Log in

3-D Lagrangian-based investigations of the time-dependent cloud cavitating flows around a Clark-Y hydrofoil with special emphasis on shedding process analysis

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present paper, the unsteady cavitating flow around a 3-D Clark-Y hydrofoil is numerically investigated with the filter-based density correction model (FBDCM), a turbulence model and the Zwart-Gerber-Belamri (ZGB) cavitation model. A reasonable agreement is obtained between the numerical and experimental results. To study the complex flow structures more straightforwardly, a 3-D Lagrangian technology is developed, which can provide the particle tracks and the 3-D Lagrangian coherent structures (LCSs). Combined with the traditional methods based on the Eulerian viewpoint, this technology is used to analyze the attached cavity evolution and the re-entrant jet behavior in detail. At stage I, the collapse of the previous shedding cavity and the growth of a new attached cavity, the significant influence of the collapse both on the suction and pressure sides are captured quite well by the 3-D LCSs, which is underestimated by the traditional methods like the iso-surface of Q-criteria. As a kind of special LCSs, the arching LCSs are observed in the wake, induced by the counter-rotating vortexes. At stage II, with the development of the re-entrant jet, the influence of the cavitation on the pressure side is still not negligible. And with this 3-D Lagrangian technology, the tracks of the re-entrant jet are visualized clearly, moving from the trailing edge to the leading edge. Finally, at stage III, the re-entrant jet collides with the mainstream and finally induces the shedding. The cavitation evolution and the re-entrant jet movement in the whole cycle are well visualized with the 3-D Lagrangian technology. Moreover, the comparison between the LCSs obtained with 2-D and 3-D Lagrangian technologies indicates the advantages of the latter. It is demonstrated that the 3-D Lagrangian technology is a promising tool in the investigation of complex cavitating flows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang Y., Wu X., Huang C. et al. Unsteady characteristics of cloud cavitating flow near the free surface around an axisymmetric projectile [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2016, 85: 48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arndt R. E. A. Cavitation in vortical flows [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2002, 34: 143–175.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Arndt R. E. A., Arakeri V. H., Higuchi H. Some observations of tip-vortex cavitation [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1991, 229: 269–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang Y., Xu C., Wu X. et al. Ventilated cloud cavitating flow around a blunt body close to the free surface [J]. Physical Review Fluids, 2017, 2(8): 084303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Arndt R. E. A. Cavitation in fluid machinery and hydraulic structures [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1981, 13: 273–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stutz B., Reboud J. L. Experiments on unsteady cavitation [J]. Experiments in Fluids, 1997, 22(3): 191–198.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Coutier-Delgosha O., Devillers J. F., Pichon T. et al. Internal structure and dynamics of sheet cavitation [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2006, 18(1): 017103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Makiharju S. A., Gabillet C., Paik B. G. et al. Timeresolved two-dimensional X-ray densitometry of a twophase flow downstream of a ventilated cavity [J]. Experiments in Fluids, 2013, 54(7): 1561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Iyer C. O., Ceccio S. L. The influence of developed cavitation on the flow of a turbulent shear layer [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2002, 14(10): 3414–3431.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gopalan S., Katz J. Flow structure and modeling issues in the closure region of attached cavitation [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2000, 12(4): 895–911.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Aeschlimann V., Barre S., Djeridi H. Velocity field analysis in an experimental cavitating mixing layer [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2011, 23(5): 055105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ji B., Luo X., Arndt R. E. A. et al. Numerical simulation of three dimensional cavitation shedding dynamics with special emphasis on cavitation-vortex interaction [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2014, 87: 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Long X., Cheng H., Ji B. et al. Numerical investigation of attached cavitation shedding dynamics around the Clark-Y hydrofoil with the FBDCM and an integral method [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2017, 137: 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dittakavi N., Chunekar A., Frankel S. Large eddy simulation of turbulent-cavitation interactions in a venturi nozzle [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2010, 132(12): 121301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Callenaere M., Franc J. P., Michel J. M. et al. The cavitation instability induced by the development of a re-entrant jet [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2001, 444: 223–256.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Peng X. X., Ji B., Cao Y. T. et al. Combined experimental observation and numerical simulation of the cloud cavitation with U-type flow structures on hydrofoils [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2016, 79: 10–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Akhatov I., Lindau O., Topolnikov A. et al. Collapse and rebound of a laser-induced cavitation bubble [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2001, 13(10): 2805–2819.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kolář V. Vortex identification: New requirements and limitations [J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2007, 28(4): 638–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang B., Zhao Y., Wang G. Large eddy simulation of turbulent vortex-cavitation interactions in transient sheet/cloud cavitating flows [J]. Computers and Fluids, 2014, 92: 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ji B., Luo X., Wu Y. et al. Numerical analysis of unsteady cavitating turbulent flow and shedding horseshoe vortex structure around a twisted hydrofoil [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2013, 51(5): 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kubota A., Kato H., Yamaguchi H. A new modeling of cavitating flows-a numerical study of unsteady cavitation on a hydrofoil section [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1992, 240: 59–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Haller G. Lagrangian coherent structures [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 47: 137–162.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Green M. A., Rowley C. W., Haller G. Detection of Lagrangian coherent structures in three-dimensional turbulence [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2007, 572: 111–120.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu C., Wang G., Chen G. et al. Three-dimensional unsteady cavitating flows around an axisymmetric body with a blunt headform [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2015, 29(3): 1093–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tseng C. C., Liu P. B. Dynamic behaviors of the turbulent cavitating flows based on the Eulerian and Lagtangian viewpoints [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 102: 479–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheng H. Y., Long X. P., Ji B. et al. Numerical investigation of unsteady cavitating turbulent flows around twisted hydrofoil from the Lagrangian viewpoint [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2016, 28(4): 709–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tang W., Chan P. W., Haller G. Lagrangian coherent structure analysis of terminal winds detected by lidar. Part I: Turbulence structures [J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 2011, 50(2): 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dular M., Bachert R., Schaad C. Investigation of a reentrant jet reflection at an inclined cavity closure line [J]. European Journal of Mechanics B-Fluids, 2007, 26(5): 688–705.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao Y., Wang G., Huang B. et al. Lagrangian investigations of vortex dynamics in time-dependent cloud cavitating flows [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2016, 93: 167–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Haller G. Lagrangian structures and the rate of strain in a partition of two-dimensional turbulence [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2001, 13(11): 3365–3385.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Huang B., Wang G. Y., Zhao Y. Numerical simulation unsteady cloud cavitating flow with a filter-based density correction model [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2014, 26(1): 26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zwart P. J., Gerber A. G., Belamri T. A two phase flow model for predicting cavitation dynamics [C]. ICMF 2004 International Conference on Multiphase Flow, Yokohama, Japan, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Long Y., Long X. P., Ji B. et al. Verification and validation of URANS simulations of the turbulent cavitating flow around the hydrofoil [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2017, 29(4): 610–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Ji  (季斌).

Additional information

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 11772239, 51576143 and 91752105), the Outstanding Youth Foundation of Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (Grant No. 2017CFA048).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, Hy., Long, Xp., Ji, B. et al. 3-D Lagrangian-based investigations of the time-dependent cloud cavitating flows around a Clark-Y hydrofoil with special emphasis on shedding process analysis. J Hydrodyn 30, 122–130 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-018-0013-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-018-0013-x

Keywords

Navigation