Log in

Numerical investigation on the mechanism of impeller hub corner separation flow and induced energy loss in the bulb tubular pump

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Impeller hub corner separation flow (IHCS) has a significant influence on energy conversion of the bulb tubular pump, and its unsteady characteristics are investigated with CFD-based method. The generation mechanism and power loss characteristics of IHCS are investigated by the entropy production method and pressure fluctuation analysis. The main cause can be attributed to the large transverse pressure gradient near the hub at the trailing edge of the impeller, which is aggravated by the circumferential movement trend and the diffuser reverse flow, while the IHCS is significantly weakened with increased flow rate. The undesirable flow behavior is more likely to cause a significant increase in energy loss near the hub region compared to that in the rim region. The relative vortex stretching induced by the velocity gradient is the main cause of the horn-like vortex (HLV), and its intensity and resulting energy loss tend to decrease along the vortex trajectory. The HLV changes the dominant frequency of the pressure fluctuations in the nearby flow field, the value of which increases from 1fr (the blade passing frequency) to 2fr with increased amplitude, mainly due to the lower pressure regions on the impeller suction surface (SS) and HLV vortex core. Due to the effect of rotor-stator interaction (RSI), the HLVs generated between two adjacent impeller blades are cut into several sections by the diffuser vanes and propagate and dissipate along the mainstream direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhao Y., He F., Wang Q. et al. Optimizing the Route to the North of the Yellow River for the Eastern Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project [J]. Strategic Study of Chinese Academy of Engineering, 2022, 24(5): 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ye W., Geng C., Ikuta A. et al. Investigation on the impeller-diffuser interaction on the unstable flow in a mixed-flow pump using a modified partially averaged Navier-Stokes model [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 238: 109756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ji L., Li W., Shi W. et al. Diagnosis of internal energy characteristics of mixed-flow pump within stall region based on entropy production analysis model [J]. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2020, 117: 104784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng H. Y., Ji B., Long X. P. et al. A review of cavitation in tip-leakage flow and its control [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2021, 33(2): 226–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Han Y., Tan L. Influence of rotating speed on tip leakage vortex in a mixed flow pump as turbine at pump mode [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 162: 144–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Han C. Z., Xu S., Cheng H. Y. et al. LES method of the tip clearance vortex cavitation in a propelling pump with special emphasis on the cavitation-vortex interaction [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2020, 32(6): 1212–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang Y., Zhang D., Wang F. et al. Vortex suppression of the tip leakage flow over a NACA0009 hydrofoil via a passive jet induced by the double-control-hole [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 237: 109647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li H., Huang Q., Pan G. et al. Wake instabilities of a pre-swirl stator pump-jet propulsor [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2021, 33(8): 085119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marsan A., Trébinjac I., Coste S. et al. Influence of unsteadiness on the control of a hub-corner separation within a radial vaned diffuser [J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2015, 137(2): 021008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang Y., Dong X., Zhang Y. et al. Flow control of hub corner stall in a highly loaded axial compressor cascade [J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2019, 78: 108434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Denton J. D. Loss mechanisms in turbomachines [J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 1993, 115(4): 621–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dring R. P., Joslyn H. D., Hardin L. W. et al. Turbine rotor-stator interaction [J]. Journal of Engineering for Power, 1982, 104(4): 729–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ji B., Luo X., Wu Y. et al. Numerical analysis of unsteady cavitating turbulent flow and shedding horse-shoe vortex structure around a twisted hydrofoil [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2013, 51: 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Asnaghi A., Feymark A., Bensow R. E. Numerical investigation of the impact of computational resolution on shedding cavity structures [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2018, 107: 33–50.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang C., Wang F., Tang Y. et al. Investigation on the horn-like vortices in stator corner separation flow in an axial flow pump [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2020, 142(7): 071208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang C., Wang F., **e L. et al. On the vortical characteristics of horn-like vortices in stator corner separation flow in an axial flow pump [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2021, 143(6): 061201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao H., Wang F., Wang C. et al. Study on the characteristics of horn-like vortices in an axial flow pump impeller under off-design conditions [J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2021, 15(1): 1613–1628.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Pei J., Meng F., Li Y. et al. Effects of distance between impeller and guide vane on losses in a low head pump by entropy production analysis [J]. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 8(11): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ji L., Li W., Shi W. et al. Energy characteristics of mixed-flow pump under different tip clearances based on entropy production analysis [J]. Energy, 2020, 199: 117447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun L., Pan Q., Zhang D. et al. Numerical study of the energy loss in the bulb tubular pump system focusing on the off-design conditions based on combined energy analysis methods [J]. Energy, 2022, 258: 124794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brandner P. A., Venning J. A., Pearce B. W. Wavelet analysis techniques in cavitating flows [J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2018, 376(2126): 20170242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ji L., Li W., Shi W. et al. Experimental study of pressure pulsation in a mixed-flow pump with different tip clearances based on wavelet analysis [J]. Shock and Vibration, 2020, 2020(9): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang R., Qiu R., Wang Y. et al. Space-time frequency spectra analyses of the unsteady cavitating vortical flows inside a mixed-flow pump [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 238: 109758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Quan H., Cheng J., Guo Y. et al. Influence of screw centrifugal inducer on internal flow structure of vortex pump [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2020, 142(9): 091203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li H., Pan G., Huang Q. Transient analysis of the fluid flow on a pumpjet propulsor [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 191: 106520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ye W., Zhu Z., Qian Z. et al. Numerical analysis of unstable turbulent flows in a centrifugal pump impeller considering the curvature and rotation effect [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2020, 34(7): 2869–2881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao G., Liang N., Zhang Y. et al. Dynamic behaviors of blade cavitation in a water jet pump with inlet guide vanes: Effects of inflow non-uniformity and unsteadiness [J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2021, 117: 102889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Eray A., Huu D. V., Ali M. Controlling corner stall separation with plasma actuators in a compressor cascade [J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2016, 138: 081008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kock F., Herwig H. Local entropy production in turbulent shear flows: A high-Reynolds number model with wall functions [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2004, 47: 2205–2215.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang D., Shi W., Van Esch B. P. M. (Bart) et al. Numerical and experimental investigation of tip leakage vortex trajectory and dynamics in an axial flow pump [J]. Computers and Fluids, 2015, 112: 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu Y., Han Y., Tan L. et al. Blade rotation angle on energy performance and tip leakage vortex in a mixed flow pump as turbine at pump mode [J]. Energy, 2020, 206: 118084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Huang B., Zhao Y., Wang G. Large eddy simulation of turbulent vortex-cavitation interactions in transient sheet/cloud cavitating flows [J]. Computers and Fluids, 2014, 92: 113–124.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province for Distinguished Young Scholars (Grant No. BK20211547), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20220542), the Key R & D projects in Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BE2021073) and the Graduate Research and Innovation Projects of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. KYCX21_3356).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to De-sheng Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval: This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. De-sheng Zhang is an editorial board member for the Journal of Hydrodynamics and was not involved in the editorial review, or the decision to publish this article. All authors declare that there are no other competing interests.

Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51979125, 52209111 and U2016225).

Biography: Long-yue Sun (1989-), Male, Ph. D. Candidate

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Ly., Pan, Q., Zhang, Ds. et al. Numerical investigation on the mechanism of impeller hub corner separation flow and induced energy loss in the bulb tubular pump. J Hydrodyn 35, 252–267 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-023-0021-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-023-0021-3

Key words

Navigation