Abstract
To reveal the cavitation forms of tip leakage vortex (TLV) of the axial flow pump and the flow mechanism of the flow field, this research adopts the partially-averaged Navier-Stokes (PANS) model to simulate the cavitation values of an axial flow pump, followed by experimental validation. The experimental result shows that compared with the shear stress transport (SST) k - ω model, the PANS model significantly reduces the eddy viscosity of the flow field to make the vortex structure clearer and allow the turbulence scale to be more robustly analyzed. The cavitation area within the axial flow pump mainly comprises of TLV cavitation, clearance cavitation and tip leakage flows combined effect of triangular cloud cavitation formed. The formation and development of cavitation are accompanied by the formation and evolution of vortex, and variations in vortex structure also generate and promote the development of cavitation. In addition, an in-depth analysis of the relationship between the turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) transport equation and cavitation patterns was also conducted, finding that the regions with relatively high TKE are mainly distributed around gas/liquid boundaries with serious cavitation and evident gas-liquid change. This phenomenon is mainly attributed to the combined effect of the pressure action term, stress diffusion term and TKE production term.
References
Zhou Y., Zhang H., Chen B. Influence of double-inlet design on the flow-head characteristics of axial-flow pump [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2021, 33(4): 763–772.
Qiu J., Yang C., Dong X. et al. Numerical simulation and uncertainty analysis of an axial-flow waterjet pump [J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2018. 6(2): 71.
Jia X., Shen S., Zhang S. et al. Influence of tip clearance on internal energy loss characteristics of axial flow pumps under different operating conditions [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2024, 36(1): 15102.
Kan K., Binama M., Chen H. et al. Pump as turbine cavitation performance for both conventional and reverse operating modes: A review [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, 168: 112786.
Cheng H. Y., Bai X. R., Long X. P. et al. Large eddy simulation of the tip-leakage cavitating flow with an insight on how cavitation influences vorticity and turbulence [J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2020, 77: 788–809.
Zhang S., Wang C., Yao Z. et al. Evaluation of a modified URANS prediction of unsteady cavitating flow around a hydrofoil by comparing with LES results and experimental results [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2023, 162: 104405.
Cudina M., Detection of cavitation phenomenon in a centrifugal pump using audible sound [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2003, 17(6): 1335–1347.
Iannetti A., Stickland M. T., Dempster W. M. A CFD and experimental study on cavitation in positive displacement pumps: Benefits and drawbacks of the ‘full’ cavitation model [J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 10(1): 57–71.
Si Q., Ali A., Liao M. et al. Assessment of cavitation noise in a centrifugal pump using acoustic finite element method and spherical cavity radiation theory [J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2023, 17(1): 2173302.
Laborde R., Chantrel P., Mory M. Tip clearance and tip vortex cavitation in an axial flow pump [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1997, 119(3): 680–685.
Wang Z., Cheng H., Ji B. et al. Numerical investigation of inner structure and its formation mechanism of cloud cavitating flow [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2023, 165: 104484.
Zhang R., Chen H. Numerical analysis of cavitation within slanted axial-flow pump [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2013, 25(5): 663–672.
Cheng H. Y., Ji B., Long X. P. et al. A review of cavitation in tip-leakage flow and its control [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2021, 33(2): 226–242.
Cheng H., Long X., Ji B. et al., A new Euler-Lagrangian cavitation model for tip-vortex cavitation with the effect of non-condensable gas [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2021, 134: 103441.
Wei X., Zhang R. The axial tip clearance leakage analysis of the winglet and composite blade tip for the liquid-ring vacuum pump [J]. Vacuum, 2022, 200: 111027.
Lee J., Han J., Park H. et al. Application of signal processing techniques to the detection of tip vortex cavitation noise in marine propeller [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2013, 25(3): 440–449.
Shen X., Zhang D., Xu B. et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of tip leakage vortex cavitation in an axial flow pump under design and off-design conditions [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 2021, 235(1): 70–80.
Liu Y., Han Y., Tan L. et al., Blade rotation angle on energy performance and tip leakage vortex in a mixed flow pump as turbine at pump mode [J]. Energy, 2020, 206: 118084.
Shervani-Tabar M. T., Shervani-Tabar N. Movement of location of tip vortex cavitation along blade edge due to reduction of flow rate in an axial pump [J]. International Journal of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, 2012, 6(1): 191–195.
Miorini R. L., Wu H., Katz J. The internal structure of the tip leakage vortex within the rotor of an axial waterjet pump [J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2012, 134(3): 031018.
Zhao X., Shen X., Geng L. et al. Effects of cavitation on the hydrodynamic loading and wake vortex evolution of a pre-swirl pump-jet propulsor [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 266: 113069.
**e C., Zhang C., Fu T. et al. Numerical analysis and model test verification of energy and cavitation characteristics of axial flow pumps [J]. Water (Basel), 2022, 14(18): 2853.
Shi G., Liu Z., **ao Y. et al. Tip leakage vortex trajectory and dynamics in a multiphase pump at off-design condition [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 150: 703–711.
Feng H., Wan Y., Fan Z. Numerical investigation of turbulent cavitating flow in an axial flow pump using a new transport-based model [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2020, 34(2): 745–756.
Cheng H., Long X., Ji B. et al., Suppressing tip-leakage vortex cavitation by overhanging grooves [J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2020, 61(7): 159.
Liu Y., Tan L. Influence of C groove on suppressing vortex and cavitation for a NACA0009 hydrofoil with tip clearance in tidal energy [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 148: 907–922.
Dzanic T., Girimaji S. S., Witherden F. D. Partially-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations of turbulence within a high-order flux reconstruction framework [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2022, 456: 110992.
Ye W., Ikuta A., Chen Y. et al., Numerical simulation on role of the rotating stall on the hump characteristic in a mixed flow pump using modified partially averaged Navier-Stokes model [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 166: 91–107.
Dreyer M., Decaix J., Münch-Alligné C. et al. Mind the gap: a new insight into the tip leakage vortex using stereo-PIV [J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2014, 55: 1849.
Long X., Cheng H., Ji B. et al. Large eddy simulation and Euler-Lagrangian coupling investigation of the transient cavitating turbulent flow around a twisted hydrofoil [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2018, 100: 41–56.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Key Research and Development Project of Zhejiang Province (Grant Nos. 2022C01148, 2022C03036)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. All authors declare that there are no other competing interests.
Ethical approval: This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent: Not application.
Additional information
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52376035).
Biography: **ao-qi Jia (1987-), Male, Ph. D., Associate Professor
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jia, Xq., Zhang, Sk. & Zhu, Zc. Research on blade tip clearance cavitation and turbulent kinetic energy characteristics of axial flow pump based on the partially-averaged Navier-Stokes model. J Hydrodyn 36, 184–201 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-024-0014-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-024-0014-x