Log in

Seismic analysis of low rise and high rise building and its foundation design

  • Research
  • Published:
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The design of foundations for tall structures is an interesting and challenging task. In structural design usually, the effect of foundation soil is generally overlooked. In this study, 3D analysis of the superstructure is carried out considering the self-weight, imposed load and earthquake load. The provisions of (BIS Code of practice for criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures: Part-1, general provisions and buildings, IS 1893, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2016a) are used to carry out the dynamic analyses. Three-dimensional analysis of the building system is used to design and analyse the superstructure in which the structural performance parameters viz., base shear, lateral load distribution, natural time period, storey drift ratio, beam-column capacity (BCC) and percentage reinforcement were evaluated for low-rise building (G + 4) and high-rise building (G + 15) located in seismic zone- II & III. The support reactions of the superstructure were exported and used to design the foundation. SAFE software was used to design the raft foundation for low-rise buildings (G + 4) whereas the piled raft was designed for high-rise buildings (G + 15). The parametric study was carried out considering different values of soil bearing capacity as 165, 200 and 250 kN/m2 and the thickness of the raft was varied from 0.3 to 1 m in the case of low-rise building. For high-rise buildings, the diameter of the pile was kept constant and the length of the pile was varied to arrive at a suitable dimension. Parameters like settlement, soil pressure and punching shear failure were compared and discussed. It was found that the column size of G + 15 building was increased when compared to G + 4 building. The time period and base shear of the building evaluated by the equivalent static method and response spectrum method were found to be in good agreement. The storey drift ratio and beam-column capacity were found to be within the prescribed limits in relevant IS codes. For G + 4 building, located in SZ II and III a minimum raft thickness of 1000 mm is recommended for soil with a bearing capacity of 165 kN/m2 while for soil with a bearing capacity of 200 and 250 kN/m2 the minimum thickness of the raft is 500 mm. For G + 15 building, located in SZ II and III even a raft with a thickness of 2.0 m was not found sufficient and hence piled raft was used with a raft thickness of 1.75 m and a pile length of 10 m for all bearing capacity of soil considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  • Bhattacharjee, T., Chanda, D., & Saha, R. (2021). Influence of soil flexibility and plan asymmetry on seismic behaviour of soil-piled raft-structure system. Structures, 33, 1775–1788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.05.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BIS. (2000). Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete, IS 456. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standard.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS. (2002). Code of practice for criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures: Part-1, general provisions and buildings, IS 1893. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS. (2006). Code of practice for design and construction of foundations in soils, general requirements, IS 1904. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standard.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS. (2008). Code of practice for design and construction of raft foundations, part 1: Design, IS 2950 (Part I). New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standard.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS. (2016a). Code of practice for criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures: Part-1, general provisions and buildings, IS 1893. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS. (2016b). Code of practice for ductile design and detailing of reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic forces IS 13920. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSI Analysis Reference Manual. (2017). Computer and structure inc

  • Dhakal, S., & Chaulagain, H. (2023). Seismic behaviour of plan irregular reinforced concrete buildings considering soil effects. Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation, 8, 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-023-00280-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ETABS User’s Guide. (2022). Building analysis and design. Computer and structure inc

  • Pandimani., Sankar, T. S., Priyathams, B. P., & Ramkumar, B. A. (2023). Evaluation of SSI impact on the structural performance of RC buildings. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 25(2), 1295–1307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-023-00844-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manjunath, N. V., Soundara, B., & Ranjitham, M. (2018). Effect of modulus of sub grade reactions on the static behavior of raft foundation resting on sand. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 119(18), 2649–2661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mughieda, O., Mehana, M. S., & Hazirbaba, K. (2017). Effect of soil subgrade modulus on raft foundation behavior. MATEC Web of Conferences, 120, 06010. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712006010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sah, J. K., Singh, P. S., & Kundu, C. K. (2018). Analysis and design of the seismic-resistant multistorey building with shear walls and raft foundation. International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology, 4(2), 2348–2356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakir, S., Mudassir, S., Abdullah, S., Najesh, Q., Pathan, M., Sufyan, S., et al. (2020). Analysis of raft pile raft foundation using safe software. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology. https://doi.org/10.17577/ijertv9is070032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddesh, V., Praveen, J. V., Mallesh, T. V., & Ramesh, S. R. (2019). Codal comparison of IS-1893 (Part 1) 2002 and IS-1893 (Part 1) 2016 for seismic analysis of high rise building with raft foundation using ETABS and SAFE software. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), 6, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, H., & Kumar-Tiwary, A. (2022). Analysis and effect of piles on raft foundation for high-rise framed structure under seismic loading. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.411

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our sincere thanks to Dr. Dhiraj Raj, Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, MNIT Jaipur for his initial inputs regading the modelling part. We also thank Computers & Structures, Inc. for providing the trial version of the both ETABS and SAFE software.

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AB: Modelling, Analysis and Results, Preparation of draft; DM: Modelling, Analysis and Results, Preparation of draft; MB: Problem formulation, Supervision, Reviewing and editing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Bharathi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meena, D., Bansal, A. & Bharathi, M. Seismic analysis of low rise and high rise building and its foundation design. Asian J Civ Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-024-01108-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-024-01108-7

Keywords

Navigation