This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Data Availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Notes
According to a United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) report, “marginalization in education is a form of acute and persistent disadvantage rooted in underlying social inequalities” (UNESCO, 2010, p. 135).
From National Assessment of Education Progress (2019). Fourth-grade reading sample question: “The Bell of Atri” as retold by Stephen Corrin. U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Education Sciences.
References
Annie E. Casey Foundation (2022). Early warning: Why reading by the end of third-grade matters.
Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. Guilford Press.
Beavers, G. A., Iwata, B. A., & Lerman, D. C. (2013). Thirty years of research on the functional analysis of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.30
Binder, C. (1994). Precision Teaching and curriculum-based measurement. Journal of Precision Teaching, 7(2), 33–35.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Sage.
Carnine, D., Silbert, J., Kame’enui, E., Slocum, T., & Travers, P. (2016). Direct Instruction reading (6th ed.). Pearson.
Cree, A., Kay, A., & Steward, J. (2022). The economic and social cost of illiteracy: A snapshot of illiteracy in a global context. World Literacy Foundation. https://worldliteracyfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/The-Economic-Social-Cost-of-Illiteracy-2022.pdf
Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., Pagani, L. S., Feinstein, L., Engel, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., Sexton, H., Duckworth, K., & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the Simple View of Reading. Research Quarterly, 56(S1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.411
Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1991). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. (rev. ed.). NADI Press.
Foorman, B. R., Herrera, S., Petscher, Y., Mitchell, A., & Truckenmiller, A. (2015). The structure of oral language and reading and their relation to comprehension in kindergarten through Grade 2. Reading and Writing, 28(5), 655–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9544-5
Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (DIBELS) (6th ed.). Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
Gough, P., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial & Special Education, 7, 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
Greenwood, C. R. (1999). Reflections on a research career: Perspective on 35 years of research at the Juniper Gardens Children’s Project. Exceptional Children, 66, 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299906600101
Greer, R. D. (2002). Designing teaching strategies: An applied behavior analysis systems approach. Academic Press.
Greer, R. D., & Ross, D. (2008). Verbal behavior analysis: Inducing and expanding new verbal capabilities in new verbal capabilities in children with language delays. Pearson.
Greer, R. D., & Speckman, J. (2009). The integration of speaker and listener responses: A theory of verbal development. The Psychological Record, 59(3), 449–488.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Paul H. Brookes.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Springer Science & Business Media.
Hernandez, D. (2012). Double jeopardy: How third grade reading skills and poverty influence high school graduation. Annie E. Casey Foundation. https://www.aecf.org/resources/double-jeopardy
Heward, W. (1994). Three “low-tech” strategies for increasing the frequency of active student response during group instruction. In R. Gardner, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction (pp. 283–320). Brooks/Cole.
Heward, W. L., Critchfield, T. S., Reed, D. D., Detrich, R., & Kimball, J. W. (2022). ABA from A to Z: Behavior Science applied to 350 domains of socially significant behavior. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 45(2), 327–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-022-00336-z
Hoover, W. A., & Tunmer, W. E. (2018). The simple view of reading: Three assessments of its adequacy. Remedial & Special Education, 39(5), 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518773154
Horner, R. H., & Sugai, G. (2015). School-wide PBIS: An example of applied behavior analysis implemented at a scale of social importance. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8, 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0045-4
Hranchuk, K., & Greer, R. D. (2024). General reflections on interactions between cross‐disciplinary theories of human language development. Psychological Record. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-024-00588-y
Hranchuk, K., Greer, R. D., & Longano, J. (2019). Instructional demonstrations are more efficient than consequences alone for children with naming. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 35(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-018-0
Johnson, K. R., & Street, E. M. (2004). The Morningside Model of Generative Instruction: What it means to leave no child behind. Journal of Direct Instruction, 4(2), 143–157.
Kourea, L., Gibson, L., & Lovelace, T. S. (2023). Guest Editorial: It is time for systemic change—A call for action in implementing inclusive and culturally responsive educational practices for young people. Behavior & Social Issues, 32, 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-023-00132-7
Layng, T. V., Joe, T., & J. S., & Stikeleather, G. (2004). Selected for Success: How Headsprout Reading Basics™ teaches beginning reading. In D. J. Moran & R. W. Malott (Eds.), Educational psychology: Evidence-based educational methods (pp. 171–197). Academic Press.
Lindsley, O. R. (1986). In Memoriam: Eric C. Haughton 1934–1985. The Behavior Analyst, 9(2), 241–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf03391958
Lindsley, O. R. (1990). Precision teaching: By teachers for children. American Association for the Advancement of Science.
McFarland, J., Husser, B., Zhang, J., Wang, X., Wang, K., Hein, S., Diliberti, M., Forrest Cataldi, I., Mann, F. B., & Barmer, A. (2019). The condition of education 2019. National Center for Education Statistics.
Muhammad, G., & Love, B. L. (2020). Cultivating genius: An equity framework for culturally and historically responsive literacy. Scholastic.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). NAEP data explorer. National Assessment of Educational Progress.
National Institute of Child Health & Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: Reports of the subgroups (00–4754). Government Printing Office.
Office of Disease Prevention & Health Promotion. (2020). Social determinants of health: Healthy People 2030. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/schools/increase-proportion-4th-graders-reading-skills-or-above-proficient-level-ah-05
Ross, D. E. (2024, February 7). Brilliant children. Broken systems: The power of the science of behavior in today’s reading crisis [Blog post]. https://www.abainternational.org/constituents/practitioners/behavior-analysis-blogs.aspx
Ross, D. E., & Greer, R. D. (forthcoming). When text speaks: Learning-to-read & reading-to-learn. Sloan.
Schwartz, S. (2024). The ‘Science of Reading’ in 2024: 5 state initiatives to watch. Education Week. https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/the-science-of-reading-in-2024-5-state-initiatives-to-watch/2024/01
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts. https://doi.org/10.1037/11256-000
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057409189001-204
Stockard, J., Wood, T. W., Coughlin, C., & Rasplica Khoury, C. (2018). The effectiveness of Direct Instruction curricula: A meta-analysis of a half century of research. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 479–507. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317751919
Ten Braak, D., Lenes, R., Purpura, D. J., Schmitt, S. A., & Størksen, I. (2022). Why do early mathematics skills predict later mathematics and reading achievement? The role of executive function. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 214, 105306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105306
Tiemann, P. W., & Markle, S. M. (1991). Instructional design and the development of expertise. Springer Science & Business Media.
Tunmer, W. E., & Chapman, J. W. (2012). The simple view of reading redux: Vocabulary knowledge and the independent components hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(5), 453–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411432685
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2023). Education Pays, 2022. Career Outlook. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/careeroutlook/2023/data-on-display/education-pays.htm
Funding
This article was not supported by any funding mechanism.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed equally to the conceptualization and writing of this article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest. Denise Ross serves as an associate editor for Behavior and Social Issues and was a guest editor for this special section; therefore, guest editors Shannon Hammond, Gwendolyn Cartledge, Jane Howard, and editor-in-chief Traci Cihon served as action editors for articles authored by Denise Ross. Guest editors Shannon Hammond, Denise Ross, Jane Howard, and editor-in-chief Traci Cihon served as action editors for the article authored by Gwendolyn Cartledge.
Ethical Approval
No studies involving human participants were conducted to prepare this article.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hammond, S.S., Ross, D., Cartledge, G. et al. Guest Editorial: The Power of the Science of Behavior in Today’s Literacy Crisis. Behav. Soc. Iss. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-024-00178-1
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-024-00178-1