Log in

Ergonomic Automated Anesthesia Recordkeeper using a Mobile Touch Screen with Voice Navigation

  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective. To develop an ergonomically designed computerized recordkee** tool for anesthesiologists that allows the clinician to maintain visual contact with the patient while performing recordkee**. Methods.To simplify the human interface software, we developed two general use software components. All purpose menu type 1 (APM1) was used for entering events using a tree structured menu. APM1 was designed to adapt to the limits of human memory, by using Miller's rule of 7 to guide the input process. APM1 can be considered to be a three-dimensional table list consisting of 7 vertical and 7 horizontal choices, which has further 5 tree-structured divergences. APM1 is also completely configurable by the user. All purpose menu 2 (APM2) was used to implement the system-initiated human interface where the system will prompt the user by voice for each entry. When users touch a key on APM1 and APM2, the system was designed to respond with a voice prompt. A touch-screen was also utilized and designed to fit the anesthesia machine. The screen is equipped with a small speaker for voice response and a microphone for voice recognition. The positions of the screen are adjustable supported by a long flexible limb (85 cm). Results. After improving the design, systems were assembled for 10 operating rooms. Of the multiple features of the VOCAAR user interface, the following were well accepted by users and employed daily: touch-screen input, and voice response. The noncompulsory use rate was 87% during the initial 2 weeks, increased to 94% after 2 weeks and 100% after two months. The mean sound emission by voice response (n = 10, mean ± SD) was 8.2 ± 2.3 dB at the main anesthetist site (35 cm from the speaker mounted on the touch-screen), 2.2 ± 1.3 dB at the staff site (1.5 m from the touch-screen), which was only audible for anesthesiologist but for surgeon. Discussion. An EARK system was designed to allow the user to maintain visual contact with the patient while performing recordkee** tasks. The combination of a mobile touch screen and voice response/recognition facilitated the design goals of the system. Although the system has enjoyed universal clinical acceptance, the voice functions remain too limited to satisfy the needs of a completely handsfree user interface. Enhancements to voice recognition technology will offer the potential for improved functionality. Additional research is also needed to better define the relationship between vigilance and visual contact with the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Smith BE. Electronic anesthesia record systems (EARS) current status – 1998. 18th International Symposium on Computing in Anesthesia and Intensive Care 1998; 136–138

  2. Coleman RL, Stanley T, Gilbert WC, Sanderson IC, Moyer GA, Silbert KS RJG. The implementation and acceptance of intra-operative anesthesia information management system. J ClinMonit 1997; 13: 121–128

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lubarsky DA, Sanderson IC, Gilbert WC, King KP, Ginsberg B, Dear GL, Coleman RL, Pafford TD, Reves JG. Using an anesthesia information management system as cost containment tool. Description and validation. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 1161–1169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Heinrichs W. Automated anesthesia record systems, observations on future trends of development. Int J Clin Monit Comput 1995; 12: 17–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ream A. The automated anesthesia record: Software design philosophy. In: Gravenstein J, Newbower R, Ream A et al, eds. The automated anesthesia record and alarm systems. Boston: Butterworth, 1987: 17–32

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sanjo Y, Ikeda K. Automated anesthesia record keeper can make the trustful database automatically (Abstract). Int J ClinMonit Comput 1996; 13: 198

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sanjo Y, Ikeda K, Nakajima R. Ergonomic design of VOCAAR (Voice Oriented Command Automated Anesthesia Recorder) and its ¢rst clinical installation (Abstract). Int J ClinMonit Comput 1994; 11: 198

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sanjo Y, Ikeda K. Aspect of human ergonomics for anesthesia information systems:TheVOCAARR project (Abstract). In: Ikeda K, Doi M, Kazama T, eds. Proceed-ings of 18th International Symposium of Computing in Anesthesia. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1998: 261–270

    Google Scholar 

  9. SanjoY, Ikeda K. The anesthesia workstation. In: Lichter JL, Miller RD, eds. Atlas of anesthesia 3. Philadelphia: CurrentMedicine, 1997: 1–1

  10. Block FE. Entry of drug administration data. In: Grave-nstein J, Newbower R, Ream A et al, eds. The automated anesthesia record and alarm systems. Boston: Butterworth, 1987: 93–98

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mitchell MM. Human factors in the man-machine inter-face. In: Gravenstein JS, Newbower R, Ream R et al, eds. The automated anesthesia record and alarm systems. Boston: Butterworth, 1987: 33–48

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sanjo Y et al. Off-line human interface to describe the information on AAR with voice guidance and touch screen input. In: Mori H, Kazama T, Ikeda K, eds. Proceedings of 1994 Japanese Society of Technology in Anesthesia and Intensive Care. Tokyo: Kokusedo, 1994: 58–64

  13. Eichhorn JH, Edsall DW. Computerization of anesthesia information management. J ClinMonit 1991; 7: 71–82

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lanza V. Automated record kee**-a nine year Italian experience. Int J ClinMonit Comput 1996; 13: 35–43

    Google Scholar 

  15. Block FE, Reynolds KM, McDonalds JS. The Arkive “Organizer” patient information management system: Experience at a university hospital. J Clin Monit 1998; 14: 89–94

    Google Scholar 

  16. Block FE, Reynolds KM, McDonald JS. An expert system to teach troubleshooting of common problems associated with the automated anesthesia recordkeeper. J Clin Monit 1995; 11: 207–211

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller GA. The magical number of seven, plus or minus two. some limits on our capacity for processing informa-tion. Psychol Rev 1956; 63: 81–97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchell MM. Automated anesthesia data management and recordkee**.Med Instrum 1982; 16: 279–282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith NT. Speech recognition for the automated anes-thesia record. In: Gravenstein J, Newbower R, Ream A et al, eds. The automated anesthesia record and alarm systems. Boston: Butterworth, 1987: 115–134

    Google Scholar 

  20. Smith NT, Brien RA, Pettus DC, Jones BR, Quinn ML, Sarnat A. Recognition accuracy with a voice-recognition system designed for anesthesia record kee**. J Clin Monit 1990; 6: 299–306

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanjo Y, Kazuyuki I, Satoshi I, Reiko N. Human inter-face to automated anesthesia record using speech recog-nition technology: 2nd report (Abstract in Japanese). Masui 1990; 40: s316

    Google Scholar 

  22. Winger M, Herdon O, Gaba D. The effect of electronic record kee** and trasesopageal echocardiography on task distribution, workload, and vigilance during cardiac anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 144–155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanjo, Y., Yokoyama, T., Sato, S. et al. Ergonomic Automated Anesthesia Recordkeeper using a Mobile Touch Screen with Voice Navigation. J Clin Monit Comput 15, 347–356 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009972223750

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009972223750

Navigation