Log in

Golden ratio-based and tapered Diptera inspired wings: Their design and fabrication using standard MEMS technology

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work presents our understanding of insect wings, and the design and micromachining of artificial wings with golden ratio-based and tapered veins. The geometric anisotropy of Leading Edge Veins (LEVs) selected by Diptera has a function able to evade impact. As a Diptera example, the elliptic hollow LEVs of cranefly wings are mechanically and aerodynamically significant. In this paper, an artificial wing was designed to be a fractal structure by mimicking cranefly wings and incorporating cross-veins and discal cell. Standard technologies of Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS) were employed to materialize the design using the selected material. One SU-8 wing sample, light and stiff enough to be comparable to fresh cranefly wings, was presented. The as-prepared SU-8 wings are faithful to real wings not only in weight and vein pattern, but also in flexural stiffness and mass distribution. Thus our method renders possible mimicking with good fidelity of natural wings with complex geometry and morphology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bolsman C T, Pålsson B, Goosen H F L, Schmidt R H M, van Keulen F. The use of resonant structures for miniaturizing FMAVs. 3rd US-European Competition and Workshop on Micro Air Vehicle Systems (MAV07) & European Micro Air Vehicle Conference and Flight Competition (EMAV2007), Toulouse, France, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dickinson M H, Lehmann F-O, Sane S P. Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science, 1999, 284, 1954–1960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Young J, Walker S M, Bomphrey R J, Taylor G K, Thomas A L R. Details of insect wing design and deformation enhance aerodynamic function and flight efficiency. Science, 2009, 325, 1549–1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lehmann F-O. The mechanisms of lift enhancement in insect flight. Naturwissenschaften, 2004, 91, 101–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ennos A R. The importance of torsion in the design of insect wings. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1988, 140, 137–160.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wootton R J. Functional morphology of insect wings. Annual Review of Entomology, 1992, 37, 113–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Combes S A, Daniel T L. Flexural stiffness in insect wings I: Scaling and the influence of wing venation. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2003, 206, 2979–2987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vincent J F V, Wegst U G K. Design and mechanical properties of insect cuticle. Arthropod Structure & Development, 2004, 33, 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pornsin-sirirak T N, Tai Y C, Nassef H, Ho C M. Titanium- alloy MEMS wing technology for a micro aerial vehicle application. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2001, 89, 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shang J K, Combes S A, Finio B M, Wood R J. Artificial insect wings of diverse morphology for flap**-wing micro air vehicles. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2009, 4, 036002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tanaka H, Wood R J. Fabrication of corrugated artificial insect wings using laser micromachined molds. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2010, 20, 075008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tanaka H, Matsumoto K, Shimoyama I. Fabrication of a three-dimensional insect-wing model by micromolding of thermosetting resin with a thin elastmeric mold. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2007, 17, 2485–2490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ennos A R. A comparative study of the flight mechanism of Diptera. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1987, 127, 355–372.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brodsky A K. Vortex formation in the tethered flight of the peacock butterfly Inachis io L. (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) and some aspects of insect flight evolution. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1991, 161, 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sun M, Du G. Lift and power requirements of hovering insect flight. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2003, 19, 458–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chan W P, Prete F, Dickinson M H. Visual input to the efferent control system of a fly’s “gyroscope”. Science, 1998, 280, 289–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dargent T, Bao X Q, Grondel S, Le Brun G, Paquet J B, Soyer C, Cattan E. Micromachining of an SU-8 flap**- wing flying micro-electro-mechanical system. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2009, 19, 085028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dargent T, Grondel S, Paquet J B, Cattan E, Soyer C. Vibrating wing analysis with passive torsion for micro flying robot. IEEE/RSJ IROS 2008, 2008, 451–457.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bao X Q, Dargent T, Cattan E. Micromachining SU-8 pivot structuresusing AZ photoresist as direct sacrificial layers for a large wing displacement. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2010, 20, 025005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bao X Q, Dargent T, Grondel S, Paquet J B, Cattan E. Improved micromachining of all SU-8 3D structures for a biologically inspired flying robot. Microelectronic Engineering, 2011. (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schmid S, Hierold C. Dam** mechanisms of single- clamped and prestressed double-clamped resonant polymer microbeams. Journal of Applied Physics, 2008, 104, 093516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zimmer M, Diestelhorst O, Lunau K. Courtship in long-legged flies (Diptera: Dolichopodidae): Function and evolution of signals. Behavioral Ecology, 2003, 14, 526–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mandelbrot B B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, USA, 1982.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. West J B, Brown J H, Enquist B J. A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science, 1997, 276, 122–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sameoto D, Tsang S-H, Foulds I G, Lee S-W, Parameswaran M. Control of the out-of-plane curvature in SU-8 compliant microstructures by exposure dose and baking times. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 2007, 17, 1093–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gaudet M, Camart J C, Buchaillot L, Arscott S. Variation of absorption coefficient and determination of critical dose of SU-8 at 365 nm. Applied Physics Letters, 2006, 88, 024107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to X. Q. Bao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bao, X.Q., Cattan, E. Golden ratio-based and tapered Diptera inspired wings: Their design and fabrication using standard MEMS technology. J Bionic Eng 8, 174–180 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60023-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60023-1

Keyword

Navigation