Log in

Benchmarks and Bellwethers in Cyberbullying: the Relational Process of Telling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Bullying Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a lack of research that examines and compares the perspectives of students and their parents and teachers with respect to cyberbullying. Qualitative data were drawn from a mixed methods study on cyberbullying among students in grades 4, 7, and 10, in a large urban school board. Interviews with 13 students and their parents and teachers took place during year one and with students and parents in year three. Data analysis occurred through an ongoing process of open, axial, and selective coding. Overall, the youth and adults demonstrated similar understanding of cyberbullying. It emerged, however, that for the youth participants, telling about their cyberbullying experiences was a relational process. In contrast, the adult participants made little mention of these relational aspects in their explanations. We characterize this relational process as students’ use of benchmarks (point of reference) and bellwethers (someone or something that is used as a predictor), throughout their decision-making (both implicit and explicit). It is important that this relational process of telling, for example, deciding whether and to whom to disclose, informs education and intervention strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

Not applicable

Notes

  1. Included in brackets are participant ID numbers and whether the quote was from year 1 or year 3 of the study.

References

  • Allen, K. P. (2012). Off the radar and ubiquitous: text messaging and its relationship to ‘drama’and cyberbullying in an affluent, academically rigorous US high school. Journal of Youth Studies, 15(1), 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, K. R., & Bussey, K. (2016). Cyber-bystanding in context: a review of the literature on witnesses’ responses to cyberbullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 65, 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ang, R. P. (2015). Adolescent cyberbullying: a review of characteristics, prevention and intervention strategies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, G. E., & Stolorow, R. D. (2012). The demons of phenomenological contextualism: a conversation. The Psychoanalytic Review, 99(2), 267–286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barlett, C. P., & Fennel, M. (2018). Examining the relation between parental ignorance and youths’ cyberbullying perpetration. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7(4), 547–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlińska, J., Szuster, A., & Winiewski, M. (2013). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: role of the communication medium, form of violence, and empathy. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23(1), 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjereld, Y., Daneback, K., Gunnarsdóttir, H., & Petzold, M. (2015). Mental health problems and social resource factors among bullied children in the Nordic countries: a population based cross-sectional study. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 46(2), 281–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulton, M. J., Hardcastle, K., Down, J., Fowles, J., & Simmonds, J. A. (2014). A comparison of preservice teachers’ responses to cyber versus traditional bullying scenarios: similarities and differences and implications for practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(2), 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brochado, S., Soares, S., & Fraga, S. (2017). A sco** review on studies of cyberbullying prevalence among adolescents. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(5), 523–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Contexts of child rearing: problems and prospects. Child and Youth Care Administrator, 5(1), 59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumpus, M. F., & Werner, N. E. (2009). Maternal rule-setting for children’s internet use. Marriage & Family Review, 45(6–8), 845–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerini, A.-L., Marciano, L., Carrara, A., & Schulz, P. J. (2020). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among children and adolescents: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Telematics and Informatics, 49, 101362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M., Whiteford, C., & Hooijer, J. (2019). Teachers’ and parents’ understanding of traditional and cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 18(3), 388–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, W., Jackson, M., & Brown, K. N. (2009). Sticks and stones can break my bones, but how can pixels hurt me? Students’ experiences with cyber-bullying. School Psychology International, 30(4), 383–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, W., Brown, K., & Jackson, M. (2012). ‘Under the radar’: educators and cyberbullying in schools. School Psychology International, 33(5), 520–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, N. N., Ahrumugam, P., Scheithauer, H., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., & Ooi, P. B. (2020). A hermeneutic phenomenological study of students’ and school counsellors’ “lived experiences” of cyberbullying and bullying. Computers & Education, 146, 103755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapin, J., & Coleman, G. (2017). The cycle of cyberbullying: some experience required. The Social Science Journal, 54(3), 314–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compton, L., Campbell, M. A., & Mergler, A. (2014). Teacher, parent and student perceptions of the motives of cyberbullies. Social Psychology of Education, 17(3), 383–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conners-Burrow, N. A., Johnson, D. L., Whiteside-Mansell, L., McKelvey, L., & Gargus, R. A. (2009). Adults matter: protecting children from the negative impacts of bullying. Psychology in the Schools, 46(7), 593–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for develo** grounded theory, 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daneback, K., Bjereld, Y., Macháčková, H., Ševčíková, A., & Dědková, L. (2018). Bullied online but not telling anyone: what are the reasons for not disclosing cybervictimization? Studia Paedagogica, 23(4), 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehue, F., Bolman, C., & Völlink, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: youngsters’ experiences and parental perception. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 217–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • den Hamer, A. H., & Konijn, E. A. (2015). Adolescents’ media exposure may increase their cyberbullying behavior: a longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56(2), 203–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • den Hamer, A., Konijn, E. A., & Keijer, M. G. (2014). Cyberbullying behavior and adolescents’ use of media with antisocial content: a cyclic process model. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 17(2), 74–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennehy, R., Meaney, S., Walsh, K. A., Sinnott, C., Cronin, M., & Arensman, E. (2020). Young people’s conceptualizations of the nature of cyberbullying: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 51, 101379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espelage, D. L. (2014). Ecological theory: preventing youth bullying, aggression, and victimization. Theory Into Practice, 53(4), 257–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espelage, D. L., & Hong, J. S. (2017). Cyberbullying prevention and intervention efforts: current knowledge and future directions. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 62(6), 374–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gakidou, E., Afshin, A., Abajobir, A. A., Abate, K. H., Abbafati, C., Abbas, K. M., Abd-Allah, F., Abdulle, A. M., Abera, S. F., & Aboyans, V. (2017). Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet, 390(10100), 1345–1422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giménez-Gualdo, A.-M., Arnaiz-Sánchez, P., Cerezo-Ramírez, F., & Prodócimo, E. (2018). Teachers’ and students’ perception about cyberbullying. Intervention and co** strategies in primary and secondary education. Comunicar, 26(56), 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, V. A., Harcourt, S., Mattioni, L., & Prior, T. (2013). Bullying in New Zealand schools: a final report. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington, School of Educational Psychology and Pedagogy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, V. A., Johnston, M., Mattioni, L., Prior, T., Harcourt, S., & Lynch, T. (2017). Who is responsible for addressing cyberbullying? Perspectives from teachers and senior managers. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 5(2), 100–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamm, M. P., Newton, A. S., Chisholm, A., Shulhan, J., Milne, A., Sundar, P., Ennis, H., Scott, S. D., & Hartling, L. (2015). Prevalence and effect of cyberbullying on children and young people: a sco** review of social media studies. JAMA Pediatrics, 169(8), 770–777.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harger, B. (2019). To tell or not to tell: student responses to negative behavior in elementary school. The Sociological Quarterly, 60, 479–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2019.1625737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiman, T., & Olenik-Shemesh, D. (2017). Cyberbullying involvement of adolescents with low vision compared to typical adolescents, as related to perceived social support. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 26(2), 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2013). Social influences on cyberbullying behaviors among middle and high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 711–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. S., Lwin, M. O., Yee, A. Z., Sng, J. R., & Chen, L. (2019). Parents’ responses to cyberbullying effects: how third-person perception influences support for legislation and parental mediation strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 373–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holfeld, B., & Mishna, F. (2018). Longitudinal associations in youth involvement as victimized, bullying, or witnessing. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, andSocial Networking, 21(4), 234–239. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houbre, B., Tarquinio, C., & Lanfranchi, J.-B. (2010). Expression of self-concept and adjustment against repeated aggressions: the case of a longitudinal study on school bullying. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25(1), 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y.-y., & Chou, C. (2013). Revisiting cyberbullying: perspectives from Taiwanese teachers. Computers & Education, 63, 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. (2010). Internet use and child development: the techno-microsystem. Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology (AJEDP), 10, 32–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds?—bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78(9), 496–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073–1137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P., & McCord, A. (2019). A developmental approach to cyberbullying: prevalence and protective factors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapidot-Lefler, N., & Dolev-Cohen, M. (2015). Comparing cyberbullying and school bullying among school students: prevalence, gender, and grade level differences. Social Psychology of Education, 18(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lietz, C. A., & Zayas, L. E. (2010). Evaluating qualitative research for social work practitioners. Advances in Social Work, 11(2), 188–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay, P. J., Betts, L. R., Stiller, J., & Kellezi, B. (2018). Perceptions and responses towards cyberbullying: a systematic review of teachers in the education system. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 43, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midamba, N., & Moreno, M. (2019). Differences in parent and adolescent views on cyberbullying in the US. Journal of Children and Media, 13(1), 106–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishna, F., Cook, C., Gadalla, T., Daciuk, J., & Solomon, S. (2010). Cyber bullying behaviors among middle and high school students. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80(3), 362–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mishna, F., Schwan, K., Lefebrvre, R., Bhole, P., & Johnston, D. (2014). Students in distress: Unanticipated findings in a cyber bullying study. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 341-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.04.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G., & Runions, K. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: a meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(5), 602–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monks, C. P., Mahdavi, J., & Rix, K. (2016). The emergence of cyberbullying in childhood: parent and teacher perspectives. Psicología Educativa, 22(1), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, M. A., Gower, A. D., Brittain, H., & Vaillancourt, T. (2019). Applying natural language processing to evaluate news media coverage of bullying and cyberbullying. Prevention Science, 20(8), 1274–1283.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, C. R., Pfetsch, J., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., & Ittel, A. (2018). Does media use lead to cyberbullying or vice versa? Testing longitudinal associations using a latent cross-lagged panel design. Computers in Human Behavior, 81, 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesi, J., Choukas-Bradley, S., & Prinstein, M. J. (2018). Transformation of adolescent peer relations in the social media context: part 1—a theoretical framework and application to dyadic peer relationships. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 21(3), 267–294.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyên, T. T. T., & Mark, L. K. (2014). Cyberbullying, sexting, and online sharing: a comparison of parent and school faculty perspectives. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), 4(1), 76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepler, D. J. (2006). Bullying interventions: a binocular perspective. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 15(1), 16–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pepler, D., Craig, W., Jiang, D., & Connolly, J. (2008). The development of bullying. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 20(2), 113–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryalls, E. (2012). Demonizing “mean girls” in the news: was Phoebe Prince “bullied to death?”. Communication, Culture & Critique, 5(3), 463–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shetgiri, R., Lin, H., Avila, R. M., & Flores, G. (2012). Parental characteristics associated with bullying perpetration in US children aged 10 to 17 years. American Journal of Public Health, 102(12), 2280–2286.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Skrzypiec, G., Slee, P., Murray-Harvey, R., & Pereira, B. (2011). School bullying by one or more ways: Does it matter and how do students cope? School Psychology International, 32(3), 288–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., & Frisén, A. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K. (2015). The nature of cyberbullying and what we can do about it. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 15(3), 176–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer, S., Heath, M. A., Coyne, S. M., & Ferrin, S. (2012). High school teachers’ perceptions of cyberbullying prevention and intervention strategies. Psychology in the Schools, 49(4), 352–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulkowski, M. L., & Simmons, J. (2018). The protective role of teacher–student relationships against peer victimization and psychosocial distress. Psychology in the Schools, 55(2), 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symons, K., Ponnet, K., Emmery, K., Walrave, M., & Heirman, W. (2017). Parental knowledge of adolescents’ online content and contact risks. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(2), 401–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Iannotti, R. J., & Nansel, T. R. (2009). School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(4), 368–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Hatzigianni, M., Shahaeian, A., Murray, E., & Harrison, L. J. (2016). The combined effects of teacher-child and peer relationships on children’s social-emotional adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 59, 1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young, R., & Tully, M. (2019). ‘Nobody wants the parents involved’: social norms in parent and adolescent responses to cyberbullying. Journal of Youth Studies, 22(6), 856–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, R., Tully, M., & Ramirez, M. (2017). School administrator perceptions of cyberbullying facilitators and barriers to preventive action: a qualitative study. Health Education & Behavior, 44(3), 476–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishna, F., McInroy, L.B., Lacombe-Duncan, A., Bhole, P., VanWert, M., Schwan, K., Birze, A., Daciuk, J., Beran, T., Craig, W., Pepler, D.J., Wiener, J.,Khoury-Kassabri, M., & Johnston, D.  (2016). Prevalence, motivations, and social, mental health and health consequences of cyberbullying amongschool-aged children and youth: Protocol of a longitudinal and multi-perspective mixed method study. JMIR Research Protocols, 5(2), e83.

  • Mishna, F., Schwan, A., Birze, A., Van Wert, M., McInroy, L., Lacombe-Duncan, A., Attar-Schwartz, S., & Daciuk. J. (2020). Gendered and sexualized bullying and cyber bullying: Spotlighting girls and making boys invisible. Youth & Society, 52(3), 403–426.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X18757150.

  • Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2015). Grounded theory: a practical guide. Sage.

  • Bjereld, Y., Daneback, K., & Mishna, F.  (2019). Adults’ responses to bullying: Victims’ point of view. Research Papers in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1646793.

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2007). The bioecological model of human development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology,Theoretical models of human development Volume 1, 6th Edition (pp. 793-828). Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0114

  • Cassidy, W., Brown, K., & Jackson, M. (2013). Moving from cyber-bullying to cyber-kindness: what do students, educators and parents say? In Examining the concepts, issues, and implications of internet trolling (pp. 62–83). IGI Global.

  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory, 2nd Edition. Sage.

  • Dean, M. (2012). The story of Amanda Todd. The New Yorker, 18.

  • Lenhart, A., Duggan, M., Perrin, A., Stepler, R., Rainie, H., & Parker, K. (2015). Teens, social media & technology overview 2015. Pew Research Center [Internet & American Life Project].

  • Mattioni, L. (2012). School staff’s perceptions and attitudes towards cyberbullying.

  • Padgett, D. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research, 2nd Edition. Sage.

  • Pepler, D. J., & Milton, P. (2013). External review of the Halifax Regional School Board’s Support of Rehtaeh Parsons. Nova Scotia Department of Education.

  • Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 3rd Edition. Sage.

  • Segal, M. D., & Parsons, R. (2015). Independent review of the police and prosecution response to the Rehtaeh Parsons case. Department of Justice.

  • Smokowski, P. R., & Evans, C. B. (2019). Consequences of bullying in childhood, adolescence, and adulthood: an ecological perspective. In Bullying and victimization across the lifespan (pp. 59–86). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20293-4.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge first and foremost the Toronto District School Board for their utmost commitment to participating in the study, as well as each school for their dedication to both data collection and ensuring that the mental health needs of students identified through the study were addressed. We would like to thank the students, parents, and teachers for sharing their experiences with us. We would also like to thank the research assistants, as without them we could not have completed this study.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Fund:Grant #410-2011-1001, for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faye Mishna.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval was received from the University Research Ethics Board and the School Board External Research Review Committee, and parental consent and student assent were obtained.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Code Availability

Not applicable

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mishna, F., Birze, A., Greenblatt, A. et al. Benchmarks and Bellwethers in Cyberbullying: the Relational Process of Telling. Int Journal of Bullying Prevention 3, 241–252 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-020-00082-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-020-00082-3

Keywords

Navigation