Log in

Effects of shear panel dampers on seismic response mitigation of high-speed railway simply supported bridge-track system under far-field and near-field ground motions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High-speed railway lines always have to cross the seismic zone with great earthquake risks leading to serious consequences. A replaceable steel panel damper (SPD) is proposed as an energy-dissipation device to mitigate the structural seismic responses. It is simulated as a simplified nonlinear spring embedded in structural system with the force–displacement behavior derived by plate-beam theory. To investigate the effect of SPD, a typical 5-span high-speed railway simply supported bridge-track system (HSRSBTS) validated by a shaking table test is established by ANSYS. A novel damage measure, the system relative damage ratio (γSRD), is proposed to quantify the effect of SPD in the system and consider the potential component-level damage modes of both bending and shear. The structural system is investigated undergoing two ground motions suites in DBE- and MCE-level intensity, including both far-field and near-field records in transverse direction. The result indicates that a significant reduce (roughly 50%) of seismic response in rail and girder are contributed by SPD, while the system damage decreases about 10–15%, especially for near-field pulse-like ground motions with high intensity. The energy-dissipation capacity of SPDs with various configurations is examined to optimize the properties of SPD. It generally decreases with the increase in the elastic stiffness ratio r of the SPD to the fixed support, and the r = 2–2.5 are recommended in engineering practice. SPD is an effective and efficient device of structure to be adopted as an energy-dissipation component and the first defense line under far-field and near-field ground motions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the authors.

References

  1. Montenegro PA, Carvalho H, Ribeiro D, Calçada R, Tokunaga M, Tanabe M, Zhai WM. Assessment of train running safety on bridges: a literature review. Eng Struct. 2021;241: 112425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Emergency Release: Investigation of Typical Bridge Earthquake Damage and Site Liquefaction in the Menyuan Earthquake., (2022). https://www.iem.ac.cn/detail.html?id=2340 (accessed 22 Jan 2022)

  3. Piras S, Palermo A, Saiid Saiidi M. State-of-the-art of posttensioned rocking bridge substructure systems. J Bridge Eng. 2022;27:03122001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. **ang N, Goto Y, Obata M, Alam MS. Passive seismic unseating prevention strategies implemented in highway bridges: a state-of-the-art review. Eng Struct. 2019;194:77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zou S, Wenliuhan H, Zhou F. Shaking table test of a high-speed railway bridge with a new isolation system. Eng Struct. 2019;196: 109315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hong X, Guo W, Wang Z. Seismic analysis of coupled high-speed train-bridge with the isolation of friction pendulum bearing. Adv Civ Eng. 2020;2020:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kang X, Lizhong Jiang Yu, Bai CC. Caprani, Seismic damage evaluation of high-speed railway bridge components under different intensities of earthquake excitations. Eng Struct. 2017;152:116–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wei B, Wang W-H, Wang P, Yang T-H, Jiang L-Z, Wang T. Seismic responses of a high-speed railway (HSR) bridge and track simulation under longitudinal earthquakes. J Earthq Eng. 2020;26:4449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yan B, Li Z, Liu S, **e H-R. Seismic response of CRTS II ballastless track-bridge system considering the damage of track structure. Sci Prog. 2021;104:003685042110352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang Y, Jiang L, Zhou W, Feng Y, Tan Z, Chai X. Study of bridge-subgrade longitudinal constraint range for high-speed railway simply-supported beam bridge with CRTSII ballastless track under earthquake excitation. Constr Build Mater. 2020;241: 118026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meng D, Yang M, Yang Z, Chouw N. Effect of earthquake-induced transverse poundings on a 32 m span railway bridge isolated by friction pendulum bearings. Eng Struct. 2022;251: 113538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chan RWK, Albermani F. Experimental study of steel slit damper for passive energy dissipation. Eng Struct. 2008;30:1058–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Feng D, Li A, Guo T. Seismic control of a single-tower extradosed railway bridge using the E-Shaped steel dam** bearing. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2020;136: 106249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maleki S, Mahjoubi S. Dual-pipe damper. J Constr Steel Res. 2013;85:81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Naeem A, Kim J. Seismic performance evaluation of a multi-slit damper. Eng Struct. 2019;189:332–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao B, Lu B, Zeng X, Gu Q. Experimental and numerical study of hysteretic performance of new brace type damper. J Constr Steel Res. 2021;183: 106717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo W, Zeng C, Gou H, Hu Y, Xu H, Guo L. Rotational friction damper’s performance for controlling seismic response of high speed railway bridge-track system. Comput Model Eng Sci. 2019;120:491–515.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li A, Gao R, Sun M, Zhang J (2016) Research on hysteretic behaviors of a saparated shock absorber applied in railway bridge. In: Proc. VII Eur. Congr. Comput. Methods Appl. Sci. Eng. ECCOMAS Congr., Institute of Structural Analysis and Antiseismic Research School of Civil Engineering National Technical University of Athens (NTUA) Greece, Crete Island, Greece, 2016: pp. 8597–8605.

  19. Nakashima M, Iwai S, Iwata M, Takeuchi T, Konomi S, Akazawa T, Saburi K. Energy dissipation behaviour of shear panels made of low yield steel. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1994;23:1299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abebe DY, Jeong SJ, Getahune BM, Segu DZ, Choi JH (2015) Hysteretic characteristics of shear panel damper made of low yield point steel. Mater Res Innov. 19:S5–902-S5-910.

  21. Chen Z, Ge H, Usami T. Hysteretic model of stiffened shear panel dampers. J Struct Eng. 2006;132:478–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chan RWK, Albermani F, Kitipornchai S. Experimental study of perforated yielding shear panel device for passive energy dissipation. J Constr Steel Res. 2013;91:14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sahoo DR, Singhal T, Taraithia SS, Saini A. Cyclic behavior of shear-and-flexural yielding metallic dampers. J Constr Steel Res. 2015;114:247–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Basler K. Strength of plate girders in shear. J Struct Div. 1961;87:151–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wei B, Hu Z, Zuo C, Wang W, Jiang L. Effects of horizontal ground motion incident angle on the seismic risk assessment of a high-speed railway continuous bridge. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2021;21:18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-020-00169-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lai Z, Jiang L, Zhou W, Yu J, Zhang Y, Liu X, Zhou W. Lateral girder displacement effect on the safety and comfortability of the high-speed rail train operation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2021.1942507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Javanmardi A, Ibrahim Z, Ghaedi K, Benisi Ghadim H, Hanif MU. State-of-the-art review of metallic dampers: testing, development and implementation. Arch Comput Methods Eng. 2020;27:455–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ozcelik Y. Strip model for steel plate shear walls with beam-connected web plates. Eng Struct. 2017;11:369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu J, Jiang L, Zhou W, Lu J, Zhong T, Peng K. Study on the influence of trains on the seismic response of high-speed railway structure under lateral uncertain earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng. 2021;19:2971–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu Z, Gong W, Wang L, Li Q, Bai Y, Yu Z, Harik IE. An efficient multi-time-step method for train-track-bridge interaction. Comput Struct. 2018;196:36–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yan B, Liu S, Pu H, Dai G, Cai X. Elastic-plastic seismic response of CRTS II slab ballastless track system on high-speed railway bridges. Sci China Technol Sci. 2017;60:865–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-016-0222-6.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Dai G, Tang Y, Liang J, Yang L, Chen YF. Temperature monitoring of high-speed railway bridges in mountainous areas. Struct Eng Int. 2018;28:288–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Jiang L, Zhang Y, Feng Y, Zhou W, Tan Z. Simplified calculation modeling method of multi-span bridges on high-speed railways under earthquake condition. Bull Earthq Eng. 2020;18:2303–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhu Z, Gong W, Wang L, Bai Y, Yu Z, Zhang L. Efficient assessment of 3D train-track-bridge interaction combining multi-time-step method and moving track technique. Eng Struct. 2019;183:290–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang L, Zhu Z, Bai Y, Li Q, Costa PA, Yu Z. A fast random method for three-dimensional analysis of train-track-soil dynamic interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2018;115:252–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jiang L, Yu J, Zhou W, Yan W, Lai Z, Feng Y. Applicability analysis of high-speed railway system under the action of near-fault ground motion. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2020;139: 106289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ministry of Railways of the People’s Republic of China (2006) Code for seismic design of railway engineering of China

  38. Ancheta TD, Darragh RB, Stewart JP, Seyhan E, Silva WJ, Chiou BS-J, Wooddell KE, Graves RW, Kottke AR, Boore DM, Kishida T, Donahue JL. NGA-West2 database. Earthq Spectra. 2014;30:989–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wen T, Jiang L-Z, Jiang L, Zhou W, Du Y. Interlayer area damage modeling and damage-based seismic fragility analysis of high-speed railway bridge and track system. Eng Struct. 2022;272: 114989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wei B, Yang T, Jiang L, He X. Effects of friction-based fixed bearings on the seismic vulnerability of a high-speed railway continuous bridge. Adv Struct Eng. 2018;21:643–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. China Academy of Railway Sciences (2013) Spherical bearings for railway bridges

  42. Huang Z, Li R, Liu F, Li A. Research on mechanical performance of improved buckling restrained shear panel damper. J Build Struct. 2016;37:85–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, U193420118, 52178180, 52008398, Key Technologies Research and Development Program, 2022YFC3004304.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tianxing Wen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Ethical approval

Hereby, I consciously assure that for the manuscript “Effects of shear panel dampers on seismic response mitigation of high-speed railway simply supported bridge-track system under far-field and near-field ground motions” the following is fulfilled: (1) these data are the authors’ own original work, which has not been previously published elsewhere. (2) The paper is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. (3) The paper reflects the authors' own research and analysis in a truthful and complete manner. (4) The paper properly credits the meaningful contributions of co-authors and co-researchers. (5) The results are appropriately placed in the context of prior and existing research. (6) All sources used are properly disclosed (correct citation). Literally copying of text must be indicated as such by using quotation marks and giving proper reference. (7) All authors have been personally and actively involved in substantial work leading to the paper, and will take public responsibility for its content. The violation of the Ethical Approval Statement rules may result in severe consequences. I agree with the above statements and declare that this submission follows the policies of Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering as outlined in the Guide for Authors and in the Ethical Statement.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, L., Yu, K., Jiang, L. et al. Effects of shear panel dampers on seismic response mitigation of high-speed railway simply supported bridge-track system under far-field and near-field ground motions. Archiv.Civ.Mech.Eng 23, 93 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-023-00632-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-023-00632-8

Keywords

Navigation