Log in

Reconfigurable Muscle Strength Training Robot with Multi-mode Training for 17 Joint Movements

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different from limb rehabilitation training, the purpose of muscle strength training is to reduce muscle atrophy and increase muscle strength and tolerance through strength training of limb muscles, and then improve the muscle strength level of muscles (groups), mainly for sports fitness and muscle strengthening groups and patients with muscle atrophy or muscle weakness caused by various diseases. In this paper, we developed a new reconfigurable muscle strength training robot, a bionic robot by imitating physicians to conduct muscle strength training for patients, which was developed with six training modes for 17 joint movements, that is, the shoulder flexion/extension, the shoulder internal/external rotation, the shoulder adduction/abduction, the elbow flexion/extension, the wrist supination/pronation, the wrist flexion/extension, the wrist radial/ulnar deviation, the hip flexion/extension, the hip internal/external rotation, the hip adduction/abduction, the knee flexion/extension, the ankle dorsiflexion/plantarflexion, the ankle adduction/abduction, the ankle inversion/eversion, the waist flexion/extension, the waist left/right rotation, and the waist left/right flexion. The reconfigurable mechanism was designed with fully electric adjuster and reconfigurable adaptors deployed on the driving unit, and six training modes were developed, namely, continuous passive motion, active exercise, passive–active exercise, isotonic exercise, isometric exercise and isokinetic exercise. Experiments with knee joint and elbow joint have shown that the developed reconfigurable muscle strength training robot can realize the multi-mode trainings for the 17 joint movements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code Availability

The codes are not publicly available. Requests to access the codes should be directed to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Dong, M. J., Fan, W. P., Li, J. F., Zhou, X. D., & Zhou, Y. (2021). A new ankle robotic system enabling whole-stage compliance rehabilitation training. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 26, 1490–1500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Proietti, T., Crocher, V., Roby-Brami, A., & Jarrasse, N. (2016). Upper-limb robotic exoskeletons for neurorehabilitation: A review on control strategies. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 9, 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huo, W., Mohammed, S., Moreno, J. C., & Amirat, Y. (2014). Lower limb wearable robots for assistance and rehabilitation: A state of the art. IEEE Systems Journal, 10(3), 1068–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dong, M. J., Zhou, Y., Li, J. F., Rong, X., Fan, W. P., Zhou, X. D., & Kong, Y. (2021). State of the art in parallel ankle rehabilitation robot: A systematic review. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 18(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Niyetkaliyev, A. S., Hussain, S., Ghayesh, M. H., & Alici, G. (2017). Review on design and control aspects of robotic shoulder rehabilitation orthoses. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 47(6), 1134–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hussain, S., Jamwal, P. K., Van Vliet, P., & Ghayesh, M. H. (2020). State-of-the-art robotic devices for wrist rehabilitation: Design and control aspects. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 50(5), 361–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tran, P., Jeong, S., Herrin, K. R., & Desai, J. P. (2021). Review: Hand exoskeleton systems, clinical rehabilitation practices, and future prospects. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, 3(3), 606–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, J. F., Zhang, P. F., Cao, Q., Jiang, L. W., & Dong, M. J. (2021). Configuration synthesis and structure design of a reconfigurable robot for muscle strength training. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Real-time Computing and Robotics (RCAR) (pp. 341–346). IEEE.

  9. Li, R. C., Wu, Y., Maffulli, N., Chan, K. M., & Chan, J. L. (1996). Eccentric and concentric isokinetic knee flexion and extension: A reliability study using the Cybex 6000 dynamometer. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 30(2), 156–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Impellizzeri, F. M., Bizzini, M., Rampinini, E., Cereda, F., & Maffiuletti, N. A. (2008). Reliability of isokinetic strength imbalance ratios measured using the Cybex NORM dynamometer. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, 28(2), 113–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Roth, R., Donath, L., Kurz, E., Zahner, L., & Faude, O. (2017). Absolute and relative reliability of isokinetic and isometric trunk strength testing using the IsoMed-2000 dynamometer. Physical Therapy in Sport, 24, 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gonosova, Z., Linduska, P., Bizovska, L., & Svoboda, Z. (2018). Reliability of ankle–foot complex isokinetic strength assessment using the Isomed 2000 dynamometer. Medicina, 54(3), 43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bergamin, M., Gobbo, S., Bullo, V., Vendramin, B., Duregon, F., Frizziero, A., & Ermolao, A. (2017). Reliability of a device for the knee and ankle isometric and isokinetic strength testing in older adults. Muscles, Ligaments and Tendons Journal, 7(2), 323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fagher, K., Fritzson, A., & Drake, A. M. (2016). Test-retest reliability of isokinetic knee strength measurements in children aged 8 to 10 years. Sports Health, 8(3), 255–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Su, C. J., Chen, S. R., Jiang, H. Y., & Chen, Y. (2020). Ankle joint torque prediction based on surface Electromyographic and angular velocity signals. IEEE Access, 8, 217681–217687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Choi, W., & Oh, S. (2018). Verification of computed muscle control and static optimization for isokinetic, isometric and isotonic exercise of upper limb. In 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (pp. 1895–1898). IEEE.

  17. Sheng, Y. X., Liu, J. B., Zhou, Z. L., Chen, H. W., & Liu, H. H. (2021). Musculoskeletal joint angle estimation based on isokinetic motor coordination. IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, 3(4), 1011–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Choi, W., Oh, S., Lee, J., Lee, C., & Kim, Y. K. (2019). Short-term effects of robot-resistance exercises on muscle strength and activations: types of muscle contraction and speed of contraction. In 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (pp. 5297–5300). IEEE.

  19. Zhang, L. B., Li, Z. J., Hu, Y. B., Smith, C., Farewik, E. M. G., & Wang, R. L. (2020). Ankle joint torque estimation using an EMG-driven neuromusculoskeletal model and an artificial neural network model. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 18(2), 564–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Park, J. Y., Lee, J. C., Bae, J. J., & Cheon, M. W. (2014). The effect of proprioceptive exercise on knee active articular position sense using Biodex System 3pro®. Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Materials, 15(3), 170–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li, J. F., Zhou, Y., Dong, M. J., Jiao, R., & Jiang, L. W. (2021). Estimation of muscle activation during ankle rehabilitation. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Real-time Computing and Robotics (RCAR) (pp. 806–811). IEEE.

  22. Dong, M. J, Li, J. F., Rong, X., Fan, W. P., Kong, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Compliant physical interaction to enhance rehabilitation training of a parallel ankle robotic system. In 2020 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC) (pp. 2191–2196). IEEE.

  23. Ding, Q. C., Han, J. D., & Zhao, X. G. (2016). Continuous estimation of human multi-joint angles from sEMG using a state-space model. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 25(9), 1518–1528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. He, T., & Lee, C. (2021). Evolving flexible sensors, wearable and implantable technologies towards BodyNET for advanced healthcare and reinforced life quality. IEEE Open Journal of Circuits and Systems, 2, 702–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhu, M. L., Sun, Z. D., Chen, T., & Lee, C. (2021). Low cost exoskeleton manipulator using bidirectional triboelectric sensors enhanced multiple degree of freedom sensory system. Nature Communications, 12, 2692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, C., Peng, L., Hou, Z. G., Li, J. Y., Zhang, T., & Zhao, J. (2020). Quantitative assessment of upper-limb motor function for post-stroke rehabilitation based on motor synergy analysis and multi-modality fusion. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 28(4), 943–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, Q., Iyer, A., Kim, K., & Sharma, N. (2020). Evaluation of non-invasive ankle joint effort prediction methods for use in neurorehabilitation using electromyography and ultrasound imaging. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 68(3), 1044–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFB1307004), in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61903011 and 52175001). Also, we’d like to thank Henan Huibo Medical Co., Ltd., China, for some useful suggestions on this apparatus.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JL, MD and XR conceived and designed this study. LJ and RJ performed the mechanical design of the mechanism. QF, MD and RJ completed the training methods. JL, QF and MD wrote the paper. XR, LJ and RJ reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingjie Dong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

All experiments were approved by the Ethical Committee of Bei**g University of Technology.

Consent to Participate

All subjects signed the informed consent before experiments.

Consent for Publication

All authors have agreed to publish their data to a journal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J., Fang, Q., Dong, M. et al. Reconfigurable Muscle Strength Training Robot with Multi-mode Training for 17 Joint Movements. J Bionic Eng 20, 212–224 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-022-00254-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-022-00254-5

Keywords

Navigation