Log in

Testing the Neoclassical Theory of Economic Growth: Evidence from Chinese Provinces

  • Published:
Economics of Planning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been renewed empirical work recently on testing the neoclassical model of economic growth using data on various groups of countries. But none of the cross-country regressions includes China, the largest develo** economy in the world. This study utilises both cross-sectional and panel data on provinces of China over the reform period 1978–1995 to examine the extent to which the growth process in this country can be explained by the augmented Solow-Swan model. We found that in spite of restrictive assumptions used, the model provides a fairly good description of cross-sectional data. The levels and growth rates of GDP per capita are shown to be higher in regional economies with lower population growth, greater openness to foreign countries and more investment in physical and human capital. In addition, regional economies are shown to converge both conditionally and unconditionally over the reform period. However, the quantitative implications of the augmented Solow-Swan model are not borne out in panel data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barro, R. J. and Sala-I-Martin, Xavier (1995), Econonic Growth, McGraw-Hill, Inc.

  • Chen, Jian and Fleisher, B. M. (1996). ‘Regional income inequality and economic growth in China’, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 44. pp. 141–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Long, Bradford, J. (1988), ‘Productivity growth. convergence, and welfare: Comment’, American Economic Review, LXXVII, pp. 1138–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart P. E. (1994), ‘Goltonian regression across countries and the convergence of productivity’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 57, 3, pp. 287–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jian, T., Sachs, J. F. and Warner, A. M. (1996), ‘Trends in regional inequality in China’, NBER Working Paper Series, 5412.

  • Knight, M., Loayza N. and Villanueva (1993), ‘Testing the neoclassical theory of economic growth: a panel data approach’, IMF Staff Paper, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 512–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiew, N. G., Romer, D. and Weil, D. N. (1992). ‘A contribution to the empirics of economic growth’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 107, pp. 407–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak, Yair (1978). ‘On the pooling of time series and cross Section Data’, Econometrica, Vol. 46, pp. 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quah, Danny (1993). ‘Galton's Fallacy and tests of the convergence hypothesis’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 95, 4, pp. 427–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, Paul (1987), ‘Crazy explanations for the productivity slowdown’, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, pp. 163–210.

  • Scrinivasan, T. N. (1992), ‘Long run growth theories and emprics: anything new?’, in Takutoshi Ito and Ane O. Krueger (ed.) Growth Theories in Light of the East Asia Experience. The University of Chicago Press, pp. 37–70.

  • Solow, R. M. (1956), ‘A contribution to the theory of economic growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, XXXIV, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, T. W (1956), ‘Economic growth and capital accumulation’, Economic Record, Vol. 32, pp. 334–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Shang-** (1992), ‘The Open Door Policy and China's rapid growth: evidence from city-level data’, in Takutoshi Ito and Ane O. Krueger (ed.) Growth Theories in Light of the East Asia Experience, The University of Chicago Press, pp. 73–104.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, H., Liu, Z. & Rebelo, I. Testing the Neoclassical Theory of Economic Growth: Evidence from Chinese Provinces. Economics of Planning 31, 117–132 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003571107706

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003571107706

Navigation