Log in

“It saved us”: parent perspectives of the 2021 expanded child tax credit

  • Original paper
  • Published:
SN Social Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In early 2021, Congress expanded the existing Child Tax Credit (CTC), increasing the credit’s maximum value (up to $3000 for school-age children and $3600 for children under the age of six). Half of the credit was issued monthly to most families from July to December 2021. The temporary expansion was further made fully refundable, meaning that for one year, even very low-income families qualified. In this study, we draw on a novel, multi-wave probability-based panel survey of more than 1000 CTC recipients to understand the credit’s impact on families. Using a mixed-methods approach that combines logistic regression and qualitative content analysis, we find that most respondents reported that the CTC made it easier for them to support their families, afford utility bills, and cover housing costs. Over one-third of respondents also stated that the CTC allowed them to pay for extracurricular activities for their children and save for their child’s future education, and spend more time with their children. In open-ended responses, parents describe that the CTC had a generally positive effect: it helped with bills/utilities, allowed families to save, helped with groceries/food, covered necessities for children, and reduced stress for parents. Conversely, some reported that it had no effects or made no difference. We also assess how participant demographics and political affiliation are associated with each theme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from NORC/AmeriSpeak, but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are, however, available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of NORC/AmeriSpeak.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the generous support of the funder, Humanity Forward.

Funding

This research was generously supported by Humanity Forward. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Author #1 was the Co-Principal Investigator of the study, secured funding, co-designed the study, and led the write-up of the paper. Author #2 contributed significantly to the writing. Author #3 conducted data analysis and wrote up the methods and findings. Author #4, as Co-Principal Investigator, co-designed the study and led the data analysis. Author #5 supported the write-up of the study. Author #6 assisted with data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leah Hamilton.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This research was approved by the Washington University in St. Louis Institutional Review Board (IRB# 202106154). The study met the criteria for approval per 45 CFR 46.111 and/or 21 CFR 56.111, as applicable.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants in this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no financial or non-financial interests that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

This research was generously supported by Humanity Forward. Inquiries can be submitted to the primary author at hamiltonl@appstate.edu.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamilton, L., Bellisle, D., Brugger, L. et al. “It saved us”: parent perspectives of the 2021 expanded child tax credit. SN Soc Sci 4, 26 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-023-00827-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-023-00827-z

Keywords

Navigation