Abstract
Objectives
Gender inequities are deeply rooted in our society and have significant negative consequences. Female physicians experience numerous gender-related inequities (e.g., microaggressions, harassment, violence). These inequities have far-reaching consequences on health, well-being and career longevity and may result in the devaluing of various strengths that female emergency physicians bring to the table. This, in turn, has an impact on patient healthcare experience and outcomes. During the 2021 Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Academic Symposium, a national collaborative sought to understand gender inequities in emergency medicine in Canada.
Methods
We used a multistep stakeholder-engagement-based approach (harnessing both quantitative and qualitative methods) to identify and prioritize problems with gender equity in emergency medicine in Canada. Based on expert consultation and literature review, we developed recommendations to effect change for the higher priority problems. We then conducted a nationwide consultation with the Canadian emergency medicine community via online engagement and the CAEP Academic Symposium to ensure that these priority problems and solutions were appropriate for the Canadian context.
Conclusion
Via the above process, 15 recommendations were developed to address five unique problem areas. There is a dearth of research in this important area and we hope this preliminary work will serve as a starting point to fuel further research. To facilitate these scholarly endeavors, we have appended additional documents identifying other key problems with gender equity in emergency medicine in Canada as well as proposed next steps for future research.
Résumé
Objectifs
Les inégalités entre les sexes sont profondément ancrées dans notre société et ont des conséquences négatives importantes. Les femmes médecins subissent de nombreuses inégalités liées au genre (par exemple, microagressions, harcèlement, violence). Ces inégalités ont des conséquences considérables sur la santé, le bien-être et la longévité de la carrière et peuvent entraîner la dévalorisation des différents atouts que les femmes médecins urgentistes apportent à la table. Ceci, à son tour, a un impact sur l’expérience et les résultats des soins de santé des patients. Au cours du Symposium académique 2021 de l’Association canadienne des médecins d’urgence (ACMU), une collaboration nationale a cherché à comprendre les inégalités entre les sexes en médecine d’urgence au Canada.
Méthodes
Nous avons utilisé une approche en plusieurs étapes basée sur l’engagement des parties prenantes (en utilisant des méthodes quantitatives et qualitatives) pour identifier et classer par ordre de priorité les problèmes d’équité entre les sexes en médecine d’urgence au Canada. À partir d’une consultation d’experts et d’une revue de la littérature, nous avons élaboré des recommandations visant à apporter des changements aux problèmes les plus prioritaires. Nous avons ensuite mené une consultation nationale auprès de la communauté canadienne de médecine d’urgence par le biais d’un engagement en ligne et du symposium universitaire de l’ACMU afin de nous assurer que ces problèmes prioritaires et ces solutions étaient adaptés au contexte canadien.
Conclusion
Grâce au processus ci-dessus, 15 recommandations ont été élaborées pour traiter 5 domaines problématiques uniques. Il existe un manque de recherche dans ce domaine important et nous espérons que ce travail préliminaire servira de point de départ pour alimenter d’autres recherches. Pour faciliter ces efforts de recherche, nous avons annexé d’autres documents identifiant d’autres problèmes clés en matière d’équité entre les sexes en médecine d’urgence au Canada, ainsi que des propositions d’étapes pour de futures recherches.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hay K, McDougal L, Percival V, et al. Disrupting gender norms in health systems: making the case for change. Lancet. 2019;393(10190):2535–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30648-8.
Derose KP, Hays RD, McCaffrey DF, Bakerg DW. Does physician gender affect satisfaction of men and women visiting the emergency department? J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(4):218–26. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016004218.x.
Nfonoyim B, Martin A, Ellison A, Wright JL, Johnson TJ. Experiences of underrepresented faculty in pediatric emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2021;28(9):982–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.14191.
Greenwood BN, Carnahan S, Huang L. Patient–physician gender concordance and increased mortality among female heart attack patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115(34):8569–74. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800097115.
Lu DW, Lall MD, Mitzman J, et al. #MeToo in EM: a multicenter survey of academic emergency medicine faculty on their experiences with gender discrimination and sexual harassment. West J Emerg Med. 2020;21(2):252–60. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.11.44592.
Bryant T, Leaver C, Dunn J. Unmet healthcare need, gender, and health inequalities in Canada. Health Policy. 2009;91(1):24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.11.002.
Heise L, Greene ME, Opper N, et al. Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health. Lancet. 2019;393(10189):2440–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30652-X.
Madsen TE, Linden JA, Rounds K, et al. Current status of gender and racial/ethnic disparities among academic emergency medicine physicians. Acad Emerg Med. 2017;24(10):1182–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13269.
Sheppard G, Pham C, Nowacki A, Bischoff T, Snider C. Towards gender equity in emergency medicine: a position statement from the CAEP Women in Emergency Medicine committee. Can J Emerg Med. 2021;23(4):455–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-021-00114-x.
Addressing gender equity and diversity in Canada’s medical profession: a review. Canadian Medical Association & Federation of Medical Women of Canada; 2018:16. https://www.cma.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/Ethics/report-2018-equity-diversity-medicine-e.pdf.
Tricco AC, Bourgeault I, Moore A, Grunfeld E, Peer N, Straus SE. Advancing gender equity in medicine. CMAJ. 2021;193(7):E244–50. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.200951.
Emergency Medicine Profile. Canadian Medical Association; 2019:21. https://www.cma.ca/sites/default/files/2019-01/emergency-e.pdf.
Lien K, Yau L, Aarsen KV, Wakabayashi A, Bhimani M. LO73: are women under-represented in emergency medicine residency programs across Canada? Can J Emerg Med. 2020;22(S1):S34–S34. https://doi.org/10.1017/cem.2020.128.
Krzyzaniak SM, Gottlieb M, Parsons M, Rocca N, Chan TM. What emergency medicine rewards: is there implicit gender bias in national awards? Ann Emerg Med. 2019;74(6):753–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.04.022.
Choo EK, Kass D, Westergaard M, et al. The development of best practice recommendations to support the hiring, recruitment, and advancement of women physicians in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23(11):1203–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13028.
Bennett CL, Raja AS, Kapoor N, et al. Gender differences in faculty rank among academic emergency physicians in the United States. Acad Emerg Med. 2019;26(3):281–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13685.
Rimmer A. How can I tackle microaggressions in the workplace. BMJ. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m690 (published online Feb 24, 2020).
Lewiss RE, Silver JK, Bernstein CA, Mills AM, Overholser B, Spector ND. Is Academic medicine making mid-career women physicians invisible? J Womens Health. 2020;29(2):187–92. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2019.7732.
Molina MF, Landry AI, Chary AN, Burnett-Bowie S-AM. Addressing the elephant in the room: microaggressions in medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;76(4):387–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.04.009.
Kolehmainen C, Brennan M, Filut A, Isaac C, Carnes M. “Afraid of being witchy with a ‘b’”: a qualitative study of how gender influences residents’ experiences leading cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2014;89(9):1276–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000372.
Rosenman ED, Misisco A, Olenick J, et al. Does team leader gender matter? A Bayesian reconciliation of leadership and patient care during trauma resuscitations. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2021;2(1): e12348. https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12348.
Brucker K, Whitaker N, Morgan ZS, et al. Exploring gender bias in nursing evaluations of emergency medicine residents. Acad Emerg Med. 2019;26(11):1266–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13843.
Ju M, van Schaik SM. Effect of professional background and gender on residents’ perceptions of leadership. Acad Med. 2019;94(11S):S42. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002925.
Meier A, Yang J, Liu J, et al. Female physician leadership during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is associated with improved patient outcomes. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(1):e8–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003464.
Linden JA, Breaud AH, Mathews J, et al. The intersection of gender and resuscitation leadership experience in emergency medicine residents: a qualitative study. AEM Educ Train. 2018;2(2):162–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10096.
Dayal A, O’Connor DM, Qadri U, Arora VM. Comparison of male vs female resident milestone evaluations by faculty during emergency medicine residency training. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(5):651–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9616.
Mueller AS, Jenkins T, Osborne M, Dayal A, O’Connor DM, Arora VM. Gender differences in attending physicians’ feedback for residents in an emergency medical residency program: a qualitative analysis. J Grad Med Educ. 2017. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-17-00126.1.
Gottlieb M, Krzyzaniak SM, Mannix A, et al. Sex distribution of editorial board members among emergency medicine journals. Ann Emerg Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.03.027 (published online May 4, 2020).
Gordon AJ, Sebok-Syer SS, Dohn AM, et al. The birth of a return to work policy for new resident parents in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2019;26(3):317–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13684.
Lent B, Phillips SP, Richardson B, Stewart D. Promoting parental leave for female and male physicians. CMAJ. 2000;162(11):1575–6.
Raub A, Nandi A, Earle A, et al. Paid parental leave: a detailed look at approaches across OECD countries. UCLA Fielding School of Public Health; 2018:82. https://www.worldpolicycenter.org/sites/default/files/WORLD%20Report%20-%20Parental%20Leave%20OECD%20Country%20Approaches_0.pdf. Accessed 3 Jul 2020.
Gottenborg E, Rock L, Sheridan A. Parental leave for residents at programs affiliated with the top 50 medical schools. J Grad Med Educ. 2019;11(4):472–4. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-19-00227.1.
Stratton T, Cook-Chaimowitz L, Pardhan A, Snelgrove N, Chan TM. Parental leave policies in Canadian residency education. J Grad Med Educ. 2021;13(2):206–12. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-20-00774.1.
Waite S. Postgraduate wage premiums and the gender wage gap in Canada. Can J High Educ. 2017;47(2):156–87. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v47i2.187939.
Cohen M, Kiran T. Closing the gender pay gap in Canadian medicine. CMAJ. 2020;192(35):E1011–7. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.200375.
Boesveld S. What’s driving the gender pay gap in medicine? CMAJ. 2020;192(1):E19–20. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1095831.
Drury BJ, Kaiser CR. Allies against sexism: the role of men in confronting sexism. J Soc Issues. 2014;70(4):637–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12083.
Hekman DR, Johnson SK, Foo M-D, Yang W. Does diversity-valuing behavior result in diminished performance ratings for non-white and female leaders? Acad Manag J. 2017;60(2):771–97. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0538.
Nash M, Grant R, Moore R, Winzenberg T. Male allyship in institutional STEMM gender equity initiatives. PLoS One. 2021;16(3): e0248373. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248373.
Tsugawa Y, Jena AB, Figueroa JF, Orav EJ, Blumenthal DM, Jha AK. Comparison of hospital mortality and readmission rates for medicare patients treated by male vs female physicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(2):206–13. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7875.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) for providing the academic symposium venue for this important work to take place. We would like to acknowledge the work of our collaborators who helped to identify and describe problems related to gender equity in emergency medicine in Canada. In addition, this group has offered their comments and feedback on various iterations of this work. Thank you to Drs. Brittany Cameron, Paula Cameron, Joan Cheng, Eileen Cheung, Roisin Dempsey, Sara Gray, Nour Khatib, Kelly Lien, Kelsey MacLeod, Shauna Martiniuk, Wanda Millard, Marika Moskalyk, Anna Karolina Nowacki, Nadia Primiani, Anita Pozgay, Nidhi Sahi, Lisa Salamon, Sheryl Seidman, Sydney Tam and Michelle Yee
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EMB, JM, RL and TMC designed the study and directed data collection and interpretation of data. They were also involved in creating intellectual content and drafting and revising the final work which they stand by. KJ, AB, TB, KH, MM, IM, AP, CP, JS and AZ were involved in creating intellectual content for subsections of the work. They have also reviewed data acquisition tools, and given their approval and feedback to the final draft of this work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
An exemption was granted from the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board after a review.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McIlveen-Brown, E., Morris, J., Lim, R. et al. Priority strategies to improve gender equity in Canadian emergency medicine: proceedings from the CAEP 2021 Academic Symposium on leadership. Can J Emerg Med 24, 151–160 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-021-00245-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-021-00245-1