Log in

Highly Accurate Gear Fault Diagnosis Based on Support Vector Machine

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 05 December 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

The global interest of develo** monitoring system is increasing due to the continuous challenges in reliability and accuracy. Automatic fault detection and diagnosis of rotating machinery play an important role for the high efficiency and reliability of modern industrial systems. The key point of having high accurate automatic model for fault detection and diagnosis is obtaining defect features and choosing a representative approach for the model.

Methods

In this paper, a model is developed based on Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) and gammatone cepstral coefficients (GTCC) that are computed for the input signal frames. Additionally, two global representations (feature concatenation and feature statistics) are adopted to feed Support Vector Machine (SVM) and a temporal representation is used with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Echo State Network (ESN) classification models. To generalize the proposed model, the experiments are evaluated based on two different datasets (PHM09 and DDS), where the PHM09 contains samples of helical and spur gears while the DDS contains samples from parallel and plenary gearboxes.

Results

The results show that the proposed SVM model based on feature concatenation can effectively detect faults from gears and outperforms the other existing methods in the state-of-the-art studies.

Conclusion

Base on the result of this paper, a global representation by concatenating frame-based features outperforms global statistical and time-series feature representations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

Both datasets (PHM09 and DDS) utilized during the current study are available in public. The PHM09 and DDS dataset can be found on (Public Data Sets - PHM Society) and (GitHub - cathysiyu/Mechanical-datasets) respectively.

Code Availability

The implementation of the concat-SVM and other models will be send upon request.

Change history

References

  1. Hai Y, Tsui KL and Zuo MJ (2021) Gear crack level classification based on multinomial logit model and cumulative link model. In: Proceeding of IEEE 2012 Progn. Syst. Heal. Manag. Conf. PHM-2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/PHM.2012.6228904

  2. Li B, Zhang PL, Wang ZJ, Mi SS, Liu DS (2011) Application of S transform and morphological pattern spectrum for gear fault diagnosis. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 225(12):2963–2972. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406211408781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hartono D, Halim D, Roberts GW (2019) Gear fault diagnosis using the general linear chirplet transform with vibration and acoustic measurements. J Low Freq Noise Vib Act Control 38(1):36–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461348418811717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tao Y, Wang X, Sanchez RV, Yang S, Bai Y (2019) Spur gear fault diagnosis using a multilayer gated recurrent unit approach with vibration signal. IEEE Access 7:56880–56889. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2914181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li H, Zhang Y, Zheng H (2009) Gear fault detection and diagnosis under speed-up condition based on order cepstrum and radial basis function neural network. J Mech Sci Technol 23(10):2780–2789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-009-0730-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cabrera JV, Sancho D, Li F, Cerrada C, Sánchez M, Pacheco RV, de Oliveira F (2017) Automatic feature extraction of time-series applied to fault severity assessment of helical gearbox in stationary and non-stationary speed operation. Appl Soft Comput J 58:53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.04.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ismail Fawaz H, Forestier G, Weber J, Idoumghar L, Muller PA (2019) Deep learning for time series classification: a review. Data Min Knowl Discov 33(4):917–963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-019-00619-1

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang J, Zhao R, Wang D, Yan R, Mao K, Shen F (2017) Machine health monitoring using local feature-based gated recurrent unit networks. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 65(2):1539–1548. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2017.2733438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen L, Liu L, He M and Liu D (2019) Gearbox fault diagnosis based on VMD and acoustic emission technology. In: I2MTC 2019 - 2019 IEEE Int. Instrum. Meas. Technol. Conf. Proc., vol. 2019-May, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC.2019.8826954.

  10. Zamanian AH, Ohadi A (2016) Gearbox fault detection through PSO exact wavelet analysis and SVM classifier. Arxiv E-prints. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4983.3442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu J, Zhou X (2020) One-dimensional residual convolutional autoencoder based feature learning for gearbox fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Ind Informatics 16(10):6347–6358. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.2966326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eyben F, Wöllmer M and Schuller B (2009) OpenEAR—introducing the Munich open-source emotion and affect recognition toolkit. In: Proceeding—2009 3rd International Conference of Affected Computer Intelligence Interact. Work. ACII 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2009.5349350

  13. Isermann R (1993) Fault diagnosis of machines via parameter estimation and knowledge processing-Tutorial paper. Automatica 29(4):815–835. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(93)90088-B

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Edwards S, Lees AW, Friswell MI (1998) Fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. Shock Vib Digest 30(1):4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/058310249803000102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Luo RC, Wang H (2018) Diagnostic and prediction of machines health status as exemplary best practice for vehicle production system. IEEE Veh Technol Conf 2018(Augus):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/VTCFall.2018.8690710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen B, Li Y, Zeng N, He W (2019) Fractal lifting wavelets for machine fault diagnosis. IEEE Access 7:50912–50932. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2908213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar P, Hati AS (2020) Review on machine learning algorithm based fault detection in induction motors. Arch Comput Methods Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09446-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zeng C, Su H, Li Y, Guo J, Yang C (2021) An approach for robotic leaning inspired by biomimetic adaptive control. IEEE Trans Ind Informatics 8(3):1479–1488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zeng N, Qiu H, Wang Z, Liu W, Zhang H, Li Y (2018) A new switching-delayed-PSO-based optimized SVM algorithm for diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurocomputing 320:195–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gaikwad SK, Gawali BW, Yannawar P (2010) A review on speech recognition technique. Int J Comput Appl 10(3):16–24. https://doi.org/10.5120/1462-1976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lei J, Liu C, Jiang D (2019) Fault diagnosis of wind turbine based on long short-term memory networks. Renew Energy 133:422–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Abdul ZK, Al-Talabani A, Abdulrahman AO (2016) A new feature extraction technique based on 1D local binary pattern for gear fault detection. Shock Vib. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8538165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang J, Jiang Q, Chang F (2018) Fault diagnosis method based on MFCC fusion and SVM. 2018 IEEE Int Conf Inf Autom ICIA 2018(August):1617–1622. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICInfA.2018.8812417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Benkedjouh AM, Chettibi T, Saadouni Y (2018) Gearbox fault diagnosis B based on mel-frequency cepstral coefficients and support vector machine. Springer International Publishing

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Abdul ZK, Al-Talabani AK, Ramadan DO (2020) A hybrid temporal feature for gear fault diagnosis using the long short term memory. IEEE Sens J 23:14444–14452. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2020.3007262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang HB, Zhang JA, Chen LL, Zhang HL, Liu SL (2019) Fault diagnosis of reciprocating compressor based on Cconvolutional neural networks with multisource raw vibration signals. Math Prob Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6921975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. **g L, Zhao M, Li P, Xu X (2017) A convolutional neural network based feature learning and fault diagnosis method for the condition monitoring of gearbox. Measurement 111(July):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.07.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shao S, McAleer S, Yan R, Baldi P (2019) Highly accurate machine fault diagnosis using deep transfer learning. IEEE Trans Ind Informatics 15(4):2446–2455. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2864759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Saufi SR, Bin Ahmad ZA, Leong MS, Lim MH (2020) Gearbox fault diagnosis using a deep learning model with limited data sample. IEEE Trans Ind Informatics 16(10):6263–6271. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.2967822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tang S, Yuan S, Zhu Y (2020) Convolutional neural network in intelligent fault diagnosis toward rotatory machinery. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2992692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tang S, Zhu Y, Yuan S (2022) Intelligent fault diagnosis of hydraulic piston pump based on deep learning and Bayesian optimization. ISA Trans 129:555–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2022.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. He W, Chen B, Zeng N, Zi Y (2018) Sparsity-based signal extraction using dual Q-factors for gearbox fault detection. ISA Trans 79:147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2018.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Staszewski WJ, Tomlinson GR (1994) Application of the wavelet transform to fault detection in a spur gear. Mech Syst Signal Process 8(3):289–307. https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.1994.1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rizos PF, Aspragathos N, Dimarogonas AD (1990) Identification of crack location and magnitude in a cantilever beam from the vibration modes. J Sound Vib 138(3):381–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(90)90593-O

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhao B, Cheng C, Peng Z, Dong X, Meng G (2020) Detecting the early damages in structures with nonlinear output frequency response functions and the CNN-LSTM model. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 69(12):9557–9567. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2020.3005113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. ** S, Wang X, Du L, He D (2021) Evaluation and modeling of automotive transmission whine noise quality based on MFCC and CNN. Appl Acoust 172:107562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sharma V, Parey A (2016) A review of gear fault diagnosis using various condition indicators. Procedia Eng 144:253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.05.131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tiwari V (2010) MFCC and its applications in speaker recognition. Int J Emerg Technol 1(1):19–22

    Google Scholar 

  39. Andrew PRS, Geib F, Kuo CC, Gawecki M, Tsau ES, Kang JW (2014) MFCC and celp to detect turbine engine faults. US Patent 8,655,571, 18 Feb 2014

  40. Adiga A, Magimai M and Seelamantula CS (2013) Gammatone wavelet cepstral coefficients for robust speech recognition. In: IEEE Reg. 10 Annu. Int. Conf. Proceedings/TENCON. https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCON.2013.6718948.

  41. Qi J, Wang D, Xu J and Tejedor J (2013) Bottleneck features based on gammatone frequency cepstral coefficients. In: Proceeding of Annual Conference of International Speech Communication of Associations interspeech, no. August, pp 1751–1755

  42. Farhat NH (1992) Photonit neural networks and learning mathines the role of electron-trap** materials. IEEE Expert Syst Appl 7(5):63–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/64.163674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Al-Talabani A, Sellahewa H and Jassim SA (2015) Emotion recognition from speech: tools and challenges. In: Mobile multimedia/image processing, security, and applications 2015, vol. 9497, p 94970N

  44. **e W, Wang J, **ng C, Guo S, Guo M, Zhu L (2021) Variational autoencoder bidirectional long and short-term memory neural network soft-sensor model based on batch training strategy. IEEE Trans Ind Informatics 17(8):5325–5334. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.3025204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jaeger H, Haas H (2004) Harnessing nonlinearity: predicting chaotic systems and saving energy in wireless communication. Science (80–) 304(5667):78–80. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Dai J, Venayagamoorthy GK and Harley RG (2009) An introduction to the echo state network and its applications in power system. In: 2009 15th International conference of intelligent system application to power system. ISAP ’09, no. 2, pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISAP.2009.5352913

  47. Validated C (2021) What is an intuitive explanation of Echo State Networks?. Stack Exchange Network. https://stats.stackexchange.com/q/261735 (accessed Nov. 19, 2021)

  48. Bianchi FM, Scardapane S, Lokse S, Jenssen R (2021) Reservoir computing approaches for representation and classification of multivariate time series. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 32(5):2169–2179. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3001377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Shao S, Member S, Mcaleer S, Yan R, Member S (2018) Highly-accurate machine fault diagnosis using deep transfer learning. IEEE Trans Ind Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2864759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. The Prognostics and Health Management Society (2009) 2009 PHM challenge competition data set. https://phmsociety.org/public-data-sets/ (accessed Oct 25, 2021)

  51. Lei Y, Kong D, Lin J, Zuo MJ (2012) Fault detection of planetary gearboxes using new diagnostic parameters. Meas Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/23/5/055605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Tong C, Wang Y, Tian Y, Yu C (2018) Dynamic reliability analysis of gear vibration response with random parameters. No Icectt. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006968502410245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ibrahim H, Loo CK, Alnajjar F (2021) Speech emotion recognition by late fusion for bidirectional reservoir computing with random projection. IEEE Access 9:122855–122871. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3107858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Amarnath M, Praveen Krishna IR (2014) Local fault detection in helical gears via vibration and acoustic signals using EMD based statistical parameter analysis. Meas J Int Meas Confed 58(December):154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.08.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wu C, Jiang P, Ding C, Feng F, Chen T (2019) Intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machinery based on one-dimensional convolutional neural network. Comput Ind 108:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Erbil Polytechnic University, the Koya University and charmo University.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zrar Kh. Abdul.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: The last affiliation was not correct.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdul, Z.K., Al-Talabani, A.K. Highly Accurate Gear Fault Diagnosis Based on Support Vector Machine. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 11, 3565–3577 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00768-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00768-6

Keywords

Navigation