for nuclear staining were added to the cells, incubated for 15 min and images were taken using the Nikon A1R-Si confocal microscope system.

For measuring KL and KP TDCLs mitochondrial membrane potential using TMRM (ab228569), after 6 h treatment as described above, cells were incubated with 1X Live Cell Imaging Buffer provided in the kit (ab228569) containing 200 nm TMRM to stain TMRM that localizes in the mitochondria for 30 min. The Hoechst 33342 for nuclear staining was added (1:1000) and incubated for 10 min, and images were taken using the Nikon A1R-Si confocal microscope system.

For measuring mitochondrial membrane potential in KL lung tumors, after one-week treatment with the single agents or the combination, mice were sacrificed and single-cell suspension of KL lung tumors was immediately prepared using a tissue dissociation kit (Miltenyi Biotech, 130-096-730). Subsequently, cells were resuspended in fresh media containing MitoTracker Red CMXRos (400 nM) and green (600 nM) together with Hoechst 33342, plated at a density of 2 × 10⁵ cells/well in 96-well plates, centrifuged for 1 min at 200 g, and incubated for 15 min. Images were taken using the Nikon A1R-Si confocal microscope system.

Fluorescence images were analyzed using the NIS Elements AR 3.2 software to calculate the mean fluorescence intensity. n ≥ 30 fields/group. Data represent the mean ± s.e.m combined from three independent experiments.

Cell proliferation assay

Cells were seeded at 2 × 10⁴ cells per well in 12-well plates in nutrient-rich RPMI conditions. The next day, media was aspirated and cells were treated with fresh media containing vehicle, HCQ, Trametinib or their combination in the presence or absence of ferroptosis inhibitor Ferrostatin-1; subsequently, cells were trypsinized off the culture dishes and then counted in triplicates for four days using a Vi-Cell Counter.

Cell viability assay

MTS (3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium) assay was performed to measure the cellular viability of KL and KP TDCLs upon treatment with HCQ, Trametinib or the combination. Briefly, cells were seeded at 7.5 × 10³ cells per well in 96-well plates in nutrient rich-RPMI conditions. The next day, fresh media containing vehicle, HCQ, Trametinib, or the combination at various concentrations (as listed in Table 1) were added to the wells and incubated for 72 h. MTS reagent was added as per the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega) and absorbance was measured at 490 nm. Each experimental condition was performed in quadruplicate and all experiments were conducted three times. The combination index (CI) was calculated using the Calcusyn software.

Clonogenic survival assay

Clonogenic survival assay were performed as described previously [30, 42] and stained with 1X Giemsa (Sigma-Aldrich). Briefly, cells were seeded at 2 × 10⁴ cells per well in 12-well plates in nutrient-rich RPMI conditions. The next day, media was aspirated and cells were treated with fresh media containing vehicle, HCQ, Trametinib or their combination in the presence or absence of ferroptosis inhibitor Ferrostatin-1 for 72 h. Media was aspirated and ice-cold ethanol was added to the wells for 5 min to fix the cells. The cells were then stained with 1X Giemsa for 30 min.

Assessment of oxygen consumption rate (OCR)

OCR of TDCLs was measured using an Agilent Seahorse XFe24 Analyzer as described previously [42, 45]. Briefly, cells were seeded at 3 × 10⁴ cells in the XF24 plates overnight prior to XF assay. Cells were preincubated in RPMI supplemented with the vehicle, HCQ, Trametinib, or the combination treatment for 6 h, and OCR was measured subsequently.

The OCR of KL lung tumors was measured by preparing single-cell suspension of the fresh lung tumors, using a tissue dissociation kit (Miltenyi Biotech, 130-096-730), from the mice treated with single agents or the combination treatment for 1-week, and attachment of cells on Seahorse plates using Cell-Tek (corning, 354240). Briefly, cells were seeded at 2 × 10⁵ cells in the XF24 plates previously coated with Cell-Tek. The cell plate was centrifuged at 200 g for 1 min, incubated for 45 min and OCR was measured subsequently.

Metabolomic analyses by LC-MS

40:40:20 (v:v) methanol:acetonitrile:water with 0.1 M formic acid solution followed by neutralization with 15% (m:v) ammonium bicarbonate were used to extract metabolites from cells and KL lung tumors for LC-MS analysis, as previously described [45, 48].

To extract metabolites from cells, KL TDCLs were cultured in 6-cm dishes in triplicate, treated with RPMI supplemented with the vehicle, HCQ, Trametinib, or their combination for 6 h and then quickly washed twice with warm PBS; subsequently, cells were incubated with 0.7 mL of 40:40:20 methanol:acetonitrile:water with 0.5% formic acid solution on ice for 5 min followed by neutralization with 50 μL of 15% ammonium bicarbonate. The cells were then scrapped from the plates using a cell lifter, transferred to 1.5 mL freshly labeled tubes on ice and centrifuged at 4 °C for 10 min at 13,000 rpm. The supernatants were transferred to LC–MS autosampler vials (on ice) and sent for LC-MS analysis.

To extract metabolites from lung tumors, the mice bearing KL lung tumors were euthanized and lung tumors were quickly dissected and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen with a pre-cooled Wollenberger clamp. Subsequently, frozen tissue samples were first weighed (~20–30 mg each sample) and ground using a Cryomill (Retsch, Newtown, PA) in liquid nitrogen at 25 Hz for 2 min. The resulting powder was then mixed with −20 °C 40:40:20 methanol:acetonitrile:water with 0.1 M formic acid, followed by 10 s of vortexing, 10 min incubation on ice, neutralization with 50 μL/mL of 15% ammonium bicarbonate, and 10 min centrifugation at 4 °C and 16,000 g. The supernatants were transferred to LC–MS autosampler vials (on ice) and sent for LC-MS analysis.

To extract metabolites from plasma, blood from the mice bearing KL lung tumors was collected using submandibular bleeding in Heparin coated tubes. The blood was centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 8 min, and plasma supernatant was aliquoted in Eppendorf tubes and stored at −80 °C. On the day of the experiment, 5 μL plasma extract was kept on ice and mixed with −20 °C 40:40:20 methanol:acetonitrile:water, followed by 10 s of vortexing, 10 min incubation on ice, and 10 min centrifugation at 4 °C and 16,000 g. The supernatants were transferred to LC–MS autosampler vials (on ice) and sent for LC-MS analysis.

LC − MS analysis of the metabolites was performed on the Q Exactive PLUS hybrid quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) coupled to hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC). The LC separation was performed on Vanquish Horizon UHPLC system with an XBridge BEH Amide column (150 mm × 2.1 mm, 2.5 μM particle size, Waters, Milford, MA) with the corresponding XP VanGuard Cartridge. The liquid chromatography used a gradient of solvent A (95%:5% H2O:acetonitrile with 20 mM ammonium acetate, 20 mM ammonium hydroxide, pH 9.4), and solvent B (20%:80% H2O:acetonitrile with 20 mM ammonium acetate, 20 mM ammonium hydroxide, pH 9.4). The gradient was 0 min, 100% B; 3 min, 100% B; 3.2 min, 90% B; 6.2 min, 90% B; 6.5 min, 80% B; 10.5 min, 80% B; 10.7 min, 70% B; 13.5 min, 70% B; 13.7 min, 45% B; 16 min, 45% B; 16.5 min, 100% B. The flow rate was 300 μl/min. Injection volume was 5 μL and column temperature 25 °C. The MS scans were in negative ion mode with a resolution of 70,000 at m/z 200. The automatic gain control (AGC) target was 3 × 10⁶ and the scan range was 75−1000. Metabolite features were extracted in MAVEN [69] and the isotope natural abundance was corrected using AccuCor [70].

Western blotting

KL and KP TDCLs were treated with nutrient rich RPMI media containing vehicle, HCQ, trametinib or their combination for 8 h. Media were aspirated and the cells were rinsed with PBS twice. Cell lysates were collected using the Tris lysis buffer. Protein concentration was assessed using the Bio-Rad BCA reagent. The following antibodies were used for Western blots: LC3 (Novus Biologicals, NB600-1384), total ERK (Cell Signaling, 4695), phosphorylated ERK (Cell Signaling, 9101), total S6 (Cell Signaling, 2217), phosphorylated S6 (Cell Signaling, 4858), and β-actin (Sigma, A1978). LC3 quantification was performed using Image Lab software.

Illustration tool

The schematic images are created with BioRender.com.

Statistics

All in vitro cell culture experiments were repeated three times. Statistical analyses were carried out with GraphPad Prism version 9.0 or Microsoft Excel. One-way or two-way ANOVA was used with Tukey’s post-hoc test for comparisons of 3 or more groups. Student’s t test was used for 2 group comparisons to determine nominal significance. Data were expressed as the mean ± s.e.m. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Asterisks displayed in the figure denote statistical significance. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

Data availability

All datasets generated and analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files. Additional data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:7–33.
Article Google Scholar
Duma N, Santana-Davila R, Molina JR. Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94:1623–40.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ferrer I, Zugazagoitia J, Herbertz S, John W, Paz-Ares L, Schmid-Bindert G. KRAS-Mutant non-small cell lung cancer: from biology to therapy. Lung Cancer. 2018;124:53–64.
Article Google Scholar
Arbour KC, Riely GJ. Systemic therapy for locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a review. JAMA. 2019;322:764–74.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bhatt V, Khayati K, Hu ZS, Lee A, Kamran W, Su X, et al. Autophagy modulates lipid metabolism to maintain metabolic flexibility for Lkb1-deficient Kras-driven lung tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 2019;33:150–65.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Skoulidis F, Byers LA, Diao L, Papadimitrakopoulou VA, Tong P, Izzo J, et al. Co-occurring genomic alterations define major subsets of KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with distinct biology, immune profiles, and therapeutic vulnerabilities. Cancer Discov. 2015;5:860–77.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bodor JN, Boumber Y, Borghaei H. Biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cancer. 2020;126:260–70.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ding L, Getz G, Wheeler DA, Mardis ER, McLellan MD, Cibulskis K, et al. Somatic mutations affect key pathways in lung adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2008;455:1069–75.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Facchinetti F, Bluthgen MV, Tergemina-Clain G, Faivre L, Pignon JP, Planchard D, et al. LKB1/STK11 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer patients: descriptive analysis and prognostic value. Lung Cancer. 2017;112:62–8.
Article Google Scholar
DuPage M, Dooley AL, Jacks T. Conditional mouse lung cancer models using adenoviral or lentiviral delivery of Cre recombinase. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:1064–72.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ji H, Ramsey MR, Hayes DN, Fan C, McNamara K, Kozlowski P, et al. LKB1 modulates lung cancer differentiation and metastasis. Nature. 2007;448:807–10.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Chen Z, Cheng K, Walton Z, Wang Y, Ebi H, Shimamura T, et al. A murine lung cancer co-clinical trial identifies genetic modifiers of therapeutic response. Nature. 2012;483:613–7.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Herter-Sprie GS, Koyama S, Korideck H, Hai J, Deng J, Li YY, et al. Synergy of radiotherapy and PD-1 blockade in Kras-mutant lung cancer. JCI Insight. 2016;1:e87415.
Article Google Scholar
Herter-Sprie GS, Korideck H, Christensen CL, Herter JM, Rhee K, Berbeco RI, et al. Image-guided radiotherapy platform using single nodule conditional lung cancer mouse models. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5870.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Skoulidis F, Li BT, Dy GK, Price TJ, Falchook GS, Wolf J, et al. Sotorasib for lung cancers with KRAS p.G12C mutation. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:2371–81.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hallin J, Engstrom LD, Hargis L, Calinisan A, Aranda R, Briere DM, et al. The KRAS(G12C) inhibitor MRTX849 provides insight toward therapeutic susceptibility of KRAS-mutant cancers in mouse models and patients. Cancer Discov. 2020;10:54–71.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Uras IZ, Moll HP, Casanova E. Targeting KRAS mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: past, present and future. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:4325.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Barbosa R, Acevedo LA, Marmorstein R. The MEK/ERK network as a therapeutic target in human cancer. Mol Cancer Res. 2021;19:361–74.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Han J, Liu Y, Yang S, Wu X, Li H, Wang Q. MEK inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14:1.
Article Google Scholar
Kim C, Giaccone G. MEK inhibitors under development for treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2018;27:17–30.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Emens LA, Middleton G. The interplay of immunotherapy and chemotherapy: harnessing potential synergies. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3:436–43.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hong A, Piva M, Liu S, Hugo W, Lomeli SH, Zoete V, et al. Durable suppression of acquired MEK inhibitor resistance in cancer by sequestering MEK from ERK and promoting antitumor T-cell immunity. Cancer Discov. 2021;11:714–35.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Cheng Y, Tian H. Current development status of MEK inhibitors. Molecules. 2017;22:1551.
Article Google Scholar
Odogwu L, Mathieu L, Blumenthal G, Larkins E, Goldberg KB, Griffin N, et al. FDA approval summary: dabrafenib and trametinib for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancers harboring BRAF V600E mutations. Oncologist. 2018;23:740–5.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Simeone E, Grimaldi AM, Festino L, Vanella V, Palla M, Ascierto PA. Combination treatment of patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma: a new standard of care. BioDrugs. 2017;31:51–61.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Benito-Jardon L, Diaz-Martinez M, Arellano-Sanchez N, Vaquero-Morales P, Esparis-Ogando A, Teixido J. Resistance to MAPK inhibitors in melanoma involves activation of the IGF1R-MEK5-Erk5 pathway. Cancer Res. 2019;79:2244–56.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Cong J, Yang L, Ye J, Wei LQ, Li X, Wang JW. [Management of toxicities associated with pegaspargase in treatment of patients with lymphoid malignancy: experience from 443 cases in a single center]. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2018;39:654–60.
CAS Google Scholar
White E, Lattime EC, Guo JY. Autophagy regulates stress responses, metabolism, and anticancer immunity. Trends Cancer. 2021;7:778–89.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yamamoto K, Venida A, Yano J, Biancur DE, Kakiuchi M, Gupta S, et al. Autophagy promotes immune evasion of pancreatic cancer by degrading MHC-I. Nature. 2020;581:100–5.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Guo JY, Karsli-Uzunbas G, Mathew R, Aisner SC, Kamphorst JJ, Strohecker AM, et al. Autophagy suppresses progression of K-ras-induced lung tumors to oncocytomas and maintains lipid homeostasis. Genes Dev. 2013;27:1447–61.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Rosenfeldt MT, O’Prey J, Morton JP, Nixon C, MacKay G, Mrowinska A, et al. p53 status determines the role of autophagy in pancreatic tumour development. Nature. 2013;504:296–300.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Strohecker AM, Guo JY, Karsli-Uzunbas G, Price SM, Chen GJ, Mathew R, et al. Autophagy sustains mitochondrial glutamine metabolism and growth of BrafV600E-driven lung tumors. Cancer Discov. 2013;3:1272–85.
Article CAS Google Scholar
**e X, Koh JY, Price S, White E, Mehnert JM. Atg7 overcomes senescence and promotes growth of BrafV600E-driven melanoma. Cancer Discov. 2015;5:410–23.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Santanam U, Banach-Petrosky W, Abate-Shen C, Shen MM, White E, DiPaola RS. Atg7 cooperates with Pten loss to drive prostate cancer tumor growth. Genes Dev. 2016;30:399–407.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Wei H, Wei S, Gan B, Peng X, Zou W, Guan JL. Suppression of autophagy by FIP200 deletion inhibits mammary tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 2011;25:1510–27.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yang A, Herter-Sprie G, Zhang H, Lin EY, Biancur D, Wang X, et al. Autophagy sustains pancreatic cancer growth through both cell-autonomous and nonautonomous mechanisms. Cancer Discov. 2018;8:276–87.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Khayati K, Bhatt V, Lan T, Alogaili F, Wang W, Lopez E, et al. Transient systemic autophagy inhibition is selectively and irreversibly deleterious to lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2022;82:4429–43.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Cararo-Lopes E, Dias MH, da Silva MS, Zeidler JD, Vessoni AT, Reis MS, et al. Autophagy buffers Ras-induced genotoxic stress enabling malignant transformation in keratinocytes primed by human papillomavirus. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:194.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Poillet-Perez L, **e X, Zhan L, Yang Y, Sharp DW, Hu ZS, et al. Autophagy maintains tumour growth through circulating arginine. Nature. 2018;563:569–73.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Sousa CM, Biancur DE, Wang X, Halbrook CJ, Sherman MH, Zhang L, et al. Pancreatic stellate cells support tumour metabolism through autophagic alanine secretion. Nature. 2016;536:479–83.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Poillet-Perez L, Sharp DW, Yang Y, Laddha SV, Ibrahim M, Bommareddy PK, et al. Autophagy promotes growth of tumors with high mutational burden by inhibiting a T-cell immune response. Nat Cancer. 2020;1:923–34.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Guo JY, Chen HY, Mathew R, Fan J, Strohecker AM, Karsli-Uzunbas G, et al. Activated Ras requires autophagy to maintain oxidative metabolism and tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 2011;25:460–70.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Lock R, Roy S, Kenific CM, Su JS, Salas E, Ronen SM, et al. Autophagy facilitates glycolysis during Ras-mediated oncogenic transformation. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22:165–78.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yang S, Wang X, Contino G, Liesa M, Sahin E, Ying H, et al. Pancreatic cancers require autophagy for tumor growth. Genes Dev. 2011;25:717–29.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Guo JY, Teng X, Laddha SV, Ma S, Van Nostrand SC, Yang Y, et al. Autophagy provides metabolic substrates to maintain energy charge and nucleotide pools in Ras-driven lung cancer cells. Genes Dev. 2016;30:1704–17.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zorova LD, Popkov VA, Plotnikov EY, Silachev DN, Pevzner IB, Jankauskas SS, et al. Mitochondrial membrane potential. Anal Biochem. 2018;552:50–9.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Shackelford DB, Shaw RJ. The LKB1-AMPK pathway: metabolism and growth control in tumour suppression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:563–75.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hui S, Ghergurovich JM, Morscher RJ, Jang C, Teng X, Lu W, et al. Glucose feeds the TCA cycle via circulating lactate. Nature. 2017;551:115–8.
Article Google Scholar
Stockwell BR, Friedmann Angeli JP, Bayir H, Bush AI, Conrad M, Dixon SJ, et al. Ferroptosis: a regulated cell death nexus linking metabolism, redox biology, and disease. Cell. 2017;171:273–85.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hou W, **e Y, Song X, Sun X, Lotze MT, Zeh HJ 3rd, et al. Autophagy promotes ferroptosis by degradation of ferritin. Autophagy. 2016;12:1425–8.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gao M, Monian P, Pan Q, Zhang W, **ang J, Jiang X. Ferroptosis is an autophagic cell death process. Cell Res. 2016;26:1021–32.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Yi J, Zhu J, Wu J, Thompson CB, Jiang X. Oncogenic activation of PI3K-AKT-mTOR signaling suppresses ferroptosis via SREBP-mediated lipogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2020;117:31189–97.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Zhou Y, Shen Y, Chen C, Sui X, Yang J, Wang L, et al. The crosstalk between autophagy and ferroptosis: what can we learn to target drug resistance in cancer? Cancer Biol Med. 2019;16:630–46.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Liu P, Anandhan A, Chen J, Shakya A, Dodson M, Ooi A, et al. Decreased autophagosome biogenesis, reduced NRF2, and enhanced ferroptotic cell death are underlying molecular mechanisms of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Redox Biol. 2022;59:102570.
Article Google Scholar
Guo C, Sun L, Chen X, Zhang D. Oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage and neurodegenerative diseases. Neural Regen Res. 2013;8:2003–14.
CAS Google Scholar
Conrad M, Kagan VE, Bayir H, Pagnussat GC, Head B, Traber MG, et al. Regulation of lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis in diverse species. Genes Dev. 2018;32:602–19.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Bryant KL, Stalnecker CA, Zeitouni D, Klomp JE, Peng S, Tikunov AP, et al. Combination of ERK and autophagy inhibition as a treatment approach for pancreatic cancer. Nat Med. 2019;25:628–40.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Truong A, Yoo JH, Scherzer MT, Sanchez JMS, Dale KJ, Kinsey CG, et al. Chloroquine Sensitizes GNAQ/11-mutated Melanoma to MEK1/2 Inhibition. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:6374–86.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Skoulidis F, Goldberg ME, Greenawalt DM, Hellmann MD, Awad MM, Gainor JF, et al. STK11/LKB1 mutations and PD-1 inhibitor resistance in KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2018;8:822–35.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Kinsey CG, Camolotto SA, Boespflug AM, Gullien KP, Foth M, Truong A, et al. Protective autophagy elicited by RAF–>MEK–>ERK inhibition suggests a treatment strategy for RAS-driven cancers. Nat Med. 2019;25:620–7.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Deng X, Guan W, Qing X, Yang W, Que Y, Tan L, et al. Ultrafast low-temperature photothermal therapy activates autophagy and recovers immunity for efficient antitumor treatment. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:4265–75.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Noman MZ, Parpal S, Van Moer K, **ao M, Yu Y, Viklund J, et al. Inhibition of Vps34 reprograms cold into hot inflamed tumors and improves anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaax7881.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Grunwald DS, Otto NM, Park JM, Song D, Kim DH. GABARAPs and LC3s have opposite roles in regulating ULK1 for autophagy induction. Autophagy. 2020;16:600–14.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Ondrej M, Cechakova L, Fabrik I, Klimentova J, Tichy A. Lys05—a promising autophagy inhibitor in the radiosensitization battle: phosphoproteomic perspective. Cancer Genomics Proteom. 2020;17:369–82.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Pavlova NN, Thompson CB. The emerging hallmarks of cancer metabolism. Cell Metab. 2016;23:27–47.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Battaglia AM, Chirillo R, Aversa I, Sacco A, Costanzo F, Biamonte F. Ferroptosis and cancer: mitochondria meet the “Iron Maiden” cell death. Cells. 2020;9:1505.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gao M, Yi J, Zhu J, Minikes AM, Monian P, Thompson CB, et al. Role of mitochondria in ferroptosis. Mol cell. 2019;73:354–63.e353.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Gao M, Monian P, Quadri N, Ramasamy R, Jiang X. Glutaminolysis and transferrin regulate ferroptosis. Mol cell. 2015;59:298–308.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Melamud E, Vastag L, Rabinowitz JD. Metabolomic analysis and visualization engine for LC-MS data. Anal Chem. 2010;82:9818–26.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Su X, Lu W, Rabinowitz JD. Metabolite spectral accuracy on orbitraps. Anal Chem. 2017;89:5940–8.
Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant #R01 CA237347-01A1, NIH grant #K22 CA190521, American Cancer Society (ACS) grant #134036-RSG-19-165-01-TBG, GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer grant, Lung Cancer Research Foundation grant, Ludwig Princeton Branch of the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and New Jersey Health Foundation to J.Y.G.; NIH grant# R01CA163591 and Ludwig Princeton Branch of the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research to E.W.; NIH grant# R01CA239093 to S.R.P.; NIH grant# P30 CA072720 to Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey (Metabolomics Shared Resource, Biomedical Informatics shared resource, and Biospecimen Repository Service Shared Resource, at Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey); NJCCR DFHS18PPC021 to K.K.; NJCCR DCHS19PPC013, Mistletoe Research Fellowship and Cox Scholarship for Cancer Research to V.B. We thank Kyle Nunn for proofreading the manuscript.

Financial supports

K22CA190521, R01CA237347-01A1, ACS 134036-RSG-19-165-01-TBG, GO2 Foundation for Lung Cancer, Ludwig Princeton Branch of the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and New Jersey Health Foundation to J.Y.G. NJCCR DCHS19PPC013, a scholarship from the Cox Foundation for Cancer Research and Mistletoe Research Fellowship to V.B, NJCCR DFHS18PPC021 to K.K. R01CA163591 and Ludwig Princeton Branch of the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research to E.W. R01CA239093 to S.R.P. NIH P30 CA072720 to Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA
Vrushank Bhatt, Tai** Lan, Wen** Wang, Jerry Kong, Eduardo Cararo Lopes, Jianming Wang, Khoosheh Khayati, Akash Raju, Michael Rangel, Enrique Lopez, Zhixian Sherrie Hu, Xuefei Luo, **aoyang Su, Jyoti Malhotra, Wenwei Hu, Sharon R. Pine, Eileen White & Jessie Yanxiang Guo
Department of Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA
**aoyang Su, Jyoti Malhotra, Sharon R. Pine & Jessie Yanxiang Guo
Department of Pharmacology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08903, USA
Wenwei Hu & Sharon R. Pine
Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
Eileen White
Ludwig Princeton Branch, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA
Eileen White
Department of Chemical Biology, Rutgers Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
Jessie Yanxiang Guo

Authors

Vrushank Bhatt
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tai** Lan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Wen** Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jerry Kong
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Eduardo Cararo Lopes
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jianming Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Khoosheh Khayati
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Akash Raju
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Michael Rangel
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Enrique Lopez
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Zhixian Sherrie Hu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xuefei Luo
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
**aoyang Su
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jyoti Malhotra
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Wenwei Hu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Sharon R. Pine
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Eileen White
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jessie Yanxiang Guo
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JYG was the lead principal investigator who conceived and supervised the project. JYG and VB designed the experiments, performed the data analysis, and interpreted the data. VB, TL, WW, JK, ECL, JW, and KK performed most experiments. JK and MR performed IHC quantification. AR, EL, and XL maintained mouse colonies and mouse genoty**. ZH performed mouse surgery. SRP helped with PDX tumor implantation. XS, JM, WH, and EW were involved in the project discussion. JYG and VB wrote the manuscript and it was reviewed by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessie Yanxiang Guo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

EW is a stockholder in Forma Therapeutics and a founder of Vescor Therapeutics. Other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Edited by Patrizia Agostinis

Supplementary information

Supplemental Figure 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhatt, V., Lan, T., Wang, W. et al. Inhibition of autophagy and MEK promotes ferroptosis in Lkb1-deficient Kras-driven lung tumors. Cell Death Dis 14, 61 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-05592-8

Download citation

Received: 02 November 2022
Revised: 10 January 2023
Accepted: 13 January 2023
Published: 26 January 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-05592-8
Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Autophagy mediates an amplification loop during ferroptosis
- Seunghee Lee
- Narae Hwang
- Su Wol Chung
Cell Death & Disease (2023)
New ruthenium-xanthoxylin complex eliminates colorectal cancer stem cells by targeting the heat shock protein 90 chaperone
- Luciano de S. Santos
- Valdenizia R. Silva
- Daniel P. Bezerra
Cell Death & Disease (2023)
Three-dimensional growth sensitizes breast cancer cells to treatment with ferroptosis-promoting drugs
- Sandhya Chipurupalli
- Peijia Jiang
- Kirill V. Rosen
Cell Death & Disease (2023)

Inhibition of autophagy and MEK promotes ferroptosis in Lkb1-deficient Kras-driven lung tumors

Abstract

Similar content being viewed by others

Blocking autophagy improves the anti-tumor activity of afatinib in lung adenocarcinoma with activating EGFR mutations in vitro and in vivo

Autophagy regulates vinorelbine sensitivity due to continued Keap1-mediated ROS generation in lung adenocarcinoma cells

LKB1 deficiency enhances sensitivity to energetic stress induced by erlotinib treatment in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells

Introduction

Combination of HCQ and Trametinib impaired KL TDCL mitochondrial metabolism

Combination of HCQ and Trametinib synergistically inhibited KL allograft tumor growth, but not KP allograft tumor growth

Combination of HCQ and Trametinib synergistically inhibited established KL lung tumor growth, but not KP lung tumor growth

Combination of HCQ and Trametinib synergistically inhibited KL PDX tumor growth, but not KP PDX tumor growth

Combination of HCQ and Trametinib impaired KL lung tumor energy homeostasis

Combination of HCQ and Trametinib induced Ferroptosis in KL tumors

Discussion

Materials and Methods

Cell culture

Mice

Reagents

Tumor burden quantification

Histology and IHC

Mitochondrial membrane potential

Cell proliferation assay

Cell viability assay

Clonogenic survival assay

Assessment of oxygen consumption rate (OCR)

Metabolomic analyses by LC-MS

Western blotting

Illustration tool

Statistics

Data availability

References

Acknowledgements

Financial supports

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Contributions

Corresponding author

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Additional information

Supplementary information

Supplemental Figure 1

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Share this article

This article is cited by

Autophagy mediates an amplification loop during ferroptosis

New ruthenium-xanthoxylin complex eliminates colorectal cancer stem cells by targeting the heat shock protein 90 chaperone

Three-dimensional growth sensitizes breast cancer cells to treatment with ferroptosis-promoting drugs

Search

Navigation