SpringerLink
Log in

Tungsten and arsenic substance flow analysis of a hydrometallurgical process for tungsten extracting from wolframite

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Tungsten Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 21 August 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

In this study, the metabolism of a hydrometallurgical process for tungsten extracting from wolframite was studied through substance flow analysis. The mass balance accounts, substance flow charts of tungsten and arsenic were established to evaluate the metabolism efficiency of the investigated system. The results showed that, the total tungsten resource efficiency of the system was 97.56%, and the tungsten recovery of unit process autoclaved alkali leaching, ion exchange, Mo removing, concentration and crystallization was 98.16%, 98.94%, 99.71%, 99.89%, respectively. Meanwhile, for extracting 1 ton of tungsten into the qualified ammonium paratungstate, 10.0414 kg of arsenic was carried into the system, with the generation of 7.2801 kg of arsenic in alkali leaching residue, 1.5067 kg of tungsten in arsenic waste residue, and 1.2312 kg of tungsten in Mo residue. Besides, 7.9 g of arsenic was discharged into nature environment with waste water, 15.5g of arsenic was entrained into the final APT. The distribution and transformation behaviors of arsenic during production were analyzed through phases change analysis, and some recommendations for improving the resource efficiency of tungsten and pollution control during production were also proposed based on the substance flow analysis in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Zhao ZW, **ao LP, Sun F, Huo GS, Li HG. Study on removing Mo from tungstate solution by activated carbon loaded with copper. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater. 2010;28(4):503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Li YL, Zhao ZW. Separation of molybdenum from acidic high-phosphorus tungsten solution by solvent extraction. JOM. 2017;69(10):1920.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang Y, **e BY, Wang RX, Xu SM, Wang JL, Xu ZH. Extraction and separation of tungsten from acidic high-phosphorus solution. Hydrometallurgy. 2016;164:97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. **e H, Zhao ZW, Cao CF, Liang Y, Li JT. Behavior of arsenic in process of removing molybdenum by sulfide method. J Cent South Univ. 2012;42(2):435 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li YK, Zhu X, Qi XJ, Shu B, Zhang X, Li KZ, Wei YG, Wang H. Removal and immobilization of arsenic from copper smelting wastewater using copper slag by in situ encapsulation with silica gel. Chem Eng J. 2020;394:124833.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Otones V, Álvarez-Ayuso E, García-Sánchez A, Santa Regina I, Murciego A. Arsenic distribution in soils and plants of an arsenic impacted former mining area. Environ Pollut. 2011;159:2637.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Li JT, Zhao ZW. Kinetics of scheelite concentrate digestion with sulfuric acid in the presence of phosphoric acid. Hydrometallurgy. 2016;163:55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Li JT, Ma ZL, Liu XH, Chen XY, Zhao ZW. Sustainable and efficient recovery of tungsten from wolframite in a sulfuric acid and phosphoric acid mixed system. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2020;8:13583.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu XH, Hu F, Zhao ZW. Treatment of high concentration sodium tungstate with macroporous resin. Chin J Nonferrous Met. 2014;24(7):1895 (in Chinese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang JL, Chen XY, Liu XH, Zhao ZW, Wang WH, Peng WL. Separating W(VI) and Mo(VI) by two-step acid decomposition. Hydrometallurgy. 2018;179:20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Loiseau E, Junqua G, Roux P, Bellon-Maurel V. Environmental assessment of a territory: an overview of existing tools and methods. J Environ Manag. 2012;112:213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bai L, Qiao Q, Li YP. Substance flow analysis of production process: a case study of a lead smelting process. J Clean Prod. 2015;104:502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindqvist A, Von Malmborg F. What can we learn from local substance flow analyses? The review of cadmium flows in Swedish municipalities. J Clean Prod. 2004;12(8–10):909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang CL, Ma HW, Yu CP. Substance flow analysis and assessment of environmental exposure potential for triclosan in mainland China. Sci Total Environ. 2014;499:265.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Guo XY, Zhong JY, Song Y, Tian QH. Substance flow analysis of zinc in China. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2010;54:171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin SH, Mao JS, Chen WQ, Shi L. Indium in mainland China: insights into use, trade, and efficiency from the substance flow analysis. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2019;149:312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang L, Cai ZJ, Yang JM, Yuan ZW, Chen Y. The future of copper in China—A perspective based on analysis of copper flows and stocks. Sci Total Environ. 2015;536:142.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Daigo I, Matsuno Y, Adachi Y. Substance flow analysis of chromium and nickel in the material flow of stainless steel in Japan. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2010;54(11):851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zeng XY, Zheng HX, Gong RY, Eheliyagoda D, Zeng XL. Uncovering the evolution of substance flow analysis of nickel in China. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2018;135:210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Elshkaki A, Graedel TE. Dynamic analysis of the global metals flows and stocks in electricity generation technologies. J Clean Prod. 2013;59:260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li L, Wania F. Tracking chemicals in products around the world: introduction of a dynamic substance flow analysis model and application to PCBs. Environ Int. 2016;94:674.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sakamornsnguan K, Kretschmann J. Substance flow analysis and mineral policy: the case of potash in Thailand. Extr Ind Soc. 2016;3(2):383.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yellishetty M, Mudd GM. Substance flow analysis of steel and long term sustainability of iron ore resources in Australia, Brazil, China and India. J Clean Prod. 2014;84:400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu J, An R, **ao RG, Yang YW, Wang GS, Wang Q. Implications from substance flow analysis, supply chain and supplier’ risk evaluation in iron and steel industry in Mainland China. Resour Policy. 2017;51:272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Arena U, Gregorio FD. A waste management planning based on substance flow analysis. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2014;85:54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chèvre N, Coutu S, Margot J. Substance flow analysis as a tool for mitigating the impact of pharmaceuticals on the aquatic system. Water Res. 2013;47(9):2995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chu JW, Yin XB, He MC, Ouyang W, Lin CY, Liu XT. Substance flow analysis and environmental release of antimony in the life cycle of polyethylene terephthalate products. J Clean Prod. 2021;291:125252.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang CL, Vause J, Ma HW. Using material/substance flow analysis to support sustainable development assessment: a literature review and outlook. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2012;68(9):104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoshida H, Christensen TH, Guildal T. A comprehensive substance flow analysis of a municipal wastewater and sludge treatment plant. Chemosphere. 2015;138:874.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zeng LQ, Zhao ZW, Huo GS, Wang XQ, Pu HP. Mechanism of selective precipitation of molybdenum from tungstate solution. JOM. 2020;72(2):800.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao ZW, Zhang WG, Chen XY, Cao CF, Li JT, Liu XH. Study on removing Mo from tungstate solution using coprecipitation adsorption method based on novel Mo sulphidation process. Can Metall Q. 2013;52(4):358.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFC1907400) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51904351 and 51620105013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Metallurgy and Environment, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China

    Yuan-Lin Chen, Xue-Yi Guo, Qin-Meng Wang & Qing-Hua Tian

  2. Changsha Research Institute of Mining and Metallurgy Co. LTD, Changsha, 410012, China

    Shao-Bo Huang

  3. Ganzhou Nonferrous Metallurgy Research Institute, Ganzhou, 341000, China

    **-**ang Zhang

Authors
  1. Yuan-Lin Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xue-Yi Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qin-Meng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qing-Hua Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shao-Bo Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. **-**ang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xue-Yi Guo or Qin-Meng Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, YL., Guo, XY., Wang, QM. et al. Tungsten and arsenic substance flow analysis of a hydrometallurgical process for tungsten extracting from wolframite. Tungsten 3, 348–360 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42864-021-00090-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42864-021-00090-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation