Log in

Peridynamics Implementation of a Gauge Theory for Brittle Damage in Solids and Applications

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Peridynamics and Nonlocal Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We propose a brittle damage model based on linearized kinematic measures derived using a gauge theory. First, we obtain the fully nonlinear kinematic measures by considering a solid with spatial defects due to micro-cracks. To accomplish this, a non-trivial affine connection, called the gauge connection, is introduced to account for local configurational changes induced by the spatial defects. This procedure, called minimal replacement, leads to the emergence of covariant derivatives and ensures the invariance of the Lagrangian under the local action of the gauge symmetry group. The covariant derivatives furnish the configuration gradients used for constructing the invariant Lagrangian. The geometric foundations and symmetry principles of the gauge theory enable accurate characterizations of the kinematic and other important physical features pertaining to defect-induced brittle damage. Another important construct, called minimal coupling, provides the stored energy corresponding to defects via the gauge field Lagrangian. Using linearization of the fully nonlinear kinematic measures, we obtain an energy functional which is quadratic in the field variables and such an energy is invariant with respect to the local gauge transformations. The resulting Euler–Lagrange equations provide the governing laws for coupled evolutions of deformation and defects. The constitutive equations in the linearized setting are linear in the field variables. A kinematically transparent approach is thus followed for modelling different aspects of brittle damage such as material stiffness degradation, tension-compression asymmetry and energy contribution of defects. We propose different tension-compression asymmetry mechanisms based on spectral decomposition of tensile and compressive deformations, dilatation-compression split of volumetric deformation, and volumetric-deviatoric split of deformation. Towards a stable and accurate numerical implementation of the model, the governing partial differential equations are recast into an integro-differential form via the principles of peridynamics (PD). The efficacy of the model, so discretized, is established through PD-based numerical simulations of tension and shear tests on a single-edge-notched plate. For further exploration, the numerical simulation of blast-induced fracture in rock is also carried out. In this case, account is taken of the physical reaction zone developed during shock wave detonation, and the interaction between gas and solid rock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kachanov LM (1958) Time of the rupture process under creep conditions. Izvestia Akademii Nauk SSSR, Otd. Tekhn. Nauk, 8:26–31

  2. YuN Rabotnov (1969) Creep problems in structural members

  3. Hult J (1979) Cdm-capabilities, limitations and promises. In Mechanisms of deformation and fracture, pages 233–247. Elsevier

  4. Lemaitre J, Chaboche JL (1978) Aspect phénoménologique de la rupture par endommagement. J Méc Appl 2(3)

  5. Krajcinovic D (1983) Constitutive equations for damaging materials

  6. Lemaitre J (1985) A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture

  7. Murakami S (1983) Notion of continuum damage mechanics and its application to anisotropic creep damage theory

  8. Chaboche J-L (1981) Continuous damage mechanics tool to describe phenomena before crack initiation. Nucl Eng Des 64(2):233–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Murakami S (1988) Mechanical modeling of material damage

  10. Bargellini R, Halm D, Dragon Aé (2008) Modelling of quasi-brittle behaviour: a discrete approach coupling anisotropic damage growth and frictional sliding. European Journal of Mechanics-A/Solids 27(4):564–581

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Desmorat R (2016) Anisotropic damage modeling of concrete materials. Int J Damage Mech 25(6):818–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. National Engineering Laboratory (Great Britain) (1962) Complex-stress Creep, Relaxation and Fracture of Metallic Alloys. H.M.S.C.

  13. Bažant ZP, **ang Y, Pere C (1996) Prat. Microplane model for concrete. i: Stress-strain boundaries and finite strain. J Eng Mech 122(3):245–254

  14. Mazars J, Pijaudier-Cabot G (1989) Continuum damage theory application to concrete. J Eng Mech 115(2):345–365

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bažant ZP, DiLuzio G (2004) Nonlocal microplane model with strain-softening yield limits. Int J Solids Struct 41(24-25):7209–7240

  16. Desmorat R, Gatuingt F, Ragueneau Frédéric (2007) Nonlocal anisotropic damage model and related computational aspects for quasi-brittle materials. Eng Fract Mech 74(10):1539–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miehe C, Welschinger F, Hofacker M (2010) Thermodynamically consistent phase-field models of fracture: Variational principles and multi-field fe implementations. Int J Numer Meth Eng 83(10):1273–1311

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Miehe C, Hofacker M, Welschinger F (2010) A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: Robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(45–48):2765–2778

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuhn C, Müller R (2010) A continuum phase field model for fracture. Eng Fract Mech 77(18):3625–3634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schlüter A, Willenbücher A, Kuhn C, Müller R (2014) Phase field approximation of dynamic brittle fracture. Comput Mech 54(5):1141–1161

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Lagoudas DC, Edelen DGB (1989) Material and spatial gauge theories of solids. gauge constructs, geometry, and kinematics. Int J Eng Sci 27(4):411–431

  22. Silling SA (2000) Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. J Mech Phys Sol 48(1):175–209

  23. Silling SA, Epton M, Weckner O, Xu J, Askari E (2007) Peridynamic states and constitutive modeling. J Elast 88(2):151–184

  24. Silling SA (2010) Linearized theory of peridynamic states. J Elast 99(1):85–111

  25. Edelen DGB (1989) Material and spatial gauge theories of solids iii dynamics of disclination free states. Int J Eng Sci 27(6):653–666

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Pathrikar A, Rahaman MDM, Roy D (2021) A gauge theory for brittle damage in solids and a peridynamics implementation. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 385:114036

  27. Kachanov L (1986) Introduction to continuum damage mechanics, volume 10. Springer Science & Business Media

  28. Lemaitre J, Chaboche JL (1994) Mechanics of solid materials. Cambridge University Press

  29. Edelen DGB, Lagoudas DC (2012) Gauge theory and defects in solids. Elsevier

  30. Pathrikar A, Rahaman MDM, Roy D (2019) A thermodynamically consistent peridynamics model for visco-plasticity and damage. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 348:29–63

  31. Pathrikar A, Tiwari SB, Arayil P, Roy D (2021) Thermomechanics of damage in brittle solids: A peridynamics model. Theo Appl Fract Mech 112:102880

  32. Bdzil JB, Stewart DS, Jackson TL (2001) Program burn algorithms based on detonation shock dynamics: discrete approximations of detonation flows with discontinuous front models. J Comp Phys 174(2):870–902

  33. (1964) Methods in Computational Physics. Number v. 3 in Methods in Computational Physics. Academic Press

  34. Pramanik R, Deb D (2015) Implementation of smoothed particle hydrodynamics for detonation of explosive with application to rock fragmentation. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48(4):1683–1698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee EL, Hornig HC, Kury JW (1968) Adiabatic expansion of high explosive detonation products. Technical report, Univ. of California Radiation Lab. at Livermore, Livermore, CA (United States)

  36. Jones H, Miller AR (1948) The detonation of solid explosives: the equilibrium conditions in the detonation wave-front and the adiabatic expansion of the products of detonation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Math Phys Sci 194(1039):480–507

  37. Wilkins ML, Squier B, Halperin B (1965) Equation of state for detonation products of pbx 9404 and lx04-01. In Symposium (International) on Combustion, volume 10, pages 769–778. Elsevier

  38. Pramanik R, Deb D (2015) Sph procedures for modeling multiple intersecting discontinuities in geomaterial. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 39(4):343–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Removal of zero-energy deformation and other implications (2019) Shubhankar Roy Chowdhury, Pranesh Roy, Debasish Roy, and JN Reddy. A modified peridynamics correspondence principle. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 346:530–549

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A.P. and D.R. acknowledge research funding by the Indian Space Research Organization, Government of India, through Grant No. #ISRO/0133.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debasish Roy.

Ethics declarations

Statement for Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pathrikar, A., Roy, D. Peridynamics Implementation of a Gauge Theory for Brittle Damage in Solids and Applications. J Peridyn Nonlocal Model 5, 20–59 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42102-021-00067-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42102-021-00067-w

Keywords

Navigation