Log in

A Comparison of Repeated Reading and Listening While Reading to Increase Oral Reading Fluency in Children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Education and Treatment of Children Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oral reading fluency is crucial to successful reading comprehension. Difficulties to effectively read aloud with fluency often pose challenges to develop more complex reading skills. Although there exists research on teaching oral reading fluency using repeated readings, there is limited research on the effectiveness of listening while reading with error correction procedures for children struggling with reading. Using a single-case, alternating treatments design, this research evaluated the effectiveness of repeated readings with word rehearsal when compared to listening while reading with error correction on the number of words read correctly per minute for three 2nd graders who struggled with reading. In addition, silent reading was assessed as a control condition in this study. The results of this research indicated an acceleration in the correct number of words read as a result of practice, as well as a deceleration of incorrect words read, overall, for both reading interventions. Listening while reading with error correction and repeated reading with word rehearsal did not seem produce a larger effect than the other. However, the implementation of silent reading resulted in both correct and incorrect words accelerating. This may suggest that silent reading may not be as effective as repeated reading and listening while reading. Furthermore, best-quality reading instruction appears to need some form of corrective feedback (e.g., error correction or word rehearsal) to obtain best outcomes for students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldhanhani, Z. R., & Abu-Ayyash, E. A. (2020). Theories and research on oral reading fluency: What is needed? Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 10(4), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1004.05

  • Amin, E. A. R. (2022). Using repeated-reading and listening-while-reading via text-to-speech apps in develo** fluency and comprehension. World Journal of English Language, 12(1), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n1p211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begeny, J. C., Krouse, H. E., Ross, S. G., & Mitchell, C. (2009). Increasing elementary-aged reading fluency with small-group interventions: A comparison of repeated reading, listening passage preview, and listening only strategies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 18(3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-009-9090-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blonder, M., Skinner, C. H., Ciancio, D., Cazzell, S., Scott, K., Jaquett, C., Ruddy, J., & Thompson, K. (2019). A comparison of comprehension accuracy and rate: Repeated readings and listening while reading in second-grade students. Contemporary School Psychology, 23, 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-017-0169-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boutot, E. A. (2017). Autism spectrum disorders: Foundations, characteristics, and effective strategies (2nd ed.). Pearson.

  • Clark, C. H. (1995). Teaching students about reading: A fluency example. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy & Language Arts, 35(3), 6. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol35iss3/6

  • Clemens, N. H., Simmons, D., Simmons, L. E., Wang, H., & Kwok, O. M. (2017). The prevalence of reading fluency and vocabulary difficulties among adolescents struggling with reading comprehension. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(8), 785–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916662120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, E. (1989). Readability formulas: Maligned but valid. Journal of Reading, 32, 292–297. https://jstor.org/stable/40029925

  • Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2007). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Institute for Development of Educational Achievement.

  • Hale, A. D., Skinner, C. H., Winn, B. D., Oliver, R., Allin, J. D., & Molloy, C. C. (2005). An investigation of listening and listening-while-reading accommodations on reading comprehension levels and rates in students with emotional disorders. Psychology in the Schools, 42(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R. O., Marsicano, R., Schmitt, A. J., McCallum, E., & Musti-Rao, S. (2015). Comparing the efficiency of repeated reading and listening-while-reading to improve fluency and comprehension. Education & Treatment of Children, 38(1), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2015.0005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R. O., Musti-Rao, S., Hale, A. D., McGuire, S., & Hailley, J. (2010). Examining listening previewing as a class wide strategy to promote reading comprehension and vocabulary. Psychology in the Schools, 47(9), 903–916. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson, D. M. (2023). How does explicit phonemic awareness instruction in a 6th-grade classroom influence students reading fluency and comprehension? Sophia, the St. Catherine University. https://sophia.stkate.edu/maed/521

  • Hudson, A., Koh, P. W., Moore, K. A., & Binks-Cantrell, E. (2020). Fluency interventions for elementary students with reading difficulties: a synthesis of research from 2000–2019. Education Sciences, 10(3), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. M., Pennypacker, H. S., & Green, G. (2020). Strategies and tactics of behavioral research and practice (4th ed.). Routledge

  • Kostewicz, D. E., Kubina, R. M., Jr., & Brennan, K. M. (2019). Improving spelling for at-risk kindergartners through element skill frequency building. Behavioral Interventions, 35, 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostewicz, D. E., & Kubina, R. M., Jr. (2011). Building science reading fluency for students with disabilities with repeated reading to a fluency criterion. Learning Disabilities, 17(3), 89–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostewicz, D. E., & Kubina, R. M., Jr. (2010). A comparison of two reading fluency methods: Repeated readings to a fluency criterion and interval sprinting. Reading Improvement, 47(1), 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledford, J. R., & Gast, D. L. (2018). Single case research methodology. Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.

  • Lee, J., & Yoon, S. Y. (2017). The effects of repeated reading on reading Fluency for students with reading disabilities: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(2), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219415605194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lionetti, T. M., & Cole, C. L. (2004). A comparison of the effects of two rates of listening while reading on oral reading fluency and reading comprehension. Education & Treatment of Children, 27(2), 114–129. https://jstor.org/stable/42899791

  • Malanga, P. (2003). Using repeated readings and error correction to build reading fluency with at risk elementary students. Journal of Precision Teaching & Celeration, 19(2), 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. S., Alber, S. R., & Gordy, A. (2004). Effects of systematic error correction and repeated readings on the reading accuracy and proficiency of second graders with disabilities. Education & Treatment of Children., 27(3), 186–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M. B., & Gadke, D. L. (2018). Improving oral reading fluency in middle-school students: A comparison of repeated reading and listening passage preview. Psychology in the Schools, 55(10), 1274–1286. https://doi.org/10.10202/pits.22184

  • Rasinski, T. V. (1990). Effects of repeated reading and listening-while-reading on reading fluency. Journal of Educational Research, 83(3), 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1990.10885946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupley, W. H., Dee Nichols, W., Rasinski, T. V., & Paige, D. (2020). Fluency: Deep roots in reading instruction. Education Sciences, 10(6), 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10060155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, A. J., Hale, A. D., McCallum, E., & Mauck, B. (2011). Accommodating remedial readers in the general education setting: Is listening-while-reading sufficient to improve factual and inferential comprehension? Psychology in the Schools, 48, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southward, J. D., & Goo, M. (2019). Repeated readings as an intervention for high school students identified with a specific learning disability. International Journal of Special Education, 34(1), 255–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinle, P. K., Stevens, E., & Vaughn, S. (2022). Fluency interventions for struggling readers in grades 6 to 12: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 55(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219421991249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Therrien, W. J., & Kubina, R. M. (2007). The importance of context in repeated reading. Reading Improvement, 44(4), 179–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Therrien, W. J., Kirk, J. F., & Woods-Groves, S. (2012). Comparison of a reading fluency intervention with and without passage repetition on reading achievement. Remedial & Special Education, 33, 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511410360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2022). Reading Assessment. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). https://nationsreportcard.gov

  • Vollmer, T. R., Sloman, K. N., & St. Peter Pipkin, C. (2008). Practical implications of data reliability and treatment integrity monitoring. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1(2), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391722

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S., Stratton, K. K., & Gadke, D. L. (2020). Maximizing repeated readings: The effects of a multicomponent reading fluenc y intervention for children with reading difficulties. Contemporary School Psychology, 24, 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-019-00248-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel E. Ampuero.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. IRB approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board. This article does not contain studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors of this article do not have conflict of interest to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maiden, M.E., Ampuero, M.E. & Kostewicz, D.E. A Comparison of Repeated Reading and Listening While Reading to Increase Oral Reading Fluency in Children. Educ. Treat. Child. 47, 51–66 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-024-00121-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-024-00121-4

Keywords

Navigation