References
Kantoff, P.W. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 411–422 (2010).
Hodi, F.S. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 711–723 (2010).
Goldman, B. & DeFrancesco, L. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 129–139 (2009).
Hoos, A. et al. J. Immunother. 30, 1–15 (2007).
Janetzki, S. et al. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 57, 303–315 (2008).
Britten, C.M. et al. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 58, 1701–1713 (2009).
Hoos, A. et al. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 102, 1388–1397 (2010).
Wolchok, J.D. et al. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 7412–7420 (2009).
Janetzki, S. et al. Immunity 31, 527–528 (2009).
Guidance for industry: Clinical considerations for therapeutic cancer vaccines. (US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, September 2009). http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/default.htm
European Medicines Agency. Concept paper on the need to revise the guidelines on the evaluation of anticancer medicinal products in man. 22 July 2010. EMA/CHMP/EWP/433478/2010. http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=search.jsp&q=22+July+2010.+EMA%2Fchmp%2Fewp%2F433478%2F2010&murl=menus%2Fregulations%2Fregulations.jsp&mid=
Finke, L.H. et al. Vaccine 25, B97–B109 (2007).
Hoos, A. et al. Semin. Oncol. 37, 533–546 (2010).
Marshall, M., Ribas, A. & Huang, B. Evaluation of baseline serum C-reactive protein and benefit from tremelimumab compared to chemotherapy in first-line melanoma. Abstract no. 2609, presented at the 2010 annual meeting of the American Society Clinical Oncology, Chicago, IL, June 4–8, 2010.
Robert, C. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 2517–2526 (2011).
Taylor, C.F. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 889–896 (2008).
Finn, O.J. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 2704–2715 (2008).
Schreiber, R., Old, L.J. & Smyth, M.J. Science 331, 1565–1570 (2011).
Zitvogel, L., Kepp, O. & Kroemer, G. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 8, 151–160 (2011).
Acknowledgements
We thank all participants of the workshops and community-wide initiatives conducted by CIC and CIMT for the contribution of knowledge to this evolving methodological framework.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
A.H. is an employee of Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), a pharmaceutical company and holds stock in BMS. C.M.B. has 50% employment at Ribological (Mainz, Germany), which is a company develo** vaccines to treat cancer. C.H. is cofounder and supervisory board member of Ganymed Pharmaceuticals and BioNtech (Mainz, Germany), both biotech companies.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hoos, A., Britten, C., Huber, C. et al. A methodological framework to enhance the clinical success of cancer immunotherapy. Nat Biotechnol 29, 867–870 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2000
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2000
- Springer Nature America, Inc.
This article is cited by
-
Development of immuno-oncology drugs — from CTLA4 to PD1 to the next generations
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (2016)
-
A quantitative analysis of therapeutic cancer vaccines in phase 2 or phase 3 trial
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer (2015)
-
Big opportunities for small molecules in immuno-oncology
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery (2015)
-
p16INK4a als Ziel therapeutischer Impfung
HNO (2015)
-
Therapeutic vaccines for cancer: an overview of clinical trials
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology (2014)