Log in

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning, Ensemble Learning and Deep Learning Classifiers for Parkinson’s Disease Detection

  • Original Research
  • Published:
SN Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A progressive neurodegenerative ailment called Parkinson's disease (PD) is marked by the death of dopamine-producing cells in the substantia nigra area of the brain. The exact etiology of PD remains elusive, but it is believed to involve the presence of Lewy bodies, abnormal protein aggregates, in affected brain regions, leading to the mobile symptoms of PD. Hence, as the management of PD continues to evolve, there is a growing demand for the establishment of a descriptive system that enables the early detection of PD. In this study, we conducted an extensive analysis using machine learning, ensemble learning, and deep learning models with different hyperparameters to develop accurate classification models for PD prediction. To enhance classifier performance and address overfitting, we employed principal component analysis (PCA) for feature selection along with various preprocessing techniques. The dataset used consisted of voice samples, comprising 188 PD patients and 64 normal individuals. Our results demonstrated that the Random Forest (RF) model with accuracy of 82.37% outperformed the other base classifiers Among the ensemble classifiers, the LGBM model exhibited the highest accuracy of 85.90% when compared to both base and ensemble classifiers. Notably, the deep learning model has 91.33% training accuracy and 85.02% testing accuracy, suggesting that deep learning models perform comparably equivalent on small datasets compared to machine learning classifiers. Overall, our findings underscore the effectiveness of machine learning, ensemble techniques and deep learning models in accurately predicting PD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used to support the findings of the study is made available from UCI Repository at https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Parkinson%27s+Disease+Classification#.

References

  1. Aarsland D, Batzu L, Halliday GM, et al. Parkinson disease-associated cognitive impairment. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kochanek KD, Xu J, Murphy SL, et al. Deaths: preliminary data for 2009. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011;59(4):1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rojas-Valenzuela I, Valenzuela O, Delgado-Marquez E, et al. Multi-class classifier in Parkinson’s disease using an evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithm. Appl Sci. 2022;12(6):3048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fox SH, Katzenschlager R, Lim SY, et al. The movement disorder society evidence-based medicine review update: treatments for the motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2011;26(S3):S2–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chaudhuri KR, Schapira AH. Non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease: dopaminergic pathophysiology and treatment. The Lancet Neurology. 2009;8(5):464–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalia LV, Lang AE. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 2015;386(9996):896–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guerreiro R, Ross OA, Kun-Rodrigues C, et al. Investigating the genetic architecture of Parkinson’s disease in ethnic Chinese. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018;89(5):553–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wirdefeldt K, Adami HO, Cole P, et al. Epidemiology and etiology of Parkinson’s disease: a review of the evidence. Eur J Epidemiol. 2011;26:S1-58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jankovic J. Parkinson’s disease: clinical features and diagnosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(4):368–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brooks DJ. Imaging approaches to Parkinson disease. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(4):596–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pereira CR, Pereira DR, Papa JP, et al. Convolutional neural networks applied for parkinson’s disease identification. In: Holzinger A, editor. Machine learning for health informatics, vol. 9605. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Cham; 2016. p. 377–90.

  12. Xu J, Zhang M. Use of magnetic resonance imaging and artificial intelligence in studies of diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2019;10(6):2658–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaur S, Aggarwal H, Rani R. Diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease using deep CNN with transfer learning and data augmentation. Multimedia Tools Appl. 2021;80(7):10113–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ricciardi L, Visco-Comandini F, Erro R, et al. Facial emotion recognition and expression in Parkinson’s disease: an emotional mirror mechanism? PLoS ONE. 2017;12(1): e0169110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kaur S, Aggarwal H, Rani R. Hyper-parameter optimization of deep learning model for prediction of Parkinson’s disease. Mach Vis Appl. 2020;31(5):1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rovini E, Maremmani C, Cavallo F. How wearable sensors can support Parkinson’s disease diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gomez-Rodellar A, Alvarez-Marquina A, Mekyska J, et al. Performance of Articulation Kinetic Distributions Vs MFCCs in Parkinson’s Detection from Vowel Utterances. Singapore: In Neural Approaches to Dynamics of Signal Exchanges Springer; 2020. p. 431–41.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fleyeh H, Westin J Extracting Body Landmarks from Videos for Parkinson Gait Analysis, In: 2019 IEEE 32nd International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), IEEE, pp. 379–384, 2019.

  19. Vasquez-Correa JC, Arias-Vergara T, et al. Multimodal assessment of Parkinson’s disease: a deep learning approach. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2018;23(4):1618–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Joshi A, Ghosh S, Gunnery S et al. Context-Sensitive Prediction of Facial Expressivity using Multimodal Hierarchical Bayesian Neural Networks, In: 2018 13th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2018), IEEE, pp. 278–285, 2018.

  21. Sonawane B, Sharma P. Review of automated emotion-based quantification of facial expression in Parkinson’s patients. Vis Comput. 2021;37(5):1151–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bowers D, Miller K, Bosch W, et al. Faces of emotion in Parkinson’s disease: micro-expressivity and bradykinesia during voluntary facial expressions. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006;12(6):765–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu P, Gonzalez I, Patsis G, et al. Objectifying facial expressivity assessment of parkinson’s patients: preliminary study. Comput Math Methods Med. 2014;2014:427826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vinokurov N, Arkadir D, Linetsky E, et al. Quantifying hypomimia in parkinson patients using a depth camera. Cham: In International Symposium on Pervasive Computing Paradigms for Mental Health Springer; 2015. p. 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Agrawal A, Mittal N. Using CNN for facial expression recognition: a study of the effects of kernel size and number of filters on accuracy. Vis Comput. 2020;36(2):405–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gan Y, Chen J, Xu L. Facial expression recognition boosted by soft label with a diverse ensemble. Pattern Recogn Lett. 2019;125:105–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsipouras MG, et al. A deep learning approach for Parkinson’s disease detection based on vocal parameters. Neural Comput Appl. 2018;29(10):743–53.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gupta R, et al. Deep learning-based early detection of Parkinson’s disease using gait analysis. J Med Syst. 2019;43(12):348.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hirschauer TJ, et al. Deep learning for individualized Parkinson’s disease diagnosis using handwritten digit tasks. Front Neurol. 2019;10:777.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Barukab O, et al. Analysis of Parkinson’s disease using an imbalanced-speech dataset by employing decision tree ensemble methods. Diagnostics. 2022;12(12):3000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sharma S, Guleria K. A systematic literature review on deep learning approaches for pneumonia detection using chest X-ray images. Multimed Tools Appl. 2023;1–51.

  32. Sharma S, Guleria K. A Deep Learning based model for the Detection of Pneumonia from Chest X-Ray Images using VGG-16 and Neural Networks. Proc Comput Sci. 2023;218:357–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Palak Goyal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicting interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the topical collection “Diverse Applications in Computing, Analytics and Networks” guest edited by Archana Mantri and Sagar Juneja.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goyal, P., Rani, R. Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning, Ensemble Learning and Deep Learning Classifiers for Parkinson’s Disease Detection. SN COMPUT. SCI. 5, 66 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-02368-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-02368-x

Keywords

Navigation