Log in

Quasilikelihood and quasi-maximum likelihood for GARCH-type processes: Estimating function approach

  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Statistical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When modeling conditionally heteroscedastic processes, it is usually the case that exact likelihood is not known to researchers or it is too complicated for practical purposes. Consequently, a quasi-maximum likelihood (QML) is frequently employed rather than the exact maximum likelihood (cf. Gourieroux (1997, Ch. 4), Straumann (2005, Ch. 5)). When a GARCH process is partially specified only through the first and second order conditional moments, a systematic and unified approach for inference is via the so called quasilikelihood (QL, see Godambe (1985)). This article aims to discriminate between the QL and QML for general GARCH-type processes.Itisverified that the QL differs with the QML in terms of conditional skewness and kurtosis. Asymptotics for the QL and QML are obtained and then compared with each other. A class of skewed t-distributions (cf. Fernandez and Steel (1998)) is considered to illustrate the difference between the QL and QML.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, T. G., Davis, R. A., Kreiss, J.-P., & Mikosch, T. (2009). Handbook of financial time series. Berlin: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Baek, J. S., Park, J. A., & Hwang, S. Y. (2012). Preliminary test of fit in a general class of conditionally heteroscedastic nonlinear time series. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 82, 82–763.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, M. S., Park, J. A., & Hwang, S. Y. (2012). Asymmetric GARCH processes featuring both threshold effect and bilinear structure. Statistics & Probability Letters, 82, 82–419.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrmeir, L., & Kaufmann, H. (1985). Consistency and asymptotic normality of maximum likelihood estimator in generalized linear models. Annals of Statistics, 13, 13–342.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, C., & Steel, M. F. J. (1998). On Bayesian modeling of fat tails and skewness. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 93–359.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Francq, C., & Zakoian, J. M. (2009). In T. G. Andersen, R. A. Davis, J.-P. Kreiss, & T. Mikosch (Eds.), Handbook of financial time series, A tour in the asymptotic theory of GARCH estimation (pp. 85–111). Berlin: Springer.

  • Francq, C., & Zakoian, J. M. (2010). GARCH models: structure, statistical inference and financial applications. Wiley: Chichester.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Francq, C., & Zakoian, J. M. (2013). Optimal predictions of powers of conditionally heteroscedastic processes. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 75, 75–345.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Godambe, V. P. (1985). The foundation of finite sample estimation in stochastic processes. Biometrika, 72, 72–419.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gourieroux, C. (1997). ARCH models and financial applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heyde, C. C. (1997). Quasi-likelihood and its application. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, S. Y., & Basawa, I. V. (2011a). Asymptotic optimal inference for multivariate branching-Markov processes via martingale estimating functions and mixed normality. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 102, 102–1018.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, S. Y., & Basawa, I. V. (2011b). Godambe estimating functions and asymptotic optimal inference. Statistics & Probability Letters, 81, 81–1121.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, S. Y., & Kim, T. Y. (2004). Power transformation and threshold modeling for ARCH innovations with applications to tests for ARCH structure. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 110, 110–295.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, S. Y., Basawa, I. V., Choi, M. S., & Lee, S. D. (2013). Non-ergodic martingale estimating functions and related asymptotics. Statistics, 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02331888.2012.748772. online published.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, D. F., & Quinn, B. G. (1982). LNS: Vol. 11. Random coefficient autoregressive models: an introduction. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Straumann, D. (2005). LNS: Vol. 181. Estimation in conditionally heteroscedastic time series models. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straumann, D., & Mikosch, T. (2006). Quasi-maximum-likelihood estimationin conditionally heteroscedastic time series: astochastic recurrence equations approach. Annals of Statistics, 34, 34–2449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, R. S. (2010). Analysis of financial time series, (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, H. (1990). Nonlinear time series, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zivot, E. (2009). Practical issues in the analysis of univariate GARCH models. In T. G. Andersen, R. A. Davis, J.-P. Kreiss, & T. Mikosch (Eds.), Handbook of financial time series, (pp. 113–155). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Y. Hwang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hwang, S.Y., Choi, M.S. & Yeo, I.K. Quasilikelihood and quasi-maximum likelihood for GARCH-type processes: Estimating function approach. J. Korean Stat. Soc. 43, 631–641 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jkss.2014.01.005

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jkss.2014.01.005

Keywords

AMS 2000 subject classifications

Navigation