Log in

Measurement and characterization of bulk nanobubbles by nanoparticle tracking analysis method

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The size of the bulk nanobubbles (typically 100 nm-200 nm in diameter) is below the optical resolution of the typical microscopes, which makes it difficult to make a direct observation of them and differentiate between the nanoparticles and the nanobubbles. In this work, a nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) system is developed for tracking and sizing the bulk nanobubbles, and more broadly, the Brownian diffusing particles. We demonstrate the capabilities of the NTA in characterizing the nanoparticles through systematic validation of accuracy and resolution. We particularly exhibit its unique advantages in detecting the polydisperse nanoparticle populations. Then the nucleation and the thermodynamic stability of the bulk nanobubbles are systematically studied by the NTA system. The bulk nanobubbles smaller than 600 nm in size are generated via the ultrasonication method. It is shown that both the ultrasonic cavitation treatment time and amplitude, essentially, the energy input, favor the nucleation of the bulk nanobubbles with a more concentrated size distribution, a higher concentration, and a smaller hydrodynamic size. The temperature dependence of the bulk nanobubbles over a wide range from 25°C to 70°C is explored. It is found that the nanobubble first shrinks in size significantly and then the size keeps approximately constant with the increasing temperature, showing a narrow size distribution. The transition temperature is around 45°C. Further, as an open system, the NTA is a potential tool in the study of the dynamic behavior of the bulk nanobubbles in situ, such as the coalescence and the collapse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tan B. H., An H., Ohl C. D. Stability of surface and bulk nanobubbles [J]. Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science, 2021, 53: 101428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Favvas E. P., Kyzas G. Z., Efthimiadou E. K. et al. Bulk nanobubbles, generation methods and potential applications [J]. Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science, 2021, 54: 101455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang F., Sun L., Yang H. et al. Recent advances for understanding the role of nanobubbles in particles flotation [J]. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2021, 291: 102403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gao Y., Li M., Sun C. et al. Microbubble-enhanced water activation by cold plasma [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 446: 137318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Epstein P. S., Plesset M. S. On the stability of gas bubbles in liquid-gas solutions [J]. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 1950, 18(11): 1505–1509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nirmalkar N., Pacek A. W., Barigou M. Bulk nanobubbles from acoustically cavitated aqueous organic solvent mixtures [J]. Langmuir, 2019, 35(6): 2188–2195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nirmalkar N., Pacek A. W., Barigou M. On the existence and stability of bulk nanobubbles [J]. Langmuir, 2018, 34(37): 10964–10973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tan B. H., An H., Ohl C. D. Identifying surface-attached nanobubbles [J]. Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science, 2021, 53: 101429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lohse D., Zhang X. Pinning and gas oversaturation imply stable single surface nanobubbles [J]. Physical Review E, 2015, 91(3): 031003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lohse D., Zhang X. Surface nanobubbles and nanodroplets [J]. Reviews of Modern physics, 2015, 87(3): 981.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang Q., Zhao H., Qi N. et al. Generation and stability of size-adjustable bulk nanobubbles based on periodic pressure change [J]. Scientific reports, 2019, 9(1): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sugano K., Miyoshi Y., Inazato S. Study of ultrafine bubble stabilization by organic material adhesion [J]. Japanese Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2017, 31(3): 299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eklund F., Alheshibri M., Swenson J. Differentiating bulk nanobubbles from nanodroplets and nanoparticles [J]. Current Opinion in Colloid and Interface Science, 2021, 53: 101427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bunkin N. F., Shkirin A. V., Ignatiev P. S. et al. Nanobubble clusters of dissolved gas in aqueous solutions of electrolyte. I. Experimental proof [J]. The Journal of chemical physics, 2012, 137(5): 054706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alheshibri M., Craig V. S. J. Differentiating between nanoparticles and nanobubbles by evaluation of the compressibility and density of nanoparticles [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2018, 122(38): 21998–22007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oh S. H., Kim J. M. Generation and stability of bulk nanobubbles [J]. Langmuir, 2017, 33(15): 3818–3823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Uchida T., Yamazaki K., Gohara K. Generation of micro- and nano-bubbles in water by dissociation of gas hydrates [J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2016, 33(5): 1749–1755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Filipe V., Hawe A., Jiskoot W. Critical evaluation of nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) by NanoSight for the measurement of nanoparticles and protein aggregates [J]. Pharmaceutical research, 2010, 27(5): 796–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gallego-Urrea J. A., Tuoriniemi J., Hassellöv M. Applications of particle-tracking analysis to the determination of size distributions and concentrations of nanoparticles in environmental, biological and food samples [J]. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2011, 30(3): 473–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Der Pol E., Coumans F. A. W., Sturk A. et al. Refractive index determination of nanoparticles in suspension using nanoparticle tracking analysis [J]. Nano letters, 2014, 14(11): 6195–6201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Malloy A., Carr B. Nanoparticle tracking analysis-The halo™ system [J]. Particle and Particle Systems Characterization, 2006, 23(2): 197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Walker J. G. Improved nano-particle tracking analysis [J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2012, 23(6): 065605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wagner T., Lipinski H. G., Wiemann M. Dark field nanoparticle tracking analysis for size characterization of plasmonic and non-plasmonic particles [J]. Journal of Nanoparticle research, 2014, 16(5): 2419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li M., Ma X., Eisener J. et al. How bulk nanobubbles are stable over a wide range of temperatures [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2021, 596: 184–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ma X., Li M., Pfeiffer P. et al. Ion adsorption stabilizes bulk nanobubbles [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2022, 606: 1380–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brennen C. E. Cavitation and bubble dynamics [M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim J. Y., Song M. G., Kim J. D. Zeta potential of nanobubbles generated by ultrasonication in aqueous alkyl polyglycoside solutions [J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2000, 223(2): 285–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ghaani M. R., Kusalik P. G., English N. J. Massive generation of metastable bulk nanobubbles in water by external electric fields [J]. Science advances, 2020, 6(14): eaaz0094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming-bo Li.

Ethics declarations

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11988102, 91852202), the Tencent Foundation through the XPLORER PRIZE.

Biography: **ao-tong Ma (1996-), Female, Ph. D. Candidate

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, Xt., Li, Mb. & Sun, C. Measurement and characterization of bulk nanobubbles by nanoparticle tracking analysis method. J Hydrodyn 34, 1121–1133 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-022-0077-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-022-0077-5

Key words

Navigation