Log in

Design and Experimental Investigation of Zeta Converter Fed Reduced Switch Multi-stage Grid Connected Boost MLI

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Single-phase grid-tied inverter is a promising structure for low wattage sustainable Energy systems due to its compact size, flexible operation and lower cost. The traditional system employs a boost converter and a full bridge inverter to pump the energy from sustainable sources to the utility grid. The traditional boost converter has bounded operation in increasing or decreasing the dc voltage from sources like PV modules. The full bridge three-level PWM inverter, on the other hand, increases switching losses, devices with high voltage/current capacity, and electromagnetic interference.This work tries to address the faults highlighted earlier by introducing a modified reduced switch count Multi-stage Boost Inverter. This setup has two stages, a zeta converter used for limitless operation across the working range and a reduced count multilevel inverter. This setup has ability to boost the input DC voltage with voltage self-balancing and convert to AC voltage. This setup has a current control technique is used to synchronize the inverter output sinusoidal and in-phase with the grid parameters. This technique is also used to control the duty cycle to maintain the required output voltage at converter side. Usefulness of the presented work is analyzed in MATLAB/Simulink and an experimental prototype is constructed to verify the simulated response.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.1
Fig.2
Fig.3
Fig.4
Fig.5
Fig.6
Fig.7
Fig.8
Fig.9
Fig.10
Fig.11
Fig.12
Fig.13
Fig.14
Fig.15
Fig.16
Fig.17
Fig.18
Fig.19
Fig.20
Fig.21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dutta S, Chatterjee K (2018) A buck and boost based grid connected PV inverter maximizing power yield from two PV arrays in mismatched environmental conditions. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 65(7):5561–5571. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2017.2774768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang Q, Huang AQ, Yu R, Liu P, Yu W (2019) High-efficiency and high-density single-phase dual-mode cascaded buck-Boost multilevel transformerless PV inverter with GaN AC switches. IEEE Trans Power Electron 34(8):7474–7488. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2018.2878586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chandrasekar B et al (2020) Non-isolated high-gain triple port DC–DC buck-boost converter with positive output voltage for photovoltaic applications. IEEE Access 8:113649–113666. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3003192

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Hussain A, Akhtar R, Ali B, Awan SE, Iqbal S (2019) A novel bidirectional DC–DC converter with low stress and low magnitude ripples for stand-alone photovoltaic power systems. Energies 12(15):2884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anurag A, Deshmukh N, Maguluri A, Anand S (2018) Integrated DC–DC converter based grid-connected transformerless photovoltaic inverter with extended input voltage range. IEEE Trans Power Electron 33(10):8322–8330. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2017.2779144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu YE, Hsiao SL (2021) Novel high-efficiency three-port bidirectional step-up/step-down DC–DC converter for photovoltaic systems. Sustainability 13(14):7913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sathyan S, Suryawanshi HM, Shitole AB, Ballal MS, Borghate VB (2018) Soft-switched interleaved DC/DC converter as front-end of multi-inverter structure for micro grid applications. IEEE Trans Power Electron 33(9):7645–7655. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2017.2768379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Das M, Pal M, Agarwal V (2019) Novel high gain, high efficiency DC–DC converter suitable for solar PV module integration with three-phase grid tied inverters. IEEE J Photovolt 9(2):528–537. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2018.2877006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Darwish A, Holliday D, Ahmed S, Massoud AM, Williams BW (2014) A single-stage three-phase inverter based on cuk converters for PV applications. IEEE J Emerg Sel Top Power Electr 2(4):797–807. https://doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE.2014.2313185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu J, Wu J, Qiu J, Zeng J (2019) Switched Z-source/Quasi-Z-source DC-DC converters with reduced passive components for photovoltaic systems. IEEE Access 7:40893–40903. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2907300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dahono A, Dahono PA (2020) A comparative evaluation of bidirectional step-up dc-dc converters. Int J Electr Eng Inform 12(2):388–397

    Google Scholar 

  12. Granello P, Soeiro TB, Van Der Blij NH, Bauer P (2022) Revisiting the partial power processing concept: Case study of a 5-kW 99.11% efficient flyback converter-based battery charger. IEEE Trans n Trans Electr 8(3):3934–3945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Urtasun A, Lu DD-C (2015) Control of a single-switch two-input buck converter for MPPT of two PV strings. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 62(11):7051–7060. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2015.2432097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shen H, Zhang B, Qiu D (2017) Hybrid Z-source boost DC–DC converters. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 64(1):310–319. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2016.2607688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang Y, Sun J-T, Wang Y-F (2013) Hybrid boost three-level DC–DC converter with high voltage gain for photovoltaic generation systems. IEEE Trans Power Electron 28(8):3659–3664. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2012.2229720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang D, Nahid-Mobarakeh B, Emadi A (2019) Second harmonic current reduction for a battery-driven grid interface with three-phase dual active bridge DC–DC converter. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 66(11):9056–9064. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2019.2899563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang Z, Fan S, Zheng Y, Cheng M (2012) Design and analysis of a CHB converter based PV-battery hybrid system for better electromagnetic compatibility. IEEE Trans Magn 48(11):4530–4533. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2012.2198912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Acharya AB, Ricco M, Sera D, Teoderscu R, Norum LE (2019) Performance analysis of medium-voltage grid integration of PV Plant using modular multilevel converter. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 34(4):1731–1740. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2019.2930819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chattopadhyay SK, Chakraborty C (2017) A new asymmetric multilevel inverter topology suitable for solar PV Applications with varying irradiance. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 8(4):1496–1506. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2017.2692257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Elsanabary AI, Konstantinou G, Mekhilef S, Townsend CD, Seyedmahmoudian M, Stojcevski A (2020) Medium voltage large-scale grid-connected photovoltaic systems using cascaded H-bridge and modular multilevel converters: A review. IEEE Access 8:223686–223699. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3044882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. R. F. Coelho, W. M. dos Santos, and D. C. Martins, “Influence of power converters on PV maximum power point tracking efficiency,” 2012.

  22. el Khateb AH, Rahim NA, Selvaraj J, Williams BW (2015) DC-to-DC converter with low input current ripple for maximum photovoltaic power extraction. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 62(4):2246–2256. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2014.2383999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Elgendy MA, Zahawi B, Atkinson DJ (2013) Assessment of the incremental conductance maximum power point tracking algorithm. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 4(1):108–117. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2012.2202698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hussan MR, Sarwar A, Siddique MD, Iqbal A, Alamri B (2021) A cross connected asymmetrical switched-capacitor Multilevel inverter. IEEE Access 9:96416–96429. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3093826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dhanamjayulu C, Prasad D, Padmanaban S, Maroti PK, Holm-Nielsen JB, Blaabjerg F (2021) Design and implementation of seventeen level inverter with reduced components. IEEE Access 9:16746–16760. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3054001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jena K (2022) A 6X-voltage-gain 13-level inverter with self-balanced switched-capacitors. CPSS Transactions on Power Electr Appl 7(1):94–102. https://doi.org/10.24295/CPSSTPEA.2022.00009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vijayalakshmi S (2020) Symmetric multi-level boost inverter with single dc source using reduced number of switches. Tehnički vjesnik 27(5):1585–1591

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ponraj RP, Sigamani T, Ravindran V (2022) Analysis of multi-input multilevel boost inverter circuit with optimal firing angles using dSPACE. J Electr Eng Technol 18(2):1435–1445

    Google Scholar 

  29. Amir A, Amir A, Selvaraj J, Abd Rahim N (2020) Grid-connected photovoltaic system employing a single-phase T-type cascaded H-bridge inverter. Sol Energy 199:645–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Rajkumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajkumar, M., Rathinam, A. Design and Experimental Investigation of Zeta Converter Fed Reduced Switch Multi-stage Grid Connected Boost MLI. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 19, 361–371 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-023-01517-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-023-01517-9

Keywords

Navigation