Abstract
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are widely accepted to be the most deleterious form of DNA lesions that pose a severe threat to genome integrity. Two predominant pathways are responsible for repair of DSBs, homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). HR relies on a template to faithfully repair breaks, while NHEJ is a template-independent and error-prone repair mechanism. Multiple layers of regulation have been documented to dictate the balance between HR and NHEJ, such as cell cycle and post-translational modifications (PTMs). Arginine methylation is one of the most common PTMs, which is catalyzed by protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs). PRMT1 and PRMT5 are the predominate PRMTs that promote asymmetric dimethylarginine and symmetric dimethylarginine, respectively. They have emerged to be crucial regulators of DNA damage repair. In this review, we summarize current understanding and unaddressed questions of PRMT1 and PRMT5 in regulation of HR and NHEJ, providing insights into their roles in DSB repair pathway choice and the potential of targeting them for cancer therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability statement
No research data is included in this review article. Please consult the authors of the individual studies for access to research data and materials.
References
Adams, M. M., Wang, B., **a, Z., Morales, J. C., Lu, X., Donehower, L. A., et al. (2005). 53BP1 oligomerization is independent of its methylation by PRMT1. Cell Cycle, 4(12), 1854–1861. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.4.12.2282
Albrecht, L. V., Ploper, D., Tejeda-Munoz, N., & De Robertis, E. M. (2018). Arginine methylation is required for canonical Wnt signaling and endolysosomal trafficking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(23), E5317–E5325. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804091115
Auclair, Y., & Richard, S. (2013). The role of arginine methylation in the DNA damage response. DNA Repair (Amst), 12(7), 459–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.04.006
Bedford, M. T. (2007). Arginine methylation at a glance. Journal of Cell Science, 120(Pt 24), 4243–4246. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.019885
Bedford, M. T., & Clarke, S. G. (2009). Protein arginine methylation in mammals: Who, what, and why. Molecular Cell, 33(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.12.013
Blanc, R. S., & Richard, S. (2017). Arginine methylation: The coming of age. Molecular Cell, 65(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.11.003
Boisvert, F. M., Cote, J., Boulanger, M. C., Cleroux, P., Bachand, F., Autexier, C., et al. (2002). Symmetrical dimethylarginine methylation is required for the localization of SMN in Cajal bodies and pre-mRNA splicing. Journal of Cell Biology, 159(6), 957–969. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200207028
Boisvert, F. M., Dery, U., Masson, J. Y., & Richard, S. (2005a). Arginine methylation of MRE11 by PRMT1 is required for DNA damage checkpoint control. Genes & Development, 19(6), 671–676. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1279805
Boisvert, F. M., Rhie, A., Richard, S., & Doherty, A. J. (2005b). The GAR motif of 53BP1 is arginine methylated by PRMT1 and is necessary for 53BP1 DNA binding activity. Cell Cycle, 4(12), 1834–1841. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.4.12.2250
Bouwman, P., Aly, A., Escandell, J. M., Pieterse, M., Bartkova, J., van der Gulden, H., et al. (2010). 53BP1 loss rescues BRCA1 deficiency and is associated with triple-negative and BRCA-mutated breast cancers. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 17(6), 688–695. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1831
Brobbey, C., Liu, L., Yin, S., & Gan, W. (2022). The role of protein arginine methyltransferases in DNA damage response. International Journal of Molecular Science. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179780
Buis, J., Wu, Y., Deng, Y., Leddon, J., Westfield, G., Eckersdorff, M., et al. (2008). Mre11 nuclease activity has essential roles in DNA repair and genomic stability distinct from ATM activation. Cell, 135(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.015
Bunting, S. F., Callen, E., Wong, N., Chen, H. T., Polato, F., Gunn, A., et al. (2010). 53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks. Cell, 141(2), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.012
Callen, E., Di Virgilio, M., Kruhlak, M. J., Nieto-Soler, M., Wong, N., Chen, H. T., et al. (2013). 53BP1 mediates productive and mutagenic DNA repair through distinct phosphoprotein interactions. Cell, 153(6), 1266–1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.023
Cannavo, E., Cejka, P., & Kowalczykowski, S. C. (2013). Relationship of DNA degradation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae exonuclease 1 and its stimulation by RPA and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 to DNA end resection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(18), E1661-1668. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1305166110
Carney, J. P., Maser, R. S., Olivares, H., Davis, E. M., Le Beau, M., Yates, J. R., 3rd., et al. (1998). The hMre11/hRad50 protein complex and Nijmegen breakage syndrome: Linkage of double-strand break repair to the cellular DNA damage response. Cell, 93(3), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81175-7
Cejka, P., Cannavo, E., Polaczek, P., Masuda-Sasa, T., Pokharel, S., Campbell, J. L., et al. (2010). DNA end resection by Dna2-Sgs1-RPA and its stimulation by Top3-Rmi1 and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2. Nature, 467(7311), 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09355
Chapman, J. R., Barral, P., Vannier, J. B., Borel, V., Steger, M., Tomas-Loba, A., et al. (2013). RIF1 is essential for 53BP1-dependent nonhomologous end joining and suppression of DNA double-strand break resection. Molecular Cell, 49(5), 858–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.002
Checa-Rodriguez, C., Cepeda-Garcia, C., Ramon, J., Lopez-Saavedra, A., Balestra, F. R., Dominguez-Sanchez, M. S., et al. (2020). Methylation of the central transcriptional regulator KLF4 by PRMT5 is required for DNA end resection and recombination. DNA Repair (Amst). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102902
Chen, X., Whitney, E. M., Gao, S. Y., & Yang, V. W. (2003). Transcriptional profiling of Kruppel-like factor 4 reveals a function in cell cycle regulation and epithelial differentiation. Journal of Molecular Biology, 326(3), 665–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-2836(02)01449-3
Cheng, C., Pei, X., Li, S. W., Yang, J., Li, C., Tang, J., et al. (2021). CRISPR/Cas9 library screening uncovered methylated PKP2 as a critical driver of lung cancer radioresistance by stabilizing beta-catenin. Oncogene, 40(16), 2842–2857. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-021-01692-x
Cheng, D., Cote, J., Shaaban, S., & Bedford, M. T. (2007). The arginine methyltransferase CARM1 regulates the coupling of transcription and mRNA processing. Molecular Cell, 25(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.11.019
Chiang, K., Zielinska, A. E., Shaaban, A. M., Sanchez-Bailon, M. P., Jarrold, J., Clarke, T. L., et al. (2017). PRMT5 is a critical regulator of breast cancer stem cell function via histone methylation and FOXP1 expression. Cell Reports, 21(12), 3498–3513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.11.096
Choudhury, A. D., Xu, H., & Baer, R. (2004). Ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of the BRCA1 tumor suppressor is regulated during cell cycle progression. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279(32), 33909–33918. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M403646200
Ciccia, A., & Elledge, S. J. (2010). The DNA damage response: Making it safe to play with knives. Molecular Cell, 40(2), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.019
Clarke, T. L., Sanchez-Bailon, M. P., Chiang, K., Reynolds, J. J., Herrero-Ruiz, J., Bandeiras, T. M., et al. (2017). PRMT5-dependent methylation of the TIP60 coactivator RUVBL1 is a key regulator of homologous recombination. Molecular Cell, 65(5), 900-916 e907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2017.01.019
Costantini, S., Woodbine, L., Andreoli, L., Jeggo, P. A., & Vindigni, A. (2007). Interaction of the Ku heterodimer with the DNA ligase IV/Xrcc4 complex and its regulation by DNA-PK. DNA Repair (Amst), 6(6), 712–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.12.007
Dimitrova, N., Chen, Y. C., Spector, D. L., & de Lange, T. (2008). 53BP1 promotes non-homologous end joining of telomeres by increasing chromatin mobility. Nature, 456(7221), 524–528. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07433
Dominici, C., Sgarioto, N., Yu, Z., Sesma-Sanz, L., Masson, J. Y., Richard, S., et al. (2021). Synergistic effects of type I PRMT and PARP inhibitors against non-small cell lung cancer cells. Clinical Epigenetics, 13(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-021-01037-1
Dong, S., Han, J., Chen, H., Liu, T., Huen, M. S. Y., Yang, Y., et al. (2014). The human SRCAP chromatin remodeling complex promotes DNA-end resection. Current Biology, 24(18), 2097–2110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.081
Du, C., Hansen, L. J., Singh, S. X., Wang, F., Sun, R., Moure, C. J., et al. (2019). A PRMT5-RNF168-SMURF2 axis controls H2AX proteostasis. Cell Reports, 28(12), 3199–3211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.031
El-Karim, E. A., Hagos, E. G., Ghaleb, A. M., Yu, B., & Yang, V. W. (2013). Kruppel-like factor 4 regulates genetic stability in mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Molecular Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-12-89
Featherstone, C., & Jackson, S. P. (1999). Ku, a DNA repair protein with multiple cellular functions? Mutation Research, 434(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8777(99)00006-3
Feng, J., Dang, Y., Zhang, W., Zhao, X., Zhang, C., Hou, Z., et al. (2019). PTEN arginine methylation by PRMT6 suppresses PI3K-AKT signaling and modulates pre-mRNA splicing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(14), 6868–6877. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811028116
Feng, Y., Maity, R., Whitelegge, J. P., Hadjikyriacou, A., Li, Z., Zurita-Lopez, C., et al. (2013). Mammalian protein arginine methyltransferase 7 (PRMT7) specifically targets RXR sites in lysine- and arginine-rich regions. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 288(52), 37010–37025. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.525345
Fong, J. Y., Pignata, L., Goy, P. A., Kawabata, K. C., Lee, S. C., Koh, C. M., et al. (2019). Therapeutic targeting of RNA splicing catalysis through inhibition of protein arginine methylation. Cancer Cell, 36(2), 194-209 e199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2019.07.003
Foster, S. S., Balestrini, A., & Petrini, J. H. (2011). Functional interplay of the Mre11 nuclease and Ku in the response to replication-associated DNA damage. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 31(21), 4379–4389. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.05854-11
Geoghegan, V., Guo, A., Trudgian, D., Thomas, B., & Acuto, O. (2015). Comprehensive identification of arginine methylation in primary T cells reveals regulatory roles in cell signalling. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7758
Geuens, T., Bouhy, D., & Timmerman, V. (2016). The hnRNP family: Insights into their role in health and disease. Human Genetics, 135(8), 851–867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-016-1683-5
Giuliani, V., Miller, M. A., Liu, C. Y., Hartono, S. R., Class, C. A., Bristow, C. A., et al. (2021). PRMT1-dependent regulation of RNA metabolism and DNA damage response sustains pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Nature Communications, 12(1), 4626. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24798-y
Goodarzi, A. A., Yu, Y., Riballo, E., Douglas, P., Walker, S. A., Ye, R., et al. (2006). DNA-PK autophosphorylation facilitates Artemis endonuclease activity. EMBO Journal, 25(16), 3880–3889. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601255
Gottlieb, T. M., & Jackson, S. P. (1993). The DNA-dependent protein kinase: Requirement for DNA ends and association with Ku antigen. Cell, 72(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(93)90057-w
Gravel, S., Chapman, J. R., Magill, C., & Jackson, S. P. (2008). DNA helicases Sgs1 and BLM promote DNA double-strand break resection. Genes & Development, 22(20), 2767–2772. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.503108
Guendel, I., Carpio, L., Pedati, C., Schwartz, A., Teal, C., Kashanchi, F., et al. (2010). Methylation of the tumor suppressor protein, BRCA1, influences its transcriptional cofactor function. PLoS ONE, 5(6), e11379. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011379
Gurunathan, G., Yu, Z., Coulombe, Y., Masson, J. Y., & Richard, S. (2015). Arginine methylation of hnRNPUL1 regulates interaction with NBS1 and recruitment to sites of DNA damage. Science and Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10475
Haber, J. E. (2000). Partners and pathwaysrepairing a double-strand break. Trends in Genetics, 16(6), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02022-9
Hamard, P. J., Santiago, G. E., Liu, F., Karl, D. L., Martinez, C., Man, N., et al. (2018). PRMT5 regulates DNA repair by controlling the alternative splicing of histone-modifying enzymes. Cell Reports, 24(10), 2643–2657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.002
Harper, J. W., & Elledge, S. J. (2007). The DNA damage response: Ten years after. Molecular Cell, 28(5), 739–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.015
He, L., Hu, Z., Sun, Y., Zhang, M., Zhu, H., Jiang, L., et al. (2020). PRMT1 is critical to FEN1 expression and drug resistance in lung cancer cells. DNA Repair (Amst). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102953
He, W., Ma, X., Yang, X., Zhao, Y., Qiu, J., & Hang, H. (2011). A role for the arginine methylation of Rad9 in checkpoint control and cellular sensitivity to DNA damage. Nucleic Acids Research, 39(11), 4719–4727. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq1264
Hopkins, B. B., & Paull, T. T. (2008). The P. furiosus mre11/rad50 complex promotes 5′ strand resection at a DNA double-strand break. Cell, 135(2), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.054
Hsu, J. H., Hubbell-Engler, B., Adelmant, G., Huang, J., Joyce, C. E., Vazquez, F., et al. (2017). PRMT1-mediated translation regulation is a crucial vulnerability of cancer. Cancer Research, 77(17), 4613–4625. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0216
Hu, D., Gur, M., Zhou, Z., Gamper, A., Hung, M. C., Fujita, N., et al. (2015). Interplay between arginine methylation and ubiquitylation regulates KLF4-mediated genome stability and carcinogenesis. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9419
Hua, Z. Y., Hansen, J. N., He, M., Dai, S. K., Choi, Y., Fulton, M. D., et al. (2020). PRMT1 promotes neuroblastoma cell survival through ATF5. Oncogenesis, 9(5), 50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41389-020-0237-9
Huen, M. S., & Chen, J. (2008). The DNA damage response pathways: At the crossroad of protein modifications. Cell Research, 18(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2007.109
Hwang, J. W., Cho, Y., Bae, G. U., Kim, S. N., & Kim, Y. K. (2021). Protein arginine methyltransferases: Promising targets for cancer therapy. Experimental & Molecular Medicine, 53(5), 788–808. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-021-00613-y
Hwang, J. W., Kim, S. N., Myung, N., Song, D., Han, G., Bae, G. U., et al. (2020). PRMT5 promotes DNA repair through methylation of 53BP1 and is regulated by Src-mediated phosphorylation. Commun Biol, 3(1), 428. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01157-z
Ikura, T., Ogryzko, V. V., Grigoriev, M., Groisman, R., Wang, J., Horikoshi, M., et al. (2000). Involvement of the TIP60 histone acetylase complex in DNA repair and apoptosis. Cell, 102(4), 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00051-9
Iwabuchi, K., Bartel, P. L., Li, B., Marraccino, R., & Fields, S. (1994). Two cellular proteins that bind to wild-type but not mutant p53. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 91(13), 6098–6102. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.13.6098
Iwabuchi, K., Basu, B. P., Kysela, B., Kurihara, T., Shibata, M., Guan, D., et al. (2003). Potential role for 53BP1 in DNA end-joining repair through direct interaction with DNA. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278(38), 36487–36495. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M304066200
Jackson, S. P., & Bartek, J. (2009). The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature, 461(7267), 1071–1078. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08467
Jarrold, J., & Davies, C. C. (2019). PRMTs and arginine methylation: Cancer’s best-kept secret? Trends in Molecular Medicine, 25(11), 993–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2019.05.007
Jensen, K. L., & Russell, P. (2016). Ctp1-dependent clip** and resection of DNA double-strand breaks by Mre11 endonuclease complex are not genetically separable. Nucleic Acids Research, 44(17), 8241–8249. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw557
Jha, S., & Dutta, A. (2009). RVB1/RVB2: Running rings around molecular biology. Molecular Cell, 34(5), 521–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.016
Jiang, J., Chan, Y. S., Loh, Y. H., Cai, J., Tong, G. Q., Lim, C. A., et al. (2008). A core Klf circuitry regulates self-renewal of embryonic stem cells. Nature Cell Biology, 10(3), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1698
**, S., & Weaver, D. T. (1997). Double-strand break repair by Ku70 requires heterodimerization with Ku80 and DNA binding functions. EMBO Journal, 16(22), 6874–6885. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/16.22.6874
**g, P., Zhao, N., Ye, M., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., Sun, J., et al. (2018). Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 promotes lung cancer metastasis via the epigenetic regulation of miR-99 family/FGFR3 signaling. Cancer Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2018.04.019
Kanno, S., Kuzuoka, H., Sasao, S., Hong, Z., Lan, L., Nakajima, S., et al. (2007). A novel human AP endonuclease with conserved zinc-finger-like motifs involved in DNA strand break responses. EMBO Journal, 26(8), 2094–2103. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601663
Karkhanis, V., Hu, Y. J., Baiocchi, R. A., Imbalzano, A. N., & Sif, S. (2011). Versatility of PRMT5-induced methylation in growth control and development. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 36(12), 633–641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2011.09.001
Khanna, K. K., & Jackson, S. P. (2001). DNA double-strand breaks: Signaling, repair and the cancer connection. Nature Genetics, 27(3), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1038/85798
Kim, H., & Ronai, Z. A. (2020). PRMT5 function and targeting in cancer. Cell Stress, 4(8), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.15698/cst2020.08.228
Kim, S., Gunesdogan, U., Zylicz, J. J., Hackett, J. A., Cougot, D., Bao, S., et al. (2014). PRMT5 protects genomic integrity during global DNA demethylation in primordial germ cells and preimplantation embryos. Molecular Cell, 56(4), 564–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.10.003
Langerak, P., Mejia-Ramirez, E., Limbo, O., & Russell, P. (2011). Release of Ku and MRN from DNA ends by Mre11 nuclease activity and Ctp1 is required for homologous recombination repair of double-strand breaks. PLoS Genetics, 7(9), e1002271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002271
Lattouf, H., Poulard, C., & Le Romancer, M. (2019). PRMT5 prognostic value in cancer. Oncotarget, 10(34), 3151–3153. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.26883
Lee, D. Y., Teyssier, C., Strahl, B. D., & Stallcup, M. R. (2005). Role of protein methylation in regulation of transcription. Endocrine Reviews, 26(2), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2004-0008
Lee, J. H., & Paull, T. T. (2005). ATM activation by DNA double-strand breaks through the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex. Science, 308(5721), 551–554. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1108297
Lee, J. W., Blanco, L., Zhou, T., Garcia-Diaz, M., Bebenek, K., Kunkel, T. A., et al. (2004). Implication of DNA polymerase lambda in alignment-based gap filling for nonhomologous DNA end joining in human nuclear extracts. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279(1), 805–811. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M307913200
Lee, Y. H., & Stallcup, M. R. (2009). Minireview: Protein arginine methylation of nonhistone proteins in transcriptional regulation. Molecular Endocrinology, 23(4), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2008-0380
Li, W. J., He, Y. H., Yang, J. J., Hu, G. S., Lin, Y. A., Ran, T., et al. (2021). Profiling PRMT methylome reveals roles of hnRNPA1 arginine methylation in RNA splicing and cell growth. Nature Communications, 12(1), 1946. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21963-1
Li, X., Wang, C., Jiang, H., & Luo, C. (2019). A patent review of arginine methyltransferase inhibitors (2010–2018). Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents, 29(2), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13543776.2019.1567711
Liao, H. W., Hsu, J. M., **a, W., Wang, H. L., Wang, Y. N., Chang, W. C., et al. (2015). PRMT1-mediated methylation of the EGF receptor regulates signaling and cetuximab response. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 125(12), 4529–4543. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI82826
Lieber, M. R. (2008). The mechanism of human nonhomologous DNA end joining. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 283(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R700039200
Lorton, B. M., & Shechter, D. (2019). Cellular consequences of arginine methylation. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 76(15), 2933–2956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-019-03140-2
Lottersberger, F., Karssemeijer, R. A., Dimitrova, N., & de Lange, T. (2015). 53BP1 and the LINC complex promote microtubule-dependent DSB mobility and DNA repair. Cell, 163(4), 880–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.057
Ma, Y., Lu, H., Tippin, B., Goodman, M. F., Shimazaki, N., Koiwai, O., et al. (2004). A biochemically defined system for mammalian nonhomologous DNA end joining. Molecular Cell, 16(5), 701–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004.11.017
Mahajan, K. N., Nick McElhinny, S. A., Mitchell, B. S., & Ramsden, D. A. (2002). Association of DNA polymerase mu (pol mu) with Ku and ligase IV: Role for pol mu in end-joining double-strand break repair. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 22(14), 5194–5202. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.14.5194-5202.2002
Mahaney, B. L., Meek, K., & Lees-Miller, S. P. (2009). Repair of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks by non-homologous end-joining. The Biochemical Journal, 417(3), 639–650. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20080413
Mari, P. O., Florea, B. I., Persengiev, S. P., Verkaik, N. S., Bruggenwirth, H. T., Modesti, M., et al. (2006). Dynamic assembly of end-joining complexes requires interaction between Ku70/80 and XRCC4. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(49), 18597–18602. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0609061103
Mathioudaki, K., Papadokostopoulou, A., Scorilas, A., Xynopoulos, D., Agnanti, N., & Talieri, M. (2008). The PRMT1 gene expression pattern in colon cancer. British Journal of Cancer, 99(12), 2094–2099. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604807
McAllister, D., Merlo, X., & Lough, J. (2002). Characterization and expression of the mouse tat interactive protein 60 kD (TIP60) gene. Gene, 289(1–2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1119(02)00546-2
Mehta, A., & Haber, J. E. (2014). Sources of DNA double-strand breaks and models of recombinational DNA repair. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 6(9), a016428. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a016428
Mersch, J., Jackson, M. A., Park, M., Nebgen, D., Peterson, S. K., Singletary, C., et al. (2015). Cancers associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations other than breast and ovarian. Cancer, 121(2), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29041
Mimitou, E. P., & Symington, L. S. (2010). Ku prevents Exo1 and Sgs1-dependent resection of DNA ends in the absence of a functional MRX complex or Sae2. EMBO Journal, 29(19), 3358–3369. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.193
Mirman, Z., & de Lange, T. (2020). 53BP1: A DSB escort. Genes & Development, 34(1–2), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.333237.119
Montenegro, M. F., Gonzalez-Guerrero, R., Sanchez-Del-Campo, L., Pinero-Madrona, A., Cabezas-Herrera, J., & Rodriguez-Lopez, J. N. (2020). PRMT1-dependent methylation of BRCA1 contributes to the epigenetic defense of breast cancer cells against ionizing radiation. Science and Reports, 10(1), 13275. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70289-3
Morris, J. R., Boutell, C., Keppler, M., Densham, R., Weekes, D., Alamshah, A., et al. (2009). The SUMO modification pathway is involved in the BRCA1 response to genotoxic stress. Nature, 462(7275), 886–890. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08593
Musiani, D., Giambruno, R., Massignani, E., Ippolito, M. R., Maniaci, M., Jammula, S., et al. (2020). PRMT1 is recruited via DNA-PK to chromatin where it sustains the senescence-associated secretory phenotype in response to cisplatin. Cell Reports, 30(4), 1208-1222 e1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.061
Najbauer, J., Johnson, B. A., Young, A. L., & Aswad, D. W. (1993). Peptides with sequences similar to glycine, arginine-rich motifs in proteins interacting with RNA are efficiently recognized by methyltransferase(s) modifying arginine in numerous proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 268(14), 10501–10509.
Nick McElhinny, S. A., Snowden, C. M., McCarville, J., & Ramsden, D. A. (2000). Ku recruits the XRCC4-ligase IV complex to DNA ends. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 20(9), 2996–3003. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.20.9.2996-3003.2000
Nimonkar, A. V., Genschel, J., Kinoshita, E., Polaczek, P., Campbell, J. L., Wyman, C., et al. (2011). BLM-DNA2-RPA-MRN and EXO1-BLM-RPA-MRN constitute two DNA end resection machineries for human DNA break repair. Genes & Development, 25(4), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.2003811
Niu, H., Chung, W. H., Zhu, Z., Kwon, Y., Zhao, W., Chi, P., et al. (2010). Mechanism of the ATP-dependent DNA end-resection machinery from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature, 467(7311), 108–111. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09318
Ochi, T., Blackford, A. N., Coates, J., Jhujh, S., Mehmood, S., Tamura, N., et al. (2015). DNA repair. PAXX, a paralog of XRCC4 and XLF, interacts with Ku to promote DNA double-strand break repair. Science, 347(6218), 185–188. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261971
Ouchi, T. (2006). BRCA1 phosphorylation: Biological consequences. Cancer Biology & Therapy, 5(5), 470–475. https://doi.org/10.4161/cbt.5.5.2845
Owens, J. L., Beketova, E., Liu, S., Tinsley, S. L., Asberry, A. M., Deng, X., et al. (2020). PRMT5 cooperates with pICln to function as a master epigenetic activator of DNA double-strand break repair genes. iScience, 23(1), 100750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2019.100750
Paiano, J., Zolnerowich, N., Wu, W., Pavani, R., Wang, C., Li, H., et al. (2021). Role of 53BP1 in end protection and DNA synthesis at DNA breaks. Genes & Development, 35(19–20), 1356–1367. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.348667.121
Panier, S., & Boulton, S. J. (2014). Double-strand break repair: 53BP1 comes into focus. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 15(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3719
Polo, S. E., Blackford, A. N., Chapman, J. R., Baskcomb, L., Gravel, S., Rusch, A., et al. (2012). Regulation of DNA-end resection by hnRNPU-like proteins promotes DNA double-strand break signaling and repair. Molecular Cell, 45(4), 505–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.12.035
Polo, S. E., & Jackson, S. P. (2011). Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: A focus on protein modifications. Genes & Development, 25(5), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.2021311
Powers, M. A., Fay, M. M., Factor, R. E., Welm, A. L., & Ullman, K. S. (2011). Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 accelerates tumor growth by arginine methylation of the tumor suppressor programmed cell death 4. Cancer Research, 71(16), 5579–5587. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0458
Prakash, R., Zhang, Y., Feng, W., & Jasin, M. (2015). Homologous recombination and human health: The roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, and associated proteins. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 7(4), a016600. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a016600
Ran, Q., & Pereira-Smith, O. M. (2000). Identification of an alternatively spliced form of the Tat interactive protein (Tip60), Tip60(beta). Gene, 258(1–2), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00410-8
Rehman, I., Basu, S. M., Das, S. K., Bhattacharjee, S., Ghosh, A., Pommier, Y., et al. (2018). PRMT5-mediated arginine methylation of TDP1 for the repair of topoisomerase I covalent complexes. Nucleic Acids Research, 46(11), 5601–5617. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky291
San Filippo, J., Sung, P., & Klein, H. (2008). Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annual Review of Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061306.125255
Sartori, A. A., Lukas, C., Coates, J., Mistrik, M., Fu, S., Bartek, J., et al. (2007). Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature, 450(7169), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06337
Schultz, L. B., Chehab, N. H., Malikzay, A., & Halazonetis, T. D. (2000). p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) is an early participant in the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks. Journal of Cell Biology, 151(7), 1381–1390. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.151.7.1381
Scully, R., Panday, A., Elango, R., & Willis, N. A. (2019). DNA double-strand break repair-pathway choice in somatic mammalian cells. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 20(11), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-019-0152-0
Sheng, X., & Wang, Z. (2016). Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 regulates multiple signaling pathways to promote lung cancer cell proliferation. BMC Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2632-3
Shim, E. Y., Chung, W. H., Nicolette, M. L., Zhang, Y., Davis, M., Zhu, Z., et al. (2010). Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 and Ku proteins regulate association of Exo1 and Dna2 with DNA breaks. EMBO Journal, 29(19), 3370–3380. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2010.219
Shishkova, E., Zeng, H., Liu, F., Kwiecien, N. W., Hebert, A. S., Coon, J. J., et al. (2017). Global map** of CARM1 substrates defines enzyme specificity and substrate recognition. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15571
Shrivastav, M., De Haro, L. P., & Nickoloff, J. A. (2008). Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Cell Research, 18(1), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2007.111
Sigurdsson, S., Van Komen, S., Bussen, W., Schild, D., Albala, J. S., & Sung, P. (2001). Mediator function of the human Rad51B-Rad51C complex in Rad51/RPA-catalyzed DNA strand exchange. Genes & Development, 15(24), 3308–3318. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.935501
Singleton, B. K., Torres-Arzayus, M. I., Rottinghaus, S. T., Taccioli, G. E., & Jeggo, P. A. (1999). The C terminus of Ku80 activates the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 19(5), 3267–3277. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.19.5.3267
Spagnolo, L., Rivera-Calzada, A., Pearl, L. H., & Llorca, O. (2006). Three-dimensional structure of the human DNA-PKcs/Ku70/Ku80 complex assembled on DNA and its implications for DNA DSB repair. Molecular Cell, 22(4), 511–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.04.013
Stracker, T. H., & Petrini, J. H. (2011). The MRE11 complex: Starting from the ends. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 12(2), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3047
Sugiyama, T., & Kowalczykowski, S. C. (2002). Rad52 protein associates with replication protein A (RPA)-single-stranded DNA to accelerate Rad51-mediated displacement of RPA and presynaptic complex formation. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 277(35), 31663–31672. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M203494200
Sung, P. (1997). Function of yeast Rad52 protein as a mediator between replication protein A and the Rad51 recombinase. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272(45), 28194–28197. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.272.45.28194
Sung, P., & Klein, H. (2006). Mechanism of homologous recombination: Mediators and helicases take on regulatory functions. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 7(10), 739–750. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2008
Takeda, S., Nakamura, K., Taniguchi, Y., & Paull, T. T. (2007). Ctp1/CtIP and the MRN complex collaborate in the initial steps of homologous recombination. Molecular Cell, 28(3), 351–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.10.016
Tan, D. Q., Li, Y., Yang, C., Li, J., Tan, S. H., Chin, D. W. L., et al. (2019). PRMT5 modulates splicing for genome integrity and preserves proteostasis of hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Reports, 26(9), 2316-2328 e2316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.02.001
Tang, J., Frankel, A., Cook, R. J., Kim, S., Paik, W. K., Williams, K. R., et al. (2000). PRMT1 is the predominant type I protein arginine methyltransferase in mammalian cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275(11), 7723–7730. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.11.7723
Tee, W. W., Pardo, M., Theunissen, T. W., Yu, L., Choudhary, J. S., Hajkova, P., et al. (2010). Prmt5 is essential for early mouse development and acts in the cytoplasm to maintain ES cell pluripotency. Genes & Development, 24(24), 2772–2777. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.606110
Tewary, S. K., Zheng, Y. G., & Ho, M. C. (2019). Protein arginine methyltransferases: Insights into the enzyme structure and mechanism at the atomic level. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 76(15), 2917–2932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-019-03145-x
Thandapani, P., O’Connor, T. R., Bailey, T. L., & Richard, S. (2013). Defining the RGG/RG motif. Molecular Cell, 50(5), 613–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.05.021
Thiebaut, C., Eve, L., Poulard, C., & Le Romancer, M. (2021). Structure, activity, and function of PRMT1. Life (basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/life11111147
Trujillo, K. M., Yuan, S. S., Lee, E. Y., & Sung, P. (1998). Nuclease activities in a complex of human recombination and DNA repair factors Rad50, Mre11, and p95. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 273(34), 21447–21450. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.34.21447
Uematsu, N., Weterings, E., Yano, K., Morotomi-Yano, K., Jakob, B., Taucher-Scholz, G., et al. (2007). Autophosphorylation of DNA-PKCS regulates its dynamics at DNA double-strand breaks. Journal of Cell Biology, 177(2), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200608077
Usui, T., Ohta, T., Oshiumi, H., Tomizawa, J., Ogawa, H., & Ogawa, T. (1998). Complex formation and functional versatility of Mre11 of budding yeast in recombination. Cell, 95(5), 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81640-2
Wang, H., Shi, L. Z., Wong, C. C., Han, X., Hwang, P. Y., Truong, L. N., et al. (2013). The interaction of CtIP and Nbs1 connects CDK and ATM to regulate HR-mediated double-strand break repair. PLoS Genetics, 9(2), e1003277. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003277
Wang, X., & Haber, J. E. (2004). Role of Saccharomyces single-stranded DNA-binding protein RPA in the strand invasion step of double-strand break repair. PLoS Biology, 2(1), E21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020021
Wang, Y., Cortez, D., Yazdi, P., Neff, N., Elledge, S. J., & Qin, J. (2000). BASC, a super complex of BRCA1-associated proteins involved in the recognition and repair of aberrant DNA structures. Genes & Development, 14(8), 927–939.
Wold, M. S. (1997). Replication protein A: A heterotrimeric, single-stranded DNA-binding protein required for eukaryotic DNA metabolism. Annual Review of Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.61
Wright, W. D., Shah, S. S., & Heyer, W. D. (2018). Homologous recombination and the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 293(27), 10524–10535. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.TM118.000372
Wu, S., Shi, Y., Mulligan, P., Gay, F., Landry, J., Liu, H., et al. (2007). A YY1-INO80 complex regulates genomic stability through homologous recombination-based repair. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 14(12), 1165–1172. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1332
**ng, M., Yang, M., Huo, W., Feng, F., Wei, L., Jiang, W., et al. (2015). Interactome analysis identifies a new paralogue of XRCC4 in non-homologous end joining DNA repair pathway. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7233
Yamagata, K., Daitoku, H., Takahashi, Y., Namiki, K., Hisatake, K., Kako, K., et al. (2008). Arginine methylation of FOXO transcription factors inhibits their phosphorylation by Akt. Molecular Cell, 32(2), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.013
Yang, Y., & Bedford, M. T. (2013). Protein arginine methyltransferases and cancer. Nature Reviews Cancer, 13(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3409
Yano, K., Morotomi-Yano, K., Wang, S. Y., Uematsu, N., Lee, K. J., Asaithamby, A., et al. (2008). Ku recruits XLF to DNA double-strand breaks. EMBO Reports, 9(1), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7401137
Yin, S., Liu, L., Brobbey, C., Palanisamy, V., Ball, L. E., Olsen, S. K., et al. (2021). PRMT5-mediated arginine methylation activates AKT kinase to govern tumorigenesis. Nature Communications, 12(1), 3444. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23833-2
Yu, Z., Chen, T., Hebert, J., Li, E., & Richard, S. (2009). A mouse PRMT1 null allele defines an essential role for arginine methylation in genome maintenance and cell proliferation. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 29(11), 2982–2996. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00042-09
Yu, Z., Vogel, G., Coulombe, Y., Dubeau, D., Spehalski, E., Hebert, J., et al. (2012). The MRE11 GAR motif regulates DNA double-strand break processing and ATR activation. Cell Research, 22(2), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.128
Zencheck, W. D., **ao, H., & Weiss, L. M. (2012). Lysine post-translational modifications and the cytoskeleton. Essays in Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1042/bse0520135
Zhao, W., Steinfeld, J. B., Liang, F., Chen, X., Maranon, D. G., Jian Ma, C., et al. (2017). BRCA1-BARD1 promotes RAD51-mediated homologous DNA pairing. Nature, 550(7676), 360–365. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24060
Zhong, Q., Chen, C. F., Li, S., Chen, Y., Wang, C. C., **ao, J., et al. (1999). Association of BRCA1 with the hRad50-hMre11-p95 complex and the DNA damage response. Science, 285(5428), 747–750. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5428.747
Zimmermann, M., Lottersberger, F., Buonomo, S. B., Sfeir, A., & de Lange, T. (2013). 53BP1 regulates DSB repair using Rif1 to control 5’ end resection. Science, 339(6120), 700–704. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231573
Acknowledgements
We apologize for original papers we were not able to cite but were covered by reviews instead. W.G. and S.Y. were supported by NIH grant (R35GM146749) and American Cancer Society (RSG-22-068-01-TBE). L.L were supported by the Hollings Cancer Center Abney Postdoctoral Fellowship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yin, S., Liu, L. & Gan, W. PRMT1 and PRMT5: on the road of homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining. GENOME INSTAB. DIS. 4, 197–209 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42764-022-00095-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42764-022-00095-w