Log in

Ideal free distribution in Daphnia? Are daphnids able to consider both the food patch quality and the position of competitors?

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The distribution of the planktonic crustacean Daphnia pulex was tested in a ring-formedflow-through chamber divided into eleven sections. Thedistribution of the animals under both homogeneousfood conditions and in a food gradient were studied.The distribution of repeated registrations of singleanimals was randomly distributed in a homogeneous,low food environment. Single daphnids exposed to afood gradient tended to reside during 88% of the timeat the highest or next highest food concentration,suggesting that daphnids can detect food gradients.When a group of approximately 100 co-occurring animalswere given low homogeneous food conditions, they alsotended to be randomly distributed. In one out of threecases, however, they were slightly less aggregatedthan expected from a random distribution. Exposed toa food gradient (0.5–0.0015 mg C l-1), thedistribution of the daphnids approximated the idealfree distribution. A very high maximum density in thefood gradient (2 mg C l-1) resulted in less strongaggregations than expected from the ideal freedistribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Thailand)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cuddington, K. M. & E. McCauley, 1994. Food-dependent aggregation and mobility of water fleas Ceriodaphnia dubiaand Daphnia pulex. Can. J. Zool. 72: 1217–1226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fretwell, S. D. & H. J. Lucas, 1970. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor. 19: 16–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, J. G. J. & M. H. A. Keenleyside, 1984. Foraging on patchily distributed prey by a cichlid fish (Teleostei, Cichlidae): a test of the ideal free distribution theory. Anim. Behav. 32: 120–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. G. C., 1982. Competitive foraging in mallards: ‘ideal free’ ducks. Anim. Behav. 30: 575–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen, P. J. & G. H. Johnsen, 1987. Behavioural response of the waterflea Daphnia pulexto a gradient in food concentration. Anim. Behav. 35: 48–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiven, O. T., P. Larsson & A. Hobæk, 1996. Direct distributional response in Daphnia pulexto a predator kairomone. J. Plankton Res. 18: 1341–1348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, P. & K. T. Kleiven, 1996. Food search in Daphnia. In Lenz, P. H., D. K. Hartline, J. E. Purcell & D. L. Macmillan (eds), Zooplankton: Sensory Ecology and Physiology, Gordon and Breach Publishers, Amsterdam: 375–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski, M., 1979. An evolutionary stable stable feeding strategy in sticklebacks. Z. Tierpsychol. 51: 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neary, J., K. Cash & E. McCauley, 1994. Behavioural aggregation of Daphnia pulexin response to food gradients. Funct. Ecol. 8: 377–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. C. & E. R. Macagno, 1990. UV photoreceptors in the common eye of Daphnia magna(Crustacea, Branchiopoda). A fourth spectral class in single ommatidia. J. Comp. Physiol. A 166: 597–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. & F. J. Rohlf, 1981. Biometry. (2 ed.), W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco: 859 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young., S., 1974. Directional differences in the colour sensitivity of Daphnia magna. J. exp. Biol. 61: 261–267.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larsson, P. Ideal free distribution in Daphnia? Are daphnids able to consider both the food patch quality and the position of competitors?. Hydrobiologia 360, 143–152 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003128315850

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003128315850

Navigation