Abstract
There has been renewed empirical work recently on testing the neoclassical model of economic growth using data on various groups of countries. But none of the cross-country regressions includes China, the largest develo** economy in the world. This study utilises both cross-sectional and panel data on provinces of China over the reform period 1978–1995 to examine the extent to which the growth process in this country can be explained by the augmented Solow-Swan model. We found that in spite of restrictive assumptions used, the model provides a fairly good description of cross-sectional data. The levels and growth rates of GDP per capita are shown to be higher in regional economies with lower population growth, greater openness to foreign countries and more investment in physical and human capital. In addition, regional economies are shown to converge both conditionally and unconditionally over the reform period. However, the quantitative implications of the augmented Solow-Swan model are not borne out in panel data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barro, R. J. and Sala-I-Martin, Xavier (1995), Econonic Growth, McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Chen, Jian and Fleisher, B. M. (1996). ‘Regional income inequality and economic growth in China’, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 44. pp. 141–164.
De Long, Bradford, J. (1988), ‘Productivity growth. convergence, and welfare: Comment’, American Economic Review, LXXVII, pp. 1138–54.
Hart P. E. (1994), ‘Goltonian regression across countries and the convergence of productivity’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 57, 3, pp. 287–293.
Jian, T., Sachs, J. F. and Warner, A. M. (1996), ‘Trends in regional inequality in China’, NBER Working Paper Series, 5412.
Knight, M., Loayza N. and Villanueva (1993), ‘Testing the neoclassical theory of economic growth: a panel data approach’, IMF Staff Paper, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 512–539.
Mankiew, N. G., Romer, D. and Weil, D. N. (1992). ‘A contribution to the empirics of economic growth’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 107, pp. 407–37.
Mundlak, Yair (1978). ‘On the pooling of time series and cross Section Data’, Econometrica, Vol. 46, pp. 69–85.
Quah, Danny (1993). ‘Galton's Fallacy and tests of the convergence hypothesis’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 95, 4, pp. 427–443.
Romer, Paul (1987), ‘Crazy explanations for the productivity slowdown’, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, pp. 163–210.
Scrinivasan, T. N. (1992), ‘Long run growth theories and emprics: anything new?’, in Takutoshi Ito and Ane O. Krueger (ed.) Growth Theories in Light of the East Asia Experience. The University of Chicago Press, pp. 37–70.
Solow, R. M. (1956), ‘A contribution to the theory of economic growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, XXXIV, pp. 1–26.
Swan, T. W (1956), ‘Economic growth and capital accumulation’, Economic Record, Vol. 32, pp. 334–61.
Wei, Shang-** (1992), ‘The Open Door Policy and China's rapid growth: evidence from city-level data’, in Takutoshi Ito and Ane O. Krueger (ed.) Growth Theories in Light of the East Asia Experience, The University of Chicago Press, pp. 73–104.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, H., Liu, Z. & Rebelo, I. Testing the Neoclassical Theory of Economic Growth: Evidence from Chinese Provinces. Economics of Planning 31, 117–132 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003571107706
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003571107706