Log in

Elucidation of meiotic nuclear restitution mechanisms in potato through analysis of microtubular cytoskeleton

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Organization and rearrangements of microtubular cytoskeleton (MTs) during microsporogenesis are determined in ‘historical’ potato genotypes producing 2n pollen following different meiotic nuclear restitution mechanisms (‘parallel spindles’, ‘fused spindles’, ‘premature cytokinesis’). The scope of the investigation is to assess the abnormalities in MT cytoskeleton and their relationships to 2n pollen formation. The genotypes of Solanum used for MT immunofluorescence in this study are diploid interspecific hybrids (2n=2x=24) coming from Wisconsin (USA)and Wageningen (NL) Universities. Based on MT analysis, a reinterpretation of the restitution mechanisms following spindle abnormalities was performed in this study. The fusion of the nuclei at prophase II occurs through the perinuclear MTs in the genotype with ‘fused spindles’. In genotypes with misoriented spindles, the ‘non-spindle’ cytoskeletal arrays,occurring at telophase II, are clue in determining the meiotic products such as dyads and triads. A particular MT array could be crucially involved in meiotic nuclear restitutions both at telophase I and II: the interzonal MTs. It is discussed which is the relationship between this array and the spindle orientation at meta-anaphase II. It is hypothesized that the fusion of non-sister nuclei at each pole depends on the lack of secondary interzonal MTs and on the short distance between nuclei. In the genotype with premature cytokinesis, effectively, a premature phragmoplast occurs at the end of meiosis I. Furthermore, two genotypes are desynaptic with a high degree of male fertility restored by the nuclear restitutions. However, no clear relationship was found between univalents and restitution mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amon, A., 1999. The spindle checkpoint. Curr Opin Genet Dev 9: 69–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt, A.M., C. Canales & H.G. Dickinson, 2001. Plant meiosis: the means to 1N. Trends Plant Sci 6: 114–121.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bogre, L., O. Calderini, I. Merskiene & P. Binarova, 2000. Regulation of cell division and the cytoskeleton by mitogen-activated protein kinases in higher plants. In: H. Hirt (Ed.), MAP Kinases in Plant Signal Transduction, pp. 95–117. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.C. & B.E. Lemmon, 1988. Microtubules associated with simultaneous cytokinesis of coenocytic microsporocytes. Am J Bot 75: 1848–1856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.C. & B.E. Lemmon, 1991. The cytokinetic apparatus in meiosis: control of division plane in the absence of a preprophase band of microtubules. In: C.W. Lloyd (Ed.), The Cytoskeletal Basis of Plant Growth and Form, pp. 259–273. Academic Press Limited, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R.C. & B.E. Lemmon, 1996. Nuclear cytoplasmic domains, microtubules and organelles in microsporocytes of the slipper orchid Cypripedium californicum A. Gray dividing by simultaneous cytokinesis. Sex Plant Reprod 9: 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawe, R.K., 1998. Meiotic chromosome organization and segregation in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 49: 371–395.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Field, C., R. Li & K. Oegema, 1999. Cytokinesis in eukaryotes: a mechanistic comparison. Curr Opin Cell Biol 11: 68–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Genualdo, G., A. Errico, A. Tiezzi, & C. Conicella, 1998. α-tubulin and F-actin distribution during microsporogenesis in a 2n pollen producer of Solanum. Genome 41: 636–641.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison, J., 1971. Wall pattern formation in angiosperm microsporogenesis. Symp Soc Exp Biol 25: 277–300.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, C.J., 1987. Microtubule patterns during meiosis in two higher plant species. Protoplasma 138: 126–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongedijk, E. & M.S. Ramanna, 1989. Synaptic mutants in potato, Solanum tuberosum L. II. Concurrent reduction of chiasma frequencies in male and female meiosis of ds-1 (desynapsis) mutants. Genome 32: 1054–1062.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, D.W.S. & S.J. Peloquin, 1975a. Three mechanisms of 2n pollen formation in diploid potatoes. Can J Genet Cytol 17: 217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, D.W.S. & S.J. Peloquin, 1975b. The inheritance of three mechanisms of diplandroid (2n pollen) formation in diploid potatoes. Heredity 35: 295–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otegui, M. & L.A. Staehelin, 2000. Cytokinesis in flowering plants: more than one way to divide a cell. Curr Opin Pl Biol 3: 493–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, A.A., D.W.S. Mok & S.J. Peloquin, 1974. Distribution and significance of diplandroids among the diploid Solanums. Am Potato J 51: 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanna, M.S., 1974. The origin of unreduced microspores due to aberrant cytokinesis in the meiocytes of potato and its genetic significance. Euphytica 23: 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanna, M.S., 1979. A re-examination of the mechanisms of 2n gamete formation in potato and its implications for breeding. Euphytica 28: 537–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanna, M.S., 1983. First division restitution gametes through fertile desynaptic mutants of potato. Euphytica 32: 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieder, C.L., A. Khodjakov, L.V. Paliulis, T.M. Fortier, R.W. Cole & G. Sluder, 1997. Mitosis in vertebrate somatic cells with two spindles: implications for the metaphase/anaphase transition checkpoint and cleavage. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94: 5107–5112.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Savoian, M.S., W.C. Earnshaw, A. Khodjakov & C.L. Rieder, 1999. Cleavage furrows formed between centrosomes lacking an intervening spindle and chromosomes contain microtubule bundles, INCEP, and CHO1 but not CENP-E. Mol Biol Cell 10: 297–311.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmit, A.C., M.C. Endle & A.M. Lambert, 1996. The perinuclear microtubule-organizing center and the synaptonemal complex of higher plants share a common antigen: its putative transfer and role in meiotic chromosomal ordering. Chromosoma 104: 405–413.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tavoletti, S., P. Pesaresi, G. Barcaccia, E. Albertini & F. Veronesi, 2000. Map** the jp (jumbo pollen) gene and QTLs involved in multinucleate microspore formation in diploid alfalfa. Theor Appl Genet 101: 372–378.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veilleux, R.E., N.A. McHale & F.I. Lauer, 1982. 2n gametes in diploid Solanum: frequency and types of spindle abnormalities. Can J Genet Cytol 24: 301–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wada, B. & F. Kusunoki, 1964. Spindle membrane in meiosis of pollen mother cells of Tradescantia and mitosis in endosperm cells of Zephyranthes. Cytologia (Tokyo) 29: 109–117.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conicella, C., Capo, A., Cammareri, M. et al. Elucidation of meiotic nuclear restitution mechanisms in potato through analysis of microtubular cytoskeleton. Euphytica 133, 107–115 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025636321757

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025636321757

Navigation