Abstract
Generalized HLRF is a reliability method for the computation of the reliability index and evaluation of the safety of structures. Two adjusting parameters of generalized HLRF have given the potential flexibility to deal with different problems with different nonlinearity degrees. However, an applicable criterion or approach for determination of these parameters in terms of the existing nonlinearity has not been defined. This paper proposes an iterative algorithm for adjusting the parameters proportional to the corresponding nonlinearity. This was carried out by introducing two criteria, each of which was used to modify one parameter in the iterations. One parameter is assigned to control the numerical instability of the value of the limit state function, and the other is to control the numerical instability of the angle between the design point and gradient vector. It is shown that the technique of classifying the instability avoids unnecessary reductions of step lengths and therefore promotes efficiency. For one of the parameters, a new lower limit is also defined in this paper. The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm is illustrated through implementation in common highly nonlinear problems of the literature. Moreover, the accuracy, robustness and efficiency of the proposed algorithm are evaluated by comparing the results with six reliability methods.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig12_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig13_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig14_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig15_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig16_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig17_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig18_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig19_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig20_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig21_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig22_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42107-022-00487-z/MediaObjects/42107_2022_487_Fig23_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ait Taleb, S., Si Salem, A., & Ait Tahar, K. (2020). Experimental and theoretical modeling coupled to a reliability approach for flexural failure prediction in hybrid composite beams. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(3), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00223-5
Akbari-Helm, M., & Massoudi, M. S. (2022). A comparison of deterministic and reliability-based optimization of tuned mass damper under uncertainties. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 23(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-022-00418-y
Bagheri, M., Hosseini, S. A., & Keshtegar, B. (2021). Dynamical relaxed directional method for fuzzy reliability analysis. Structures, 34, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.043
Cao, S., Lu, H., Peng, Y., & Ren, F. (2021). A novel fourth-order l-moment reliability method for l-correlated variables. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 95, 806–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2021.02.030
Chen, Z., Li, G., He, J., Yang, Z., & Wang, J. (2022). Adaptive structural reliability analysis method based on confidence interval squeezing. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 225, 108639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108639
Choi, S.-H., Lee, G., & Lee, I. (2018). Adaptive single-loop reliability-based design optimization and post optimization using constraint boundary sampling. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 32(7), 3249–3262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-018-0627-5
Dang, C., Valdebenito, M. A., Faes, M. G. R., Wei, P., & Beer, M. (2022). Structural reliability analysis: A Bayesian perspective. Structural Safety, 99, 102259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2022.102259
Der Kiureghian, A., & Dakessian, T. (1998). Multiple design points in first and second-order reliability. Structural Safety, 20(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4730(97)00026-X
Ezzati, G., Mammadov, M., & Kulkarni, S. (2015). A new reliability analysis method based on the conjugate gradient direction. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 51(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1113-z
Gong, J.-X., & Yi, P. (2010). A robust iterative algorithm for structural reliability analysis. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 43(4), 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0582-y
Gong, J.-X., Yi, P., & Zhao, N. (2014). Non-gradient–based algorithm for structural reliability analysis. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 140(6), 04014029. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0000722
Guo, S. (2014). An efficient third-moment saddlepoint approximation for probabilistic uncertainty analysis and reliability evaluation of structures. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(1), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.06.026
Hasofer, A. M., & Lind, N. C. (1974). Exact and invariant second-moment code format. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 100(1), 111–121.
Jiang, C., Wang, D., Qiu, H., Gao, L., Chen, L., & Yang, Z. (2019). An active failure-pursuing Kriging modeling method for time-dependent reliability analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 129, 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.034
Kaveh, A., Hoseini Vaez, S. R., Hosseini, P., & Fathali, M. A. (2021). Heuristic operator for reliability assessment of frame structures. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 65(3), 702–716. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.17580
Kaveh, A., Javadi, S. M., & Mahdipour Moghanni, R. (2020). Reliability analysis via an optimal covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy: Emphasis on applications in civil engineering. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 64(2), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.15793
Keshtegar, B., Ben Seghier, M. E. A., Zio, E., Correia, J. A. F. O., Zhu, S.-P., & Trung, N.-T. (2021). Novel efficient method for structural reliability analysis using hybrid nonlinear conjugate map-based support vector regression. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 381, 113818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.113818
Keshtegar, B., & Meng, Z. (2017). A hybrid relaxed first-order reliability method for efficient structural reliability analysis. Structural Safety, 66, 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.02.005
Keshtegar, B., & Miri, M. (2013). An enhanced HL-RF method for the computation of structural failure probability based on relaxed approach. Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal, 46(1), 69–80.
Kiureghian, A. D., & Stefano, M. D. (1991). Efficient algorithm for second-order reliability analysis. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 117(12), 2904–2923. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1991)117:12(2904)
Kolo, D. N., Aguwa, J. I., Tsado, T. Y., Abdullahi, M., Yusuf, A., & Oritola, S. F. (2021). Reliability studies on reinforced concrete beam subjected to bending forces with natural stone as coarse aggregate. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 22(3), 485–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-020-00327-y
Leng, Y., Lu, Z.-H., Cai, C.-H., Li, C.-Q., & Zhao, Y.-G. (2022). Ring simulation: A novel simple and efficient simulation method for structural reliability analysis. Structural Safety, 96, 102182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2022.102182
Liu, P.-L., & Der Kiureghian, A. (1991). Optimization algorithms for structural reliability. Structural Safety, 9(3), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(91)90041-7
Liu, X., Zheng, S., Wu, X., Chen, D., & He, J. (2021). Research on a seismic connectivity reliability model of power systems based on the quasi-Monte Carlo method. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 215, 107888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107888
Meng, Z., Guo, L., & Wang, X. (2021). A general fidelity transformation framework for reliability-based design optimization with arbitrary precision. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 65(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03091-y
Meng, Z., Li, G., Wang, B. P., & Hao, P. (2015). A hybrid chaos control approach of the performance measure functions for reliability-based design optimization. Computers & Structures, 146, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.08.011
Meng, Z., Li, G., Yang, D., & Zhan, L. (2017). A new directional stability transformation method of chaos control for first order reliability analysis. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 55(2), 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1525-z
Meng, Z., Pang, Y., Wu, Z., Ren, S., & Yildiz, A. R. (2022). A novel maximum volume sampling model for reliability analysis. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 102, 797–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2021.10.025
Meng, Z., Zhang, Z., Zhang, D., & Yang, D. (2019). An active learning method combining Kriging and accelerated chaotic single loop approach (AK-ACSLA) for reliability-based design optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 357, 112570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112570
Rackwitz, R., & Flessler, B. (1978). Structural reliability under combined random load sequences. Computers & Structures, 9(5), 489–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(78)90046-9
Ren, C., Aoues, Y., Lemosse, D., & Souza De Cursi, E. (2022). Ensemble of surrogates combining Kriging and Artificial Neural Networks for reliability analysis with local goodness measurement. Structural Safety, 96, 102186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2022.102186
Roudak, M. A., & Karamloo, M. (2019). Establishment of non-negative constraint method as a robust and efficient first-order reliability method. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 68, 281–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2018.11.021
Roudak, M. A., Shayanfar, M. A., Barkhordari, M. A., & Karamloo, M. (2017a). A new three-phase algorithm for computation of reliability index and its application in structural mechanics. Mechanics Research Communications, 85, 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2017.08.008
Roudak, M. A., Shayanfar, M. A., Barkhordari, M. A., & Karamloo, M. (2017b). A robust approximation method for nonlinear cases of structural reliability analysis. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 133, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.08.038
Roudak, M. A., Shayanfar, M. A., & Karamloo, M. (2018). Improvement in first-order reliability method using an adaptive chaos control factor. Structures, 16, 150–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2018.09.010
Santosh, T. V., Saraf, R. K., Ghosh, A. K., & Kushwaha, H. S. (2006). Optimum step length selection rule in modified HL–RF method for structural reliability. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Pi**, 83(10), 742–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.07.004
Shayanfar, M. A., Barkhordari, M. A., & Roudak, M. A. (2017a). An adaptive importance sampling-based algorithm using the first-order method for structural reliability. International Journal of Optimization in Civil Engineering, 7(1), 93–107.
Shayanfar, M. A., Barkhordari, M. A., & Roudak, M. A. (2017b). An efficient reliability algorithm for locating design point using the combination of importance sampling concepts and response surface method. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 47, 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.11.021
Shayanfar, M. A., Barkhordari, M. A., & Roudak, M. A. (2017c). Locating design point in structural reliability analysis by introduction of a control parameter and moving limited regions. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 126, 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.04.003
Shayanfar, M. A., Barkhordari, M. A., & Roudak, M. A. (2017d). A modification to HL-RF method for computation of structural reliability index in problems with skew-distributed variables. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1473-1
Shayanfar, M. A., Barkhordari, M. A., & Roudak, M. A. (2018). A new effective approach for computation of reliability index in nonlinear problems of reliability analysis. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 60, 184–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2018.01.016
Valdebenito, M. A., Beer, M., Jensen, H. A., Chen, J., & Wei, P. (2020). Fuzzy failure probability estimation applying intervening variables. Structural Safety, 83, 101909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2019.101909
Wang, L., & Grandhi, R. V. (1996). Safety index calculation using intervening variables for structural reliability analysis. Computers & Structures, 59(6), 1139–1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(96)00291-X
Yang, D. (2010). Chaos control for numerical instability of first order reliability method. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 15(10), 3131–3141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.10.018
Yuan, X., Liu, S., Valdebenito, M. A., Gu, J., & Beer, M. (2021). Efficient procedure for failure probability function estimation in augmented space. Structural Safety, 92, 102104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102104
Zhang, Y., & Der Kiureghian, A. (1995). Two Improved Algorithms for Reliability Analysis. In R. Rackwitz, G. Augusti, & A. Borri (Eds.), Reliability and Optimization of Structural Systems: Proceedings of the sixth IFIP WG75 working conference on reliability and optimization of structural systems 1994 (pp. 297–304). Springer US.
Zhang, C., Song, C., & Shafieezadeh, A. (2022). Adaptive reliability analysis for multi-fidelity models using a collective learning strategy. Structural Safety, 94, 102141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2021.102141
Zhang, D., Han, X., Jiang, C., Liu, J., & Li, Q. (2017). Time-dependent reliability analysis through response surface method. Journal of Mechanical Design. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035860
Zhong, C., Wang, M., Dang, C., Ke, W., & Guo, S. (2020). First-order reliability method based on Harris Hawks Optimization for high-dimensional reliability analysis. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 62(4), 1951–1968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02587-3
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Roudak M. A., Karamloo M. and Shayanfar M. A. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Roudak M. A. and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Roudak, M.A., Karamloo, M. & Shayanfar, M.A. A numerical optimization approach for structural reliability analysis using the control parameters in the generalized HLRF method. Asian J Civ Eng 23, 1321–1342 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-022-00487-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-022-00487-z