Log in

Child Protection Reform in Aotearoa-New Zealand: Devolution or Revolution?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal on Child Maltreatment: Research, Policy and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drawing on historical analysis and recent research into child welfare inequalities in the Aotearoa-New Zealand context, this article considers the possible future trajectory of policy and practice. It will be argued that child protection is firmly located within the relative poverty and inequality which is endemic to the political economy of liberal capitalism. In common with other colonial settler states, social and economic suffering is disproportionately experienced by Indigenous Māori. Child protection in New Zealand underwent a prolonged process of politically driven child protection reform between 2011 and 2015. The consequences of this reform process led to a spike in the forced removal of newborn Indigenous babies into state care. This outcome sparked a political backlash which generated a series of inquiries into the child protection system. These inquiries have considered the structural reform necessary to address racially structured inequalities. The implications of proposed reforms based on the eradication of racism through the empowerment of Māori is considered in tension with the structural reproduction of inequality as a function of capitalist economic and social relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Brazil)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although this report was completed in 1986, it was not published in booklet form until 1986 which is apt to foster confusion with dating / referencing.

References

  • Ballantyne, N. (2019). The ethics and politics of human service technology: The case of predictive risk modelling in New Zealand’s child protection system. Hong Kong Journal of Social Work, 53(1–2), 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, I., Nottingham, C., & Plunkett, S. (2008). A tale of two reports: Social work in Scotland from social work in the community (1966) to changing lives (2000). British Journal of Social Work, 38(4), 697–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boshier, P. (2020). He Take Kōhukihuki: A matter of urgency – Investigation report int policies, practices and procedures for the removal of newborn pēpi by Oranga Tamariki, Ministry for Children. Retrieved from: https://www.ombudsman.parliament.nz/resources/he-take-kohukihuki-matter-urgency

  • Bywaters, P. (2020). Child welfare inequalities: Final report’, Paul Bywaters and the child welfare inequalities project team. Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield. Retrieved from: https://pure.hud.ac.uk/ws/files/21398145/CWIP_Final_Report.pdf

  • Connolly, M., & Morris, K. (2020). Understanding child and family welfare: Statutory responses to children at risk. MacMillan Education – Red Globe Press.

  • Cook, L. (2020). A statistical window for the justice system: Putting a spotlight on the scale of state custody of generations of māori - brief of evidence, Wai 2915, A040. Retrieved from: https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/WT/wt_DOC_161895442/Wai%202915%2C%20A040(a).pdf

  • Cummins, I. (2018). Poverty, inequality and social work: The impact of neo-liberalism and austerity politics on welfare provision. Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cram, F., Gulliver, P., Ota, R., & Wilson, M. (2015). Understanding overrepresentation of indigenous children in child welfare data: An application of the Drake risk and bias models. Child Maltreatment, 20(3), 170–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eketone, A. (2020). The “hidden depression” that never really went away. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 32(3), 37–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Expert Advisory Panel – Modernising child, youth and family. (2015). Final report, Wellington. Retrieved from: https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/corporate/expert-panel-cyf/investing-in-children-report.pdf

  • Featherstone, B., & WhiteMorris, S. K. (2014). Re-imagining child protection – Towards humane social work with families. Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, B., Gupta, A., & Morris, K. (2017). Bringing back the social: The way forward for children’s social work? Journal of Children’s Services, 12(2–3), 190–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, H. (2004). Protecting children in time: Child abuse, child protection and the consequences of modernity. Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, K. (2018). “Problem families” in public housing: Discourse, commentary and (dis) order. Housing Studies, 33(5), 684–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garlick, T. (2012). Social developments – An organisational history of the Ministry of Social Development and its predecessors, 1860–2011. Steele Roberts Aotearoa.

  • Garrett, P. M. (2021). A world to win: In defence of (dissenting) social work – A response to Chris Maylea, The British Journal of Social Work, bcab009. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab009

  • Gilbert, N. (2012). A comparative study of child welfare systems: Abstract orientations and concrete results. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 532–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, V., Edwards, R., & Horsley, N. (2017). Challenging the politics of early intervention: Who’s ‘saving’ children and why? Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hackell, M. (2016). Managing anxiety: Neoliberal modes of subjectivity, fantasy and child abuse in New Zealand. Citizenship Studies, 20(6–7), 867–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2007). Dancing with the state: Māori creative energy and policies of integration, 1945 – 1967. [Doctoral Thesis: University of Auckland] Retrieved from: hhh://hdl.handle.net/2292/2605.

  • Heilbroner, R. L. (1985). The nature and logic of capitalism. Norton.

  • Hyslop, I. (2013). The “white paper for vulnerable children” and the “Munro review of child protection in england”: A comparative critique. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 25(4), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyslop, I. (2017). Child protection in New Zealand: A history of the future. British Journal of Social Work, 47(6), 1800–1817. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcx088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyslop, I., & Keddell, E. (2019). Child protection under national: Reorienting towards genuine social investment or continuing social neglect. New Zealand Sociology, 34(2), 93–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interim Report. (2020). Royal Commission of Inquiry into Historical Abuse in State Care and in the Care of Faith-based Institutions - ‘Tāwharautia: Pūrongo o te Wā (Tāwharautia)’. Retrieved from: https://www.abuseincare.org.nz/

  • Jenson, T., & Tyler, I. (2015). “Benefit broods”: The cultural and political crafting of anti-welfare common sense. Critical Social Policy, 35(4), 470–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddell, E. (2014). Current debates on variability in child welfare decision-making. Social Science, 3, 916–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddell, E. (2017). The vulnerable child in neoliberal contexts: The construction of children in the Aotearoa New Zealand child protection reforms. Childhood, 25(1), 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddell, E. (2019). Harm, care and babies: An inequalities and policy discourse perspective on recent child protection trends in Aotearoa New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 31(4), 18–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddell, E. (2020). The case for an inequalities perspective in child protection. Policy Quarterly, 16(1), 36–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddell, E., Davie, G., & Barson, D. (2019). Child protection inequalities in Aotearoa New Zealand: Social gradient and the ‘inverse intervention law’, Child and Youth Services Review, 104.

  • Lunt, N. (2010). Winning hearts and minds for the competition state. Policy Studies, 31(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maylea, C. (2020). The end of social work. The British Journal of Social Work, 2020, bcaa203. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministerial Advisory Committee. (1998). Puao te Ata Tu (daybreak) – The Report of the Ministerial Advisory Committee on a Maori perspective for the department of social welfare. Wellington, New Zealand. Available from: https://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/about-msd-and-our-work/publications-resources/archive/1988-puaoteatatu.pdf

  • Morel, N., Palier, B., & Palme, J. (2012). Towards a social investment welfare state? Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Productivity Commission (2015). More effective social services, Retrieved from: https://www.productivity.govt.nz/inquiries/more-effective-social-services/

  • Office of the Commissioner for Children – Part 2. (2020). Te Kuku O Te Manawa – Moe ararā Haumanutia ngā moemoeā a ngā tūpuna mō te oranga ngā tamariki. Retrieved from: https://www.occ.org.nz/publications/reports/tktm-report-2/

  • Parton, N. (2008). Changes in the form of knowledge in social work: From the ‘social’ to the ‘informational’? British Journal of Social Work, 38(2), 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parton, N. (2014). Child protection and politics: Some critical and constructive reflections. British Journal of Social Work, 44(7), 2042–2056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poata-Smith, E. S. (2002). The political economy of Māori protest politics, 1968–1995 : A Marxist analysis of the roots of Māori oppression and the politics of resistance (Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy). University of Otago. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/151

  • Potter, H., & Jackson, M. (2017). Constitutional transformation and the Matike Mai project: A korero with Moana Jackson, Economic and Social Research Aotearoa. Retrieved from: https://esra.nz/constitutional-transformation-matike-mai/

  • Provan, S. (2012). The uncanny place of the bad mother and the innocent child at the heart of New Zealand’s “cultural identity”, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.

  • Scott, D. (2006). Sowing the seeds of innovation in child protection. Keynote paper presented to 10th Australasian Child Abuse and Neglect conference, Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.121.4966&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • Sutherland, O. (2019). Witness statement of Dr Oliver Sutherland - Royal Commission of Inquiry into Historical Abuse in State Care and in the Care of Faith Based Institutions. Retrieved from: https://www.abuseincare.org.nz/library/v/61/statement-of-dr-oliver-sutherland

  • Tennant, M. (1989). Paupers and providers – Charitable aid in New Zealand. Allen and Unwin / Historical Branch of Internal Affairs.

  • Walker, R. (2004). Ka whawhai tonu mātou – Struggle without end (Rev.edn). Penguin.

  • Warner, J. (2015). The emotional politics of social work and child protection. Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whānau Ora Commissioning Agency. (2020). Ko Te Wā Whakawhiti, it’s time for change: A Māori inquiry into Oranga Tamariki. Retrieved from: https://whanauora.nz/assets/62879b6bdf/OT-REVIEW-REPORT.pdf

  • Žižek, S. (2014). From the end of history to the end of capitalism: Trouble in paradise. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian Kelvin Hyslop.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hyslop, I.K. Child Protection Reform in Aotearoa-New Zealand: Devolution or Revolution?. Int. Journal on Child Malt. 4, 439–454 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-021-00086-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-021-00086-6

Keywords

Navigation