Log in

Influence of C6 and CNS1 Brain Tumors on Methotrexate Pharmacokinetics in Plasma and Brain Tissue

  • Published:
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: Comparison of the influence of two different brain tumors (C6 and CNS1 glioma) on methotrexate (MTX) disposition in plasma, brain, and tumor tissue extracellular fluid (ECF).

Methods: Serial collection of plasma samples and brain ECF dialysates after i.v. bolus administration of MTX (50 mg kg-1) for 4 h. Quantitation of MTX concentrations by HPLC-UV.

Results: Histological studies revealed a 3-fold higher number of blood vessels in CNS1 than in C6 tumor tissue. In vivo recoveries (reverse dialysis) were significantly different in tumor tissue (C6: 8.0 ± 3.8%; CNS1: 4.9 ± 2.5%), and in the contralateral hemisphere (C6: 6.0 ± 4.0%; CNS1: 3.9 ± 2.5%) between the two tumors. Area under the concentration–time curve (AUC) in plasma was 30% higher in CNS1 than in C6 due to a lower systemic clearance. Maximum MTX levels in brain tumor ECF were significantly higher in CNS1 than in C6, and decreased faster in CNS1 than in C6 tumor-bearing rats. Penetration in tumor ECF (AUCECF/AUCPlasma ratio) was similar in CNS1 and C6. MTX concentrations in contralateral hemisphere were significantly lower than in tumor tissue and dependent on tumor model.

Conclusion: C6 and CNS1 brain tumors have a distinct yet highly variable impact on MTX penetration in brain and brain tumor ECF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Brazil)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shapiro WR, Voorhies RM, Hiesiger EM, Sher PB, Basler GA, Lipschutz LE: Pharmacokinetics of tumor cell exposure to [14C]methotrexate after intracarotid administration without and with hyperosmotic opening of the blood-brain and blood-tumor barriers in rat brain tumors: a quantitative autoradiographic study. Cancer Res 3: 694–701, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  2. Neuwelt EA, Rapoport SI: Modification of the blood–brain barrier in the chemotherapy of malignant brain tumors. Fed Proc 2: 214–219, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dukic S, Heurtaux T, Kaltenbach ML, Hoizey G, Lallemand A, Gourdier B, Vistelle R: Pharmacokinetics of methotrexate in the extracellular fluid of brain C6-glioma after intravenous infusion in rats. Pharm Res 8: 1219–1225, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jain RK: Transport of molecules across tumor vasculature. Cancer Metastasis Rev 4: 559–593, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  5. Groothuis DR, Fischer JM, Lapin G, Bigner DD, Vick NA: Permeability of different experimental brain tumor models to horseradish peroxidase. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2: 164–185, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  6. Devineni D, Klein-Szanto A, Gallo JM: In vivo microdialysis to characterize drug transport in brain tumors: analysis of methotrexate uptake in rat glioma-2 (RG-2)-bearing rats. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 6: 499–507, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Lange EC, de Vries JD, Zurcher C, Danhof M, de Boer AG, Breimer DD: The use of intracerebral microdialysis for the determination of pharmacokinetic profiles of anticancer drugs in tumor-bearing rat brain. Pharm Res 12: 1924–1931, 1995

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Neuwelt EA, Barnett PA, Frenkel EP: Chemotherapeutic agent permeability to normal brain and delivery to avian sarcoma virus-induced brain tumors in the rodent: observations on problems of drug delivery. Neurosurgery 14: 154–160, 1984

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Benda P, Lightbody J, Sato G, Levine L, Sweet W: Differentiated rat glial cell strain in tissue culture. Science 161: 370–371, 1968

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kruse CA, Molleston MC, Parks EP, Schiltz PM, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Hickey WK: A rat glioma model, CNS-1, with invasive characteristics similar to those of human gliomas: a comparison to 9L gliosarcoma. J Neuro-Oncol 3: 191–200, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  11. Urien S: MicroPharm-K, a microcomputer interactive program for the analysis and simulation of pharmacokinetic processes. Pharm Res 12: 1225, 1995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gibaldi M, Perrier D: Pharmacokinetics. In: Swarbrick J (ed) Drugs and Pharmaceutical Sciences. Marcel Decker, New York, pp 45–111, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  13. Motulsky H: Analyzing Data with GraphPad Prism. In: GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  14. Morreale VM, Herman BH, Der-Minassian V, Palkovits M, Klubes P, Perry D, Csiffary A, Lee AP:Abrain–tumor model utilizing stereotactic implantation of a permanent cannula. J Neurosurg 6: 959–965, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kobayashi N, Allen N, Clendenon NR, Ko LW: An improved rat brain–tumor model. J Neurosurg 6: 808–815, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nugent LJ, Jain RK: Plasma pharmacokinetics and interstitial diffusion of macromolecules in a capillary bed. Am J Physiol 246: H129–H137, 1984

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hammarlund-Udenaes M, Paalzow LK, de Lange EC: Drug equilibration across the blood–brain barrier – pharmacokinetic considerations based on the microdialysis method. Pharm Res 2: 128–134, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bacic M, Edwards NA, Merrill MJ: Differential expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (Vascular Permeability Factor) forms in rat tissues. Growth Factors 12: 11–15, 1995

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dukic, S.F., Kaltenbach, M.L., Heurtaux, T. et al. Influence of C6 and CNS1 Brain Tumors on Methotrexate Pharmacokinetics in Plasma and Brain Tissue. J Neurooncol 67, 131–138 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NEON.0000021820.12444.4c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NEON.0000021820.12444.4c

Navigation