Abstract
As marine resources continue to be exploited, the remarkable locomotion and coordination of fish provide an excellent source of inspiration for scientists and engineers to design and control the next -generation autonomous underwater vehicles within a bionic framework. Underwater biomimetic robots combine bionics and robot technology, and their biological characteristics offer a lot of convenience for the robot so that it can obtain better performance in adaptability and robustness. Recently, with the combination of bionics, mechanics, electronics, materials science, and automation, there has been great progress in develo** underwater bionic robots with different structure types and energy supply modes. This paper summarizes the research status of underwater robots, focuses on the research status of underwater bionic robots with different materials, types and motion modes, and introduces the propulsion mechanism of underwater robots with different structures and the control methods adopted in the propulsion process. Finally, the broad application prospect and market potential of underwater biomimetic robot are introduced.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
A bionic underwater robot, as the name suggests, is a new type of robot that imitates the propulsion mechanism and body structure of fish or other marine creatures living underwater using electromechanical components and intelligent materials (such as memory alloy materials, mixed materials, and rigid materials), which can adapt to different underwater environments and realize underwater propulsion (Chu et al. 2012). It has the characteristics of high efficiency, high mobility, and low noise (Chen et al. 2021a). For a long time, scholars have been committed to studying marine biological propulsion models and bionic underwater robots. Underwater vehicles can be classified into two groups based on their structural design: cabled underwater vehicles, commonly known as remotely operated vehicles (ROVs), and cableless underwater robots, traditionally known as autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) (Wynn et al. 2014). Moreover, they can be categorized by use into underwater investigation robots (observation, measurement, test material collection, etc.) and underwater operation robots (underwater welding, pipe twisting, underwater construction, underwater cutting, etc.) (Vu et al. 2018).
At present, most underwater robots are frame-based, similar to the rotating elongated body of a submarine. With the continuous development of bionic technology, the bionic fish shape and control modes of underwater robots will also evolve (** with high Froude number. Ocean Eng 268(1):113512" href="/article/10.1007/s44295-023-00010-3#ref-CR77" id="ref-link-section-d41130708e669">2023) and used a lightweight piezoelectric composite ceramic (PZT), a single crystal piezoelectric ceramic encased in glass/epoxy and carbon/epoxy resins, as the actuator material. The robot uses a crank, rack, and pinion structure (the size of the robot is increased by 400 mm due to the need for an additional device to achieve the movement). The robot has a maximum speed of 25.16 mm/s at an operating voltage of 300 vpp and an operating frequency of 0.9 Hz.
The miniature underwater mobile robot developed by Professor Toshio Fukuda of Nagoya University in Japan contains piezoelectric ceramics to drive the oscillation of two symmetrical legs to realize its movement. The two legs of the robot are equipped with a pair of symmetrical fins at a certain angle. The symmetrical structural design can offset the lateral force and strengthen the forward momentum. A 250-fold elastic hinge amplification mechanism is designed to amplify the PZT. The robot is 320 mm long and 190 mm wide, and the motion speed is 21.6–32.5 m/s. In 2009, the Marine Science Center of Northeastern University in the United States developed a robot fish with wave propulsion using PZT materials and chain rod structure (Zhou et al. 2008). Through lateral body fluctuations, the robotic eel drives itself through the water column and controls its floating depth. In 2008, DRAPER Lab launched VCUUV (Vorticity Control Unmanned Underwater Vehicle), a piezoelectric ceramic-driven robot fish designed after tuna (Suk and Hwan 2014). It is about 2.4 m long and weighs 300 lbs. Its maximum swing frequency is 1.5 Hz, with a maximum swimming speed of 1.25 m/s at 1 Hz. The goal of the laboratory is to develop an autonomous underwater vehicle using eddy current-controlled propulsion and show that PZT materials have good drag reduction characteristics, excellent maneuverability, depth-holding ability, and higher acceleration and deceleration ability through free swimming. Harbin Engineering University (Yue et al. 2015) developed a water microrobot with a PZT drive; the main feature of this drive is that it is a polymer material actuator only in water or wet environment work. The robot, which can be turned forward, left, or right, has a pair of driving wings driven by a pulse voltage to generate propulsion. PZT material can realize the continuous fluctuation deformation of the fluctuating fins of bionic fish, which makes it compact in structure, light in weight, and high in efficiency. This kind of robot has broad application prospects and value in microtubule detection and biomedicine.
1.4 Mixed materials
The underwater environment is complex, so the material requirements of the underwater bionic robot are very strict. Currently, polymer-metal composite materials are widely employed, combining the advantages of both the polymer and the metal. Polymers can withstand a certain degree of deformation in most environments. Both materials can make good adjustments to the impact of the external environment, with the polymer being lighter and the metal material being harder (Zheng et al. 2021) (Fig. 3c).
Mixed-material robot. a Composite robotic fish structure (Yan et al. 2021); b Prototype jellyfish-like biomimetic underwater microrobot (Shi et al. 2010); c Mechanism composition of the soft robotic fish (Zhang et al. 2021); d Dolphin robot (Shen et al. 2013); e Composite robotic fish (** patterns by using a biomimetic robot fish. IEEE Robot Automat Lett 5(1):64–71" href="/article/10.1007/s44295-023-00010-3#ref-CR135" id="ref-link-section-d41130708e752">2020); f Illustration of the robotic fish (Marras and Porfiri 2012)
DE, which is widely used in robot drives, has good softness, and its outstanding advantages are that the relative adjustment rate after shape change is fast, the response is quite rapid, the energy consumption is less, and the mechanical and electrical conversion efficiencies are high. The dielectric elastic material-driven robot developed by Kagawa University is a jet propulsion robot simulating a pike (Bal et al. 2019). The driver is composed of SMA, ICPF, and rubber materials. The length of the motion direction is 46.1 mm, the diameter of the section is 36.3 mm, and the maximum speed of the robot is 6 mm/s. The dolphin robot developed by Beihang University consists of three parts: (1) a rigid plastic shell that acts as a body, (2) IPMC stripes that act as muscles, and (3) a plastic sheet that mimics a tail fin. The shell is designed based on the proportions of the dolphin’s streamlined body, made of nylon plastic, using a 3D printer, and covered with a black matte resin varnish, leading to a smooth surface. The IPMC is attached to the body by two small rectangular conductive copper plates, which act as clamps, with a flexible fin attached to the end of the IPMC, which is designed based on the shape of a natural dolphin fin. The robot can jump and swim freely like a dolphin (Shen et al. 2013) (Fig. 3d). The bionic robotic fish developed by the Chinese University of Hong Kong includes a rigid head, a wired-driven active body, and a flexible tail. A pair of SMA spring plates with the same stiffness pass through an active body comprising multiple connecting rods, which are like the backbone of a real fish, and then distribute a pair of wires along the spring plate to drive the moving body. The robotic fish tail is a flexible tail made of silicone and carbon fiber reinforced material that allows the robotic fish to swim in multiple modes, such as cruising, turning, rising, and descending (** patterns by using a biomimetic robot fish. IEEE Robot Automat Lett 5(1):64–71" href="/article/10.1007/s44295-023-00010-3#ref-CR135" id="ref-link-section-d41130708e782">2020) (Fig. 3e). The robotic fish designed by the New York University consists of a rigid acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) plastic body shell and a tail consisting of rigid ABS elements and flexible polyester tail fins. The robot fish uses a waterproof servo motor to control the tail, and a flexible tail fin allows the tail to bend and undulate to mimic the swimming of a live fish. The tail beat frequency and amplitude of the robot are controlled by an external microcontroller. The signals driven by the servo motor generate the periodic sinusoidal movement of the flexible polyester tail fin to mimic the movement of fish (Marras and Porfiri 2012) (Fig. 3f).
2 Underwater robot control system classification
At present, the commonly used motion control methods of underwater biomimetic robots are model-based control methods, sine controllers, and central mode generator (CPG)-based methods. As the structural components of marine biomimetic robots usually include power modules, sensors, chips, and driving components, the behavior of the bionic robot is controlled by the predefined program or the command controller (the power supply of the controller is mainly provided by traditional lithium batteries) (Chen et al. 2017). The robot adjusts its height through a buoyancy module, and a motor in the tail provides power and adjusts its direction. The flexible part of the robotic fish, designed by the State Key Laboratory of Complex Systems Management and Control at the Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, consists of three joints connected by an aluminum exoskeleton. Each joint is connected to an R/C servo motor that controls the rotation angle of the joint. The rubber caudal fin is connected to the third segment by the peduncle and is crescent-shaped with good coordination (Yu et al. 2016) (Fig. 6c). The robot fish designed by the University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences employs a magnetic actuator as a motor. The propulsion system is characterized by remote control using Bluetooth low power and easy operation through smart devices. By the electromagnetic induction law, the robot fish can swim quickly and turn flexibly. This miniature robot fish could be employed for animal behavior research and special underwater tasks (Chen et al. 2017) (Fig. 6d).
Single motor-driven bionic robot. a Soft robotic fish and diver interface module (Katzschmann et al. 2018); b Details of a soft-bodied robotic fish (Marchese et al. 2014); c Prototype of the robotic fish applied to the underwater robot competition (Yu et al. 2009) (Fig. 10d). To produce greater thrust, the choice of motor parameters becomes very significant.
Research on bionic flutter drive systems has never stopped. Still, due to the complexity of the drive mechanism and its unique motion characteristics and the different research methods, the forms of flutter wing propulsion are also different (Zhu 2018). So far, it has been impossible to conduct a theoretical study for various bionic drive mechanisms because many crucial technical and theoretical problems remain in the research stage, and the technical design of various bionic propulsion systems is still very backward and far from practical application.
3.3 Bionic wave oscillation rigid drive
At present, the main biomimetic fish propulsion systems are BCF models, such as dolphins, which are propelled by the caudal fin, and MPF models, such as manta rays, which are propelled by the pectoral fin.
The propulsion model has high thrust, stability, and maneuverability (Jung et al. 2002). It has an excellent performance in fast swimming under hydrostatic conditions and better start and stop functions but poor maneuverability in low-speed turns and turbulent environments. Peking University developed a robot fish consisting of a rigid head, a flexible body, and a tail fin. The hard head houses a control unit, a wireless communication module, and a set of batteries. The battery is placed at the bottom of the head to ensure the vertical stability of the robot while swimming. A pair of pectoral fins are fixed on both sides of the head to ensure the stability of the fins in water. The flexible body comprises three joints, each connected to a servo motor to adjust the deflection angle of the joint. The rubber tail fin is fixed on the third joint and acts with the water flow to move forward in waves (Li et al. 2020); d Underwater robot with elastic skin (Ma et al. 2015)
California Institute of Technology established a piston jet model by studying the propulsion mechanism of a squid water jet (Wu et al. 2020) (Fig. 12c). The bionic pectoral fin of the manta ray robot developed by Beihang University can produce an effective angle of attack, and the thrust generated by the interaction with the current can effectively propel the robot fish. The experimental results exhibit that the maximum forward speed of the robot fish can reach 0.43 m/s (0.94 times body length/second) when it is swimming in the tank, and it has good small radius turning maneuverability (Ma et al. 2015) (Fig. 12d).
Due to different conditions, various bionic water jet propulsion systems cannot realize the same movement as real organisms, nor do they have extremely sensitive responses and fast movement ability. However, research on biomimetic water jet propulsion systems is still in its nascent stage: there is no relatively mature biomimetic propulsion system, the types of technologies are relatively small, there are several difficulties to be overcome, and there is a long way to go.
4 Applications
Oceans are vital to life on Earth; they are key to regulating climate and balancing various ecosystems (Park and Kim 2016). They are also home to countless creatures and diverse environments. In addition, the oceans are important channels for global transportation. They are indispensable sources of energy. Despite their vital significance, oceans remain underexplored due to their harsh conditions, making exploration impossible with traditional methods. Using underwater vehicles for ocean exploration is becoming increasingly popular as they allow people to conduct safe exploration in extreme environments for long periods. At present, underwater bionic robots are used in many fields, from oil and gas and fisheries to archaeology, search, rescue, and defense (Li et al. 2014c). In addition, underwater robots are of use in scientific missions, such as map** water composition and environmental parameters over time and space, exploring the characteristics of the seafloor in terms of depth, morphology, and composition, investigating glacial areas and icebergs, observing biological species in the environment, collecting biological and geological samples, searching for life in the deep ocean, and hel** protect the environment from pollution.
4.1 Application status of underwater robots
Since the second half of the twentieth century, underwater robots have begun to assist human exploration of the ocean, and with the continuous advancement of human reach and exploration depth, underwater robots performing various tasks have also been born. In 2017, Professor Yang Canjun of Zhejiang University designed an underwater robot that can automatically clean marine life 100 m below the surface of water. In its first sea test, the robot sent back a 'selfie' video underwater: firmly attached to the wall of the tube, spraying water filled with bubbles, and the accumulated shells were 'swept' away. The robot is specially designed to clean the marine organisms attached to the surface of a steel pipe of an oil drilling platform and has been successfully tested in the **hu oil and gas field in the East China Sea. In 2018, the underwater unmanned robot enterprise Yoken Robot launched a new product—BW Space Pro—which is the world’s first underwater UAV with intelligent functions, which is widely used in diving entertainment, underwater shooting, underwater survey, sea fishing, marine environmental protection, marine biological research, aquaculture, underwater archaeology, underwater search and rescue, and other fields. In 2019, Dr. Erik Engeberg of Florida Atlantic University in the United States developed a jellyfish robot that can autonomically shuttle between coral reefs and monitor jellyfish robots at close range. Besides assisting in research, the jellyfish robot can shoulder the task of defending the ocean and serve as a small spearhead in the front line of protecting the environment. In July 2020, the team of Professor Wen Li of Bei**g University of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Junzhi, a researcher from the Institute of Automation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, designed and manufactured an underwater soft robot arm that can be applied to the natural environment of the near shallow sea, with the aim of establishing the kinematic model and rapid solution method of inverse kinematics to realize real-time kinematic control and finally realizing underwater grasp operations in the natural environment of the near shallow sea. With the upgrading and mature application of underwater robot technology, it can not only greatly reduce the risk of manual operation but also improve operation efficiency and reduce the corresponding expenditure cost. Meanwhile, driven by the integration of other innovative technologies, both the comprehensive performance and cost performance levels of underwater robots are continuing to improve, which can better complete the work and is conducive to promoting large-scale development of the industry.
4.2 Natural resource surveys
By duplicating the form of marine organisms, bionic robots can better adapt to harsh environments, such as high pressure, low temperature, and current, at the bottom of the sea. They are usually small in size and light in weight; thus, they can better collect various substances in their original conditions, which is of great significance for the study of natural resources at the bottom of the sea.
Underwater vehicles have been widely used in various marine geoscience research, initially focusing on seafloor map** but more recently expanding to water column and oceanographic surveys. The first underwater vehicle dedicated to marine was probably the IFREMER AUV, which was used in the early 1980s to map deep-sea manganese nodule fields. A Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) Sentry AUV was used to map the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, which resulted in a hydrocarbon plume (Levshonkov et al. 2020), using robots carrying detectors to assess its impact on animals and habitats. Many underwater vehicles were deployed in 1995 and 1996 at the Juan de Fuca Ridge in the northwestern United States to detect and map new lava flows (Stenius et al. 2022). To use magnetometers to measure young lava flows at 2200 m east longitude, WHOI developed the mixed-material underwater vehicle Nereus for scientific exploration at 11000 m in the deepest part of the ocean. This was almost twice the depth range of the AUV at the time. In 2013, the French National Center for Marine Exploitation built Orca, an unmanned cable-free underwater vehicle with a maximum depth of 6000 m (Gao et al. 2013). In 2020, the French National Sea Bomb Development Center cooperated with a company to jointly develop the 'Eret' acoustic remote-control diving robot, which is used for underwater drilling rig inspection, submarine oil rig installation, oil pipeline auxiliary installation, anchor cable reinforcement, and other complex operations. In China, the underwater vehicle was first used in 2022 for subglacial surveys in the Arctic Ocean. Shortly after the scientific survey ship 'Ocean' began the third leg of the expedition, 'Ocean' conducted its first underwater robot operation in the East Pacific Sea for the first time with the underwater robot 'Sea Dragon 2', which was used to observe a rare giant chimney in the 'Bird’s nest' black chimney area and carried a robotic arm used to accurately capture about 7 kg of vulcanized black chimney ventilation samples. 'Hailong 2' relying on accurate dynamic positioning, accurately landed on the seabed in the black chimney area of the 'Bird’s nest' and performed camera observation and measurement of hydrothermal environmental parameters. The discovery marks China as one of the few countries worldwide that can use underwater robots to conduct hydrothermal surveys and sampling studies at mid-ocean ridges. The robot fish has the concealment of integrating into the fish, which can be used to collect information on the fish or guide the fish to schedule the distribution or cluster of the fish according to some algorithms (Marras and Porfiri 2012) (Fig. 13a). Thus, underwater bionic robots may effectively be used in marine environment observation, deep-sea resource exploration and development, and deep-sea and polar scientific investigation.
4.3 Biodiversity research
Through the bionic robot’s similarity in appearance to marine life, marine life can be studied without disturbing its normal activities, enabling close observation of marine life and potentially becoming a new platform for studying and interacting with underwater species (Wang et al. 2020). Underwater bionic robots play an important role in marine ecological protection. First, they can be used to collect marine environmental data. Using underwater robots, scientists can obtain detailed geographic images of the ocean and the conditions at the bottom of the ocean. This data is crucial for understanding the health and pollution levels of marine ecosystems. Professor Li Tiefeng’s team at Zhejiang University began research on a bionic deep-sea soft robot based on lionfish. Based on the dispersion and fusion of lionfish head bones in soft tissues, the project team performed the mechanical design of the structure and material of electronic devices and soft matrix and optimized the stress state in the robot body under a high-pressure environment. By designing materials and structures that adjust the devices and software, the robot could withstand a deep-sea pressure of 10000 m without a pressure-resistant shell and successfully conducted exploration missions in the Mariana Trench (Li et al. 2021) (Fig. 13b). Underwater robots can also be used to monitor the population and activity areas of marine life. With cameras and sensors, scientists can observe and record the behavior of many aquatic organisms in real time, providing evidence for their conservation.
In addition to data collection and monitoring, ROV maps can help protect marine life. They can remove debris and harmful substances from the ocean. Many marine creatures often die by ingesting waste. The underwater vehicle can collect this waste through its robotic arm and bring it to a safe location for disposal. Some underwater robot maps can even perform deep seabed cleanup operations to help restore the health of the ocean (Wang et al. 2002) (Fig. 13c). The University of Icahnx developed a new kind of robotic fish for detecting pollution in river water and drawing 3D pollution maps of the river (Gomatam et al. 2012). Each robotic fish is about 50 cm long, 15 cm high, and 12 cm wide. Each is equipped with pollution detection sensors and Global Positioning System (GPS), can 'smell' harmful substances in the water, and can work together, even if there is no one to direct. When they 'sniff out' the harmful substances in the water, they communicate with each other through a Wi-Fi wireless connection. The GPS navigation system allows them to swim freely without human operation, and once they find pollutants, they will send an alert to the environmental protection department personnel (Skorohod et al. 2020).
Biosensors were first deployed on an underwater robot when an NERC autonomous submersible AUV was fitted with an in situ dissolved manganese analyzer (Skorohod et al. 2020). This deployment showed how an autonomous underwater robot carrying a biosensor could detect small-scale changes in species distribution that traditional sampling methods could not address. Since then, chemical sensors on underwater robots used for marine purposes have been used mainly to search the water column for active hydrothermal columns and to study species distributions, and a suite of sensors for detecting hazardous liquid spills have been deployed on underwater robots in the North Sea Sleipner project for frequent, high time scale studies of areas of potential spills to protect the ecological environment (Tran and Park 2020). By application of underwater robot map**, people can better protect the diversity of marine ecosystems and marine life. They help people understand and solve the problems of the marine environment and provide a guarantee for the rational use of marine resources.
4.4 Underwater imaging
There is an increasing demand for exploration of the seabed environment, and the imaging requirements for marine resources and the underwater world are also getting higher and higher (Liang et al. 2010). Due to the uncertainty of the underwater environment, such as interference of the current and limited sensing ability, conventional underwater navigation equipment has limitations; thus, bionic robots designed for different underwater environments have great advantages.
The bionic underwater foot robot studied by the National Metrology Institute of Japan (Maeda et al. 2020) imitates the appearance and behavior of crabs and can walk and jump underwater. Compared to traditional AUV and ROV, it is better adapted to complex underwater terrains and has a higher affinity for underwater organisms. Due to their bionic appearance, the natural movements of underwater creatures can be well imaged. National Institute of Ocean Technology (Ramesh et al. 2017) used the bionic fish REMUS to map the habitat at 1–2 m water depth in the Juan Strait in the northern United States. It used underwater video data for ground truth measurements. Underwater robots have been used to map various seafloor morphological features, including under ice sheets inaccessible to research ships. For instance, State Marine Technical University (Siek and Sakovich 2019) used the underwater vehicle NERC Autosub3 to investigate the retreat of the Pine Island Glacier (PIG) in West Antarctica. The robot performed six missions in 94 h, collecting 510 km of orbital data under the PIG ice shelf 50 km above the ice surface.
Underwater vehicles are also being used to image sedimentary features in submarine canyons. The University of Kanagawa used an underwater vehicle carrying a high-resolution multibeam waveform acoustic system (0.7 m lateral resolution) and a submarine profiler (0.1 m vertical resolution) to conduct underwater imaging experiments, collecting data from La Jolla Canyon on the Southern California coast. To understand the processes that produce observational patterns on a scale comparable to the surface (Tsukioka et al. 2002), the Science and Technology on Underwater Vehicle Laboratory used underwater robotic fish diving to collect deep-sea data and provide vibration core samples for sediment dating (Liu et al. 2020) (Fig. 13d). In the article on acoustically controlled soft robotic fish studied by the University of Zagreb (Kapetanovic et al. 2020), it is possible to approach underwater organisms without disturbing their normal life and to image underwater organisms and underwater landscapes through shape features similar to those of fish (Katzschmann et al. 2018).
When conducting underwater imaging, conventional underwater vehicles have higher accuracy in the tangential direction of the seabed and lower accuracy in the vertical direction of the seabed. In comparison, underwater bionic robots have lower accuracy in the tangential direction of the seabed and higher accuracy in the vertical direction of the seabed (Wang et al. 2014a). Moreover, the underwater bionic robot has high stability and adaptability to the seabed environment, and the combination of the two can obtain higher-quality underwater imaging maps.
4.5 Underwater search and rescue
Underwater robots can be used to check whether explosives are installed on dams and bridge piers, remote-reconnaissance structural conditions or dangerous goods, and closely inspect underwater evidence. In 2010, underwater robots could walk at 3–6 km/h in the deepest underwater world of 6000 m (Brown and Clark 2010). The forward-looking and downward-looking radar gives it 'good eyesight'. The accompanying camera, video camera, and precise navigation system allow it to 'overlook'. The underwater robot WHOI provided in 2012 took just a few days to find the wreckage of an Air France flight in 4000 km2 of ocean after two years of fruitless searching by various ships and aircraft. Underwater robots have great potential and application value in rescue missions. When encountering dangerous situations, underwater bionic robots can play a greater role in on-site situation assessment and positioning, providing important information for the next step. Through the underwater high-definition camera group, sonar, and a variety of sensors carried by the underwater robot itself, rescue workers can grasp the water depth and temperature on the shore. They can determine the obstacles in the water and remove the danger of entering the water (Wang et al. 2019c). In salvage and other operations, the underwater robot can quickly locate the location of underwater objects. Armed with this information, commanders can better formulate a reasonable and efficient rescue plan. Another major advantage of underwater robots lies in search and rescue missions. In dangerous waters such as rapids and low temperatures, it can take the lead in entering underwater areas that rescuers cannot reach to detect the location and situation of trapped people. The robot operator can control the movement of the robot by manipulating the handle or wireless sensing device on the shore. Carrying tools such as robotic arms can also assist rescue workers in completing tasks such as clearing and salvaging. The water environment where the danger occurs is not always ideal, and low visibility is one of the most significant problems. Bionic fluorescent robot fish can provide rescuers with a light source, and rescuers can also determine the location of the target and search for risks by referring to the umbilical cable connected to the underwater robot (Asadnia et al. 2015). The emergence of underwater robots makes underwater rescue work safer and more efficient.
5 Summary and outlook
From the above summarized research results, it can be observed that research on bionic underwater robots has grown considerably. Rapid turning, path tracking, autonomous operation, and other actions have been achieved on some prototypes, and there is a great improvement in speed and mobility, but there is still a very obvious gap with real fish. Underwater bionic robot development is high-end manufacturing industry supported by the Chinese government and plays the role of a 'strategic commanding height'. In China and abroad, a series of work has been conducted on the mechanical structure design, materials, and control methods of underwater bionic robots, and the related research has grown considerably. Due to the complexity of underwater, the mechanical structure design and control technology of underwater robots still require further optimization and improvement to truly achieve a life-like system that integrates the structure and biological characteristics. By enhancing the characteristics of underwater robots, such as self-control and self-perception, and through the coordinated control of robot systems, underwater robots can better integrate into the underwater environment to complete the work, pursue sustainability on the road to development, and make this technology more mature.
Research on bionic underwater robots has become more in-depth and expanded, and some prototypes have realized multimodal motion, fast turning, path tracking, autonomous operation, and other actions, which have greatly improved in speed and maneuverability. However, there is still a very obvious gap with real fish. In the future, bionic underwater robots should be developed into autonomous, intelligent, and collaborative tools. To further improve the performance of the bionic underwater robot system, further work should be conducted in the following main research directions: (1) Mechanism design and optimization. Most bionic underwater robots are driven by motors. Research can be conducted in terms of streamlined low-resistance shapes, intelligent driving materials, and rigid and flexible coupling efficient transmission mechanisms to improve the motion performance of bionic underwater robots. (2) Underwater environment perception and modeling are significant for bionic underwater robots to perform underwater tasks. Information fusion technology of various sensors can be examined and combined with the technology to conduct underwater environment modeling and improve the autonomy intelligence of bionic underwater robots. (3) Intelligent control methods, such as artificial intelligence, are a hot field right now. Some artificial intelligence technologies, such as reinforcement learning and transfer learning, can be applied to the intelligent control of bionic underwater robots so that they can learn various motor skills independently. (4) Multibionic underwater robot cooperation. In nature, fish is often in the form of clusters for foraging, defense, and cruising. The use of multiple bionic underwater vehicles to form a cooperative system is helpful in improving operational efficiency. Due to the complexity of underwater, the particularity of the propulsion mechanism, and the bottleneck of underwater communication, sensing, positioning, and other technologies, the collaboration of multibionic underwater robots will be a very challenging direction.
Due to the complexity of the marine environment, underwater bionic robots will face problems such as the drastic change in water velocity, the difference in pressure under different water depths, and their waterproofing, which poses a great challenge to the structural design of robots. To address these issues, the structure of the future underwater bionic robot needs to be more detailed and more lightweight, and the application of materials should also meet the requirements of the underwater environment. Miniaturization is the current trend of robot development because small structures are easier to adapt to the environment, reduce the contact area, and thus reduce the impact of underwater pressure on the machine structure to a greater extent. The most prominent point is that miniaturized robots are closer to the physiological structure of marine organisms and fundamentally realize the bionic effect rather than just the imitation of appearance. Marine space is generally unsuitable for human survival, and large-scale development and utilization of marine resources have a great dependence on robotics technology. Replacing humans with robots to promote and realize unmanned marine equipment has far-reaching strategic significance. Thus, future bionic underwater robots should be further developed, mainly in the direction of autonomy, intelligence, and synergy, to enhance the performance of bionic underwater robotic systems.
Availability of data and materials
The data and materials used to support the findings of this study are included in the article.
References
Alexander P (2017) Robot fish: bio-inspired fishlike underwater robots. Underwater Technol Int J Soc Underwater 34(3):143–145
Asadnia M, Kottapalli AGP, Haghighi R, Cloitre A, Alvarado PV, Miao JM et al (2015) MEMS sensors for assessing flow-related control of an underwater biomimetic robotic stingray. Bioinspir Biomim 10(3):10
Ay M, Korkmaz D, Koca GO, Bal C, Akpolat ZH, Bingol MC (2018) Mechatronic design and manufacturing of the intelligent robotic fish for bio-inspired swimming modes. Electronics 7(7):118
Bai XJ, Wang Y, Wang S, Wang R, Tan M, Wang W (2021) Modeling and analysis of an underwater biomimetic vehicle-manipulator system. Sci China Inf Sci 65(3):35
Bal C, Koca GO, Korkmaz D, Akpolat ZH, Ay M (2019) CPG-based autonomous swimming control for multi-tasks of a biomimetic robotic fish. Ocean Eng 189:106334
Bottasso CL, Scorcelletti F, Ruzzene M, Ahn SS (2008) Trajectory optimization for DDE models of supercavitating underwater vehicles. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 131(1):18
Brown C, Clark RP (2010) Automated conceptual design utility for unmanned underwater vehicles. Sea Technol 51(12):33–36
Cai YR, Bi SS, Li GY, Hildre HP, Zhang HX (2019) From natural complexity to biomimetic simplification: the realization of bionic fish inspired by the Cownose Ray. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 26(3):27–38
Cao Q, Wang R, Zhang T, Wang Y, Wang S (2022) Hydrodynamic modeling and parameter identification of a bionic underwater vehicle: RobDact. Cyborg Bionic Syst 2022:13
Chen AL, Thind K, Demir KG, Gu GX (2021a) Modeling bioinspired fish scale designs via a geometric and numerical approach. Materials 14(18):5378
Chen BX, Jiang HZ (2019) Swimming performance of a tensegrity robotic fish. Soft Rob 6(4):520–531
Chen JY, Yin B, Wang CC, **e FR, Du RX, Zhong Y (2021b) Bioinspired closed-loop CPG-based control of a robot fish for obstacle avoidance and direction tracking. J Bionic Eng 18(1):171–183
Chen X, Shigemune H, Sawada H (2020) An untethered bionic robotic fish using SMA actuators. Int Conf Mechatr Auto 13(6):1768–1773
Chen X, Wu Z, Yu J, Zhou C, Yu JZ (2017) Design and implementation of a magnetically actuated miniature robotic fish. 20th World Congress of the International-Federation-of-Automatic-Control (IFAC), Toulouse, France, 9-14 July 2017, pp 6851–6856
Chong CW, Zhong Y, Zhou CL, Low KH, Seet GLG, Lim HB (2009) Can the swimming thrust of BCF biomimetics fish be enhanced. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Bangkok, Thailand, 22-25 February 2009, pp 437–442
Chowdhury AR, Prasad B, Kumar V, Kumar R, Panda SK (2011) Design, modeling and open-loop control of a BCF mode bio-mimetic robotic fish. Int Siberian Conf Contr Commun 15(3):87–93
Chu WS, Lee KT, Song SH, Han MW, Lee JY, Kim HS et al (2012) Review of biomimetic underwater robots using smart actuators. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 13:1281–1292
Crespi A, Ijspeert AJ (2008) Online optimization of swimming and crawling in an amphibious snake robot. IEEE Trans Rob 24(1):75–87
Dawson HA, Allison M (2020) Requirements for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) for scientific data collection in the Laurentian Great Lakes: a questionnaire survey. J Gt Lakes Res 47(1):259–265
Du T, Hughes J, Wah S, Matusik W, Rus D (2021) Underwater soft robot modeling and control with differentiable simulation. IEEE Robot Auto Lett 6(3):4994–5001
Francis O, Coakley G, Kitts C (2002) A digital control system for the triton undersea robot. IFAC Proc Vol 35(2):633–638
Fras J, Noh Y, Macias M, Wurdemann H, Althoefer K (2018) Bio-inspired octopus robot based on novel soft fluidic actuator. IEEE Int Conf Robot Auto 21(5):1583–1588
Gao CZ, Du YC, Yang L (2022) The influence of the discharge port structure on the infrared characteristics of underwater vehicle thermal jets. Appl Sci 12(14):7108
Gao JW, Yu JP, Li QC, Leng WZ, Ma ZT (2013) A layered obstacles avoidance algorithm for biomimetic robotic fish. ICIC Express Letters 7(1):1798–1810
Gomatam S, Vengadesan S, Bhattacharyya SK (2012) Numerical simulations of flow past an autonomous underwater vehicle at various drift angles. J Nav Archit Mar Eng 9(2012):135–152
Guo S, He Y, Shi L, Pan S, **ao R, Tang K et al (2018) Modeling and experimental evaluation of an improved amphibious robot with compact structure. Robot Comp-Integr Manufact 51(2):37–52
Guo SX, Shi LW, Ye XF, Li LF (2007) A new jellyfish type of underwater microrobot. 2007 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Harbin, pp 509–514
Haji BJ, Bamdad M (2022) Nonlinear modeling and analysis of a novel robot fish with compliant fluidic actuator as a tail. J Bionic Eng 19(3):629–642
Hu Q, Dong E, Cheng G, ** H, Yang J, Sun D (2019) Inchworm-inspired soft climbing robot using microspine arrays. IEEE/RSJ Int Conf Intell Robots Syst (IROS) 78(5):5800–5805
Hu QQ, Dong EB, Sun D (2023) Soft modular climbing robots. IEEE Trans Robot 39(1):399–416
Hu QS, Zhou H (2009) IPMC propelled biomimetics robotic fish energy consumption model construction and its application to energy-saving control. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), Guilin, China, 19-23 December 2009, pp 2151–2156
Jiao ZW, Wang HY, Luo B, Yang WM, Yu Y (2022) A BCF bionic robot fish driven by a dielectric elastomer actuator. J Phys: Conf Ser 2331(1):12010
Jung KY, Kim, IS, Yang SY, Lee MH (2002) Autopilot design of an autonomous underwater vehicle using robust control. Int J Control Autom Syst 4(4):264–269
Kapetanovic N, Vasilijevic A, Nad D, Zubcic K, Miskovic N (2020) Marine robots map** the present and the past: unraveling the secrets of the deep. Remote Sens 12(23):3902
Karthik S (2014) Underwater vehicle for surveillance with navigation and swarm network communication. Indian J Sci Technol 7(S6):22–31
Katzschmann RK, DelPreto J, MacCurdy R, Rus DL (2018) Exploration of underwater life with an acoustically controlled soft robotic fish. Sci Robot 3(1):12–22
Kelasidi E, Pettersen KY, Liljeback P, Gravdahl JT (2016) Locomotion efficiency of underwater snake robots with thrusters. 14th IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR), Lausanne, Switzerland, 23-27 October 2016, pp 174–181
Khalaji AK, Zahedifar R (2020) Lyapunov-based formation control of underwater robots. Robotica 38(6):1105–1122
Ko Y, Na S, Lee Y, Cha K, Ko SY, Park J et al (2012) A jellyfish-like swimming mini-robot actuated by an electromagnetic actuation system. Smart Mater Struct 21(5):057001
Koch RM (2002) Analysis of variable-thickness, streamlined transducer array windowing concepts for high speed underwater vehicles. J Acoust Soc Am 112(5):2217–2218
Kopman V, Porfiri M (2013) Design, modeling, and characterization of a miniature robotic fish for research and education in biomimetics and bioinspiration. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 18(2):471–483
Korkmaz D, Akpolat ZH, Soyguder S, Alli H (2015) Dynamic simulation model of a biomimetic robotic fish with multi-joint propulsion mechanism. Trans Inst Meas Contr 37(5):684–695
Korkmaz D, Budak U, Bal C, Koca GO, Akpolat Z (2012) Modeling and implementation of a biomimetic robotic fish. Int Symp Power Electr Power Electr Electr Drives, Automat Motion 77(5):1187–1192
Kumar S, Rastogi V, Gupta P (2016) Recent developments in modeling and control of underwater robot manipulator: a review. Indian J Sci Technol 9(48):8
Levshonkov NV, Gusev AL, Krylosova AA (2020) Calculation of vibrations in a tethered underwater vehicle-umbilical cable system. J Mach Manuf Reliab 49(7):562–567
Li DJ (2015) Analysis on numerical simulation for bionic robot fish based on CATIA. Appl Mech Mat 742:511–515
Li G, Chen X, Zhou F, Liang Y, **ao Y, Cao X et al (2021) Self-powered soft robot in the Mariana trench. Nature 591(7848):66–71
Li J, Zhang YX, Li WB (2021) Formation control of a multi-autonomous underwater vehicle event-triggered mechanism based on the Hungarian algorithm. Machines 9(12):346
Li L, Wang C, **e GM (2014a) Modeling of a carangiform-like robotic fish for both forward and backward swimming: based on the fixed point. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Hong Kong, pp 800–805
Li T, Li G, Liang Y, Cheng T, Dai J, Yang X et al (2017) Fast-moving soft electronic fish. Sci Adv 4(1):7
Li WK, Chen H, Cui WC, Song CH, Chen LK (2023) Multi-objective evolutionary design of central pattern generator network for biomimetic robotic fish. Complex Intell Syst 9:1707–1727
Li Y, Jiang YQ (2012) The application of distributed multi-sensor information fusion technology in underwater vehicle. Adv Mat Res 532–533:1006–1010
Li Y, Jiang YQ, Ma S, Chen PY, Li YM (2014b) Inverse speed analysis and low speed control of underwater vehicle. J Centr South Univ 21(7):2652–2659
Li YS, Sun HX, Chu M, Zhang YH, Jia QX, Lan XJ (2014c) Experiment, simulation and analysis on coupling hydrodynamic forces under key parameters for a spherical underwater exploration robot. J Vibroengine 16(6):3014–3025
Li ZG, Ge LM, Xu WQ, Du YJ (2018) Turning characteristics of biomimetic robotic fish driven by two degrees of freedom of pectoral fins and flexible body/caudal fin. Int J Adv Rob Syst 15(1):21
Li ZJ, Yin PL, Jiang XM, Tang LH, Wu H, Peng Y et al (2021) Towards self-powered technique in underwater robots via a high-efficiency electromagnetic transducer with circularly abrupt magnetic flux density change. Appl Energy 302(4):793–798
Liang JH, Wang TM, Wen L (2011) Development of a two-joint robotic fish for real-world exploration. J Field Robot 28(1):70–79
Liang XA, Zhang JD, Li W, Su LF (2010) Extended Kalman filter based identification of dynamic model for underwater robots. International Conference on Applied Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering, Changsha, China, 8-9 September 2010, pp 780–783
Liu G, Wang M, Xu L, Incecik A, Sotelo MA, Li Z et al (2020) A new bionic lateral line system applied to pitch motion parameters perception for autonomous underwater vehicles. Appl Ocean Res 99:102142
Liu J, Hu H (2010) Biological inspiration: from carangiform fish to multi-joint robotic fish. J Bionic Eng 7(1):35–48
Liu JD, Hu HS (2006) Biologically inspired behaviour design for autonomous robotic fish. Int J Autom Comput 3(4):336–347
Liu YW, Jiang HZ (2022) Research development on fish swimming. Chin J Mech Engine 35(1):114
Lou BD, Ni YJ, Mao MH, Wang P, Cong Y (2017) Optimization of the kinematic model for biomimetic robotic fish with rigid headshaking mitigation. Robotics 6(4):30
Low KH (2009) Modelling and parametric study of modular undulating fin rays for fish robots. Mech Mach Theory 44(3):615–632
Ma HW, Cai YR, Wang YL, Bi SS, Gong Z (2015) A biomimetic cownose ray robot fish with oscillating and chordwise twisting flexible pectoral fins. Industr Robot: Int J 42(3):214–221
Ma LP, Yue ZJ, Zhang RF (2020) Path tracking control of hybrid-driven robotic fish based on deep reinforcement learning. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), Bei**g, China, 13-16 October 2020, pp 815–820
Ma YJ, Li XY, Liang B, Du Y, Liu JQ, Yang S (2019) Development and motion mode analysis of IPMC bionic jellyfish based on app bluetooth remote control. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 252(2):022040
Maeda Y, Kida Y, Deguchi M (2020) Hadal free-fall camera lander transmitting hadal images via high-rate acoustic communication. Sea Technol 61(12):22–24
Marchese AD, Onal CD, Rus D (2014) Autonomous soft robotic fish capable of escape maneuvers using fluidic elastomer actuators. Soft Robot 1(1):75–87
Marras S, Porfiri M (2012) Fish and robots swimming together: attraction towards the robot demands biomimetic locomotion. J R Soc Interf 9(73):1856–1868
Nagai T, Shintake J (2022) Rolled dielectric elastomer antagonistic actuators for biomimetic underwater robots. Polymers 14(21):4549
Najem J, Sarles SA, Akle B, Leo DJ (2012) Biomimetic jellyfish-inspired underwater vehicle actuated by ionic polymer metal composite actuators. Smart Mater Struct 21(9):11
Nakashima M, Karako Y (2014) Effect of bubbles around an underwater robot arm on thrust during the crawl stroke motion. Proc Engine 72(1):715–719
Ning KW, Hartono P, Sawada H (2022) Using inverse learning for controlling bionic robotic fish with SMA actuators. MRS Adv 7(30):649–655
Ozog P, Johnson-Roberson M, Eustice RM (2017) Map** underwater ship hulls using a model-assisted bundle adjustment framework. Robot Auton Syst 87(4):329–347
Park J, Kim J (2016) Model-based pose estimation for high-precise underwater navigation using monocular vision. J Korea Robot Soc 11(4):14
Pham TH, Nguyen K, Park HC (2023) A robotic fish capable of fast underwater swimming and water lea** with high Froude number. Ocean Eng 268(1):113512
Praczyk T (2014) Using augmenting modular neural networks to evolve neuro-controllers for a team of underwater vehicles. Soft Comput Fusion Foundations Methodol Appl 18(12):2445–2460
Rajamohamed S, Raviraj P (2015) Bio-inspired swimming techniques for robotic fish using fow and pressure sensing mechanism (computational bio-mimetic). Ind J Sci Technol 8(24):10
Ramesh S, Ramadass GA, Prakash VD, Sandhya CS, Ramesh R, Sathianarayanan D et al (2017) Application of indigenously developed remotely operated vehicle for the study of driving parameters of coral reef habitat of South Andaman Islands India. Curr Sci 113(12):2353–2359
Ravalli A, Rossi C, Marrazza G (2017) Bio-inspired fish robot based on chemical sensors. Sens Actuators, B Chem 239:325–329
Ren QY, Xu JX, Fan LP, Niu XL (2013) A GIM-based biomimetic learning approach for motion generation of a multi-joint robotic fish. J Bionic Eng 10(4):423–433
Rossi C, Colorado J, Coral W, Barrientos A (2011) Bending continuous structures with SMAs: a novel robotic fish design. Bioinspir Biomim 6(4):045005
Sabet M, Nourmohammadi H (2022) Water velocity sensor with the ability to estimate the sideslip angle based on Bernoulli’s law for use in autonomous underwater vehicles. Ocean Eng 263(3):112252
Şafak KK, Adams GG (2002) Dynamic modeling and hydrodynamic performance of biomimetic underwater robot locomotion. Auton Robot 13(3):233–240
Salumäe T, Kruusmaa M (2013) Flow-relative control of an underwater robot. Math Phys Engine Sci 469(2153):20120671
Sankaranarayanan V, Mahindrakar AD, Banavar RN (2008) A switched controller for an underactuated underwater vehicle. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 13(10):2266–2278
Saxena M, Chauhan NR (2017) A review study on bio-inspired robotic fish. Int J of Mechan Robot Syst 4(1):1–23
Scaradozzi D, Palmieri G, Costa D, Pinelli A (2017) BCF swimming locomotion for autonomous underwater robots: a review and a novel solution to improve control and efficiency. Ocean Eng 130:437–453
Serhat Y (2022) Development stages of a semi-autonomous underwater vehicle experiment platform. Int J Adv Robot Syst 19(3):15
Shen Q, Olsen Z, Stalbaum T, Trabia S, Lee J, Hunt R et al (2020) Basic design of a biomimetic underwater soft robot with switchable swimming modes and programmable artificial muscles. Smart Mater Struct 29(3):1–24
Shen Q, Wang TM, Liang JH, Wen L (2013) Hydrodynamic performance of a biomimetic robotic swimmer actuated by ionic polymer–metal composite. Smart Mater Struct 22(7):075035
Shi L, Guo S, Asaka K (2010) A novel jellyfish-like biomimetic microrobot. 2010 IEEE/ICME Int Conf Compl Med Engine 13(5):277–281
Shi LW, Guo SX, Mao SL, Yue CF, Li MX, Asaka K (2013) Development of an amphibious turtle-inspired spherical mother robot. J Bionic Eng 10(4):446–455
Shintake J, Cacucciolo V, Shea H, Floreano D (2018) Soft biomimetic fish robot made of dielectric elastomer actuators. Soft Robot 5(4):466–474
Siek Y, Sakovich S (2019) Simulation of the controlled movement based on the complexity principle for an automatic underwater vehicle. Vibroeng Procedia 25:194–200
Skorohod BA, Statsenko AV, Fateev SI, Zhilyakov PV (2020) Accuracy analysis of 3D points reconstructed from workspace of underwater robot. J Phys: Conf Ser 1661(1):1–7
Song TL, Lu YP, Liu HQ (2013) Control and research of bionic robotic fish based on Arduino. Adv Mat Res 2428(706–708):691–694
Stenius I, Folkesson J, Bhat S, Sprague CI, Ling L, Özkahraman Ö et al (2022) A system for autonomous seaweed farm inspection with an underwater robot. Sensors 22(13):5064
Su ZS, Yu JZ, Tan M, Zhang JW (2014) Implementing flexible and fast turning maneuvers of a multijoint robotic fish. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 19(1):329–338
Suk YT, Hwan KM (2014) Analysis of integrated navigation performance for sensor selection of Unmanned Underwater Vehicle (UUV). J Ocean Engine Technol 28(6):566–573
Tian QH, Wang T, Wang YX, Li CJ, Liu B (2022a) Robust optimization design for path planning of bionic robotic fish in the presence of ocean currents. J Marine Sci Engine 10(8):1109
Tian QH, Wang T, Wang YX, Wang ZW, Liu CW (2022b) A two-level optimization algorithm for path planning of bionic robotic fish in the three-dimensional environment with ocean currents and moving obstacles. Ocean Eng 266(P3):112829
Todd C, Samuel L, Yahya MS (2020) A bio-inspired robotic fish utilizes the snap-through buckling of its spine to generate accelerations of more than 20g. Bioinspir Biomim 15(5):1–18
Trabia S, Shen Q, Stalbaum T, Hunt R, Hwang T, Kim K (2016) Numerical and experimental investigation of a biomimetic robotic jellyfish actuated by ionic polymer-metal composite. 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI), **'an, China, 19-22 August 2016, pp 204–205
Tran LG, Park WT (2020) Biomimetic flow sensor for detecting flow rate and direction as an application for maneuvering autonomous underwater vehicle. Int J Prec Engine Manufacturing-Green Technol 9(1):163–173
Tsukioka S, Aoki T, Ochi H, Shimura T, Sawa T, Nakamura T et al (2002) Development of an acoustic lens for an imaging sonar for autonomous underwater vehicle 'Urashima' and experimentation in a water tank. Jpn J Appl Phys 41(6R):1–10
Villanueva A, Smith C, Priya S (2011) A biomimetic robotic jellyfish (Robojelly) actuated by shape memory alloy composite actuators. Bioinspir Biomim 6(3):036004
Vogel V (2012) Soft robotics: bionic jellyfish. Nat Mater 11(10):841–842
Vu MT, Jeong SK, Choi HS, Oh JY, Ji DH (2018) Study on down-cutting ladder trencher of an underwater construction robot for seabed application. Appl Ocean Res 71:90–104
Wang CC, Lu J, Ding XL, Jiang CX, Yang JY, Shen JH (2021) Design, modeling, control, and experiments for a fish-robot-based IoT platform to enable smart ocean. IEEE Int Things J 8(11):9317–9329
Wang G, Song YJ, Tang WS, **e GM, Li DJ (2019a) A numerical simulation analysis on bionic robot fish based on Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) method. J Nanoelectron Optoelectron 14(3):400–407
Wang LL, Wang HJ, Pan LX (2014a) Autonomous underwater vehicle motion planning via sampling based model predictive control. Appl Mech Mater 670–671:1370–1377
Wang M, Dong HF, Li X, Zhang YL, Yu JZ (2019b) Control and optimization of a bionic robotic fish through a combination of CPG model and PSO. Neurocomputing 337:144–152
Wang M, Zhang YL, Dong HF, Yu JZ (2020) Trajectory tracking control of a bionic robotic fish based on iterative learning. Sci China Inf Sci 63(7):170202
Wang R, Wang S, Wang Y, Cai MX, Tan M (2019c) Vision-based autonomous hovering for the biomimetic underwater robot-RobCutt-II. IEEE Trans Industr Electr 66(11):8578–8588
Wang SY, Han Y, Mao ST (2021) Innovation concept model and prototype validation of robotic fish with a spatial oscillating rigid caudal fin. J Marine Sci Eng 9(4):435
Wang T, Wang Z, Zhang B (2021) Mechanism design and experiment of a bionic turtle dredging robot. Machines 9(5):86
Wang TM, Liang JH, Shen GX, Tan GK (2005) Stabilization based design and experimental research of a fish robot. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Edmonton, Canada, 2-6 August 2005, pp 2065–2070
Wang W, Bian XQ, Chang ZH (2002) 3D track-kee** method for autonomous underwater vehicle. J Mar Sci Appl 1(2):18–22
Wang W, Wei XY, Meng K, Zhong LH, Wang Y, Yu XH (2017) Bio-tribology properties of bionic carp scale morphology on Ti6A14V surface. IOP Conf Ser: Mat Sci Engine 281:012060
Wang YD, Wang PC (2014) Design of a kind of minitype shallow water power underwater vehicle. Appl Mechan Mat 644–650:674–677
Wang YW, Tan JB, Gu BT, Sang PF, Zhao DB (2014b) Design and modeling of a biomimetic stingray-like robotic fish. Adv Mat Res 945–949:1473–1477
Wang YW, Tan JB, Zhao DB (2015) Erratum to: 'Design and experiment on a biomimetic robotic fish inspired by freshwater stingray.' J Bionic Eng 12(3):371
Wang ZL, Wang YW, Li J, Hang GR (2009) A micro biomimetic manta ray robot fish actuated by SMA. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), Guilin, pp 1809–1803
Wang ZW, Dong CL, Zhang ZM, Tian QH, Sun AQ, Yuan L et al (2022) Review of multi-fin propulsion and functional materials of underwater bionic robotic fish. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 236(13):71
Watts CM, McGookin EW (2014) Surge performance of an underwater vehicle with a biomimetic tendon drive propulsion system. Proc Inst Mech Engine, Part M: J Engine Maritime Environ 228(4):315–330
Wehner M, Truby RL, Fitzgerald DJ, Mosadegh B, Whitesides GM, Lewis JA et al (2016) An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots. Nature 536(7617):451–455
Wu RX, Du G, Liu Z, Zhang DX, Yu YJ (2021a) Design of bionic robot fish propelled by two joint caudal fin. J Phys: Conf Ser, 1982:012056
Wu YH, Liu JC, Wei YG, An D, Duan YH, Li WS et al (2021b) Intelligent control method of underwater inspection robot in netcage. Aquac Res 53(5):1928–1938
Wu YH, Ta XX, **ao RC, Wei YG, An D, Li DL (2019) Survey of underwater robot positioning navigation. Appl Ocean Res 90:101845
Wu ZX, Yu JZ, Su ZS, Tan M (2013) Control and implementation of S-start for a multijoint biomimetic robotic fish. Acta Automatica Sinica 39(11):1914–1922
Wynn RB, Huvenne VAI, Le Bas TP, Murton BJ, Connelly DP, Bett BJ et al (2014) Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs): their past, present and future contributions to the advancement of marine geoscience. Mar Geol 352:451–468
**a QC, Li H, Song N, Wu ZL, Wang X, Sun X et al (2023) Research on flexible collapsible fluid-driven bionic robotic fish. Ocean Eng 276(8):1–10
** patterns by using a biomimetic robot fish. IEEE Robot Automat Lett 5(1):64–71
**e FR, Zuo QY, Chen QL, Fang HT, He K, Du RX et al (2021) Designs of the biomimetic robotic fishes performing Body and/or Caudal Fin (BCF) swimming locomotion: a review. J Intell Robot Syst 102(1):13
**e O, Zhu QX, Shen L, Ren K (2018) Kinematic study on a self-propelled bionic underwater robot with undulation and jet propulsion modes. Robotica 36(11):1613–1626
Yan CY, Zhang XQ, Ji ZY, Wang XL, Zhou F (2021) 3D-Printed electromagnetic actuator for bionic swimming robot. J Mater Eng Perform 30(9):6579–6587
Yan Q, Han Z, Zhang SW, Yang J (2008) Parametric research of experiments on a carangiform robotic fish. J Bionic Eng 5(2):95–101
Yang H, Ma J (2010) Nonlinear control for autonomous underwater glider motion based on inverse system method. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Science) 15(6):713–718
Yang J, Feng JF, Qi D, Li YL (2016) Longitudinal motion control of underwater vehicle based on fast smooth second order sliding mode. Optik 127(20):9118–9130
Yang YC, Ye XF, Guo SX (2007) A new type of jellyfish-like microrobot. 2007 IEEE International Conference on Integration Technology, Shenzhen, China, 20-24 March 2007, pp 673–678
Yang YH, Chu CZ, ** H, Hu QQ, Xu M, Dong EB (2023) Design, modeling, and control of an aurelia-inspired robot based on SMA artificial muscles. Biomimetics (Basel) 8(2):261
Yeom SW, Oh IK (2008) Fabrication and evaluation of biomimetic jellyfish robot using IPMC. Symposium on Mining Smartness from Nature held at the 3rd International Conference on Smart Materials, Structures and Systems, Acireale, Italy, 8-13 June 2008, pp 171–176
You SS, Lim TW, Jeong SK (2010) General path-following manoeuvres for an underwater vehicle using robust control synthesis. Proc Inst Mech Engine Part I: J Syst Control Eng 224(8):960–969
Yu JZ, Wang C, **e GM (2016) Coordination of multiple robotic fish with applications to underwater robot competition. IEEE Trans Industr Electr 63(2):1280–1288
Yu JZ, Wen L, Ren ZY (2017) A survey on fabrication, control, and hydrodynamic function of biomimetic robotic fish. Sci China Technol Sci 60(9):1365–1380
Yu JZ, Wu ZX, Wang M, Tan M (2016) CPG network optimization for a biomimetic robotic fish via PSO. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 27(9):1962–1968
Yue CF, Guo SX, Li MX, Li YX, Hirata H, Ishihara H (2015) Mechatronic system and experiments of a spherical underwater robot: SUR-II. J Intell Robot Syst 80(2):325–340
Zhang SX, Yan WS, **e GM (2017) Consensus-based leader-following formation control for a group of semi-biomimetic robotic fishes. Int J Adv Robot Syst 14(4):12
Zhang Z, Yang T, Zhang T, Zhou F, Cen N, Li T et al (2021) Global vision-based formation control of soft robotic fish swarm. Soft Robot 8(3):310–318
Zhao W, Yu J, Fang Y, Wang L (2006) Development of multi-mode biomimetic robotic fish based on central pattern generator. 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Bei**g, China, 9-13 October 2006, pp 3891–3896
Zheng XW, Wang W, **ong ML, **e GM (2020) Online state estimation of a fin-actuated underwater robot using artificial lateral line system. IEEE Trans Robot 36(2):472–487
Zhong Y, Song JL, Yu HY, Du RX (2018) Toward a transform method from lighthill fish swimming model to biomimetic robot fish. IEEE Robot Automat Lett 3(3):2632–2639
Zhou C, Cao ZQ, Wang S, Tan M (2008) Study on the pitching and depth control of biomimetic robot fish: study on the pitching and depth control of biomimetic robot fish. Acta Automatica Sinica 34(9):1215–1218
Zhou J, Huang C, Liu B, Wang TT (2014) A control system design of underwater robot for detecting underwater structures. Appl Mech Mater 536–537:1105–1109
Zhou L, Dong EB, Hang H, Kong XW, Yang J (2017) Design and research of a novel caudal-fin propulsion mechanism with two degrees of freedom. IEEE International Conference on Real-time Computing and Robotics (RCAR), Okinawa, Japan, 14-18 July 2017, pp 454–458
Zhou ZY, Jiang YQ, Li Y, Jian C, Sun YY (2018) A single acoustic beacon-based positioning method for underwater mobile recovery of an AUV. Int J Adv Robot Syst 15(5):1729881418801739
Zhou ZY, Liu JC, Pan J, Yu JZ (2023) Proactivity of fish and leadership of self-propelled robotic fish during interaction. Bioinspir Biomim 18(3):1748
Zhu KB (2018) Tracking and positioning technology of chemical plumes by underwater robots based on source distribution model. Chem Engine Trans (CET Journal) 71(1):451–456
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62201537 and U20A20194), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (Grant No. ZR2022QF008), and the Central University Basic Research Fund of China (Grant No. 202312035). We thank Yanyue Teng at the Ocean University of China for the useful discussion on the soft actuator drive part of this review.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Zhongao Cui and Liao Li performed the literature survey, drafted the manuscript and revised it critically for the key content. Yuhang Wang conducted literature research and content verification. Zhiwei Zhong carried out the document sorting and figure modification. Junyang Li is the corresponding author, responsible for organizing the manuscript sequence alignment, proofreading and revising the manuscript, and giving the final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cui, Z., Li, L., Wang, Y. et al. Review of research and control technology of underwater bionic robots. Intell. Mar. Technol. Syst. 1, 7 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44295-023-00010-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44295-023-00010-3